Take a few deep breaths, there, Fu. It'll be all right, just let it pass and you'll feel better. It seems you've been off your medication, so get your dose, get some sleep, and it'll be just fine in the morning with the new realization that it's okay that someone disagrees with you.
After going through archive.org, try z-lib.is. They're back up, but to download, you need to make a $5 donation. Your bank may block the transaction because it goes out of the country, so you'll need to call them and approve that single transaction.
I did not read "On the Genealogy of Morals", but I did read "Beyond Good and Evil". Nietzsche was a jew lover. In "Beyond Good and Evil" he praises them in subsection 250 and condemns anti-semitism in subsection 251. Here is the entirety of SS 250:
"250. What Europe owes to the Jews?—Many things, good and bad, and above all one thing of the nature both of the best and the worst: the grand style in morality, the fearfulness and majesty of infinite demands, of infinite significations, the whole Romanticism and sublimity of moral questionableness—and consequently just the most attractive, ensnaring, and exquisite element in those iridescences and allurements to life, in the aftersheen of which the sky of our European culture, its evening sky, now glows—perhaps glows out. For this, we artists among the spectators and philosophers, are—grateful to the Jews."
SS 251 is very lengthy, but this gem sticks out: "... for instance, among present-day Germans there is alternately the anti-French folly, the anti-Semitic folly, the anti-Polish folly, the Christian-romantic folly, the Wagnerian folly, the Teutonic folly, the Prussian folly (just look at those poor historians, the Sybels and Treitschkes, and their closely bandaged heads), and whatever else these little obscurations of the German spirit and conscience may be called."
He reminds me of a crank who calls everyone and everything fools and wants to correct everyone's wrong thinking with his own nonsensical writing based on nothing more than his own opinion. There is no logic in his writing, no reasoning, only polemic, and trolls readers by creating a philosophical framework of his own definition of "masters and slaves".
Typical jew argumentation. You misrepresented what I said. I didn't say I didn't understand it, I said I found it to be nonsense.
I'd like to know your methodology for polling "EVERYONE" who didn't understand the book. Did you ask each and every one of them? That must have been very time consuming.
This list is utter crap. Plus, most of these movies were written or directed by jews. "Catch-22"? I read the novel by Joseph Heller. Absolute garbage, just as "Good Morning Vietnam" was idiotic.
I give him a pass for that. He's gravely wrong about that. I don't believe the tenuous and tautological theory of evolution either. But for everything else he wrote in the book, it's more than a net balance. He brings a lot of information to support his racialist views, even disregarding his misguided belief in evolution and Darwinism.
>4. Of course, you will NEVER NEVER NEVER consent to being interviewed in the first place.
Of course I won't. It would give legitimacy to your trolling. And considering you've already set the boundaries and rules of the "chat", it's already set up in bad faith. This is just more jewish trolling.
I think you're talking about getting the answers you like or want instead of what your respondents think. In other words, you're saying "they don't think like I do and won't answer my bad faith question, so obviously they're Christ-cucks". This is one of your most jewy posts, and most people here think you're a jew. You're not as obnoxious as that "GAIA!" guy, but just as transparent.
You have no real understanding of history, and you seem to think all past events were just compressed into one enormous "past". Besides what Anus_Expander said about marijuana, no one who was working on the Empire building was high. There was no cocaine in Coca Cola. Its cocaine content was significantly reduced in the beverage in 1903, and it was no longer used at all in 1929. Cocaine was illegal in the US in 1914. No White person smoked opium, and absinthe was expensive and nearly unavailable, and no steel worker would be caught dead drinking a faggy drink like that. They drank beer legally after the repeal of the Volstead Act, and since it was NYC, they likely knew where to buy bootleg beer before 1933. Beer was the beverage of the working class.
HughBriss 0 points 2.5 years ago
The jew cries out when he strikes you.
/v/PaganFarmRemembers viewpost?postid=63b0a9c34e6c8
HughBriss 0 points 2.5 years ago
Take a few deep breaths, there, Fu. It'll be all right, just let it pass and you'll feel better. It seems you've been off your medication, so get your dose, get some sleep, and it'll be just fine in the morning with the new realization that it's okay that someone disagrees with you.
/v/PaganFarmRemembers viewpost?postid=63b0a9c34e6c8
HughBriss 2 points 2.5 years ago
After going through archive.org, try z-lib.is. They're back up, but to download, you need to make a $5 donation. Your bank may block the transaction because it goes out of the country, so you'll need to call them and approve that single transaction.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=63b0d43ad7acb
HughBriss 1 point 2.5 years ago
I did not read "On the Genealogy of Morals", but I did read "Beyond Good and Evil". Nietzsche was a jew lover. In "Beyond Good and Evil" he praises them in subsection 250 and condemns anti-semitism in subsection 251. Here is the entirety of SS 250:
"250. What Europe owes to the Jews?—Many things, good and bad, and above all one thing of the nature both of the best and the worst: the grand style in morality, the fearfulness and majesty of infinite demands, of infinite significations, the whole Romanticism and sublimity of moral questionableness—and consequently just the most attractive, ensnaring, and exquisite element in those iridescences and allurements to life, in the aftersheen of which the sky of our European culture, its evening sky, now glows—perhaps glows out. For this, we artists among the spectators and philosophers, are—grateful to the Jews."
SS 251 is very lengthy, but this gem sticks out: "... for instance, among present-day Germans there is alternately the anti-French folly, the anti-Semitic folly, the anti-Polish folly, the Christian-romantic folly, the Wagnerian folly, the Teutonic folly, the Prussian folly (just look at those poor historians, the Sybels and Treitschkes, and their closely bandaged heads), and whatever else these little obscurations of the German spirit and conscience may be called."
He reminds me of a crank who calls everyone and everything fools and wants to correct everyone's wrong thinking with his own nonsensical writing based on nothing more than his own opinion. There is no logic in his writing, no reasoning, only polemic, and trolls readers by creating a philosophical framework of his own definition of "masters and slaves".
/v/PaganFarmRemembers viewpost?postid=63b0a9c34e6c8
HughBriss 0 points 2.5 years ago
Typical jew argumentation. You misrepresented what I said. I didn't say I didn't understand it, I said I found it to be nonsense.
I'd like to know your methodology for polling "EVERYONE" who didn't understand the book. Did you ask each and every one of them? That must have been very time consuming.
/v/PaganFarmRemembers viewpost?postid=63b0a9c34e6c8
HughBriss 1 point 2.5 years ago
Agreed. I read "Beyond Good and Evil" and found it to be utter nonsense.
/v/PaganFarmRemembers viewpost?postid=63b0a9c34e6c8
HughBriss 1 point 2.5 years ago
The "Committee of 300" is an invention. John Coleman made it up entirely without any proof.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=63b06cb8ac0f8
HughBriss 0 points 2.5 years ago
It's all you can expect from a retard.
/v/Screenshot viewpost?postid=63afeab230ed9
HughBriss 0 points 2.5 years ago
This list is utter crap. Plus, most of these movies were written or directed by jews. "Catch-22"? I read the novel by Joseph Heller. Absolute garbage, just as "Good Morning Vietnam" was idiotic.
/v/movies viewpost?postid=63aff9eace35a
HughBriss 3 points 2.5 years ago
I've hated that mouthy broad for 30 years.
She asks Katherine Hepburn "If you were a tree, which tree would you be?" What an insipid question.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gu9lJMlA2Kw
/v/UpliftingNews viewpost?postid=63afa7e62542c
HughBriss 0 points 2.5 years ago
I give him a pass for that. He's gravely wrong about that. I don't believe the tenuous and tautological theory of evolution either. But for everything else he wrote in the book, it's more than a net balance. He brings a lot of information to support his racialist views, even disregarding his misguided belief in evolution and Darwinism.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=63af34128a0f4
HughBriss 0 points 2.5 years ago
Please explain.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=63af34128a0f4
HughBriss 2 points 2.5 years ago
I lost track. What was your point? That you argue like a jew? jewfag is as jewfag does.
/v/Christcucks viewpost?postid=63af562464085
HughBriss 0 points 2.5 years ago
>4. Of course, you will NEVER NEVER NEVER consent to being interviewed in the first place.
Of course I won't. It would give legitimacy to your trolling. And considering you've already set the boundaries and rules of the "chat", it's already set up in bad faith. This is just more jewish trolling.
/v/Christcucks viewpost?postid=63af562464085
HughBriss 1 point 2.5 years ago
What is the question?
/v/Christcucks viewpost?postid=63af562464085
HughBriss 1 point 2.5 years ago
I was talking about you, not Josh Hawley, and your needless and gratuitous antagonism of Christians. Don't deflect, jew.
/v/Christcucks viewpost?postid=63af562464085
HughBriss 2 points 2.5 years ago*
I think you're talking about getting the answers you like or want instead of what your respondents think. In other words, you're saying "they don't think like I do and won't answer my bad faith question, so obviously they're Christ-cucks". This is one of your most jewy posts, and most people here think you're a jew. You're not as obnoxious as that "GAIA!" guy, but just as transparent.
/v/Christcucks viewpost?postid=63af562464085
HughBriss 3 points 2.5 years ago
I should have expected a one-liner.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=63aee1dd740b9
HughBriss 1 point 2.5 years ago
Can you document that?
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=63aee1dd740b9
HughBriss 1 point 2.5 years ago
Good lord, that's *exactly* what it looks like. That, and having a resemblance to Anton La Vey minus the goatee.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=63af1b458bee1
HughBriss 0 points 2.5 years ago
OP, I read your post and I like it. It reminded me of something David Duke wrote in one of his books. I'd appreciate your perspective on it. Thanks.
https://www.voat.xyz/viewpost?postid=63af34128a0f4
I just re-read the Reddit link. So many removed comments!
/v/MeanwhileOnReddit viewpost?postid=63af021fa21d0
HughBriss 1 point 2.5 years ago
And his brother. Andrew Tate has a creep vibe about him.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=63af1b458bee1
HughBriss 2 points 2.5 years ago*
You have no real understanding of history, and you seem to think all past events were just compressed into one enormous "past". Besides what Anus_Expander said about marijuana, no one who was working on the Empire building was high. There was no cocaine in Coca Cola. Its cocaine content was significantly reduced in the beverage in 1903, and it was no longer used at all in 1929. Cocaine was illegal in the US in 1914. No White person smoked opium, and absinthe was expensive and nearly unavailable, and no steel worker would be caught dead drinking a faggy drink like that. They drank beer legally after the repeal of the Volstead Act, and since it was NYC, they likely knew where to buy bootleg beer before 1933. Beer was the beverage of the working class.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=63aee1dd740b9
HughBriss 0 points 2.5 years ago
Who?
/v/politics viewpost?postid=63ae4692ef95c
HughBriss 0 points 2.5 years ago
There's a picture of it in the nypost link.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=63ae4a3f29d4c