×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
3

Scientist test blood on shroud of Turin also correlated with another cloth almost certainly jesus's shroud and determined that Jesus was what is called a "Drew" which is an Egyptian

submitted by Crackinjokes to History 19 hoursMay 1, 2025 20:18:46 ago (+3/-0)     (youtu.be)

https://youtu.be/wWtwrUIHqcY

Very interesting documentary here somebody who lets his religious beliefs get in the way of the science a little bit but in this they do a couple of things number one they correlate the shroud of Turin with another shroud that was reputed to wrap jesus's face and has exactly the same matching markings as the face on the trout of Turin and this other cloth has a much more documented history of its location. They all talk about how the DNA and if they take from the blood clots off the shroud of Turin is definitely dated to the time period of Jesus which is interesting and that the DNA is not of European origin which would be if the blood on it and the child was from Europe and later a fake. And the most interesting thing is then they do a little more in-depth discussion of the DNA and they find out that Jesus is blood was actually what is called a sect called a Drew d r e w. Which is an ancient sect older than Christianity and predates Jesus by about two or 3,000 years and is basically originally Egyptian origin which makes sense because there's a lot of talk about how Jesus between his birth and his return to Israel or Jerusalem I actually probably went to Egypt and studied with the mystics. Furthermore the Drew sect descendants actually live in Nazareth which is right around where Jesus was from and they have a continuing history and low and behold they go and they test some blood of some living druze and guess what they match the blood of Jesus so pretty conclusive evidence here that I had not heard before of number one the offense of the shroud because of the correlation with the other cloth which has even more documented history and I hadn't even heard of before and then this DNA analysis that kind of makes sense.

Now the one area where this documentary fails is that the two religious guys who are Christians and believe in jesus's resurrection deny the possibility that this other professor found the actual ossuary which is where the bones of dead people were kept in those times of both the mother Mary Mary Magdalene Jesus jesus's son and jesus's brother the names were all on the different oscillaries in this one tomb which is quite a coincidence if that's not who it is and these two guys reject the possibility that those are the bones of Jesus because they believe Jesus rose from the dead and therefore no bones were left behind. So I guess they just believe that his body just disappeared and vaporized as he mystically did whatever he did. Personally I think it would have been very interesting to try to get some testing of all those bone samples as well and the fact that that even exists is another interesting aspect of this video.


18 comments block


[ - ] UncleDoug 1 point 19 hoursMay 1, 2025 20:34:31 ago (+1/-0)

The shroud of Turin has been proven an elaborate forgery hundreds and hundreds of years after the supposed existence of the jew Jesus.

[ - ] Crackinjokes [op] 0 points 17 hoursMay 1, 2025 22:22:28 ago (+0/-0)

I've seen the cases for it being a forgery but then a lot of those cases were debunk themselves and I have to say that finding the DNA in one of the blood clots on the shroud of Turin and have it match a person who lived at that time would be very difficult for a European in the 800s or the 1300s to do where is he going to get blood from a person who lived during the time of Jesus to sprinkle on his fake shroud of turin?

[ - ] UncleDoug 1 point 17 hoursMay 1, 2025 23:12:29 ago (+1/-0)

Totally, completely, verifiably cheap and nasty fake proven by all except christcucks digest.

[ - ] FacelessOne 1 point 16 hoursMay 1, 2025 23:59:54 ago (+1/-0)

Muh scientist told me covid is real watch this video!

[ - ] UncleDoug 0 points 14 hoursMay 2, 2025 01:41:12 ago (+0/-0)

Scientists never said covid was real, politicians, jewish actors and the media said it was real.

[ - ] FacelessOne 1 point 13 hoursMay 2, 2025 02:26:09 ago (+1/-0)

Checks notes

Yeah scientists say Viruses are totally real and we should vaccinate against them.

Wtf are you talking about nigger

[ - ] UncleDoug 0 points 12 hoursMay 2, 2025 04:07:17 ago (+0/-0)

So because Covid was fake, all viruses must be fake. Humans can also get sick, so humans must also be fake.

Were you dropped on your head.?

[ - ] FacelessOne 0 points 10 hoursMay 2, 2025 05:38:09 ago (+0/-0)

Muh Appeal to authority harder!

[ - ] mahavishnunj 1 point 10 hoursMay 2, 2025 05:58:05 ago (+1/-0)

The shroud is fake too.

[ - ] Joe_McCarthy 0 points 18 hoursMay 1, 2025 21:37:30 ago (+0/-0)

The argument over Jesus' ancestry is essentially a lot of dispute over something that is unimportant. It is often said that man created God in his image. But men were actually created to have similar traits to God. A Jew, or Egyptian, though, is a human being. God is not human, hence he is neither. This suddenly becomes very unimportant if you believe Jesus Christ exists. Jesus was only human for a brief period of time.

[ - ] Crackinjokes [op] -1 points 17 hoursMay 1, 2025 22:27:01 ago (+0/-1)

Well the thing that stands out to me is that Jesus was fighting the corrupt Jewish practices of the time the table turning incident certainly is one of the major points in jesus's life and I think if you're fighting the current sect at the time the current Jewish sect at that time it helps if you've come from a somewhat different culture so him being basically from an older Egyptian-based model theistic culture would explain where the ideas would have been planted in his head to fight the Jewish money-grubbing cult that had evolved at that day. So I think his cultural background as a member of this a very much more historic early Egyptian cult of the druze probably had a lot of impact on his Outlook and view of what would have been another culture to him that rabbinical Jewish pay me for your sacrifices to the Lord kind of thing that he fought against so much.

[ - ] HelenHighwater 0 points 18 hoursMay 1, 2025 21:38:56 ago (+0/-0)

I wanna know, Have you ever seen the rain?

[ - ] Cantaloupe 0 points 18 hoursMay 1, 2025 21:58:21 ago (+0/-0)

Interesting, how do they know the blood is his though? Perhaps it's just their best analysis.

[ - ] FacelessOne 1 point 16 hoursMay 1, 2025 23:58:34 ago (+1/-0)

Confirmation bias. Apologists start from the assumption of "Yes Jesus Lived and was a Real Man" and move from this point on using all information to go Ah See Jesus!

[ - ] Crackinjokes [op] 0 points 17 hoursMay 1, 2025 22:25:14 ago (+0/-0)

Well if you watch this documentary and I do recommend it if you're at all interested in this they're really a couple of things that set this apart number one is it's correlation with this other piece of cloth that was on jesus's head that is much more well-documented throughout its timeline than the shroud of turn was the shroud of turn sort of disappeared and then appear to I think in the 1500s and this other piece of cloth which whose facial appearance matches that of the shroud of Turin was more well documented and given to the king of Spain in the year 500 and quite a few other things so there's some additional information that it likely was from that time period now if you watch the documentary you see that they did date the DNA of and the blood of the shroud of Turin to someone who lived in jesus's time so that sets it up and then there is the DNA that itself which matches a sect that lived in the area and in fact still lives in the area of Nazareth to this day so you know that's a lot of supporting evidence. First of all the shroud was kept all these years secondly it matches the other piece of cloth which has a well-known history Thirdly the time. Of the blood when it was radiocarbonated matched someone who would have been alive in jesus's time and fourthly the DNA analysis was just been done matches a sect that was around in Nazareth where Jesus came from during that time and in fact still is and the documentary goes and finds a few people who are in that SEC today and takes their DNA match and it matches that of Jesus in many ways that would be a distant relative so there's a lot of supporting evidence now that that wasn't always there it certainly made me think more highly of the shroud of Turin.

[ - ] FacelessOne 2 points 16 hoursMay 1, 2025 23:55:25 ago (+2/-0)

Complete fabrication, shroud of Turin proven to be crusade era burial shroud. Appropriate for the times. No fucking cloth is surviving from 20 ad with amazing DNA evidence.

We've gotten to the point where DNA evidence has been proven to be used as evidence in more cases of wrongful conviction than "Reasonable Doubt" should even consider calling evidence.

Scientism and its NPCs who believe and follow clickbait like this has destroyed every aspect of society.

[ - ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic 0 points 16 hoursMay 1, 2025 23:56:09 ago (+0/-0)

That matches my conclusion of where he was from. I think he was an Egyptian of the old order, probably survivors of Atlantis. I also think moses was Egyptian too. But jews will lie and claim that everyone was jewish back then. Jesus despised the jews.

[ - ] GetFuckedCunt 1 point 15 hoursMay 2, 2025 00:55:40 ago (+1/-0)

Interesting in that the entire point of Jesus and the new testament is that Jesus is supposed to be a jew that ended the covenant between god and the jews to begin a new covenant between gentiles, jews and god.

This is because he is considered to be the jewish messiah, king of all jews and its funny watching Christians try to push some alternative when Christianity is based on Jesus being a jew.

If Jesus was an egyptian than the entire new testament is moot.

Jesus was never real, he is a metaphorical representation of those that truly seek wisdom.