I think one of the only things gravity really proves is that there are 3 spatial dimensions. Observing its inverse square effect, that comes from the flux behaving like an expanding sphere surface, which requires 3 dimensions to occur.
In any case, such a theory lacks a lot by not addressing why the Pauli exclusion principle exists, because that gives outward pressure which HALTS gravity collapsing a star, holds it steady in a balance for billions of years, then explodes it OUTWARD after it expends too much mass for gravity to continue.
Sure, there are a couple of higher mass thresholds where gravity wins and different results occur, including black holes where individual atoms no longer need simulating (just the total mass at a singular point), but those are a fraction of a % of the mass. Around them, we have stars going nova and throwing mass everywhere!
[ + ] Love240
[ - ] Love240 1 point 1 dayApr 29, 2025 00:26:50 ago (+1/-0)
Gravity is a false god.
[ + ] KosherHiveKicker
[ - ] KosherHiveKicker 1 point 1 dayApr 29, 2025 00:10:42 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] xmasskull
[ - ] xmasskull 0 points 9 hoursApr 29, 2025 15:52:06 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] SithEmpire
[ - ] SithEmpire 0 points 22 hoursApr 29, 2025 02:56:45 ago (+0/-0)
In any case, such a theory lacks a lot by not addressing why the Pauli exclusion principle exists, because that gives outward pressure which HALTS gravity collapsing a star, holds it steady in a balance for billions of years, then explodes it OUTWARD after it expends too much mass for gravity to continue.
Sure, there are a couple of higher mass thresholds where gravity wins and different results occur, including black holes where individual atoms no longer need simulating (just the total mass at a singular point), but those are a fraction of a % of the mass. Around them, we have stars going nova and throwing mass everywhere!
[ + ] TheBigGuyFromQueens
[ - ] TheBigGuyFromQueens [op] 1 point 22 hoursApr 29, 2025 03:14:07 ago (+1/-0)