×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
40

Why peer review is the death of innovation in science.

submitted by VaccineWaters to science 3 monthsFeb 19, 2025 07:45:20 ago (+40/-0)     (m3.gab.com)

https://m3.gab.com/media_attachments/6f/fa/c3/6ffac36e19788617f33e77d2ffb95533.mp4



22 comments block


[ - ] canbot 1 point 3 monthsFeb 19, 2025 15:24:11 ago (+1/-0)

Peer review worked until jews coopted it.

[ - ] dassar 0 points 3 monthsFeb 19, 2025 13:56:59 ago (+0/-0)

BS, has this joker got a peer-reviewed paper to back up and substantiate his claim ?? /

[ - ] PotatoWhisperer2 2 points 3 monthsFeb 19, 2025 13:23:10 ago (+2/-0)

Worship of authority programmed into them at an early age. This is why we don't innovate, we only iterate. It allows those in control to keep anything done to their exact standards.

Don't you dare investigate IQ, unless you have the pre-approved outcomes. Don't you dare investigate banking structures and DNA, unless... etc etc.

They take our medium bright children and turn them into insane frothing communists, curbing their natural curiosity into a self-defeating ideology.

[ - ] CornBorn 1 point 3 monthsFeb 19, 2025 12:49:08 ago (+1/-0)

College was coopted by jews after they took control of the Realm. you can learn more online self taught in a month and you wouldnt end up a faggot commie.

[ - ] Clubberlang 0 points 3 monthsFeb 19, 2025 12:40:08 ago (+0/-0)

Oyyyyyy Veyyyy aye lyke his eyedeeyuh ov killink demselvs cuzzuh stooPdiddy! Kvetch!

[ - ] hylo 0 points 3 monthsFeb 19, 2025 11:00:59 ago (+0/-0)

Universities pump out pseudo-intellectual NPCs. On top of that they're a money mill.

[ - ] green_man 6 points 3 monthsFeb 19, 2025 10:38:17 ago (+7/-1)

Peer review, when executed honestly and properly, is a great tool to help validate findings. The problem is (((modern science))), aka soyence, does not allow for actual peer review in most cases, it's all politically motivated bullshit that is rubber stamp reviewed by some faggot(s) with the same faggot ideology as the author(s). This leads to things like the replication crisis where soyentific findings cannot be reproduced, because they're all made up with some jewish political goal in mind.

[ - ] ImplicationOverReason 3 points 3 monthsFeb 19, 2025 10:36:38 ago (+4/-1)

Science/scio - "to know" implies each ones perception, which cannot have a peer (equal), because nature differentiates each one from one another. Each one has a different point of view.

A jew tricks gentiles with suggestion to ignore perception, hence establishing the parable of the blind men and an elephant... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blind_men_and_an_elephant

[ - ] dassar 0 points 3 monthsFeb 19, 2025 13:55:37 ago (+0/-0)

Huh, you didnt include the usual 'implies inception towards death' ??.

It denotes knowledge, understanding awareness of a 'FACT' OR understanding. Not one's perception.

[ - ] ImplicationOverReason -1 points 3 monthsFeb 20, 2025 03:24:20 ago (+0/-1)

you didn't include the usual 'implies inception towards death

You implies the life included within the inception towards death procession. One cannot FORM an expression without implying the FLOW of procession.

it denotes

To denote implies "identify by a mark". That which one makes identical by marking...was formed different (life) by flow (inception towards death).

Ones consent to suggested words "identifies by mark", which in return distracts from perceivable sound, which moves in-spirit-ation through one; a separation forcing each being to adapt to.

knowledge, understanding

Edge implies in-between over/under...understanding implies standing under that which is above. Knowledge (perceivable inspiration) moves through one, hence in/out of each being. Understanding (suggested information) tempts one to hold onto a side, while ignoring ones position in-between.

Sleight of hand: https://genius.com/Aerosmith-livin-on-the-edge-lyrics

"seeing things in a different way...and God knows it ain't his" aka suggestion instead of perception.

fact

Fact/facere - "to do" implies towards (inception towards death) re-doing (life). If the forwarding motion existed before one comes into being, then one can only re-do aka re-act to being done aka to being enacted upon.

Example: writing "land" into desert sand represents an artificial fact, written into nature. This fact tempts one to ignore that land; air and water aka natural L-A-W moves. Whatever fact one holds onto tempts one to ignore actual movement.

In short...F(ictional)ACT

not one's perception

Suggested "not" contradicts one's perception. Not implies suggested nihil-ism (nihilo; nothing); tempting ones de-nial of perceivable for suggested. Nothing is based on creation ex nihilo aka the jewish suggestion of creationism, and the most wildly understood (not known) allegory for it is...

Nailed to the cross aka ones de-nial/nail of being (life) moved a-cross (inception towards death).

or

Energy OR what else? God OR what else? ALL OR what else? Sound OR what else? Light OR what else?

What if alternation (or) implies reaction (life) within action (inception towards death)? What if there cannot exist an outside OR; only those within lacking self discernment of being alternated from one another?

[ - ] dassar 0 points 3 monthsFeb 20, 2025 14:12:22 ago (+0/-0)

Lmaoooo - you did include it after all. What a joker.

But Stop copy-pasting from Chatgpt.

You're engaged in jew sophistry 'letter of the law vs spirit of the law',

Now go do your Q-tier nonsense with some Dr Suess. You will get the very same rubbish.

[ - ] x0x7 1 point 3 monthsFeb 19, 2025 09:53:09 ago (+2/-1)*

I'd broaden it to academia. There is nothing wrong with peer-reviewing a paper. There is something wrong with teaching people that such papers deserve implicit trust and things without it deserve implicit distrust. That's academia's fault, and not the fact that peer review exists as an option.

What's also worse than peer review is peer review policy. Journals saying in the case of psychiatry "We aren't going to review long term studies." Well when you are the only journal in town that means there is no long term research in psychiatric drugs. Or refusal to review papers that don't align with a pro-trans agenda or the journal's "values". Now that's just engineering confirmation bias and exporting it to the whole field.

[ - ] mannerbund 5 points 3 monthsFeb 19, 2025 09:41:03 ago (+5/-0)

Its worse than that:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=shFUDPqVmTg

They protect their own once they get in and few have the courage to call it out.

[ - ] Consensus_Reality 1 point 3 monthsFeb 19, 2025 19:58:25 ago (+1/-0)

I viewed this the other day and thought about posting it here. (You beat me to it.)

I like some stuff Sabine puts out, but she still has to much Eurofag, socalist, mind-virus tendencies for me to consider her based.

[ - ] mannerbund 0 points 3 monthsFeb 20, 2025 09:38:15 ago (+0/-0)

Indeed, it's not so much about her being based or not as much as it is that she's at least calling out the bullshit in the community.

[ - ] Jimmycrackerson 11 points 3 monthsFeb 19, 2025 09:33:11 ago (+11/-0)*

This leads to retards like nigger degrass tyson being shoved down the throats of mainstream science.

"No, I can't tell you WHY the hallway chirps. But I can measure it. I can predict the next and following chirp. I have a very good understanding of it and that's good enough for me. I'm not distracted by the philosophical side of WHY the hallway chirps"

[ - ] Consensus_Reality 0 points 3 monthsFeb 19, 2025 19:51:33 ago (+0/-0)

retards like nigger degrass tyson

I call him Nigger Dumbass Token.

[ - ] WNwoman 4 points 3 monthsFeb 19, 2025 08:57:09 ago (+4/-0)

Science is just dead. At this point just let Reddit peer review.

[ - ] PotatoWhisperer2 0 points 3 monthsFeb 19, 2025 13:20:28 ago (+0/-0)

They do.

[ - ] founder 3 points 3 monthsFeb 19, 2025 08:51:31 ago (+3/-0)

especially when you consider that NO papers on the correlation between race and intelligence will ever be published.

[ - ] GreenSaint -2 points 3 monthsFeb 19, 2025 08:34:55 ago (+0/-2)

You should post your dick pics so I can personally peer review them.