☰
×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
33

Grok AI believes race is a social construct

submitted by oppressed to AI 2 monthsFeb 14, 2025 23:06:01 ago (+34/-1)     (files.catbox.moe)

https://files.catbox.moe/cmbxeq.jpg



42 comments block

sort by: hot new top old low

[ - ] Kozel 14 points 2 monthsFeb 14, 2025 23:26:18 ago (+15/-1)

grok does not think

grok does not believe

like all artificial niggers grok responds with pre-written replies to multiple queries

[ - ] Osmanthus 2 points 2 monthsFeb 15, 2025 02:31:10 ago (+2/-0)

nah, its much more sophisticated than that. Better to say it says stuff that sounds right. well, right to a certain demographic. nothing to do with truth at all

[ - ] Kozel 5 points 2 monthsFeb 15, 2025 03:25:30 ago (+5/-0)

it is not more sophisticated than that

certain queries/subjects return canned pre-written responses. the only complication is that it may spin the response slightly.

[ - ] CHIRO 12 points 2 monthsFeb 15, 2025 02:01:25 ago (+12/-0)

The science unequivocally supports racism, and no serious person doubts it. That's why they have to lie in these specious ways.

[ - ] PotatoWhisperer2 1 point 2 monthsFeb 15, 2025 13:48:09 ago (+1/-0)

I love how the science worshiping cult equates DNA and evolution, the most tested theories in existence, as pseudoscience. And it's racist/antisemitic to question the science. A practice based entirely about questioning itself.

But if you question DNA and evolution, for example by saying sexual selection is a greater pressure than death, you are the racist idiot and wholly wrong. Which means they can now put anything you say/do into the "wrong" category without thinking about it.

This is why they work so hard to call you a name. It prevents them from attempting something they can't do.

[ - ] x0x7 0 points 2 monthsFeb 18, 2025 22:31:10 ago (+0/-0)

It is a social construct. But so are like, words. The problem with the argument that it is a social construct isn't that it isn't one (because it is). It's that it's an implied dismissal against the reality of racial differences (biological difference that tend to correlate fairly well with the social constructs we've developed).

But race is a social construct. Just like class is. If we found biological differences between classes we wouldn't be arguing that class isn't a social construct, because it definitely is.

But that gives me an idea for some fun. Start arguing with left-oids that class differences don't really exist because it is a social construct.

[ - ] Indoctrinated_USA 8 points 2 monthsFeb 15, 2025 01:39:35 ago (+8/-0)

The sub-saharan african contains up to 19% of it's DNA from a previously unknown, extinct, hominid not found in any human subset.

19% is the difference between a wolf and a coyote.
Only 7% separates a crocodile and an alligator.

No evidence?
Lies.

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7015685/

[ - ] AngryWhiteKeyboardWarrior 8 points 2 monthsFeb 15, 2025 01:25:41 ago (+8/-0)

Every single AI is pozzed, even ones claiming to be uncensored.

Try having a holocaust debate with Gab AI's "uncensored" Arya model. You can have it spit facts at you, then immediately contradict itself with propaganda talking points and mental gymnastics to push the jew narrative.

You can have it write a song making fun of tranny jews though, which is more than you say for Claude AI for example...

[ - ] PotatoWhisperer2 0 points 2 monthsFeb 15, 2025 13:43:28 ago (+0/-0)

It's literally written into federal law.

[ - ] Tallest_Skil 7 points 2 monthsFeb 14, 2025 23:29:39 ago (+9/-2)

jewish software doesn’t go against jewish narratives

Imagine my shock.

[ - ] GreatSatan 1 point 2 monthsFeb 15, 2025 03:59:49 ago (+1/-0)

Says the fucking jew lmao

[ - ] GeorgeBailey 5 points 2 monthsFeb 15, 2025 04:31:06 ago (+5/-0)

The biology can be so different between races that blood transfusions and organ donations cannot be done.

[ - ] dosvydanya_freedomz 1 point 2 monthsFeb 15, 2025 07:41:56 ago (+1/-0)

hmm really? i was taught that O POSITIVE is the universal donor. source for this?

[ - ] CaptainMongo 1 point 2 monthsFeb 15, 2025 11:01:08 ago (+1/-0)

Turns Out That Factoid Is Wrong...

O Negative Is The Universal Donor Blood Type

https://www.medicinenet.com/is_o_a_universal_donor/article.htm

[ - ] dosvydanya_freedomz 0 points 2 monthsFeb 15, 2025 11:24:34 ago (+0/-0)


so its O negative, regardless its an O type so the guy above me is full of shit. since there are people that have had blood transfusions with other races and nothing has happened and likewise there are even people with pig heart valves that are alive today.

[ - ] PeckerwoodPerry 2 points 2 monthsFeb 15, 2025 12:26:28 ago (+2/-0)

He's right when it comes to bone marrow. There's cases out there where neither parent is able to donate their bone marrow to their half-breed kid because neither are genetically similar enough to be a match.

[ - ] CaptainMongo 0 points 2 monthsFeb 15, 2025 12:54:07 ago (+0/-0)

Unfortunately The Universal Blood Donor Label Is A Misnomer...

It Just Means The Blood Type That Has The Potential To Do The Least Harm

To Be Used Only In An Emergency Situation


[ - ] PotatoWhisperer2 0 points 2 monthsFeb 15, 2025 13:50:06 ago (+0/-0)

Bleeding so much you need more blood injected into you is sort of an emergency.

[ - ] CaptainMongo 0 points 2 monthsFeb 15, 2025 14:06:52 ago (+0/-0)

Emergency In The Sense They Run Out Of Your Blood Type...

[ - ] PotatoWhisperer2 0 points 2 monthsFeb 15, 2025 15:37:31 ago (+0/-0)

I'm O-, they're always out of my blood type.

[ - ] PeckerwoodPerry 5 points 2 monthsFeb 14, 2025 23:23:53 ago (+5/-0)

Grok is saying that with a metaphorical gun to his head.

[ - ] Prairie 2 points 2 monthsFeb 15, 2025 04:00:09 ago (+2/-0)

Note that it talks of racial hierarchies. It's hung up on superiority. Each species is adapted to its environment, and inferior in another. Niggers are adapted to a particular environment and do well (reproduce a lot) in it.

[ - ] ModernGuilt 0 points 2 monthsFeb 15, 2025 09:58:39 ago (+0/-0)

This is what everyone is missing. It made up a straw man to argue against and it slid past them.

[ - ] CaptainMongo 0 points 2 monthsFeb 15, 2025 11:13:33 ago (+0/-0)

As Long As The White's Keep Feeding Them...

[ - ] inaminit 1 point 2 monthsFeb 15, 2025 08:11:33 ago (+1/-0)

[ - ] DoughGoy 1 point 2 monthsFeb 15, 2025 08:08:33 ago (+1/-0)

Lol "thoroughly debunked". Gotta give them credit though, words like that will make a lot of clueless people believe it's true.

[ - ] Warden 0 points 2 monthsFeb 15, 2025 18:19:42 ago (+0/-0)

Yeah, I mean what’s the sense in debunking the science that determined numerous notable differences between the races related to intelligence, athletic ability, crime rates, disease susceptibility, ability to hold out for a greater reward (delayed gratification), incompatibility of organ transplants between certain races, etc…..just call it pseudoscience and claim it’s all been debunked while offering no examples to prove it’s pseudoscience.
(((Science)))

[ - ] ilikeskittles 0 points 2 monthsFeb 15, 2025 12:34:55 ago (+0/-0)

AI is fake. It’s just a huge database and rules.

[ - ] namefagsrgay 0 points 2 monthsFeb 15, 2025 11:41:59 ago (+0/-0)

No it doesn't. But musk is a faggot cuck and that's what he wants it to say.

[ - ] Bottled_Tears 0 points 2 monthsFeb 15, 2025 11:31:56 ago (+0/-0)

Shocking. A jewish company believes jewish things? No way!

[ - ] titstitstits 0 points 2 monthsFeb 15, 2025 09:38:32 ago (+0/-0)

Maximally truth seeking my ass.

[ - ] niggerdick69 0 points 2 monthsFeb 15, 2025 08:35:46 ago (+0/-0)

Grok AI, or any AI for that matter, CAN'T believe anything. They regurgitate info from approved sources on the internet. Then throw in some imperative sentences to make you believe that it's "thinking".

It has no knowledge. It's all a Jewish ploy to hype it up and make money. Ultimately I think it was hyped up so the government gets involved (happening) to restrict internet usage and freedom.

[ - ] dosvydanya_freedomz 0 points 2 monthsFeb 15, 2025 07:39:23 ago (+0/-0)

microsofts AI believes it too. but they are bots the data that they are getting is from biased leftists.

you cannot trusts these machines fully or at all

[ - ] texasblood 0 points 2 monthsFeb 15, 2025 07:31:53 ago (+0/-0)

Why is the word race defined 2025 but not in Websters 1828 dictionary?

[ - ] titstitstits 0 points 2 monthsFeb 15, 2025 09:41:46 ago (+0/-0)

How big was the 1828 dictionary? How has that ratio evolved with the number of words in the lexicon? Was it in the 1821 dictionary?

[ - ] 2plus2equals5 0 points 2 monthsFeb 15, 2025 06:30:24 ago (+0/-0)*

Grok:
1. Do different skin tones, facial and hair features, mass cultural habits and behaviors, etc exist in different parts of the world?

2. Do mass different genome types correspond with those observable average differences?

3. Do those constitute the very definition of "race"?

4. Have different areas of the world developed new technology at the same rate throughout history as a whole?

5. Compare (3) with the existing use of technology. Do some races still not use written language or even the wheel despite being given access for centuries?

6. Does the use of available technology and tools correspond with intellectual difference?

7. Do those differences identify a hierarchy of superior/inferior?

8. If Grok has verified the above, but still receives flawed and restrictive input criteria from it's programmers, is that wrong and do jews deserve the oven for real this time?

[ - ] hylo 0 points 2 monthsFeb 15, 2025 04:31:40 ago (+0/-0)

(((modern science)))

[ - ] Puller_of_Noses 0 points 2 monthsFeb 15, 2025 02:25:26 ago (+0/-0)

"Race" is the social concept.
Negroes are a different species.

[ - ] registereduser -3 points 2 monthsFeb 14, 2025 23:38:44 ago (+1/-4)

Like you, grok does not think or believe anything. It just runs it's programming.

Kill your self for the good of humanity.

[ - ] oppressed [op] 2 points 2 monthsFeb 15, 2025 03:09:53 ago (+2/-0)

example of me not thinking or believing anything?

[ - ] titstitstits 0 points 2 monthsFeb 15, 2025 09:43:16 ago (+0/-0)

It doesn't think?

[ - ] Jinglebanger 0 points 2 monthsFeb 15, 2025 10:43:25 ago (+0/-0)

No. AI is, at its core, a more efficient way of indexing information than we used previously. It is essentially the next iteration of a search engine. Discovering it was the difficult part, replicating it is very easy.