supreme being, prime creator, universal logos, allmighty, most high
a) Supreme implies under (sup) prime (preme), hence each being (partial) within oneness (whole).
b) Creation implies out of nothing, which would make nothing the prime of everything. That's a deception...suggested creationism tempts one to de-nial (nihilo;nothing) everything perceivable.
c) Universal implies the turning (vers;versus,wer) of one (uni) against another, hence logos (suggested words) tempting logic (circular reasoning), which then turns one against another within conflicts of reason.
d) Only within all can each one wield might/may - "to be able". All enables each ones being.
e) Most high implies conflicts of reason aka most vs least and low vs high aka one versus one another, while ignoring all.
b) Creation can also imply bringing into ordered existence - and the act of making, inventing, or producing an original.
Trouble with parsing ancient/ esoteric text - you really need to know the exact etymological definition the author is ascribing - otherwise implication quickly becomes assumption.
Creation can also imply bringing into ordered existence
a) EX-istence implies outwards, hence natural order (inception towards death) generating existence (life) from within outwards aka impressing (action) expressions (reactions).
b) Order (ongoing loss) brings forward being (temporary growth)...growth struggling within loss implies chaos.
c) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creatio_ex_nihilo aka a jew suggesting creation out of nothing as the inversion of all perceivable transforming into each ones perception aka from every (whole) into each (partial) through internal separation.
act of making, inventing, or producing an original.
Origin (motion) produces (momentum) products (matter). Action (inception towards death) generates reactions (life). Invent/inveniere (to come upon within) aka to come upon (life) within (inception towards death).
All acts; each one within reacts. One cannot act; only react. A jew suggests actors under directors to distract gentiles from discerning self to be reactions (life) within direction (inception towards death).
Trouble with parsing...text
Parse/pars implies taking apart; text/teks implies to weave together. The trouble is ones ignorance of contradictions.
You really need to know the exact etymological definition the author is ascribing
a) To know implies ones perception of all perceivable...ones consent to suggested ascription by another tempts one to ignore perceivable reality (inspiration) for suggested fiction (information).
b) To define implies "to affix", which contradicts all perceivable moving each ones perception apart from one another. It's ones consent to a suggested definition, which affixes information within ones mind/memory; while ignoring that inspiration moves through ones mind/memory and cannot be held onto, since it moves.
Furthermore...ignoring perceivable sound for suggested words makes one a definition aka a DEAF PHONETICIAN aka deaf to phonic (sound). A jew tricking gentiles to respond to words within sound implies spell-craft, hence few crafting the spelling of many through the consent of each LETTER LETTING another shape words.
implication quickly becomes assumption.
To assume implies "to take upon self"...that's the self inflicted corruption, which tempts one to ignore that perceivable inspiration cannot be taken into possession, and what permits others to trick one to hold onto suggested information.
Implication (if/then) implies ones adaptation to all motion from within, hence if alive, then being moved from inception towards death. If alive, while unable to perceive ones own inception and death; then being (matter) separated (momentum) from origin (motion).
"Implication of reason" aka using if/then (implication) instead of reason (assuming a side to hold onto, while fighting the opposite).
This is slightly less ambiguous than
Ambi/ambhi - "around"...ones consent to suggested information establishes "circular" logic within self, which "turns" into a conflict of reason (more vs less) against others.
Meanwhile...implication (if/then) is based on the direction of motion, moving matter (life) from inception towards death.
It's a jew aka a kike/kikel - "circle" who suggests gentiles "the circle of life; the wheel of fortune; the leap of faith; the band of hope; till we find our place on the path unwinding"... https://genius.com/Elton-john-circle-of-life-lyrics
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason 0 points 3 monthsJan 20, 2025 10:04:16 ago (+0/-0)
a) Supreme implies under (sup) prime (preme), hence each being (partial) within oneness (whole).
b) Creation implies out of nothing, which would make nothing the prime of everything. That's a deception...suggested creationism tempts one to de-nial (nihilo;nothing) everything perceivable.
c) Universal implies the turning (vers;versus,wer) of one (uni) against another, hence logos (suggested words) tempting logic (circular reasoning), which then turns one against another within conflicts of reason.
d) Only within all can each one wield might/may - "to be able". All enables each ones being.
e) Most high implies conflicts of reason aka most vs least and low vs high aka one versus one another, while ignoring all.
[ + ] GreatSatan
[ - ] GreatSatan [op] 1 point 3 monthsJan 20, 2025 10:29:16 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] dassar
[ - ] dassar 0 points 3 monthsJan 20, 2025 16:16:19 ago (+0/-0)
Trouble with parsing ancient/ esoteric text - you really need to know the exact etymological definition the author is ascribing - otherwise implication quickly becomes assumption.
This is slightly less ambiguous than Q-tardery.
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason -1 points 3 monthsJan 20, 2025 17:20:42 ago (+0/-1)
a) EX-istence implies outwards, hence natural order (inception towards death) generating existence (life) from within outwards aka impressing (action) expressions (reactions).
b) Order (ongoing loss) brings forward being (temporary growth)...growth struggling within loss implies chaos.
c) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creatio_ex_nihilo aka a jew suggesting creation out of nothing as the inversion of all perceivable transforming into each ones perception aka from every (whole) into each (partial) through internal separation.
Origin (motion) produces (momentum) products (matter). Action (inception towards death) generates reactions (life). Invent/inveniere (to come upon within) aka to come upon (life) within (inception towards death).
All acts; each one within reacts. One cannot act; only react. A jew suggests actors under directors to distract gentiles from discerning self to be reactions (life) within direction (inception towards death).
Parse/pars implies taking apart; text/teks implies to weave together. The trouble is ones ignorance of contradictions.
a) To know implies ones perception of all perceivable...ones consent to suggested ascription by another tempts one to ignore perceivable reality (inspiration) for suggested fiction (information).
b) To define implies "to affix", which contradicts all perceivable moving each ones perception apart from one another. It's ones consent to a suggested definition, which affixes information within ones mind/memory; while ignoring that inspiration moves through ones mind/memory and cannot be held onto, since it moves.
Furthermore...ignoring perceivable sound for suggested words makes one a definition aka a DEAF PHONETICIAN aka deaf to phonic (sound). A jew tricking gentiles to respond to words within sound implies spell-craft, hence few crafting the spelling of many through the consent of each LETTER LETTING another shape words.
To assume implies "to take upon self"...that's the self inflicted corruption, which tempts one to ignore that perceivable inspiration cannot be taken into possession, and what permits others to trick one to hold onto suggested information.
Implication (if/then) implies ones adaptation to all motion from within, hence if alive, then being moved from inception towards death. If alive, while unable to perceive ones own inception and death; then being (matter) separated (momentum) from origin (motion).
"Implication of reason" aka using if/then (implication) instead of reason (assuming a side to hold onto, while fighting the opposite).
Ambi/ambhi - "around"...ones consent to suggested information establishes "circular" logic within self, which "turns" into a conflict of reason (more vs less) against others.
Meanwhile...implication (if/then) is based on the direction of motion, moving matter (life) from inception towards death.
It's a jew aka a kike/kikel - "circle" who suggests gentiles "the circle of life; the wheel of fortune; the leap of faith; the band of hope; till we find our place on the path unwinding"... https://genius.com/Elton-john-circle-of-life-lyrics
[ + ] dassar
[ - ] dassar 0 points 3 monthsJan 20, 2025 21:10:35 ago (+0/-0)
You're saying a lot of words to repeat what has already been written, while adding zero worthwhile context.
Now do some Dr Suess Cat in the hat and you will end up with similar garbage.
[ + ] RobertJHarsh
[ - ] RobertJHarsh 0 points 3 monthsJan 20, 2025 10:24:42 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] HelenHighwater
[ - ] HelenHighwater 0 points 3 monthsJan 20, 2025 11:33:14 ago (+0/-0)
Ancient persian mythology.
[ + ] x0x7
[ - ] x0x7 0 points 3 monthsJan 20, 2025 12:37:34 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Master_Foo
[ - ] Master_Foo 3 points 3 monthsJan 20, 2025 10:35:41 ago (+4/-1)