...employed among non-jews, with its characteristic "Hebrew" inscription.
This is from the middle ages from somewhere in the Rhineland. Isn't it interesting there is no "star of david"?! Notice the symbol to identify "sorcery" was the "magic circle" ... it seems not only are the name changers changing names, but various other things.
a) Encircling the square. Ones perception from within left/right + up/down + front/back implies a squared cube, while reasoning about a suggestion aka circular logic implies the circle.
b)There are no "middle ages". He-brew His-story to distract jew/you from discerning for self to be the middle of age/aevum/aiw - "vital force, life; eternity"
c) Sorcery implies using source (all perceivable) to distract ingredients (ones perception) with magic (suggested). Ones consent to suggested magic establishes the circle (logic) within self.
d) Nature moves sound, which implies the source for any words shaped within aka spell-craft. A jew suggests gentiles to hold onto names (idolizing brands), which by consent tempts the gentiles to ignore perceivable sound.
For example...suggested "insane person" tempts a consenting gentile to ignore being in sanus (within sound) and therefore per sonos (by sound), instead gentiles reasoning against each other over who is vs who isn't an insane person aka name calling.
e) Everything perceivable changes...a jew utilizes suggestion to tempt consenting gentiles to hold onto fiction (suggestion), while ignoring reality (perception).
That's why a jew can "change" everything...while humbling gentiles by allowing them to have "spare change".
Edit: If there's a square; then there's a cube with a hexagram within...
"Kike" is short for the yiddish word (קײַקל or 'kikel') for circle. Note the similarity to the ancient Greek word for circle, κύκλος (kyklos). It was at the time a symbol of 'alchemy' meaning to "control" or "encircle" and out of town traders would wear the badge.
What do you make of the square around the circle on the bottom? I don't understand the enscriptions myself.
middle ages
I am referring to what other refer to as ~1000-1700 AD ... assuming the calender hasn't been completely messed with (which seems to be the case).
sorcery
sorcery: one who sorts by 'supernatural' means. supernatural: non-natural
spell-craft
Merely a provided suggestion dosed with an affirmation to get ones consent to a falsehood. Once one consents, the "spell" has been cast ... or, in another way, the spell casts when the reciever "believes" what is suggested.
For example...suggested "insane person" tempts a consenting gentile to ignore being in sanus (within sound) and therefore per sonos (by sound), instead gentiles reasoning against each other over who is vs who isn't an insane person aka name calling.
This is very much like the formula "suggestion-affirm-consent" above. Interesting indeed ... it seems we are converging to a similar idea. This is a rare viewpoint ...
Aka all + chemy/khein/gheu - "to pour", with pour implying "to cause to flow or stream either out of a vessel or into one" aka all motion pouring momentum (inception towards death) into each one matter (life).
The circle (logic/reason) tempts one to ignore the implication (if/then) of all moving through one.
b) Trader/traitor...ones FREE will of choice cannot buy into without selling self out, hence betray/tradere - "hand over" aka handing over ONES CHOICE by selecting a CHOSEN ONES suggestion.
This trade is called religion/religio - "to bind anew".
assuming the calendar hasn't been completely messed with
a) To assume (take upon self) and complete (filling together) are being suggested to mess with ones perception.
b) Calendar aka CALL ENDER...a call implies a summoning aka being (life) send forwards (inception towards death). A suggested calendar/calendier/calare - "call out" tempts one out.
C-al-end aka "see all end"...
sorts by 'supernatural' means
a) Super aka uper(over) and upo (under) hidden within the same word aka as above; so below.
b) Sort/ser - "to line up" implies upping (life) within line (inception towards death), which is what nature does aka generating temporary growth within ongoing loss.
Suggested sort/sors - "a share, lot" tempts ones consent to sell self out to another, hence trade/traitor.
What do you make of the square around the circle on the bottom?
Consent to a suggestion makes the magic happen, which is how a chosen one outside of self gets entrance into ones mind/memory. The difference...those consenting are encircled as square, while those suggesting are casting the circle (suggestion) from within the square (perception).
non-natural
Non/nihilo - "nothing" implies ones de-nial of all perceivable, when consenting to suggested nihil-ism. There is no such thing as non-natural...only all nature and each ones free will of choice within to ignore it for each other suggested choices.
Merely a provided suggestion
a) Only nature provides all perceivable through each ones perception...suggestion is being shaped within and in ignorance of nature, hence artifice.
b) Merely/mere - "pure, absolute" implies ALL (whole) before dividing into each ONE (partial)...something one can discern but never perceive, which others exploit by suggesting it.
Consent to a suggestion implies affirmation (want) or denial (not want), hence establishing a conflict of reason (affirm vs denial), while tempting one with nihil-ism to de-nial perceivable for suggested.
Nature forces adaptation, hence each partial within wielding free will of choice aka response-ability...that's what one needs to do, resisting the temptation of want vs not want (imbalance), which grows ones resistance during need (balance).
to get ones consent to a falsehood
Con-sent implies "sending together"...a suggested inversion of whole (perceivable) sending apart (perception). That's the false hood one puts over self when ignoring perceivable for suggested.
Others cannot put that hood over one...only ones FREE will of choice can do that.
the "spell"
Words are shaped by LETTERS...yet only ones consent LETTING others shape letters permits spell-craft. Consenting to a suggestion implies symbol aka syn (together) bole (throwing; casting) which makes/magic oneself the LETTER of any words shaped by others and held within self.
we are converging to a similar idea
Ones consent to suggested pluralism (we) and idealism (idea) tempts one to con-verge (turn together), hence against each other within conflicts of reason, and circular logic within self.
This is a rare viewpoint ...
a) Because similar consent ignores each ones different sight.
b) A point implies "end of sentence"...being implies life sentenced towards point of death.
c) A viewpoint implies focusing ones line (perceivable) of sight (perception) to a suggested point shown.
d) Ones life line (inception towards death) implies perceivable inspiration moving through ones perception, while allowing one to draw from, within and out of all offered. The scribbled suggestions drawn by others tempt one to ignore being the brush/brisk - "quick or rapid in action or motion, swift, lively"
I notice you are very astute in several ways. If I may recommend one thing (I also have a similar issue to you when dealing with the enchanted): try to use as few words as you can to articulate. I mean this as a personal challenge (as I do for myself). It's a more difficult challenge than elaboration, because it requires a person to "cut away" anything extra. It's led me to many word challenges but has helped me awaken to much of the language subversion.
There's only one way (inception towards death) for each one (life) within.
If I may reCOMmend ONE thing
Impossible, since COM (together) contradicts ONE (apart)...
dealing with the enchanted
a) Deal/dæl - "part of a whole, share"...being implies part (ones perception) of a whole (all perceivable), sharing (suggested) implies carrying a burden taken on by consent.
b) Shaping a suggestion tempts those who consent into (en) cantation (chant) aka artificial spells; magical words; uttered formula etc.
try to use as few words as you can to articulate
a) Words imply suggested artifice; sound implies perceivable nature. Sound sets in-stru-ments apart from one another, while words reshape instruments into letters, hence tempting a mind (ment) structured (stru) within (in) sound to LET another shape words.
Nature can't be articulated without the articulation (word) distracting from nature (sound).
b) I can break words apart, but I can't prevent others from holding letters; words and added meaning together. While I struggle to describe the difference between ALL (perceivable) and ONE (perception)...any gentile can be easily tempted by a jew putting it together aka ALONE to hide differences.
c) FEW shape WORDS to tempt many together...are these few words enough to describe the situation?
a) DIFFER (difficult) implies setting apart...more vs less implies coming together.
b) Elaboration implies being within (e) work (labor) of action (ation), hence working outwards (temporary growth), while being inwards (ongoing loss).
to "cut away" anything extra
Extra (all) generates Intra (one) by cutting (life) a way (inception towards death).
It's led me TO... helped me awaken TO
TO aka towards implies towards death for ones life. One needs to resist the wanted temptation of being led towards, which then implies becoming awaken aka rising within.
It's led me to many word challenges but has helped me awaken to much of the language subversion.
SUB (ones consent submitting to the suggested words of another) VERT (ones consent to a suggested word turning into a conflict of reason against others) ION (perceivable sound moving directly through ones perception).
SUB prevents one from awakening (rising up), while VERT turns one from being directed by ION.
depending on the left hand path sect, sometimes you can do stuff inside these circles.
btw, these types of anagrams have certain power according to the practitioners and by that i mean just the mere act of looking at them may influence you spiritually and mentally too
i recommend people to stay away from watching these types of stuff.
yeah if you are looking for the occult. it will find you easily but at a price, sometimes a heavy one
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason 2 points 5 monthsDec 1, 2024 14:37:09 ago (+2/-0)*
b)There are no "middle ages". He-brew His-story to distract jew/you from discerning for self to be the middle of age/aevum/aiw - "vital force, life; eternity"
c) Sorcery implies using source (all perceivable) to distract ingredients (ones perception) with magic (suggested). Ones consent to suggested magic establishes the circle (logic) within self.
d) Nature moves sound, which implies the source for any words shaped within aka spell-craft. A jew suggests gentiles to hold onto names (idolizing brands), which by consent tempts the gentiles to ignore perceivable sound.
For example...suggested "insane person" tempts a consenting gentile to ignore being in sanus (within sound) and therefore per sonos (by sound), instead gentiles reasoning against each other over who is vs who isn't an insane person aka name calling.
e) Everything perceivable changes...a jew utilizes suggestion to tempt consenting gentiles to hold onto fiction (suggestion), while ignoring reality (perception).
That's why a jew can "change" everything...while humbling gentiles by allowing them to have "spare change".
Edit: If there's a square; then there's a cube with a hexagram within...
[ + ] Dingo
[ - ] Dingo [op] 0 points 5 monthsDec 1, 2024 15:43:37 ago (+0/-0)
"Kike" is short for the yiddish word (קײַקל or 'kikel') for circle. Note the similarity to the ancient Greek word for circle, κύκλος (kyklos). It was at the time a symbol of 'alchemy' meaning to "control" or "encircle" and out of town traders would wear the badge.
What do you make of the square around the circle on the bottom? I don't understand the enscriptions myself.
I am referring to what other refer to as ~1000-1700 AD ... assuming the calender hasn't been completely messed with (which seems to be the case).
sorcery: one who sorts by 'supernatural' means.
supernatural: non-natural
Merely a provided suggestion dosed with an affirmation to get ones consent to a falsehood. Once one consents, the "spell" has been cast ... or, in another way, the spell casts when the reciever "believes" what is suggested.
This is very much like the formula "suggestion-affirm-consent" above. Interesting indeed ... it seems we are converging to a similar idea. This is a rare viewpoint ...
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason 2 points 5 monthsDec 3, 2024 15:32:57 ago (+2/-0)
Aka all + chemy/khein/gheu - "to pour", with pour implying "to cause to flow or stream either out of a vessel or into one" aka all motion pouring momentum (inception towards death) into each one matter (life).
The circle (logic/reason) tempts one to ignore the implication (if/then) of all moving through one.
a) Check this out... https://www.etymonline.com/word/town#etymonline_v_15429 aka town/dunon/dheue - "to close; finish; come full circle", hence town/down.
b) Trader/traitor...ones FREE will of choice cannot buy into without selling self out, hence betray/tradere - "hand over" aka handing over ONES CHOICE by selecting a CHOSEN ONES suggestion.
This trade is called religion/religio - "to bind anew".
a) To assume (take upon self) and complete (filling together) are being suggested to mess with ones perception.
b) Calendar aka CALL ENDER...a call implies a summoning aka being (life) send forwards (inception towards death). A suggested calendar/calendier/calare - "call out" tempts one out.
C-al-end aka "see all end"...
a) Super aka uper(over) and upo (under) hidden within the same word aka as above; so below.
b) Sort/ser - "to line up" implies upping (life) within line (inception towards death), which is what nature does aka generating temporary growth within ongoing loss.
Suggested sort/sors - "a share, lot" tempts ones consent to sell self out to another, hence trade/traitor.
Consent to a suggestion makes the magic happen, which is how a chosen one outside of self gets entrance into ones mind/memory. The difference...those consenting are encircled as square, while those suggesting are casting the circle (suggestion) from within the square (perception).
Non/nihilo - "nothing" implies ones de-nial of all perceivable, when consenting to suggested nihil-ism. There is no such thing as non-natural...only all nature and each ones free will of choice within to ignore it for each other suggested choices.
a) Only nature provides all perceivable through each ones perception...suggestion is being shaped within and in ignorance of nature, hence artifice.
b) Merely/mere - "pure, absolute" implies ALL (whole) before dividing into each ONE (partial)...something one can discern but never perceive, which others exploit by suggesting it.
For example: "Row your boat gently down the stream, merrily life is but a dream"... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Row%2C_Row%2C_Row_Your_Boat
Consent to a suggestion implies affirmation (want) or denial (not want), hence establishing a conflict of reason (affirm vs denial), while tempting one with nihil-ism to de-nial perceivable for suggested.
Nature forces adaptation, hence each partial within wielding free will of choice aka response-ability...that's what one needs to do, resisting the temptation of want vs not want (imbalance), which grows ones resistance during need (balance).
Con-sent implies "sending together"...a suggested inversion of whole (perceivable) sending apart (perception). That's the false hood one puts over self when ignoring perceivable for suggested.
Others cannot put that hood over one...only ones FREE will of choice can do that.
Words are shaped by LETTERS...yet only ones consent LETTING others shape letters permits spell-craft. Consenting to a suggestion implies symbol aka syn (together) bole (throwing; casting) which makes/magic oneself the LETTER of any words shaped by others and held within self.
Ones consent to suggested pluralism (we) and idealism (idea) tempts one to con-verge (turn together), hence against each other within conflicts of reason, and circular logic within self.
a) Because similar consent ignores each ones different sight.
b) A point implies "end of sentence"...being implies life sentenced towards point of death.
c) A viewpoint implies focusing ones line (perceivable) of sight (perception) to a suggested point shown.
d) Ones life line (inception towards death) implies perceivable inspiration moving through ones perception, while allowing one to draw from, within and out of all offered. The scribbled suggestions drawn by others tempt one to ignore being the brush/brisk - "quick or rapid in action or motion, swift, lively"
[ + ] Dingo
[ - ] Dingo [op] 0 points 4 monthsDec 6, 2024 11:55:10 ago (+0/-0)*
I just loved this one. Thank you!
I notice you are very astute in several ways. If I may recommend one thing (I also have a similar issue to you when dealing with the enchanted): try to use as few words as you can to articulate. I mean this as a personal challenge (as I do for myself). It's a more difficult challenge than elaboration, because it requires a person to "cut away" anything extra. It's led me to many word challenges but has helped me awaken to much of the language subversion.
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason 0 points 4 monthsDec 7, 2024 15:36:13 ago (+0/-0)*
There's only one way (inception towards death) for each one (life) within.
Impossible, since COM (together) contradicts ONE (apart)...
a) Deal/dæl - "part of a whole, share"...being implies part (ones perception) of a whole (all perceivable), sharing (suggested) implies carrying a burden taken on by consent.
b) Shaping a suggestion tempts those who consent into (en) cantation (chant) aka artificial spells; magical words; uttered formula etc.
a) Words imply suggested artifice; sound implies perceivable nature. Sound sets in-stru-ments apart from one another, while words reshape instruments into letters, hence tempting a mind (ment) structured (stru) within (in) sound to LET another shape words.
Nature can't be articulated without the articulation (word) distracting from nature (sound).
b) I can break words apart, but I can't prevent others from holding letters; words and added meaning together. While I struggle to describe the difference between ALL (perceivable) and ONE (perception)...any gentile can be easily tempted by a jew putting it together aka ALONE to hide differences.
c) FEW shape WORDS to tempt many together...are these few words enough to describe the situation?
https://www.etymonline.com/word/challenge#etymonline_v_8398 Nature doesn't have faults...those within ignoring nature for artificial faults are given the free will of choice to do so.
a) DIFFER (difficult) implies setting apart...more vs less implies coming together.
b) Elaboration implies being within (e) work (labor) of action (ation), hence working outwards (temporary growth), while being inwards (ongoing loss).
Extra (all) generates Intra (one) by cutting (life) a way (inception towards death).
TO aka towards implies towards death for ones life. One needs to resist the wanted temptation of being led towards, which then implies becoming awaken aka rising within.
Sleight of hand: "Cut my life into piece; this is my last resort"... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8gjda5zIx_g
SUB (ones consent submitting to the suggested words of another)
VERT (ones consent to a suggested word turning into a conflict of reason against others)
ION (perceivable sound moving directly through ones perception).
SUB prevents one from awakening (rising up), while VERT turns one from being directed by ION.
[ + ] dosvydanya_freedomz
[ - ] dosvydanya_freedomz 1 point 5 monthsDec 1, 2024 16:20:32 ago (+1/-0)
depending on the left hand path sect, sometimes you can do stuff inside these circles.
btw, these types of anagrams have certain power according to the practitioners and by that i mean just the mere act of looking at them may influence you spiritually and mentally too
i recommend people to stay away from watching these types of stuff.
yeah if you are looking for the occult. it will find you easily but at a price, sometimes a heavy one
[ + ] Dingo
[ - ] Dingo [op] 0 points 5 monthsDec 1, 2024 16:28:05 ago (+0/-0)