Sign into an existing account

Right. Things change. The issue right now isn't a document. It's shared interests. We have a group of people, even people with different political priorities, who have a shared interest. We also have a group of people whose interest is in thwarting the interests of the first group. A political system is always inefficient, but it operates counter to the people's interests when it is usurped by a group who has no existential dependence on that system at all. A document means nothing if we aren't actually bonded by something more abstract and fundamental. Diversity is a nightmare. Putting anyone in leadership (ala the corporate model) whose own ship doesn't sink or swim with that enterprise's success is a recipe for disaster. Mutual stakes. Mutual skin in the game. That's the only balance.

Foundation (inception towards death) generates alternation (life)...anything put into motion needs to adapt, hence alternate. A constitution was written by those already alternating, which is why it will always change.


Abject implies "thrown away; impelled"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/abject hence being (life) impelled (inception towards death) within a moving foundation.

Any petition tempts one to sign a written constitution, while ignoring the moving foundation.

As for nonsense...one cannot sense nothing. I'm all ears about how one could tho...


Which is why an enacting foundation (inception towards death) generates reactions (life) by setting each apart from one another, so that each can alternate "exclusively".


Being implies coming INTO being within foundation. Matter (life) can only sustain shape within momentum (inception towards death) of motion.