Ukrainian troops destroyed an advanced Russian tank with an interesting weapon - Upgoat

-1

Ukrainian troops destroyed an advanced Russian tank with an interesting weapon
submitted by paul_neri to Military 9 monthsJul 11, 2024 05:30:20 ago (+2/-3) (www.msn.com)
https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/other/ukrainian-troops-destroyed-an-advanced-russian-tank-with-an-interesting-weapon/ss-BB1pMJzL?ocid=msedgntp&pc=HCTS&cvid=9d1192f529cd41b5ba7ed5574f337710&ei=9#interstitial=5

11 comments block

sort by: hot new top old low

[ - ] McNasty 1 point 9 monthsJul 11, 2024 08:42:03 ago (+2/-1)

You're just really into fake and gay shit I guess.

[ - ] Not_a_redfugee 1 point 9 monthsJul 11, 2024 08:09:47 ago (+1/-0)

Why do you post these terrible Microsoft ads?

[ - ] NegaroNegaroNeeegaro 1 point 9 monthsJul 11, 2024 06:33:38 ago (+1/-0)

End jew wars

[ - ] FreeinTX 0 points 9 monthsJul 11, 2024 07:16:16 ago (+0/-0)

Are ya winning, yet, son?

[ + ] paul_neri

[ - ] paul_neri [op] -1 points 9 monthsJul 11, 2024 07:40:27 ago (+0/-1)

There'll be no winners. Putin is dragging the world into WW3.

[ + ] FreeinTX

[ - ] FreeinTX 2 points 9 monthsJul 11, 2024 07:43:01 ago (+2/-0)

Putin has established the new Ukrainian border and the people in the Donbass support this. How is Putin dragging us, people who are in countries that are NOT allies of Ukraine, into war?

You seem confused.

[ + ] paul_neri

[ - ] paul_neri [op] -1 points 9 monthsJul 11, 2024 07:50:49 ago (+0/-1)

"When the responses are weighted by the estimated total population on either side of the line of control in the Donbas before the war (1.7 million in the Kyiv-controlled zone and 2.1 million in the separatist republics), more people preferred to remain in Ukraine (42 percent) than be annexed to Russia (31 percent)."

"The United States stands by Ukraine because it is the right thing to do and because America cares when freedom is at risk, the secretary said. "But we also stand by Ukraine because it's crucial to our own security," he said (Secretary of Defense Lloyd J. Austin III)

[ + ] FreeinTX

[ - ] FreeinTX 1 point 9 monthsJul 11, 2024 08:10:31 ago (+1/-0)

When the responses are weighted by the estimated total population

When they manipulated the findings using mafs?

Lol.

Tell me about the Minsk agreement and why Ukraine decided to violate it.

Would the US allow Mexico to host Russian or Chinese military bases? How about Canada?

What about Australia? Would Australia tolerate Chinese military bases in New Zealand? How about Chinese intelligence outfits? Or Chinese bioweapons labs? Would any of that be tolerated off Australia's coast?

And, didn't Zelensky want peace with Russia? Didn't he campaign on peace with Russia? Didn't BoJo interfere with Zelensky's attempt to peacefully resolve this situation months into the incursion? Didn't Putin tell NATO that Russia would not incur if NATO simply agreed to stay out of Ukraine?

[ + ] paul_neri

[ - ] paul_neri [op] 0 points 9 monthsJul 11, 2024 08:21:37 ago (+0/-0)

"Would the US allow Mexico to host Russian or Chinese military bases? How about Canada?"

"There is no evidence of Nato ground forces participating in Ukraine,"BBC

"What about Australia?...How about Chinese intelligence outfits?"

Um... Yes.

The response came as a Daily Mail Australia report claimed on July 3 that China has "handed over $30million to get a special economic zone in the town of Kikori in PNG's Gulf Province off the ground and are desperate to invest more."

"The futuristic $8 billion development project is set to include an airport, naval base and military base carved out of jungle land in Orokolo Bay at - about 250km northwest of the capital Port Moresby," claimed the report.

[ + ] FreeinTX

[ - ] FreeinTX 1 point 9 monthsJul 11, 2024 11:57:45 ago (+1/-0)

"There is no evidence of Nato ground forces participating in Ukraine,"BBC

That's a blatant lie. You know that, right? And why the qualifier "NATO ground forces"? NATO special forces? US/UK/French forces of any kind? LePen acknowledged, herself, that if France allowed Ukraine to use their weapons against Ukraine, the French would be considered "co-belligerents". How is that different than the US or UK doing it? The US weapons being allowed to be used against Russia aren't simply aiming through a reticle and pulling a trigger. The US and UK have acknowledged helping target Russian assets and using US and Euro systems to target and guide these weapons.

The response came as a Daily Mail Australia report claimed on July 3 that China has "handed over $30million to get a special economic zone in the town of Kikori in PNG's Gulf Province off the ground and are desperate to invest more."

You disingenuous fucking nigger. Why didn't you put the link to the story? Is it because you didn't want me to read this part?

The Chinese Embassy in Papua New Guinea(PNG) has strongly refuted media reports claiming China's cooperation with PNG in the Ihu Special Economic Zone is aimed at building a military base, saying the report was "completely baseless and hype with ulterior motives."

Is it because that if it were true, Australia and NATO world be furious over it and would move to put a stop to it? Because Australia would be FUCKING INSANE to allow a belligerent nation to station a military base within easy striking distance of their civilian population.

Sign into an existing account