Cool. Christianity is a religion focused on forgiveness. Paganism actively encourages prostitution and uses it as an element of its religion. So you are kind of in a glass house.
From a logical and argumentative point of view, whataboutism is considered a variant of the tu-quoque pattern (Latin 'you too', term for a counter-accusation), which is a subtype of the ad-hominem argument.
[ - ] x0x7 1 point 9 monthsJul 4, 2024 08:19:39 ago (+1/-0)*
Because he promotes paganism as an alternative. It is not whataboutism when there is context for a larger discussion.
I appreciate you bringing up whataboutism because without that larger context it would be so that is fair to bring up if you don't have that context. But it is also fair for me in response point out that he usually attacks Christianity as an opening gambit for promoting Paganism. It's not non-sequtir. I'm just saying its odd that the a Pagan is attacking a religion on aspects that it isn't very effectively associated with when his own is.
It isn't tu-quoque if my point isn't actually a defense of Christianity but really an effort to show that he is a piece of shit. My arguments perfectly demonstrate that without fallacy.
You are right that someone else having a problem is not a defense of Christianity. But to understand if someone is committing a fallacy you have to look at what their initial claim is and what they are arguing. My argument from the very beginning is that he satisfies at least some heuristic metrics of a jew. I have not committed a single fallacy toward that argument, to my knowledge.
I would suggest, if you want your position to be taken seriously, to address what is written when it is written. The context of a debate is specifically what is written in the debate not what is written elsewhere.
an effort to show that he is a piece of shit
This is definition of strawman fallacy. Address the message not the person who is writing it. This is also a very specific jewish/communist tactic such as calling a person who is making too much sense a nazi to destroy their credibility rather than addressing their message.
My argument from the very beginning is that he satisfies at least some heuristic metrics of a jew.
Again, that's not an argument. It is a strawman fallacy. If you want to have an argument, or better yet a debate, you must address what is written not who is writing it.
When masterfoo, or rob, or whomever does this type of stuff I call them out on it just the same. Even when if we are backing the same or similar position. The people in your camp would be wise to do the same. That is, if they want to sway the opinions of others.
You know why the Jews want you to believe human sacrifice is bad? It's because the Pagans were sacrificing Jews. And it was hilarious! https://files.catbox.moe/afefvf.jpg
are you now going to deny that ritual human sacrifice was not a huge part of pagan worship
Non Sequitur fallacy. Occurs when someone responds to an argument or statement with an unrelated or irrelevant point, often as a way of avoiding addressing the original issue.
Keep believing in your made-up pagan gods to explain their ancient tribal world veiw, buddy.
Those are not my beliefs. You are using false attribution fallacy. Which involves misrepresenting someone else's words by falsely attributing a statement, quote, or idea to them, often with the intention of discrediting their argument.
Is this how American women look like these days? I've never seen a good looking woman on that show and I can't imagine people jerking off to those mongrel thots.
I feel sorry for our grandsons. They'll probably never have the joy of finding an attractive partner.
I went to school with these yellow whores that would do anything to be with White boys, no matter how degrading. Every time someone says aSiäNs are so sMÂrT, I wanna smack them so hard. They aren’t smart, they are just ugly and just study by rote to make it
I don't think porn is good but I have this suspicion that this guy who does this podcast probably has some real problems.
And the truth is if you're religious the number one instruction from God is go forth and multiply.
So desexualizing everything in life and trying to raise the age of consent higher and higher all go against getting out there and fucking and making as many babies as possible which was the number one instruction.
Go forth and multiply.
It'd be one thing if this guy who does this podcast constantly against porn was also spending equal time telling people to go fuck like crazy and have babies but he's not.
So I really wonder if his real obsession here is his own problem with sex.
Now if he was fucking tons of girls and having tons of babies and talking about that on his podcast as much as he is trying to embarrass his girls doing porn then that would be one thing but he's not.
I'm just wondering if he's some incell trying to justify his own fail ability to fuck women
Interesting mix of girls on there. Some are very aware of the female place, while (prime example) others struggle with cognition. In a nearby clip, Andrew electrocutes her.
[ - ] Sector2 1 point 10 monthsJul 3, 2024 23:25:37 ago (+1/-0)
It's a great show if you want to be innoculated against the temptation of that species.
Almost posted the clip the other day of the 18 yo who had had 30 paypigs, 7 of whom had each given her more than $100,000. "One brings the money over and bows to my camera before leaving the money at my door."
Only fans: Total amount paid to creators since inception: $3.2 billion.
Imagine being someone still against a massive cull of the population.
I knew a woman that was doing camshit preOnly Fans and she got a fuckton of money. She got gifts, clothes, all sorts of shit.
It's been a number of years later and she's a fucking mess. She is broke, near homeless, morbidly obese and pathetic.
If she had saved that money she'd be set for life but it came so easily she not only didn't take care of it, she has no value for any money since she's been taught it just appears without any effort. These women ultimately fuck themselves hard.
[ + ] Master_Foo
[ - ] Master_Foo -2 points 10 monthsJul 3, 2024 22:18:31 ago (+1/-3)
[ + ] x0x7
[ - ] x0x7 4 points 10 monthsJul 3, 2024 22:41:45 ago (+4/-0)
[ + ] Master_Foo
[ - ] Master_Foo 0 points 10 monthsJul 3, 2024 22:43:58 ago (+3/-3)
Stupid Christ-Cuck.
[ + ] x0x7
[ - ] x0x7 3 points 10 monthsJul 3, 2024 23:04:24 ago (+3/-0)
What is the pagan view on prostitution? https://www.academia.edu/31859586/Paganism_Playing_the_Prostitute
[ + ] Master_Foo
[ - ] Master_Foo 0 points 10 monthsJul 3, 2024 23:08:01 ago (+2/-2)
John 8:3
[ + ] x0x7
[ - ] x0x7 0 points 9 monthsJul 4, 2024 06:37:57 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Kozel
[ - ] Kozel [op] 0 points 9 monthsJul 4, 2024 06:49:09 ago (+1/-1)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whataboutism
From a logical and argumentative point of view, whataboutism is considered a variant of the tu-quoque pattern (Latin 'you too', term for a counter-accusation), which is a subtype of the ad-hominem argument.
[ + ] x0x7
[ - ] x0x7 1 point 9 monthsJul 4, 2024 08:19:39 ago (+1/-0)*
I appreciate you bringing up whataboutism because without that larger context it would be so that is fair to bring up if you don't have that context. But it is also fair for me in response point out that he usually attacks Christianity as an opening gambit for promoting Paganism. It's not non-sequtir. I'm just saying its odd that the a Pagan is attacking a religion on aspects that it isn't very effectively associated with when his own is.
It isn't tu-quoque if my point isn't actually a defense of Christianity but really an effort to show that he is a piece of shit. My arguments perfectly demonstrate that without fallacy.
You are right that someone else having a problem is not a defense of Christianity. But to understand if someone is committing a fallacy you have to look at what their initial claim is and what they are arguing. My argument from the very beginning is that he satisfies at least some heuristic metrics of a jew. I have not committed a single fallacy toward that argument, to my knowledge.
[ + ] Kozel
[ - ] Kozel [op] 0 points 9 monthsJul 4, 2024 08:39:31 ago (+0/-0)
This is definition of strawman fallacy. Address the message not the person who is writing it. This is also a very specific jewish/communist tactic such as calling a person who is making too much sense a nazi to destroy their credibility rather than addressing their message.
Again, that's not an argument. It is a strawman fallacy. If you want to have an argument, or better yet a debate, you must address what is written not who is writing it.
When masterfoo, or rob, or whomever does this type of stuff I call them out on it just the same. Even when if we are backing the same or similar position. The people in your camp would be wise to do the same. That is, if they want to sway the opinions of others.
[ + ] Master_Foo
[ - ] Master_Foo 0 points 9 monthsJul 4, 2024 08:36:12 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Anus_Expander
[ - ] Anus_Expander 0 points 9 monthsJul 4, 2024 21:48:35 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Kozel
[ - ] Kozel [op] -2 points 10 monthsJul 4, 2024 03:17:33 ago (+1/-3)*
https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/tu-quoquehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tu_quoque
do better, sweaty
[ + ] dass
[ - ] dass 1 point 9 monthsJul 4, 2024 04:44:03 ago (+2/-1)
Keep believing in your made-up pagan gods to explain their ancient tribal world veiw, buddy.
[ + ] Master_Foo
[ - ] Master_Foo -1 points 9 monthsJul 5, 2024 00:17:52 ago (+0/-1)
It's because the Pagans were sacrificing Jews.
And it was hilarious!
https://files.catbox.moe/afefvf.jpg
[ + ] Kozel
[ - ] Kozel [op] -2 points 9 monthsJul 4, 2024 05:35:13 ago (+1/-3)
Non Sequitur fallacy. Occurs when someone responds to an argument or statement with an unrelated or irrelevant point, often as a way of avoiding addressing the original issue.
Those are not my beliefs. You are using false attribution fallacy. Which involves misrepresenting someone else's words by falsely attributing a statement, quote, or idea to them, often with the intention of discrediting their argument.
Get a brain, you fucking moron.
[ + ] dass
[ - ] dass 0 points 9 monthsJul 4, 2024 15:55:15 ago (+0/-0)
Lmao.
[ + ] Kozel
[ - ] Kozel [op] -1 points 9 monthsJul 4, 2024 15:59:41 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] dass
[ - ] dass 0 points 9 monthsJul 4, 2024 16:10:10 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] TheNoticing
[ - ] TheNoticing 0 points 9 monthsJul 4, 2024 08:42:03 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Kozel
[ - ] Kozel [op] 0 points 9 monthsJul 4, 2024 08:43:40 ago (+0/-0)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tu_quoque
being familiar with what fallacies are should be a requirement of being an adult
[ + ] dass
[ - ] dass 2 points 10 monthsJul 3, 2024 23:19:52 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] Kozel
[ - ] Kozel [op] -3 points 10 monthsJul 4, 2024 03:17:59 ago (+0/-3)*
https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/tu-quoquehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tu_quoque
do better, sweaty
edit: lol this little faggot downvoted me and then replied to another comment with two fallacies. 🤣🤣🤣🤣👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻
[ + ] x0x7
[ - ] x0x7 0 points 9 monthsJul 4, 2024 06:39:23 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Kozel
[ - ] Kozel [op] 0 points 9 monthsJul 4, 2024 06:44:18 ago (+0/-0)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tu_quoque
or just use a search engine
[ + ] boekanier
[ - ] boekanier 0 points 10 monthsJul 4, 2024 01:26:11 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Rowdybme
[ - ] Rowdybme 0 points 10 monthsJul 4, 2024 03:13:47 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] NoRefunds
[ - ] NoRefunds 0 points 9 monthsJul 4, 2024 11:48:12 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] CoronaHoax
[ - ] CoronaHoax 0 points 9 monthsJul 5, 2024 00:01:22 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] fritz_maurentod
[ - ] fritz_maurentod 1 point 10 monthsJul 4, 2024 03:18:30 ago (+1/-0)
I feel sorry for our grandsons. They'll probably never have the joy of finding an attractive partner.
[ + ] CoronaHoax
[ - ] CoronaHoax 0 points 9 monthsJul 5, 2024 00:03:14 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Ragnar
[ - ] Ragnar 2 points 10 monthsJul 4, 2024 00:16:11 ago (+2/-0)
Every time someone says aSiäNs are so sMÂrT, I wanna smack them so hard. They aren’t smart, they are just ugly and just study by rote to make it
[ + ] Crackinjokes
[ - ] Crackinjokes 2 points 10 monthsJul 4, 2024 04:22:09 ago (+2/-0)
And the truth is if you're religious the number one instruction from God is go forth and multiply.
So desexualizing everything in life and trying to raise the age of consent higher and higher all go against getting out there and fucking and making as many babies as possible which was the number one instruction.
Go forth and multiply.
It'd be one thing if this guy who does this podcast constantly against porn was also spending equal time telling people to go fuck like crazy and have babies but he's not.
So I really wonder if his real obsession here is his own problem with sex.
Now if he was fucking tons of girls and having tons of babies and talking about that on his podcast as much as he is trying to embarrass his girls doing porn then that would be one thing but he's not.
I'm just wondering if he's some incell trying to justify his own fail ability to fuck women
[ + ] Kozel
[ - ] Kozel [op] 0 points 9 monthsJul 4, 2024 05:13:57 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] Sector2
[ - ] Sector2 4 points 10 monthsJul 3, 2024 23:11:21 ago (+4/-0)
[ + ] Rob3122
[ - ] Rob3122 5 points 10 monthsJul 3, 2024 23:08:51 ago (+5/-0)
[ + ] Sector2
[ - ] Sector2 1 point 10 monthsJul 3, 2024 23:25:37 ago (+1/-0)
Almost posted the clip the other day of the 18 yo who had had 30 paypigs, 7 of whom had each given her more than $100,000. "One brings the money over and bows to my camera before leaving the money at my door."
Only fans: Total amount paid to creators since inception: $3.2 billion.
Imagine being someone still against a massive cull of the population.
[ + ] NuckFiggers
[ - ] NuckFiggers 3 points 10 monthsJul 3, 2024 23:34:43 ago (+3/-0)
It's been a number of years later and she's a fucking mess. She is broke, near homeless, morbidly obese and pathetic.
If she had saved that money she'd be set for life but it came so easily she not only didn't take care of it, she has no value for any money since she's been taught it just appears without any effort. These women ultimately fuck themselves hard.
[ + ] Sector2
[ - ] Sector2 0 points 10 monthsJul 3, 2024 23:55:54 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Ragnar
[ - ] Ragnar 1 point 10 monthsJul 4, 2024 00:16:56 ago (+1/-0)