Logic'd - Upgoat - "where a goat can be a goat"

Logic'd
submitted by Kozel to femcels 10 monthsJul 3, 2024 21:41:30 ago (+25/-2) (files.catbox.moe)
https://files.catbox.moe/f6dmzn.mp4

[ - ] Rob3122 5 points 10 monthsJul 3, 2024 23:08:51 ago (+5/-0)

This show is just free promotion for all of those whores.

[ - ] Sector2 1 point 10 monthsJul 3, 2024 23:25:37 ago (+1/-0)

It's a great show if you want to be innoculated against the temptation of that species.

Almost posted the clip the other day of the 18 yo who had had 30 paypigs, 7 of whom had each given her more than $100,000. "One brings the money over and bows to my camera before leaving the money at my door."

Only fans: Total amount paid to creators since inception: $3.2 billion.

Imagine being someone still against a massive cull of the population.

[ + ] NuckFiggers

[ - ] NuckFiggers 3 points 10 monthsJul 3, 2024 23:34:43 ago (+3/-0)

I knew a woman that was doing camshit preOnly Fans and she got a fuckton of money. She got gifts, clothes, all sorts of shit.

It's been a number of years later and she's a fucking mess. She is broke, near homeless, morbidly obese and pathetic.

If she had saved that money she'd be set for life but it came so easily she not only didn't take care of it, she has no value for any money since she's been taught it just appears without any effort. These women ultimately fuck themselves hard.

[ + ] Sector2

[ - ] Sector2 0 points 10 monthsJul 3, 2024 23:55:54 ago (+0/-0)

There are a number of ways to expose the reality of modern jewish society. Raking in absurd amounts of money is an effective one.

[ + ] Ragnar

[ - ] Ragnar 1 point 10 monthsJul 4, 2024 00:16:56 ago (+1/-0)

Correct. I have never watched it and refuse to ever do so

[ - ] Sector2 4 points 10 monthsJul 3, 2024 23:11:21 ago (+4/-0)

Interesting mix of girls on there. Some are very aware of the female place, while (prime example) others struggle with cognition. In a nearby clip, Andrew electrocutes her.

[ - ] Crackinjokes 2 points 10 monthsJul 4, 2024 04:22:09 ago (+2/-0)

I don't think porn is good but I have this suspicion that this guy who does this podcast probably has some real problems.

And the truth is if you're religious the number one instruction from God is go forth and multiply.

So desexualizing everything in life and trying to raise the age of consent higher and higher all go against getting out there and fucking and making as many babies as possible which was the number one instruction.

Go forth and multiply.

It'd be one thing if this guy who does this podcast constantly against porn was also spending equal time telling people to go fuck like crazy and have babies but he's not.

So I really wonder if his real obsession here is his own problem with sex.

Now if he was fucking tons of girls and having tons of babies and talking about that on his podcast as much as he is trying to embarrass his girls doing porn then that would be one thing but he's not.

I'm just wondering if he's some incell trying to justify his own fail ability to fuck women

[ + ] Kozel

[ - ] Kozel [op] 0 points 9 monthsJul 4, 2024 05:13:57 ago (+1/-1)

nobody is an incel, pussy is $50 on the corner

[ - ] Ragnar 2 points 10 monthsJul 4, 2024 00:16:11 ago (+2/-0)

I went to school with these yellow whores that would do anything to be with White boys, no matter how degrading.
Every time someone says aSiäNs are so sMÂrT, I wanna smack them so hard. They aren’t smart, they are just ugly and just study by rote to make it

[ - ] fritz_maurentod 1 point 10 monthsJul 4, 2024 03:18:30 ago (+1/-0)

Is this how American women look like these days? I've never seen a good looking woman on that show and I can't imagine people jerking off to those mongrel thots.

I feel sorry for our grandsons. They'll probably never have the joy of finding an attractive partner.

[ + ] CoronaHoax

[ - ] CoronaHoax 0 points 9 monthsJul 5, 2024 00:03:14 ago (+0/-0)

Erm American women are doing good overall at being more attractive than 10 or 20 years ago.

[ - ] CoronaHoax 0 points 9 monthsJul 5, 2024 00:01:22 ago (+0/-0)

God should consider showing himself because satan sure is

[ - ] NoRefunds 0 points 9 monthsJul 4, 2024 11:48:12 ago (+1/-1)

Some women are only good as holes, just like some men are only good for digging ditches.

[ - ] Rowdybme 0 points 10 monthsJul 4, 2024 03:13:47 ago (+0/-0)

How are we somehow making Asians stupid too. BTW what's her name. Asking for a friend

[ - ] boekanier 0 points 10 monthsJul 4, 2024 01:26:11 ago (+0/-0)

I thought (it's being said) asians were smarter than whites...

[ - ] Master_Foo -2 points 10 monthsJul 3, 2024 22:18:31 ago (+1/-3)

It's a consistant heuristic.

[ + ] x0x7

[ - ] x0x7 4 points 10 monthsJul 3, 2024 22:41:45 ago (+4/-0)

Heuristics tell us you are a jew.

[ + ] Master_Foo

[ - ] Master_Foo 0 points 10 monthsJul 3, 2024 22:43:58 ago (+3/-3)

Imagine having a God that accepts whores.
Stupid Christ-Cuck.

[ + ] x0x7

[ - ] x0x7 3 points 10 monthsJul 3, 2024 23:04:24 ago (+3/-0)

You know that very jewish thing where you project the things that make you distinct onto others to make them look bad. That is a jewish heuristic.

What is the pagan view on prostitution? https://www.academia.edu/31859586/Paganism_Playing_the_Prostitute

[ + ] Master_Foo

[ - ] Master_Foo 0 points 10 monthsJul 3, 2024 23:08:01 ago (+2/-2)

Luke 7:36
John 8:3

[ + ] x0x7

[ - ] x0x7 0 points 9 monthsJul 4, 2024 06:37:57 ago (+0/-0)

Cool. Christianity is a religion focused on forgiveness. Paganism actively encourages prostitution and uses it as an element of its religion. So you are kind of in a glass house.

[ + ] Kozel

[ - ] Kozel [op] 0 points 9 monthsJul 4, 2024 06:49:09 ago (+1/-1)

Why are you bringing up paganism? What does it have to do with what Master_Foo said about Christianity?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whataboutism

From a logical and argumentative point of view, whataboutism is considered a variant of the tu-quoque pattern (Latin 'you too', term for a counter-accusation), which is a subtype of the ad-hominem argument.

[ + ] x0x7

[ - ] x0x7 1 point 9 monthsJul 4, 2024 08:19:39 ago (+1/-0)*

Because he promotes paganism as an alternative. It is not whataboutism when there is context for a larger discussion.

I appreciate you bringing up whataboutism because without that larger context it would be so that is fair to bring up if you don't have that context. But it is also fair for me in response point out that he usually attacks Christianity as an opening gambit for promoting Paganism. It's not non-sequtir. I'm just saying its odd that the a Pagan is attacking a religion on aspects that it isn't very effectively associated with when his own is.

It isn't tu-quoque if my point isn't actually a defense of Christianity but really an effort to show that he is a piece of shit. My arguments perfectly demonstrate that without fallacy.

You are right that someone else having a problem is not a defense of Christianity. But to understand if someone is committing a fallacy you have to look at what their initial claim is and what they are arguing. My argument from the very beginning is that he satisfies at least some heuristic metrics of a jew. I have not committed a single fallacy toward that argument, to my knowledge.

[ + ] Kozel

[ - ] Kozel [op] 0 points 9 monthsJul 4, 2024 08:39:31 ago (+0/-0)

I would suggest, if you want your position to be taken seriously, to address what is written when it is written. The context of a debate is specifically what is written in the debate not what is written elsewhere.

an effort to show that he is a piece of shit

This is definition of strawman fallacy. Address the message not the person who is writing it. This is also a very specific jewish/communist tactic such as calling a person who is making too much sense a nazi to destroy their credibility rather than addressing their message.

My argument from the very beginning is that he satisfies at least some heuristic metrics of a jew.

Again, that's not an argument. It is a strawman fallacy. If you want to have an argument, or better yet a debate, you must address what is written not who is writing it.

When masterfoo, or rob, or whomever does this type of stuff I call them out on it just the same. Even when if we are backing the same or similar position. The people in your camp would be wise to do the same. That is, if they want to sway the opinions of others.

[ + ] Master_Foo

[ - ] Master_Foo 0 points 9 monthsJul 4, 2024 08:36:12 ago (+0/-0)

A glass house is better than a whore house.

[ + ] Anus_Expander

[ - ] Anus_Expander 0 points 9 monthsJul 4, 2024 21:48:35 ago (+0/-0)

Now, imagine a world with glass whorehouses..

[ + ] Kozel

[ - ] Kozel [op] -2 points 10 monthsJul 4, 2024 03:17:33 ago (+1/-3)*

[ + ] dass

[ - ] dass 1 point 10 monthsJul 4, 2024 04:44:03 ago (+2/-1)

LOl, say wut, are you now going to deny that ritual human sacrifice was not a huge part of pagan worship ?.

Keep believing in your made-up pagan gods to explain their ancient tribal world veiw, buddy.

[ + ] Master_Foo

[ - ] Master_Foo -1 points 9 monthsJul 5, 2024 00:17:52 ago (+0/-1)

You know why the Jews want you to believe human sacrifice is bad?
It's because the Pagans were sacrificing Jews.
And it was hilarious!
https://files.catbox.moe/afefvf.jpg

[ + ] Kozel

[ - ] Kozel [op] -2 points 9 monthsJul 4, 2024 05:35:13 ago (+1/-3)

are you now going to deny that ritual human sacrifice was not a huge part of pagan worship

Non Sequitur fallacy. Occurs when someone responds to an argument or statement with an unrelated or irrelevant point, often as a way of avoiding addressing the original issue.

Keep believing in your made-up pagan gods to explain their ancient tribal world veiw, buddy.

Those are not my beliefs. You are using false attribution fallacy. Which involves misrepresenting someone else's words by falsely attributing a statement, quote, or idea to them, often with the intention of discrediting their argument.

Get a brain, you fucking moron.

[ + ] dass

[ - ] dass 0 points 9 monthsJul 4, 2024 15:55:15 ago (+0/-0)

Lol wut??/
Lmao.

[ + ] Kozel

[ - ] Kozel [op] -1 points 9 monthsJul 4, 2024 15:59:41 ago (+0/-1)

shut up retard

[ + ] dass

[ - ] dass 0 points 9 monthsJul 4, 2024 16:10:10 ago (+0/-0)

Hurr durr Ad-hominin - looks like you've lost.

Continue thread

[ + ] TheNoticing

[ - ] TheNoticing 0 points 9 monthsJul 4, 2024 08:42:03 ago (+0/-0)

"something went wrong" when clicking on the link.

[ + ] Kozel

[ - ] Kozel [op] 0 points 9 monthsJul 4, 2024 08:43:40 ago (+0/-0)

the website is down, just look up tu_quoque

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tu_quoque

being familiar with what fallacies are should be a requirement of being an adult

[ + ] dass

[ - ] dass 2 points 10 monthsJul 3, 2024 23:19:52 ago (+2/-0)

Meh, imagine sacrificing members of your very own tribe to pagan gods so you'll have better weather and crops.

[ + ] Kozel

[ - ] Kozel [op] -3 points 10 monthsJul 4, 2024 03:17:59 ago (+0/-3)*

I've yet to see a christcuck not turn to fallacies in his debates. Your position has no standing if you use fallacies to make your non-points.

~~https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/tu-quoque~~

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tu_quoque

do better, sweaty

edit: lol this little faggot downvoted me and then replied to another comment with two fallacies. 🤣🤣🤣🤣👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻

[ + ] x0x7

[ - ] x0x7 0 points 9 monthsJul 4, 2024 06:39:23 ago (+0/-0)

That link doesn't work.

[ + ] Kozel

[ - ] Kozel [op] 0 points 9 monthsJul 4, 2024 06:44:18 ago (+0/-0)

It did when I posted it, site is probably undergoing maintenance. Try this:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tu_quoque

or just use a search engine

Sign into an existing account

Logic'd submitted by Kozel to femcels 10 monthsJul 3, 2024 21:41:30 ago (+25/-2) (files.catbox.moe)https://files.catbox.moe/f6dmzn.mp4 Your browser does not support the video tag.

Logic'd
submitted by Kozel to femcels 10 monthsJul 3, 2024 21:41:30 ago (+25/-2) (files.catbox.moe)
https://files.catbox.moe/f6dmzn.mp4