×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
10
23 comments block


[ - ] PeckerwoodPerry 4 points 11 monthsMay 27, 2024 12:28:19 ago (+4/-0)

Again I bring this up because it seems relevant. Well Of Souls theory. Only a certain amount of souls, and not everyone gets one. So basically, people with no inner dialogue are just soulless automatons.

[ - ] Razzoriel 0 points 11 monthsMay 27, 2024 19:57:45 ago (+0/-0)

Absolutely everyone gets a soul. Not everyone gets to be in touch with it.

[ - ] deleted 0 points 11 monthsMay 27, 2024 22:03:10 ago (+0/-0)

deleted

[ - ] Razzoriel 0 points 11 monthsMay 28, 2024 13:52:20 ago (+0/-0)

Souls have a flame which Jesus Christ ignites. This flame can either become embers, or smothered to become nearly dimmed out, but never fully put out. It is up to us to maintain it alive so that it immolates us to action.

[ - ] Spaceman84 -4 points 11 monthsMay 27, 2024 13:11:49 ago (+0/-4)

This nigger spams boomer Facebook memes. Absolutely soulless. Now he's posting tiktoks.

[ - ] ImplicationOverReason -4 points 11 monthsMay 27, 2024 13:16:11 ago (+0/-4)

Only a certain amount of souls

As in SOUL/SOLE - "one and only"?

not everyone gets one

So not every ONE gets ONE of "ONE and only"?

soulless

What's less than sole (one and only)?

[ - ] RMGoetbbels 3 points 11 monthsMay 27, 2024 11:43:14 ago (+3/-0)

I wish my voices would shut the fuck up for awhile. Yes I KNOW. Jews should be gassed, niggers need to be strung up and commies can fly if they exit the helicopter door! I know already.

[ - ] con77 [op] 4 points 11 monthsMay 27, 2024 11:48:59 ago (+5/-1)

I do lay in bed at night and think too much

[ - ] fritz_maurentod 1 point 11 monthsMay 27, 2024 12:50:11 ago (+1/-0)*

Your average women who's obnoxiously talking shit all the time doesn't need an inner dialogue...

[ - ] NoSalvation 1 point 11 monthsMay 27, 2024 18:55:10 ago (+1/-0)

they are not human in a sense

[ - ] PotatoWhisperer2 1 point 11 monthsMay 27, 2024 19:42:04 ago (+1/-0)

When people were discovering the whole NPC phenomenon I noticed that those with no inner dialog very nearly matched with the % of non-Whites in the country.

[ - ] Spaceman84 0 points 11 monthsMay 27, 2024 13:10:25 ago (+0/-0)

You watch and idenfity with dumbass tiktok videos reposted to youtube. I don't believe you can visualize and manipulate an apple in three dimensions.

[ - ] ImplicationOverReason -2 points 11 monthsMay 27, 2024 13:23:27 ago (+0/-2)

I don't believe you can visualize and manipulate an apple in three dimensions.

The DI in di-mension implies division/divis/duo/two...how does one divide three into two? Make believe aka pretension/imagination!

I don't believe

Can one perceive "don't/doing nothing" or was it suggested by another as nihil-ism (Latin nihilo; nothing) and one consented by de-nial of perceivable?

What if few tempt many to believe in nothing? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQnaRtNMGMI&themeRefresh=1

[ - ] Spaceman84 0 points 11 monthsMay 27, 2024 13:41:19 ago (+0/-0)

Fuck off bot

[ - ] ImplicationOverReason -2 points 11 monthsMay 27, 2024 11:43:09 ago (+2/-4)

a) What language is ones dialogue?

b) Imagination (Latin imago) - "copy"...what does ones imagination copy?

c) What if few tempt many to mimic (suggested word) origin (perceivable sound)?

d) "We'll begin with a spin; traveling in the world of my creation; What we'll see will defy explanation"

~Willy Wonka - 'Pure Imagination'

[ - ] yesiknow 2 points 11 monthsMay 27, 2024 13:51:56 ago (+2/-0)

Latin is spoken every day in 46 languages. Not recognizing the Latin because the jew foundations had Latin taken out of universal schooling is why people respond to words in Pavlovian fashion.

At risk and underprivilged means whatever the receiver wants it to. Enclose it in other words specifically chosen and the speaker or writer leads them to an implication of their choice.

When Freud's nephew Edward Bernays codified advertising non profit nd political manipulation he had all the research Freud collected from smarter people, including Ivan Pavlov's work and Pierre Janet's work on hypnosis.

Nobody knows why some people are suggestible with hypnosis and others are not, so hypnosist y stupid things that suggest flattery, like the suggestible are "sensitive".

"Prohibition doesn't work, they're self medicating a mental illness. it's a victimless crime, it's the oldest profession, nurture over nature, diversity is our strength" .... Those things are false or irrelevent. They're hypnosis

[ - ] deleted 0 points 11 monthsMay 27, 2024 12:04:25 ago (+0/-0)

deleted

[ - ] PeckerwoodPerry 1 point 11 monthsMay 27, 2024 12:25:36 ago (+1/-0)

Autistic and nonsensical

[ - ] ImplicationOverReason 0 points 11 monthsMay 27, 2024 13:09:29 ago (+2/-2)

a) How could one sense nothing (non)?

b) Aut-ist implies ones consent to suggested aut-ism, hence ones submission to another, while ignoring perceivable AUTARKY aka ones self sufficiency.

c) Here's Sigismund Schlomo Freud (alleged father of psychoanalysis) and Eugene Bleuler (allegedly coined autism + schizophrenia) conspiring with each other to "conquer psychiatry" (Psychatrie erobern)... https://img.gvid.tv/i/3gc1x1nk.jpg

Using "autistic" to psychoanalyze another implies divide and conquer in effect.

[ - ] deleted 0 points 11 monthsMay 27, 2024 19:02:19 ago (+0/-0)

deleted

[ - ] Spaceman84 -1 points 11 monthsMay 27, 2024 13:42:37 ago (+0/-1)

Bot. He can't type this garbage that fast.

[ - ] Spaceman84 1 point 11 monthsMay 27, 2024 13:41:55 ago (+1/-0)

It's a bot.

[ - ] ImplicationOverReason -1 points 11 monthsMay 27, 2024 13:01:37 ago (+1/-2)

a) AUTO (inception towards death) generates MATTER (life)...an autonomous (self-governing) system.

b) WONDER; noun - "astonishment" + ASTONISH; verb - "to stun; strike senseless; daze, deafen"...that's what few tempt many to choose willingly for themselves aka stunning their minds/memories.

c) The more I describe reality; the more fictitious I look to those ignoring reality. Why? Because what I describe (perceivable inspiration) contradicts what others are holding onto (suggested information) and so instead of letting go; they hold onto it harder, while blaming me for wanting to take it from them...hence behaving like a goyim/golem/gollum.

tl; dr: AI can't do what I'm doing...adapting to perceivable inspiration...but it can tempt others with suggested information to seek verification from each other.