Sign into an existing account

Civilizing implies a permanent change. Any of these places returned to natives, or any non white, is plunged back into the stone age. Examples include Haiti, Zimbobwe, South Africa (to a lesser extent because whites still live there), every Indian reservation.

What the left will argue is that even though the country when run by whites was better in every metric the benefits all went to the white people while the natives were abused and worked to death. This is, of course, a spurious claim based on some examples of abuse by international corporations (nearly all owned by jews). While it is true that working conditions, all around the world for everyone including whites, were much worse a century ago no one ever considers the alternative.

First one needs to realize that cherry picking the most abusive practices is not a valid representation of the whole. Secondly, the alternative to even abusive practices is not paradise but desperate abject poverty and the violence and starvation that brings.

One does not need to imagine what that means, and in fact anyone stupid enough to be a liberal will imagine a retarded scenario that compliments their retarded view of the world anyway, but instead one should compare the living standards of working class blacks before and after the fall of white control. The only contemporary example being South Africa, and to a lesser extent Zimbabwe. Both show that even for the most "abused" and "subjugated" blacks their standard of living has fallen.

They were dreamers. Immigration is good and anyone taking the indians side is a fucking racist nazi. RRRRrrrrreeeeeeeeeee

It’s not our job to civilize savages…
Look at them to this day, they’re largely not civilized people even though they live in what we Whites call a civilized society.
The truth is, our ancestors fought for some of this territory and won fair and square, not to mention huge swaths of the land was acquired through legitimate deals with tribal leaders who didn’t fully understand the ramifications of what owning property meant to the White man. We sold them a few pelts, blankets and muskets to purchase the land, and they thought we were dumb to just give them stuff for something they thought nobody could own. The Indians were too dumb to understand these deals meant we’d be creating permanent settlements in that territory, it didn’t even dawn on them there was a problem selling the land until the herd of buffalo they followed everywhere came back to the territory they sold us, then they finally saw structures and communities being built on property they still thought they had access to…nope, ours now, unless you can take it back from us by force.

I don’t feel bad about it, they did try to take the land back and found out what Whitey is best at, organized warfare. We could’ve wiped them out completely and didn’t. We allowed these injuns an opportunity to benefit from our creation, to become a more advanced people than their ancestors were. The strong survive, its natures will, and God dictates nature….who are we to argue with God? There’s room for guilt here.

Water is wet, dude. Europeans should have just left them to their cannibalistic nature.

Blacks will always think Whites are holding them back no matter how good Whites are to them. That alone makes multiracialism a disaster.

They still aren't civilized. They are still savages. Don't even simp for them by implying they moved on.

Imagine thinking savagery and civility are points on a scale.

no sweat! they're on their own now. good luck to them.

Our ancestors were pussies. Face it. I mean look at them from 1600 on, they dress like dandies. The only brave ones were lower class people forced to serve in the army. They had an opportunity unparalleled in history, to rule over and take new lands barely challenged, and instead of forcing the already mostly enslaved natives to work for them instead of the chief and then killing them off and gaining a whole new land to thrive on, they forced the natives to end slavery in exchange for 'trade' aka free gibs in exchange for resources the natives had no use for, HOPING FOR THEIR BETTERMENT INSTEAD OF OUR OWN.

deleted

If it were me doing the ‘conolizing’, there would only be stuffed prairie niggers on display for my white brethren to ridicule

The only good skin is from Northern Europe…, and some Portuguese and Italian olive tinged too….

Everyone else is just a diverse tone of lampshade fodder

Now, if you will excuse me, i will politely click the heels of my boots together twice (click click) and raise my right arm to the sky then pound it to my chest, once. Sieg hiel niggerfaggots

Jews who were pulling the political strings in Spain, Holland, Portugal, Germany, France, and England then as now financed the period of colonial expansion. Then engineered nationalist movements that went on to establish "new countries" not limited to Australia and the USA, which had the effect of washing the hands of the invaders .. a la Captain Cook, who planted a Union Jack into the ground on an island in Torres Strait then declared the entire region a British possession. Link.

1839 - The Jew run British Government Annexes New Zealand.