White skulls have been discovered in the pacific northwest and southwest that pre date indians. They stop any one from studying them saying they are in sacred burial sites.
At the request of both the Seminole and Miccosukee tribes, no images or video of human remains are displayed publicly. Also, no DNA testing has been performed to determine how the current Native Americans may be related to the prehistoric inhabitants.”
You're welcome. They've found several white skulls other than Kennewick man (who was WHITE so fuck you FBI unpaid intern kike). They found skulls belonging to white people in New Mexico and Arizona but of course the local chugs dispute it and ZOG says it's not. On a side note, ZOG also hides giants, even though chug stories talk about wars being fought against them and entire tribes joining up to kill them.
On a side note, ZOG also hides giants, even though chug stories talk about wars being fought against them and entire tribes joining up to kill them.
Facts. Back in the early 1900s (or somewhere around then iirc) near Lovelock, Nevada a couple guys found several full skeletons along with a number of artifacts in Lovelock Cave while harvesting guano. I think there were three of them and their hair was red. The indians maintain that they were red haired and had pale skin while muh sCiEnCtiSts tend to think it was turned red on account of the guano. The skeletons were taken away and one was sent to Stanford University and the rest to the Smithsonian; never to be seen again like so many other things. I don't remember the exact details but I'm fairly sure this is correct. It was a topic that interested me and one I investigated back when I lived in the area.
There is one skull that resides in a museum in Winnemucca but it has not been on display for a decade or more. I asked about it when I went to the museum there and the lady got nervous and told me they did have a skull but it was not for public display and refused to let me see it. I expect it's because they didn't want the local tribe to claim it and take it away even though the tribes own history tells of their conflicts with these giants. There were several artifacts from these people that were on display. A few duck decoys that were woven out of cattails which were really neat and then some baskets and assorted other things.
According to the indian's oral history this race of red-haired giants lived in the area around what is now known as the Lahontan Sink. The indians were afraid of them as they would snatch up women or children and carry them off to eat. The indians had a couple different names for these giants: Si-Te-Cah and the reed people or people of the reeds...my memory is somewhat vague on the details as it has been quite some time since I was in the area or thought about it. Anyway, these giants numbers were dwindling for whatever reason and the local tribes chased and cornered some of them in the cave. Then they heaped a bunch of brush and wood in front of the cave and set it on fire. Some of the giants tried to escape the cave through the flames and the indians stuck them with arrows and presumably the three in the cave died of asphyxiation.
You can still go into the cave, or you could the last time I was in the area, but there really isn't much to see there other than a plaque out front describing the events.
There is a sadly neglected book few people seem to know about that documents discoveries of giant artifacts in America. "The Ancient Giants Who Ruled America: The Missing Skeletons and the Great Smithsonian Cover-Up by Richard J. Dewhurst.
The great lack of artifacts discovered in the 18th and 19th centuries is due to the Smithsonian Institute pushing the isolationist theory of how North America was populated with the Beringia theory. This is obviously wrong. It's clear that the alternative, diffusionism, the theory that the continent was populated by people from many different areas at many different times, is correct.
As people began to find artifacts, particularly from burial mounds, they sent them to the Smithsonian, who kept them in a warehouse and eventually put them into a barge and dumped them at sea.
Epigrapher Barry Fell documents his discoveries and finding by interpreting ancient Ogam and Phoenician inscriptions and coins found around the country. A cache of Roman coins began washing ashore in New England last century. Coins in Phoenician script have been found in the area of the largest ancient copper mines in the world in Michigan.
The evidence ancient migration to North America is overwhelming.
Erik discovered Greenland and was a Pagan. Olaf Trygvason became king during their lives and began torturing and killing those who refused to convert to jew worship. Couldn't let whites who didn't worship jews flee to a new land to build up their strength without jews around to feed on them. So Lief "converted" under threat of torture and death, and fled to the new world - likely for religious freedom, as so many after him would.
[ - ] McNasty 1 point 1 monthMar 30, 2024 18:29:56 ago (+1/-0)
Because there is one conspiracy. It's about the shape of the world, how it works and what it means, and who occupied this world and how they lived before our version of history was forcefed to us.
[ - ] Razzoriel 1 point 1 monthMar 30, 2024 15:46:04 ago (+1/-0)
Because he made no real advancements there.
Its a two-way street. He did "discover" the land, but he did not effectively made use of his time there nor managed to fully utilize the land for the good of his people.
Actually one of the first things Columbus (2nd voyage I think) was to help out one crew of chugs kill off the Carib (which means cannibal so yeah, the Caribbean was named after the tribe of cannibals) chugs that were ENSLAVING and EATING other tribes. It was a "help us get rid of these fuckers and we'll help out whatever King you serve). Same thing happened with the Aztecs. Cortes had ~450 soldiers but 20,000 chugs that were tired of the Aztecs and their bullshit.
This is your typical dodgy junk. There is no proof Columbus was Jewish. There's been speculation he's been everything from a Sardinian nobleman to a Swede - indicating the desire of people to claim him.
'Jews are liars unless they become authorities on historically contentious matters Jew haters like me agree with'.
Again, there is no proof Columbus was a Jew. Most scholars think he was Genoese, as advertised.
He might have been Jewish though. He might have been a Polack. Heck if I know. Some think he was Norwegian or Portuguese. What I do know is there is no proof he was Jewish.
[ + ] gardella
[ - ] gardella 15 points 1 monthMar 30, 2024 15:51:34 ago (+15/-0)
[ + ] DeusExMachina
[ - ] DeusExMachina 4 points 1 monthMar 30, 2024 21:38:16 ago (+4/-0)
[ + ] Belfuro
[ - ] Belfuro 7 points 1 monthMar 30, 2024 15:29:18 ago (+7/-0)
Were found in na, they just buried it.
They have a narrative and it's religious in nature.
And its not just human history that is falsified. So is physics and Cosmology and anthropology
[ + ] Nosferatjew
[ - ] Nosferatjew 6 points 1 monthMar 30, 2024 15:33:59 ago (+6/-0)
[ + ] Zyklonbeekeeper
[ - ] Zyklonbeekeeper 3 points 1 monthMar 30, 2024 14:10:28 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] RobertJHarsh
[ - ] RobertJHarsh 2 points 1 monthMar 30, 2024 21:32:39 ago (+2/-0)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dnFUGnjgwHc&list=PL84200DAB0C4521BB
[ + ] KosherHiveKicker
[ - ] KosherHiveKicker [op] 0 points 1 monthMar 30, 2024 21:43:45 ago (+0/-0)*
The glacial landbridge from Europe theory was always considered "fringe" for sometime.
[ + ] RobertJHarsh
[ - ] RobertJHarsh 2 points 1 monthMar 30, 2024 21:53:42 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] DeusExMachina
[ - ] DeusExMachina 1 point 1 monthMar 30, 2024 22:33:31 ago (+1/-0)*
Facts. Back in the early 1900s (or somewhere around then iirc) near Lovelock, Nevada a couple guys found several full skeletons along with a number of artifacts in Lovelock Cave while harvesting guano. I think there were three of them and their hair was red. The indians maintain that they were red haired and had pale skin while muh sCiEnCtiSts tend to think it was turned red on account of the guano. The skeletons were taken away and one was sent to Stanford University and the rest to the Smithsonian; never to be seen again like so many other things. I don't remember the exact details but I'm fairly sure this is correct. It was a topic that interested me and one I investigated back when I lived in the area.
There is one skull that resides in a museum in Winnemucca but it has not been on display for a decade or more. I asked about it when I went to the museum there and the lady got nervous and told me they did have a skull but it was not for public display and refused to let me see it. I expect it's because they didn't want the local tribe to claim it and take it away even though the tribes own history tells of their conflicts with these giants. There were several artifacts from these people that were on display. A few duck decoys that were woven out of cattails which were really neat and then some baskets and assorted other things.
According to the indian's oral history this race of red-haired giants lived in the area around what is now known as the Lahontan Sink. The indians were afraid of them as they would snatch up women or children and carry them off to eat. The indians had a couple different names for these giants: Si-Te-Cah and the reed people or people of the reeds...my memory is somewhat vague on the details as it has been quite some time since I was in the area or thought about it. Anyway, these giants numbers were dwindling for whatever reason and the local tribes chased and cornered some of them in the cave. Then they heaped a bunch of brush and wood in front of the cave and set it on fire. Some of the giants tried to escape the cave through the flames and the indians stuck them with arrows and presumably the three in the cave died of asphyxiation.
You can still go into the cave, or you could the last time I was in the area, but there really isn't much to see there other than a plaque out front describing the events.
[ + ] Lost_In_The_Thinking
[ - ] Lost_In_The_Thinking 1 point 1 monthMar 31, 2024 11:14:52 ago (+1/-0)
The great lack of artifacts discovered in the 18th and 19th centuries is due to the Smithsonian Institute pushing the isolationist theory of how North America was populated with the Beringia theory. This is obviously wrong. It's clear that the alternative, diffusionism, the theory that the continent was populated by people from many different areas at many different times, is correct.
As people began to find artifacts, particularly from burial mounds, they sent them to the Smithsonian, who kept them in a warehouse and eventually put them into a barge and dumped them at sea.
Epigrapher Barry Fell documents his discoveries and finding by interpreting ancient Ogam and Phoenician inscriptions and coins found around the country. A cache of Roman coins began washing ashore in New England last century. Coins in Phoenician script have been found in the area of the largest ancient copper mines in the world in Michigan.
The evidence ancient migration to North America is overwhelming.
[ + ] NaturalSelectionistWorker
[ - ] NaturalSelectionistWorker 1 point 1 monthMar 30, 2024 22:37:14 ago (+1/-0)
Kiked history indeed.
[ + ] dosvydanya_freedomz
[ - ] dosvydanya_freedomz 1 point 1 monthMar 30, 2024 19:27:03 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] KosherHiveKicker
[ - ] KosherHiveKicker [op] 2 points 1 monthMar 30, 2024 19:31:28 ago (+2/-0)
I am also certain that it was covered one time, and not celebrated annually as it should be on Lief Erikson Day.
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leif_Erikson_Day
[ + ] dosvydanya_freedomz
[ - ] dosvydanya_freedomz 1 point 1 monthMar 30, 2024 19:46:54 ago (+1/-0)
but for whatever reason , the viking incursion in to canada was pretty brief. compared with Iceland and Greenland...
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty 1 point 1 monthMar 30, 2024 18:29:56 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Razzoriel
[ - ] Razzoriel 1 point 1 monthMar 30, 2024 15:46:04 ago (+1/-0)
Its a two-way street. He did "discover" the land, but he did not effectively made use of his time there nor managed to fully utilize the land for the good of his people.
[ + ] Joe_McCarthy
[ - ] Joe_McCarthy -2 points 1 monthMar 30, 2024 18:35:06 ago (+0/-2)
[ + ] KosherHiveKicker
[ - ] KosherHiveKicker [op] 2 points 1 monthMar 30, 2024 19:02:30 ago (+2/-0)*
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_sexual_slavery_in_the_United_States
Capture 9 year old female Taino Indian children, rape them, and traffick them back to European Elite as sex slaves. Just like the Jews of today.
[ + ] RobertJHarsh
[ - ] RobertJHarsh 1 point 1 monthMar 30, 2024 21:39:15 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Joe_McCarthy
[ - ] Joe_McCarthy -2 points 1 monthMar 30, 2024 19:14:44 ago (+1/-3)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Origin_theories_of_Christopher_Columbus
Not bad for a guy that the left seeks to demonize. And which you add a dubious anti-Jewish twist in joining in with them.
[ + ] KosherHiveKicker
[ - ] KosherHiveKicker [op] 1 point 1 monthMar 30, 2024 19:24:01 ago (+1/-0)
- Steven Spielberg Jewish Film Archive - Columbus And The Jews - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O0gliUWOpM4
- Was Christopher Columbus Jewish? - https://youtu.be/R7lds4afgv0?t=103
[ + ] Joe_McCarthy
[ - ] Joe_McCarthy -1 points 1 monthMar 30, 2024 22:50:53 ago (+0/-1)*
'Jews are liars unless they become authorities on historically contentious matters Jew haters like me agree with'.
Again, there is no proof Columbus was a Jew. Most scholars think he was Genoese, as advertised.
He might have been Jewish though. He might have been a Polack. Heck if I know. Some think he was Norwegian or Portuguese. What I do know is there is no proof he was Jewish.
[ + ] KosherHiveKicker
[ - ] KosherHiveKicker [op] 0 points 1 monthMar 30, 2024 23:33:57 ago (+0/-0)
- Christopher Columbus was a Sephardic Jew. - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rjkiJJ5vsvA