If chimpanzees were only 35 times more likely to attack a White than the other way around according to the National Crime Victimization Survey, Table 13, would it be acceptable to force integrate our children with chimpanzees in the name of equality and tolerance? ---
A Black is 35 Times More Likely to Attack A White Than The Other Way Around, proof some "racism" against Blacks could save lives:
If owning chimps as pets was as common as owning dogs and cats, and the chimps attacked people 35 times as often as the most aggressive dogs, chimps would get banned and likely destroyed.
You're more likely to have a negative encounter with a nigger, than with most wild animals, so why the fuck do we allow ourselves to be forcefully integrated with them?
[ + ] x0x7
[ - ] x0x7 0 points 1.1 yearsMar 21, 2024 12:06:09 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] AngryWhiteKeyboardWarrior
[ - ] AngryWhiteKeyboardWarrior 0 points 1.1 yearsMar 21, 2024 12:47:23 ago (+0/-0)
You're more likely to have a negative encounter with a nigger, than with most wild animals, so why the fuck do we allow ourselves to be forcefully integrated with them?
[ + ] TheNoticing
[ - ] TheNoticing 0 points 1.1 yearsMar 21, 2024 16:56:48 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] NaturalSelectionistWorker
[ - ] NaturalSelectionistWorker 1 point 1.1 yearsMar 21, 2024 14:44:36 ago (+1/-0)