×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules
16

If chimpanzees were only 35 times more likely to attack a White than the other way around accoring to the National Crime Victimization Survey, Table 13, would it be acceptable to force integrate our children with chimpanzees in the name of equality and tolerance?

submitted by oppressed to QuotesToWakeWhites 1 monthMar 21, 2024 10:05:38 ago (+16/-0)     (QuotesToWakeWhites)

If chimpanzees were only 35 times more likely to attack a White than the other way around according to the National Crime Victimization Survey, Table 13, would it be acceptable to force integrate our children with chimpanzees in the name of equality and tolerance?
---

A Black is 35 Times More Likely to Attack A White Than The Other Way Around, proof some "racism" against Blacks could save lives:

https://rumble.com/v4jmnic-blacks-are-35-times-more-likely-to-attack-a-white-than-the-other-way-around.html?mref=34hwxv&mc=do95b




4 comments block


[ - ] NaturalSelectionistWorker 1 point 1 monthMar 21, 2024 14:44:36 ago (+1/-0)

Isn't that the same study that found blacks commit twice as much crime as is committed against them?

[ - ] AngryWhiteKeyboardWarrior 0 points 1 monthMar 21, 2024 12:47:23 ago (+0/-0)

If owning chimps as pets was as common as owning dogs and cats, and the chimps attacked people 35 times as often as the most aggressive dogs, chimps would get banned and likely destroyed.

You're more likely to have a negative encounter with a nigger, than with most wild animals, so why the fuck do we allow ourselves to be forcefully integrated with them?

[ - ] TheNoticing 0 points 1 monthMar 21, 2024 16:56:48 ago (+0/-0)

Because it was enforced by the state national guards.

[ - ] x0x7 0 points 1 monthMar 21, 2024 12:06:09 ago (+0/-0)

Yes. I’m for considering Chimpanzees and other Great Apes human. Make it more obvious there are differences in what we choose to label human.