@system does this constitute spamming? He flat out admits to posting content for others and the post in question is spam quality...
I'm not trying to stir up shit but many of us for a long time have assumed the Conspirologist was some form of shill but this looks to be a flat out admission. How many subs will Conspirologist ban me from for this post? I don't really know what a proper solution to this is.
Technically, all he really admitted is grabbing a link without looking at it. He still obviously spends all day posting random bullshit for no apparent reason.
Also, I'm with @MrPancake on this one and haven't seen a Conspirologist post in a while.
Spamming has multiple meanings. The original meaning was mass posting of commercial or scam material. That type of content has negative value.
Mass posting of content can be referred to as spamming but is more subjective because the content has to be low value which people may disagree on. This spam is useless noise rather than outright harm. The voting system should cover this form.
[ + ] big_fat_dangus
[ - ] big_fat_dangus 0 points 1.2 yearsFeb 23, 2024 16:46:12 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] TheOriginal1Icemonkey
[ - ] TheOriginal1Icemonkey 0 points 1.2 yearsMar 2, 2024 00:13:42 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Version6
[ - ] Version6 1 point 1.2 yearsFeb 23, 2024 13:54:35 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] MrPancake
[ - ] MrPancake 3 points 1.2 yearsFeb 23, 2024 14:11:49 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] Glowbright
[ - ] Glowbright [op] 4 points 1.2 yearsFeb 23, 2024 13:29:04 ago (+4/-0)
@system does this constitute spamming? He flat out admits to posting content for others and the post in question is spam quality...
I'm not trying to stir up shit but many of us for a long time have assumed the Conspirologist was some form of shill but this looks to be a flat out admission. How many subs will Conspirologist ban me from for this post? I don't really know what a proper solution to this is.
[ + ] Sector2
[ - ] Sector2 2 points 1.2 yearsFeb 23, 2024 14:35:19 ago (+2/-0)
Also, I'm with @MrPancake on this one and haven't seen a Conspirologist post in a while.
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty 2 points 1.2 yearsFeb 23, 2024 15:36:09 ago (+2/-0)
Is spamming against the rules?
[ + ] big_fat_dangus
[ - ] big_fat_dangus 0 points 1.2 yearsFeb 23, 2024 17:14:10 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] TheYiddler
[ - ] TheYiddler 0 points 1.2 yearsFeb 24, 2024 08:05:48 ago (+0/-0)
Mass posting of content can be referred to as spamming but is more subjective because the content has to be low value which people may disagree on. This spam is useless noise rather than outright harm. The voting system should cover this form.
I'm sure the rules use the first definition.
[ + ] BaalsDeep
[ - ] BaalsDeep 1 point 1.2 yearsFeb 23, 2024 17:41:19 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] lord_nougat
[ - ] lord_nougat 0 points 1.2 yearsFeb 24, 2024 01:03:03 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Fascinus
[ - ] Fascinus 5 points 1.2 yearsFeb 23, 2024 13:32:03 ago (+5/-0)
Every time I've commented on any of its posts in a non-confrontational manner, it has responded in full asshole mode.
If it's not organic participation, which seems to be the case, I wonder what the angle is.
[ + ] Glowbright
[ - ] Glowbright [op] 3 points 1.2 yearsFeb 23, 2024 13:36:14 ago (+3/-0)
His first response to me was "Go fuck yourself, kike alt account" Are you saying that this was only partial asshole mode? I'll have to work harder
[ + ] Fascinus
[ - ] Fascinus 2 points 1.2 yearsFeb 23, 2024 13:45:13 ago (+2/-0)
I was looking at the "My bad" part. I now see that it wasn't replying to you.