What are the legal implications of passing a resolution there? I assume it's not the same as passing a law but is there anything legally binding about it in terms of enforcement?
There was a case in the 70s or 80s where some spic group sued Texas schools for not allowing their anchor spawn to attend, and the supreme court ruled that "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" apparently means any asshole currently in the US, therefore public services cannot be refused for anyone regardless of citizenship. It was total bullshit pulled out of their ass, just like Brown v Board, but since then the de facto law of the land is that there is no such thing as an illegal alien. This is probably why so many shitskins started flooding in at the time, and NAFTA only made it worse. We send manufacturing to mexico so they can get better jobs, and they come here any way for free shit instead. Amazing. My old school district right now is 70% alien, 70% free lunch, and it's one of the worst performing in the state, and none of these shits existed until the 90's.
As for the legal implications, you probably open yourself up to lawsuits based on this retarded precedent, which SHOULD be overturned but you're running a real risk with the current court, but the truth is that States could have been nullifying blatantly unconstitutional bullshit all along. The reason they don't is because it's tied to federal funding and they won't give up the fedbux, but a county can and should do this and you wouldn't have to deal with this shit. It's either that or klan it up and take a stand. Migrants? Never seen any.
[ + ] HelenHighwater
[ - ] HelenHighwater 7 points 1.2 yearsFeb 2, 2024 10:07:05 ago (+7/-0)
[ + ] ElementalPee
[ - ] ElementalPee 1 point 1.2 yearsFeb 2, 2024 10:42:35 ago (+1/-0)*
[ + ] tacos2goplease
[ - ] tacos2goplease 2 points 1.2 yearsFeb 2, 2024 17:57:15 ago (+2/-0)
As for the legal implications, you probably open yourself up to lawsuits based on this retarded precedent, which SHOULD be overturned but you're running a real risk with the current court, but the truth is that States could have been nullifying blatantly unconstitutional bullshit all along. The reason they don't is because it's tied to federal funding and they won't give up the fedbux, but a county can and should do this and you wouldn't have to deal with this shit. It's either that or klan it up and take a stand. Migrants? Never seen any.
[ + ] Leveraction
[ - ] Leveraction 4 points 1.2 yearsFeb 2, 2024 11:52:58 ago (+4/-0)
[ + ] Sector2
[ - ] Sector2 3 points 1.2 yearsFeb 2, 2024 20:50:32 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] Clubberlang
[ - ] Clubberlang 2 points 1.2 yearsFeb 2, 2024 19:29:56 ago (+2/-0)
#ARE YOU VACCINATED!!? STOP RESISTING!
[ + ] fnbs
[ - ] fnbs 1 point 1.2 yearsFeb 2, 2024 12:11:53 ago (+1/-0)*
[ + ] Panic
[ - ] Panic [op] 0 points 1.2 yearsFeb 2, 2024 15:36:39 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Backwards
[ - ] Backwards 1 point 1.2 yearsFeb 2, 2024 15:35:29 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Panic
[ - ] Panic [op] 0 points 1.2 yearsFeb 2, 2024 15:36:16 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Anus_Expander
[ - ] Anus_Expander 3 points 1.2 yearsFeb 2, 2024 15:50:50 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] Fascinus
[ - ] Fascinus 5 points 1.2 yearsFeb 2, 2024 16:47:35 ago (+5/-0)
[ + ] prototype
[ - ] prototype 2 points 1.2 yearsFeb 3, 2024 13:40:32 ago (+2/-0)
Repeated for emphasis.
[ + ] Fascinus
[ - ] Fascinus 3 points 1.2 yearsFeb 2, 2024 16:45:29 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] Clubberlang
[ - ] Clubberlang 1 point 1.2 yearsFeb 2, 2024 19:28:41 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] PhantomXLII
[ - ] PhantomXLII 0 points 1.2 yearsFeb 2, 2024 20:35:39 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] RedBarchetta
[ - ] RedBarchetta 1 point 1.2 yearsFeb 2, 2024 20:57:11 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] SirNiggsalot
[ - ] SirNiggsalot 1 point 1.2 yearsFeb 3, 2024 06:54:41 ago (+1/-0)