Good point. I hate how much Whites are conditioned to look to foreigners for a sense of well being. Some of them might have good approaches, but those approaches are made for them, not us.
We will never feel complete trying to be someone else.
A fair point can be made for that and the upper caste of Aryan Indians are like cousins to us in a sense, but a lot of time has passed for them to mix with the darker ones who aren't related and culturally drift away from us.
I stand by my statement. You will not find completeness trying to be upper caste Indian.
a) every -ism implies a suggestion by someone else.
b) being implies partial (life) within whole (inception towards death)...others suggest one to seek completion; hence sacrificing ones partial existence for seeking a conclusion thereof.
c) suggested pluralism (we) tempts perceiving singularity (one) to ignore self. The so called gentiles seek each other for completion; while the so called jews represent apartheid aka dia-spora (diametrical-sporadic) aka each chosen one.
d) nature sets itself apart (from whole into partials); while those within tempt each other together aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one) aka tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) aka abrahamism (father of multitude) aka united states; united nations; european union; university; uniformity; unicode; unions; universal basic income aka mass migration; miscegenation; melting pot; multi-culturalism; internationalism aka equality (same) through diversity (difference) etc.
Why are you speaking with the mannerisms of a nigger professor of "cultural studies"
a) only nature professes (making known; to clear; to free from obscurity; to make plain); hence professing everything perceivable towards each ones perception...others tempt one with suggestions to ignore that.
b) viewing others as professors implies ones consent to "stand-under" (understand) as a student...notice the stu/sta root etymology. This implies ones willing submission (nigger) to another (massa)...
Another example...using the name "Hitler" implies speaking in the name of another; hence hiding self under another; or to use the obvious rhetoric...Führer (leader) and follower aka massa and nigger aka professor and student.
mannerism
MANNER; noun (Latin manere) -"kind, sort, variety"...what defines ones manners? What does it imply to be ONE aka apart from every other one? Kind implies "particular nature", so how does nature (whole) establish partials within itself?
If one consent to a suggested -ism (mannerism) then one gives others the power of ones consent to define; redefine and contradict the suggested meaning at will. For example...the suggested rhetoric "hole in one" tempts one to ignore being "one within whole"...
who makes shit up as they go...
What if that which goes on (inception towards death) makes shit up (life) aka flow (velocity) generating form (resistance) within itself?
If form (life) can discern being within flow (inception towards death); then how could form make anything up (suggestion) that wasn't already there (perceivable)? In other words...how could those inside everything make anything up? How could an inside create more than an outside offers?
And this religion [Buddhism] — as valuable it might be — also brings problems with it, such as the concept of karma. Contemporary Buddhism has yet to adequately address the question of karma and the Holocaust.
Wow that's a stretch, but not for a jew. Karma is a problem because it makes the holocaust victims look like they deserved it? Hilarious.
Ones consent to want or not want a suggestion by another, shapes a conflict of reason (want vs not want) within ONEself...two sides at war within one aka dualism aka reason.
I've read a lot of Buddhist texts, and considered myself one when I was younger. It's basically Christianity without a messiah, and you fuckers can get mad at me all you want. I've also read the KJ bible cover to cover. It's a lot more violent than the collected works of Buddhism. That should tell you something. I don't consider myself either Buddhist or Christian. They're both wrong in different ways that I won't go into, but they're both also right in a lot of ways. You could sum it all up as don't be a dick, suffering is a choice, and salvation exists on here while we're alive if you understand the first two points. Not perfect, but not bad. That's the other thing. We're fundamentally imperfect, and that's ok. We're getting there. Some quicker than others, but that's fine too.
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 9 points 1.8 yearsJul 18, 2023 10:51:52 ago (+9/-0)
[ + ] lord_nougat
[ - ] lord_nougat 8 points 1.8 yearsJul 18, 2023 11:18:39 ago (+8/-0)
[ + ] SecretHitler
[ - ] SecretHitler 6 points 1.8 yearsJul 18, 2023 11:23:39 ago (+6/-0)
[ + ] Boyakasha
[ - ] Boyakasha 6 points 1.8 yearsJul 18, 2023 11:51:24 ago (+6/-0)
[ + ] PeckerwoodPerry
[ - ] PeckerwoodPerry 2 points 1.8 yearsJul 18, 2023 13:15:26 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] SumerBreeze
[ - ] SumerBreeze 1 point 1.8 yearsJul 18, 2023 18:39:16 ago (+1/-0)
Kek
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 5 points 1.8 yearsJul 18, 2023 11:00:34 ago (+5/-0)
[ + ] SecretHitler
[ - ] SecretHitler 5 points 1.8 yearsJul 18, 2023 11:22:04 ago (+5/-0)
We will never feel complete trying to be someone else.
[ + ] PeckerwoodPerry
[ - ] PeckerwoodPerry 6 points 1.8 yearsJul 18, 2023 11:35:51 ago (+6/-0)
[ + ] zongongo
[ - ] zongongo 2 points 1.8 yearsJul 18, 2023 12:14:39 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] SecretHitler
[ - ] SecretHitler 1 point 1.8 yearsJul 18, 2023 18:28:19 ago (+1/-0)
I stand by my statement. You will not find completeness trying to be upper caste Indian.
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason -1 points 1.8 yearsJul 18, 2023 13:47:53 ago (+0/-1)
a) every -ism implies a suggestion by someone else.
b) being implies partial (life) within whole (inception towards death)...others suggest one to seek completion; hence sacrificing ones partial existence for seeking a conclusion thereof.
c) suggested pluralism (we) tempts perceiving singularity (one) to ignore self. The so called gentiles seek each other for completion; while the so called jews represent apartheid aka dia-spora (diametrical-sporadic) aka each chosen one.
d) nature sets itself apart (from whole into partials); while those within tempt each other together aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one) aka tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) aka abrahamism (father of multitude) aka united states; united nations; european union; university; uniformity; unicode; unions; universal basic income aka mass migration; miscegenation; melting pot; multi-culturalism; internationalism aka equality (same) through diversity (difference) etc.
[ + ] SecretHitler
[ - ] SecretHitler 1 point 1.8 yearsJul 18, 2023 18:30:54 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason -1 points 1.8 yearsJul 19, 2023 04:13:51 ago (+0/-1)
a) only nature professes (making known; to clear; to free from obscurity; to make plain); hence professing everything perceivable towards each ones perception...others tempt one with suggestions to ignore that.
b) viewing others as professors implies ones consent to "stand-under" (understand) as a student...notice the stu/sta root etymology. This implies ones willing submission (nigger) to another (massa)...
Another example...using the name "Hitler" implies speaking in the name of another; hence hiding self under another; or to use the obvious rhetoric...Führer (leader) and follower aka massa and nigger aka professor and student.
MANNER; noun (Latin manere) -"kind, sort, variety"...what defines ones manners? What does it imply to be ONE aka apart from every other one? Kind implies "particular nature", so how does nature (whole) establish partials within itself?
If one consent to a suggested -ism (mannerism) then one gives others the power of ones consent to define; redefine and contradict the suggested meaning at will. For example...the suggested rhetoric "hole in one" tempts one to ignore being "one within whole"...
What if that which goes on (inception towards death) makes shit up (life) aka flow (velocity) generating form (resistance) within itself?
If form (life) can discern being within flow (inception towards death); then how could form make anything up (suggestion) that wasn't already there (perceivable)? In other words...how could those inside everything make anything up? How could an inside create more than an outside offers?
[ + ] SecretHitler
[ - ] SecretHitler 1 point 1.8 yearsJul 19, 2023 07:53:34 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason -1 points 1.8 yearsJul 19, 2023 08:30:15 ago (+0/-1)
Using suggested words over perceivable sound represents spell-craft...ain't that weird?
[ + ] Prairie
[ - ] Prairie 4 points 1.8 yearsJul 18, 2023 13:41:35 ago (+4/-0)
Wow that's a stretch, but not for a jew. Karma is a problem because it makes the holocaust victims look like they deserved it? Hilarious.
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 5 points 1.8 yearsJul 18, 2023 14:09:23 ago (+5/-0)
[ + ] Sector7
[ - ] Sector7 3 points 1.8 yearsJul 18, 2023 12:51:52 ago (+3/-0)
Effectively an enemy combatant. When only one side fights, it's not called a war.
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason -1 points 1.8 yearsJul 18, 2023 13:52:05 ago (+0/-1)
Ones consent to want or not want a suggestion by another, shapes a conflict of reason (want vs not want) within ONEself...two sides at war within one aka dualism aka reason.
[ + ] PeckerwoodPerry
[ - ] PeckerwoodPerry 0 points 1.8 yearsJul 18, 2023 13:24:52 ago (+2/-2)
[ + ] PhantomXLII
[ - ] PhantomXLII -3 points 1.8 yearsJul 18, 2023 13:17:39 ago (+0/-3)
3 strikes.