Sign into an existing account

Its dysgenic. How many times have I explained why a 47yr old / 18 yr old pairing is dysgenic? You gonna make Helena do it again?

High age disparity is bad for the same reason polygyny is bad— it creates an assymetrical distribution of females which favors elites and more aggressive males. And what do men do in their single years between 18 and 47? Fuck whores? So all these whores are unmarriageable creating an even worse scarcity of available women for young men to marry and fuck.

This is why Italy and Greece and Spain are worse than Scandinavia. It fucks up the whole economy, by favoring the most rent seeking males reproductively over “team players”, thereby creating massive wealth disparity within the society.

The most successful countries have the highest monogamy and small age disparity/late marriage age for females. On the shitty side of the Hajnal line you have high age disparity but fairly high monogamy, and then the next level down is full on polygyny.

Its totally dysgenic. It favors the worst cheaters and psychos to out reproduce nice guys. Theres basically no exception to this rule.

I elaborate at great length here. https://www.talk.lol/viewpost.php?postid=630b28425e912&commentid=630bd1bf17727

The most egalitarian societies where you dont have some men kiking and exploiting each other through taxation or addiction or some other form of slavery are the ones where men and women get married at the same age, early 20s and start reproducing forthwith.

He has no arguments, it’s all emotional for him. He is no different than a woman.

Hajnal did alot of this research. There are other studies that have estimated average age of marriage for men and women in germanic countries like Britain and Netherlands from church records goung back a thousand years. Ireland, predictably has higher age disparity and is an outlier in NW Europe with similar marriage patterns to southern and eastern europe. Marriage records of early america show the same patterns. Relative late marriage age for women in germanic societies. Small age disparity. This is more monogamous than countries with higher age disparities like Italy because of the benefits of even reproductive opportunity for working white men on par with elites exploiting kikey strategies. In fact the instances where you did see some age disparity in marriage was in the elite classes. Elite males would philander with their servants or whomever while putting off marriage until 30. Nobody else could afford to do that. Respectable working class germanics married in their early twenties, men and women. Go research marriage age trends from church records in northwest europe and america. You won’t dind anything to contradict me. Even Cicero noted that the Germanics of his time married at 20, universally, men and women.