Was he black? Fuck no, of course not. Was he mexican? Fuck no, of course not. Was he a chinaman, fuck no, of course not. Was it a feminist? Fuck no, of course not. Was he a jew? Hahahahah Of course not.
Everybody - truly everybody - knew the storm was coming, and that it was going to be very bad. Yet they ventured out, of their own volition, and ended up endangering themselves.
Are the people that decided to stay home more evil than the ones that ignored warnings and endangered themselves? Are we to expect everyone to help the retards when they do stupid shit?
I like the quote "danger is nature's way of eliminating stupid people". My family and I would be safe and warm at home for the entire storm, not going out to do stupid shit.
Those retards that got stranded and need help are now alive to breed - just like the stupid niggers in africa... How is that helping society?
Or, just be neighborly and help people? Tough call.
[ - ] localsal 1 point 2.3 yearsDec 30, 2022 22:54:09 ago (+1/-0)
First question I would ask is what was so important that they had to leave their own shelter.
Why are they being retarded? I have zero sympathy for anyone that went out and got stuck after being warned.
I've read a couple stories about the 1900s storms that would start with temps above freezing in the morning and then drop to very cold temps with blizzard conditions. Schoolchildren would be caught in sweaters instead of winter coats, and a lot of deaths resulted. This is way more understandable - no weather forecasting, it appears clear with warm temps... what can go wrong?
But with a week or more warning of cold, and a 2-3 day warning of huge snowfall, wtf? Stay home retards. Nothing - especially in a holiday week - is that important that a) can't be planned for, and b) is really that vital.
The thing is, danger and conditions are not equally distributed. There was an earthquake here about 35 years ago. Okay, that's expected, and all but 4 people survived. Wind blew a couple of my plants over a few years ago. And it's literally raining right now. (unique to the 4 winter months) There was also an unusual cold front this year, with temps in the 30s!
Other than that, no environmental danger. There'll be another earthquake again someday, but around 80 miles further up the fault, since pressure is released here.
The 'everyplace is dangerous' answer has always intrigued me, particularly from people in tornado and hurricane zones. Dunno if they're just oblivious, or if that's a way of coping with their inability to relocate.
Where will they go? How large is your area? Is it able to hold 7 billion people?
Where will the farming be done? The "tornado" region of the US produces a huge amount of the farming. What huge part of the world will replace it?
How many people live over the Yellowstone Caldera? That will eventually erupt, right? A big danger to people for a 1000km all around, right?
How much of the planet are you willing to abandon for "safety"?
Do you drive? driving is dangerous, right? Do you even go outside? There are so many dangers outside, right?
What about niggers? niggers are going to be everywhere - how do you avoid that danger? Or spics from the invasion? etc. Nature isn't the only danger when living somewhere.
Ask insurance adjusters about how dangerous it is to live in a hurricane zone - which is the entire eastern US, and typhoons all over Asia. These kikes sell insurance to replace damage, right? How do these filthy kikes intend to make money if it is so dangerous?
These are the people that understand risk in great detail. Yet they do not decline policies in these areas, they just charge more.
Isn't everything in Australia trying to kill people? Why live there?
People have to live somewhere, and everything is a balance, right?
Nature that would have essentially killed thousands of people a century ago only gets to kill a dozen or so now - as per your earthquake example. This isn't the ability of humans to conquer nature, as much as it is the ability of humans to make things stronger and safer.
They can stay right there and die if they wish. I accept the reality of IQ distribution. My immediate jurisdiction has around 40K, which is around 2.5 times more than it should be.
The Yellowstone Caldera is no longer connected to the hot spot that left a trail of calderas across the western US. (coast shifted north, so the trail curves up to the northwest)
How much of the planet are you willing to abandon for "safety"?
Personally? All of it. And no, I stopped believing in driving. Not that the 3000+ daily deaths from vehicle collisions was the reason. I go outside on occasion, although it's literally raining in California right now. As for the dangers, this site highlights the worst possible things that can go wrong, whatever your location.
There are some niggers to be seen now, but there were zero niggers my first 30 years here. Still under 2%.
How do these filthy kikes intend to make money if it is so dangerous?
By charging more than it costs them. And/or deals with the criminal cabal that runs the US.
There are dangerous critters in Australia, but they have nothing like grizzly bears or other large mammals that will eat you. Although death by cane toad would suck too. People live there because it's a kind of meme country.
People have to live somewhere, and everything is a balance, right?
Choosing a physical location does mean making tradeoffs. For example, as great as this physical location is, it's also been #1 most unaffordable in the US a number of times, is full of leftist/liberal idiots, and is falling to developers. What's unfortunate is that there's no better place to go and still maintain my criteria for 'optimal'. I lived in the north, east, and south US before coastal California.
The thing about earthquakes is that they occur on a timescale that's 1000 times longer than tornadoes and hurricanes. There are massively destructive earthquakes on the schedule. The Hayward Fault directly under the population center on the east side of the SF bay is up next. Will likely kill thousands. The fault offshore from northern California through Washington state will likely kill tens of thousands. This is known, yet people still live right in the death zones.
To be fair, a tsunami will sweep through my location if the Hilina Slump on the island of Hawaii collapses. That possibility is currently so low that it's not really a consideration, but it's something to watch. Would take 4:15 to arrive if it did happen.
Lol, a 2.5 foot dia. Eucalyptus tree about 50 feet from me just fell over and crushed a couple cars. There was some wind with that rainstorm.
Weird to think that if this story is true and without embellishment, then the households that originally turned this man away are indirectly responsible for saving several lives. If this man's safety had been ensured immediately, would he have guided the other stranded travellers to safety? He might not have been in a position to accomodate others.
[ - ] Sector7 1 point 2.3 yearsDec 31, 2022 04:30:19 ago (+1/-0)
So if anyone would have opened their door to him, he would have tried to turn their house into a refugee center. This is why people turn away strangers. Well, that and not wanting to get stabbed to death.
[ + ] AmalekTheZOG
[ - ] AmalekTheZOG 5 points 2.3 yearsDec 30, 2022 16:51:47 ago (+5/-0)
[ + ] xmasskull
[ - ] xmasskull 2 points 2.3 yearsDec 30, 2022 16:57:13 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] yesiknow
[ - ] yesiknow 4 points 2.3 yearsDec 30, 2022 18:39:43 ago (+4/-0)
As always, he was a White man.
[ + ] Belfuro
[ - ] Belfuro 0 points 2.3 yearsDec 31, 2022 04:04:59 ago (+0/-0)
Something doesn't want earth creatures to reach the stars
[ + ] BoozyB
[ - ] BoozyB 3 points 2.3 yearsDec 30, 2022 19:06:48 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] Laputois
[ - ] Laputois 3 points 2.3 yearsDec 30, 2022 17:57:24 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] localsal
[ - ] localsal 2 points 2.3 yearsDec 30, 2022 18:37:32 ago (+2/-0)
Everybody - truly everybody - knew the storm was coming, and that it was going to be very bad. Yet they ventured out, of their own volition, and ended up endangering themselves.
Are the people that decided to stay home more evil than the ones that ignored warnings and endangered themselves? Are we to expect everyone to help the retards when they do stupid shit?
I like the quote "danger is nature's way of eliminating stupid people". My family and I would be safe and warm at home for the entire storm, not going out to do stupid shit.
Those retards that got stranded and need help are now alive to breed - just like the stupid niggers in africa... How is that helping society?
Or, just be neighborly and help people? Tough call.
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 1 point 2.3 yearsDec 30, 2022 21:13:34 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] PotatoWhisperer
[ - ] PotatoWhisperer 0 points 2.3 yearsDec 30, 2022 20:22:52 ago (+0/-0)
Ask yourself a few questions first.
Are they White?
Are they old?
Are they a female/child?
Are they from your area?
Can you help them without endangering yourself/yourfolk?
But the flip side is if they are a loud, smelly jew-nigger-fag who is looking to cause trouble in a White area in a storm to hide its crimes.
[ + ] localsal
[ - ] localsal 1 point 2.3 yearsDec 30, 2022 22:54:09 ago (+1/-0)
Why are they being retarded? I have zero sympathy for anyone that went out and got stuck after being warned.
I've read a couple stories about the 1900s storms that would start with temps above freezing in the morning and then drop to very cold temps with blizzard conditions. Schoolchildren would be caught in sweaters instead of winter coats, and a lot of deaths resulted. This is way more understandable - no weather forecasting, it appears clear with warm temps... what can go wrong?
But with a week or more warning of cold, and a 2-3 day warning of huge snowfall, wtf? Stay home retards. Nothing - especially in a holiday week - is that important that a) can't be planned for, and b) is really that vital.
Edit: here is one story:
https://www.minnpost.com/minnesota-history/2013/01/125-years-ago-deadly-children-s-blizzard-blasted-minnesota/
[ + ] Sector7
[ - ] Sector7 0 points 2.3 yearsDec 31, 2022 04:27:37 ago (+0/-0)
Same for people who live in places that have blizzards, tornadoes, or hurricanes. It is known, yet there they are.
[ + ] localsal
[ - ] localsal 1 point 2.3 yearsDec 31, 2022 08:06:42 ago (+1/-0)
1) life is dangerous - get over it.
2) people have to live somewhere.
3) everywhere has dangers. This is inescapable.
4) preparing for an expected danger is much better than trying to avoid dangers forever.
You want all the Whites in Texas to move because the illegal invaders are taking over and a danger? Nah.
[ + ] Sector7
[ - ] Sector7 0 points 2.3 yearsDec 31, 2022 17:12:24 ago (+0/-0)
Other than that, no environmental danger. There'll be another earthquake again someday, but around 80 miles further up the fault, since pressure is released here.
The 'everyplace is dangerous' answer has always intrigued me, particularly from people in tornado and hurricane zones. Dunno if they're just oblivious, or if that's a way of coping with their inability to relocate.
[ + ] localsal
[ - ] localsal 0 points 2.3 yearsDec 31, 2022 17:43:58 ago (+0/-0)
Where will the farming be done? The "tornado" region of the US produces a huge amount of the farming. What huge part of the world will replace it?
How many people live over the Yellowstone Caldera? That will eventually erupt, right? A big danger to people for a 1000km all around, right?
How much of the planet are you willing to abandon for "safety"?
Do you drive? driving is dangerous, right? Do you even go outside? There are so many dangers outside, right?
What about niggers? niggers are going to be everywhere - how do you avoid that danger? Or spics from the invasion? etc. Nature isn't the only danger when living somewhere.
Ask insurance adjusters about how dangerous it is to live in a hurricane zone - which is the entire eastern US, and typhoons all over Asia. These kikes sell insurance to replace damage, right? How do these filthy kikes intend to make money if it is so dangerous?
These are the people that understand risk in great detail. Yet they do not decline policies in these areas, they just charge more.
Isn't everything in Australia trying to kill people? Why live there?
People have to live somewhere, and everything is a balance, right?
Nature that would have essentially killed thousands of people a century ago only gets to kill a dozen or so now - as per your earthquake example. This isn't the ability of humans to conquer nature, as much as it is the ability of humans to make things stronger and safer.
[ + ] Sector7
[ - ] Sector7 0 points 2.3 yearsDec 31, 2022 20:52:10 ago (+0/-0)
The Yellowstone Caldera is no longer connected to the hot spot that left a trail of calderas across the western US. (coast shifted north, so the trail curves up to the northwest)
Personally? All of it. And no, I stopped believing in driving. Not that the 3000+ daily deaths from vehicle collisions was the reason. I go outside on occasion, although it's literally raining in California right now. As for the dangers, this site highlights the worst possible things that can go wrong, whatever your location.
There are some niggers to be seen now, but there were zero niggers my first 30 years here. Still under 2%.
By charging more than it costs them. And/or deals with the criminal cabal that runs the US.
There are dangerous critters in Australia, but they have nothing like grizzly bears or other large mammals that will eat you. Although death by cane toad would suck too. People live there because it's a kind of meme country.
Choosing a physical location does mean making tradeoffs. For example, as great as this physical location is, it's also been #1 most unaffordable in the US a number of times, is full of leftist/liberal idiots, and is falling to developers. What's unfortunate is that there's no better place to go and still maintain my criteria for 'optimal'. I lived in the north, east, and south US before coastal California.
The thing about earthquakes is that they occur on a timescale that's 1000 times longer than tornadoes and hurricanes. There are massively destructive earthquakes on the schedule. The Hayward Fault directly under the population center on the east side of the SF bay is up next. Will likely kill thousands. The fault offshore from northern California through Washington state will likely kill tens of thousands. This is known, yet people still live right in the death zones.
To be fair, a tsunami will sweep through my location if the Hilina Slump on the island of Hawaii collapses. That possibility is currently so low that it's not really a consideration, but it's something to watch. Would take 4:15 to arrive if it did happen.
Lol, a 2.5 foot dia. Eucalyptus tree about 50 feet from me just fell over and crushed a couple cars. There was some wind with that rainstorm.
[ + ] AmalekTheZOG
[ - ] AmalekTheZOG 0 points 2.3 yearsJan 1, 2023 02:34:11 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] dalai_llama
[ - ] dalai_llama 1 point 2.3 yearsDec 30, 2022 16:40:09 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] AmalekTheZOG
[ - ] AmalekTheZOG 1 point 2.3 yearsDec 30, 2022 16:52:53 ago (+1/-0)
False logic.
[ + ] Sector7
[ - ] Sector7 1 point 2.3 yearsDec 31, 2022 04:30:19 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] dalai_llama
[ - ] dalai_llama 0 points 2.3 yearsDec 31, 2022 19:32:21 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] AmalekTheZOG
[ - ] AmalekTheZOG 0 points 2.3 yearsJan 1, 2023 02:33:01 ago (+0/-0)
This guy is made of different better stuff.
[ + ] dalai_llama
[ - ] dalai_llama -1 points 2.3 yearsJan 2, 2023 14:40:48 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] AmalekTheZOG
[ - ] AmalekTheZOG 0 points 2.3 yearsJan 2, 2023 15:29:47 ago (+0/-0)*
[ + ] lastlist
[ - ] lastlist 0 points 2.3 yearsDec 30, 2022 20:28:39 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Hoobeejoo
[ - ] Hoobeejoo 0 points 2.3 yearsDec 31, 2022 06:46:16 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] ModernGuilt
[ - ] ModernGuilt 0 points 2.3 yearsDec 30, 2022 22:29:08 ago (+0/-0)