a) the ignorance of the many shapes the insolence of the few.
b) VULGAR , adjective - "pertaining to the common unlettered people" aka those not domesticated (civilized) to follow the suggested orders by others.
c) LET'TER, noun [from let.] - "one who permits"...the natural order (balance) permits each ones free will of choice, because balancing requires adaptation by free will of choice.
d) the few utilize letters (suggested information over perceivable inspiration) and vulgarism (suggested rules for behavioral manners) to domesticate; exploit and destroy the consenting many within the confines of a controlled environment.
[ - ] HughBriss 1 point 2.4 yearsDec 17, 2022 11:22:40 ago (+1/-0)
Interesting article. Utter bollocks, of course. Cuddihy was an idiot and a commie. This sentence is revealing.
"Jews deployed their rudeness to make a principled argument against the goyim (a word Cuddihy didn’t shy away from), who were cultural prisoners of a hypocritical code that swept unruly emotions under the rug and leaned on polite euphemism to conceal the vampiric nature of capitalist exploitation. The grand Marxist and Freudian theories about the human condition have a crude Jewish impulse at their core, Cuddihy argued, which makes them more, not less, compelling."
I doubt that was the motivation for jewish vulgarity. It's always been that they don't care about anyone or anything but themselves.
Jews have levels of narricism that is hard to understand then throw on top of that their religion tells them they are literally the special boy gods choosen people and the limits to their NPD has no bounds.
NPD is a real mental disorder the true narcs don't have the part of the brain that allows empathy its like trying to explain to a blind person the beauty of a sunset that how trying to explain empathy is to a narc they don't truly know what you are talking about.
Jews have this at levels that is unbelievable and it's getting worse with technology some reason
The code represents suggested moralism, while the prison represents choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law, which the few utilize as mass suggestion to control the many as RELIGION; noun (Latin religio) - "to bind anew".
The natural bond represents perceivable balance (enacting) to perceiving choice (reaction), while the inversion thereof represents consenting choice binding itself to suggesting choices of others. This also represents the origin for following orders and the chain of command.
unruly emotions
a) EMO'TION, noun [Latin emotio; emoveo, to move from.] tempt one (living) to ignore being moved by (process of dying), hence ignoring to resist (living) temptation (dying).
b) RULE, noun [Latin regula, rego, to govern, that is, to stretch, strain or make straight.]...straight (inception towards death) rules narrow (life).
under the rug
Ones choice of want (suggested information) over need (perceivable inspiration) represents ignorance, which shapes lack of self discernment and thereby lack of comprehension about perceivable. Perceivable can be tempted "under the rug" of suggested if one consents to ignore perceivable for suggested. A mind/memory operating through the lens of suggested information distorts one sight within perceivable inspiration.
the vampiric nature
Nature offers everything "needed", choosing to "want" from others a) represents the vampiric nature of being response-ability (living) within temptation (process of dying), hence always tempts to ignore need for want and b) wanting or not wanting from others implies choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law aka "knock, knock...who's there?...a vampire...can I come in?"
Impressing (process of dying) inspires expression (living)...why repress it?
rhetoric
What if the suggested flow of speech (rhetoric) tempts one to ignore the perceivable flow of sound?
marxist
Being a marxist implies ones consent to suggested marxism...where did I consent to that?
college
Implies suggested collectivism (want of gathering together), which tempts one to ignore the perceivable need to sustain "one"self aka apartheid aka partial (living) within whole (process of dying).
student
How could reaction (living) within enacting (process of dying) not learn (study) from the consequences of ones choices made?
HughBriss
As in more than the tip...full on castrated eunuch?
You said nothing that makes me change my mind about you. And if you were an English major, you should return your degree, because all of that was gibberish.
a) everything (process of dying) changes the memory/mind of everyone (living) at every moment (um). Memory cannot exist outside the momentum of motion.
b) suggested nothing tempts one to ignore perceivable everything. How could one thing (living) within everything (process of dying) perceive nothing?
your degree
DEGREE, noun - "a space in progression"...aka a space (momentum) in progression (motion) for those wandering (Latin spatior) within, hence the perceivable, ever changing moment (um) for temporary form (life) within ongoing flow (inception towards death).
gibberish
GIB'BERISH, noun [from gibber.] - "rapid and inarticulate talk; unintelligible language; unmeaning words"...perceivable sound represents predefined meaning; while suggested words tempt one to ignore that for a meaning that can be defined (idolatry); redefined (revisionism) and contradicted (talmudic reasoning) by those suggesting them.
As for rapid...being resistance (life) within velocity (inception towards death) implies being reaction (choice) within enacting (balance), hence establishing a frequency of adaptation, depending on free will of choice.
PER (by) SONOS (sound)...if one is by sound, then that implies being within sound as-well aka IN (within) SANUS (sound). Therefore, both resonance (need) and dissonance (want) are "at home" within sound.
nonsense
Sensing represents ones perception within everything perceivable. How could one sense nothing within everything?
We're done here.
a) temporary (living) implies within ongoing (process of dying).
b) suggested we (togetherness) tempts the perceiving one (apartheid) to ignore being partial (living) within whole (process of dying).
Have you considered that growing oneself is more beneficial then judging others for the sustenance of self?
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason 0 points 2.4 yearsDec 17, 2022 11:54:23 ago (+0/-0)
b) VULGAR , adjective - "pertaining to the common unlettered people" aka those not domesticated (civilized) to follow the suggested orders by others.
c) LET'TER, noun [from let.] - "one who permits"...the natural order (balance) permits each ones free will of choice, because balancing requires adaptation by free will of choice.
d) the few utilize letters (suggested information over perceivable inspiration) and vulgarism (suggested rules for behavioral manners) to domesticate; exploit and destroy the consenting many within the confines of a controlled environment.
[ + ] HughBriss
[ - ] HughBriss 1 point 2.4 yearsDec 17, 2022 11:22:40 ago (+1/-0)
"Jews deployed their rudeness to make a principled argument against the goyim (a word Cuddihy didn’t shy away from), who were cultural prisoners of a hypocritical code that swept unruly emotions under the rug and leaned on polite euphemism to conceal the vampiric nature of capitalist exploitation. The grand Marxist and Freudian theories about the human condition have a crude Jewish impulse at their core, Cuddihy argued, which makes them more, not less, compelling."
I doubt that was the motivation for jewish vulgarity. It's always been that they don't care about anyone or anything but themselves.
[ + ] Doglegwarrior
[ - ] Doglegwarrior 1 point 2.4 yearsDec 17, 2022 13:42:04 ago (+1/-0)
NPD is a real mental disorder the true narcs don't have the part of the brain that allows empathy its like trying to explain to a blind person the beauty of a sunset that how trying to explain empathy is to a narc they don't truly know what you are talking about.
Jews have this at levels that is unbelievable and it's getting worse with technology some reason
[ + ] HughBriss
[ - ] HughBriss 1 point 2.4 yearsDec 17, 2022 13:44:37 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason 0 points 2.4 yearsDec 17, 2022 12:09:05 ago (+0/-0)
The code represents suggested moralism, while the prison represents choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law, which the few utilize as mass suggestion to control the many as RELIGION; noun (Latin religio) - "to bind anew".
The natural bond represents perceivable balance (enacting) to perceiving choice (reaction), while the inversion thereof represents consenting choice binding itself to suggesting choices of others. This also represents the origin for following orders and the chain of command.
a) EMO'TION, noun [Latin emotio; emoveo, to move from.] tempt one (living) to ignore being moved by (process of dying), hence ignoring to resist (living) temptation (dying).
b) RULE, noun [Latin regula, rego, to govern, that is, to stretch, strain or make straight.]...straight (inception towards death) rules narrow (life).
Ones choice of want (suggested information) over need (perceivable inspiration) represents ignorance, which shapes lack of self discernment and thereby lack of comprehension about perceivable. Perceivable can be tempted "under the rug" of suggested if one consents to ignore perceivable for suggested. A mind/memory operating through the lens of suggested information distorts one sight within perceivable inspiration.
Nature offers everything "needed", choosing to "want" from others a) represents the vampiric nature of being response-ability (living) within temptation (process of dying), hence always tempts to ignore need for want and b) wanting or not wanting from others implies choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law aka "knock, knock...who's there?...a vampire...can I come in?"
[ + ] HughBriss
[ - ] HughBriss 2 points 2.4 yearsDec 17, 2022 12:14:52 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason 0 points 2.4 yearsDec 17, 2022 12:47:50 ago (+0/-0)
Impressing (process of dying) inspires expression (living)...why repress it?
What if the suggested flow of speech (rhetoric) tempts one to ignore the perceivable flow of sound?
Being a marxist implies ones consent to suggested marxism...where did I consent to that?
Implies suggested collectivism (want of gathering together), which tempts one to ignore the perceivable need to sustain "one"self aka apartheid aka partial (living) within whole (process of dying).
How could reaction (living) within enacting (process of dying) not learn (study) from the consequences of ones choices made?
As in more than the tip...full on castrated eunuch?
[ + ] HughBriss
[ - ] HughBriss 0 points 2.4 yearsDec 17, 2022 13:42:35 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason 0 points 2.4 yearsDec 17, 2022 13:54:55 ago (+0/-0)
a) everything (process of dying) changes the memory/mind of everyone (living) at every moment (um). Memory cannot exist outside the momentum of motion.
b) suggested nothing tempts one to ignore perceivable everything. How could one thing (living) within everything (process of dying) perceive nothing?
DEGREE, noun - "a space in progression"...aka a space (momentum) in progression (motion) for those wandering (Latin spatior) within, hence the perceivable, ever changing moment (um) for temporary form (life) within ongoing flow (inception towards death).
GIB'BERISH, noun [from gibber.] - "rapid and inarticulate talk; unintelligible language; unmeaning words"...perceivable sound represents predefined meaning; while suggested words tempt one to ignore that for a meaning that can be defined (idolatry); redefined (revisionism) and contradicted (talmudic reasoning) by those suggesting them.
As for rapid...being resistance (life) within velocity (inception towards death) implies being reaction (choice) within enacting (balance), hence establishing a frequency of adaptation, depending on free will of choice.
[ + ] HughBriss
[ - ] HughBriss 0 points 2.4 yearsDec 17, 2022 14:20:32 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason 0 points 2.4 yearsDec 17, 2022 14:36:36 ago (+0/-0)
Why would you reply that to the written word?
PER (by) SONOS (sound)...if one is by sound, then that implies being within sound as-well aka IN (within) SANUS (sound). Therefore, both resonance (need) and dissonance (want) are "at home" within sound.
Sensing represents ones perception within everything perceivable. How could one sense nothing within everything?
a) temporary (living) implies within ongoing (process of dying).
b) suggested we (togetherness) tempts the perceiving one (apartheid) to ignore being partial (living) within whole (process of dying).
Have you considered that growing oneself is more beneficial then judging others for the sustenance of self?