a) suggested LE'GAL, adjective [Latin legalis, from lex, legis, law] - "according to law" tempts one to ignore that perceivable natural law doesn't require consent (accord) from those within...it demands adaptation aka reaction (living) to enacting (process of dying).
b) TERM, noun [Latin terminus, a limit or boundary]...the process of dying represents the limit/boundary for everything living within.
c) perceivable "legal term" (natural law within natural order) can be ignored for suggested "legal terms" (laws of men and their orders), while ignorance represents ones free will of choice between need (perceivable) or want (suggested).
d) what I'm trying to do is to describe a moving system (perceivable inspiration) to a majority which willingly (by consent) ignores it for affixed idols (suggested information). The words I'm using represent the affixed idols tempting them to ignore the moving sound underneath.
Example...the few suggest "insane person" which tempts the many to reason (want vs not want) about it, hence always a conflict, no matter which side one consents to. Meanwhile; "in sanus" (within sound) + "per sonos" (by sound) implies one to be within; by; out of and in response to the perceivable source of sound. Comprehending this represents the growth of ones self discernment (who; where; what, why am I?).
Words (suggested information) cannot be shaped without utilizing sound (perceivable inspiration), yet consenting to suggested (word) tempts one to ignore perceivable (sound), and it gives those suggesting the words, the power to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism), and contradict (talmudic reasoning) the meaning of suggested information. In other words...the few tempt the many to consent to affixed labels (word) upon a moving system (sound), which gives control over the labels to the few, while the many comprehend less and less about the ignored system.
Could you elaborate a little please?
a) try to express what you comprehend about whatever inspires you and I can adapt to that way more specifically, then a "little elaboration" could ever reach you.
b) on essence and substance...action (the process of dying) represents the essence for reaction (living) as the substance. Life cannot react if not being moved from inception towards death, hence being enacted upon.
The few distort ones comprehension thereof by for example suggesting "actors" under "directors", which tempts one to ignore that directors (action) generate reactors (reaction), hence a sleight of hand for being reactors (living) within a generator (process of dying).
If one consents to suggested "actors", then one mimics acting, while ignoring to react (living) to what is being enacted (process of dying) upon self...a suggested fiction as the inversion of perceivable reality.
c) on the process of dying and living within it...as temporary form (life) within ongoing flow (inception towards death) one represents resistance (growth) within temptation (loss)...others can suggest temptation (want) to tempt one to ignore resisting (need).
The trick...choice (suggestion) towards choice (consent) contract law as the inversion of balance (perceivable) towards choice (perceiving) natural law.
d) on values and evaluation...whatever others are suggesting (fiction) was shaped out of what everyone perceives (reality). Suggestion by itself represents the temptation to ignore perceivable, yet consent (as free will of choice) to suggestion (by free will of choice) binds the consenting choice to the fiction of the suggesting choice.
The industrialization of mass suggestion is called RELIGION; noun (Latin religio) - "to bind anew", which represents choice to choice (bind anew) over balance to choice (natural bond).
That being said...choice can only exist at the center of balance, while balance can only exist at the center of motion (momentum). Life (choice) exists within the momentum (balance) of motion (inception towards death), hence reaction within enacting aka evaluation (choice) within value (balance).
Living doesn't represent value, but the struggle to evaluate the value of dying. Others suggest values (money) to tempt one to devaluate self by consenting to allow others to define; redefine and contradict suggested values, which leaves one with less and less choices to evaluate.
PRICE, noun [Latin pretium] - "the amount at which a thing is valued"...the amount at which the process of dying values represents each ONEs evaluation living within. The whole (value) sets itself apart (evaluation)...only then can each partial (living) evaluate the whole value (process of dying).
Whatever your getting at is going over my head.
Trying to "understand" suggested information represents ones choice to "stand under" what another one is suggesting, hence it going "over my head". Instead of standing under others; try growing within the perceivable flow of inspiration surrounding you.
Ask yourself about the origin of what you allow to go into your head...is there more than what others are suggesting you to agree or disagree with? Where did those others get the information they are suggesting you to consent to? Follow suggested information to its origin and ask yourself if nature suggests you information?
[ + ] ReincarnatedGoat
[ - ] ReincarnatedGoat 2 points 1.4 yearsDec 17, 2022 07:35:35 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason 1 point 1.4 yearsDec 17, 2022 06:06:20 ago (+1/-0)
PROP'ERTY, noun [Latin proprietas] - "a peculiar quality of any thing; that which is inherent in a subject, or naturally essential to it"
a) essence (process of dying) generates substance (living)
b) perceivable value (process of dying) generates perceiving evaluation (living).
As long as the many ignore this, so long will the few exploit this ignorance.
[ + ] ReincarnatedGoat
[ - ] ReincarnatedGoat 0 points 1.4 yearsDec 17, 2022 07:40:14 ago (+0/-0)
Could you elaborate a little please? Whatever your getting at is going over my head.
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason -1 points 1.4 yearsDec 17, 2022 09:46:33 ago (+0/-1)
a) suggested LE'GAL, adjective [Latin legalis, from lex, legis, law] - "according to law" tempts one to ignore that perceivable natural law doesn't require consent (accord) from those within...it demands adaptation aka reaction (living) to enacting (process of dying).
b) TERM, noun [Latin terminus, a limit or boundary]...the process of dying represents the limit/boundary for everything living within.
c) perceivable "legal term" (natural law within natural order) can be ignored for suggested "legal terms" (laws of men and their orders), while ignorance represents ones free will of choice between need (perceivable) or want (suggested).
d) what I'm trying to do is to describe a moving system (perceivable inspiration) to a majority which willingly (by consent) ignores it for affixed idols (suggested information). The words I'm using represent the affixed idols tempting them to ignore the moving sound underneath.
Example...the few suggest "insane person" which tempts the many to reason (want vs not want) about it, hence always a conflict, no matter which side one consents to. Meanwhile; "in sanus" (within sound) + "per sonos" (by sound) implies one to be within; by; out of and in response to the perceivable source of sound. Comprehending this represents the growth of ones self discernment (who; where; what, why am I?).
Words (suggested information) cannot be shaped without utilizing sound (perceivable inspiration), yet consenting to suggested (word) tempts one to ignore perceivable (sound), and it gives those suggesting the words, the power to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism), and contradict (talmudic reasoning) the meaning of suggested information. In other words...the few tempt the many to consent to affixed labels (word) upon a moving system (sound), which gives control over the labels to the few, while the many comprehend less and less about the ignored system.
a) try to express what you comprehend about whatever inspires you and I can adapt to that way more specifically, then a "little elaboration" could ever reach you.
b) on essence and substance...action (the process of dying) represents the essence for reaction (living) as the substance. Life cannot react if not being moved from inception towards death, hence being enacted upon.
The few distort ones comprehension thereof by for example suggesting "actors" under "directors", which tempts one to ignore that directors (action) generate reactors (reaction), hence a sleight of hand for being reactors (living) within a generator (process of dying).
If one consents to suggested "actors", then one mimics acting, while ignoring to react (living) to what is being enacted (process of dying) upon self...a suggested fiction as the inversion of perceivable reality.
c) on the process of dying and living within it...as temporary form (life) within ongoing flow (inception towards death) one represents resistance (growth) within temptation (loss)...others can suggest temptation (want) to tempt one to ignore resisting (need).
The trick...choice (suggestion) towards choice (consent) contract law as the inversion of balance (perceivable) towards choice (perceiving) natural law.
d) on values and evaluation...whatever others are suggesting (fiction) was shaped out of what everyone perceives (reality). Suggestion by itself represents the temptation to ignore perceivable, yet consent (as free will of choice) to suggestion (by free will of choice) binds the consenting choice to the fiction of the suggesting choice.
The industrialization of mass suggestion is called RELIGION; noun (Latin religio) - "to bind anew", which represents choice to choice (bind anew) over balance to choice (natural bond).
That being said...choice can only exist at the center of balance, while balance can only exist at the center of motion (momentum). Life (choice) exists within the momentum (balance) of motion (inception towards death), hence reaction within enacting aka evaluation (choice) within value (balance).
Living doesn't represent value, but the struggle to evaluate the value of dying. Others suggest values (money) to tempt one to devaluate self by consenting to allow others to define; redefine and contradict suggested values, which leaves one with less and less choices to evaluate.
PRICE, noun [Latin pretium] - "the amount at which a thing is valued"...the amount at which the process of dying values represents each ONEs evaluation living within. The whole (value) sets itself apart (evaluation)...only then can each partial (living) evaluate the whole value (process of dying).
Trying to "understand" suggested information represents ones choice to "stand under" what another one is suggesting, hence it going "over my head". Instead of standing under others; try growing within the perceivable flow of inspiration surrounding you.
Ask yourself about the origin of what you allow to go into your head...is there more than what others are suggesting you to agree or disagree with? Where did those others get the information they are suggesting you to consent to? Follow suggested information to its origin and ask yourself if nature suggests you information?
[ + ] HeavyBrain
[ - ] HeavyBrain 0 points 1.4 yearsDec 17, 2022 04:36:27 ago (+0/-0)
And now they cut the heat and food to convince everyone that a pod needs less heat and not being able to move as much will make you consume less bugs.