Sign into an existing account

[ - ] Isaacjan [op] 6 points 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 07:26:06 ago (+7/-1)*

I doubt the husband knows. This started a while ago.

That was when her and her retarded harpy friends were talking about their 3rd shot or whatever. Her husband apparently refuses to inject his child, and the whore wanted to. I mentioned the news about dangerous side effects and that was her response, which she trailed off of and tried to backpedal from. Easily the most disturbing thing I've heard a mother say.

Edit: come out and talk, faggot down voting me. Or is that just how this place works

[ - ] Gowithit 4 points 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 07:36:45 ago (+5/-1)*

3rd shot? Well on the plus side she might drop soon? leaving the husband to raise their kid in peace.
Edit- haha the downvotes.. yes thats how this place works.Theres no explaining them sometimes.

[ - ] Isaacjan [op] 3 points 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 07:38:17 ago (+4/-1)

If that happened I may actually believe in karma or a higher power, or something. These evil people need something to happen to them.

[ + ] DoughGoy

[ - ] DoughGoy 2 points 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 07:55:24 ago (+2/-0)

Sounds exactly like a cheating whore--no regard at all for their own children while the affair is going on, and still hardly any afterwards.

[ - ] Metanoid 10 points 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 07:31:26 ago (+10/-0)

You should get undeniable evidence. Either her going into the guys house on video or something along those lines. Be careful getting it to the guy. Its going to be a shock. If in any way you can get it to the husband in a way that he can have some support while receiving the info, that would be good as well. Avoid going through a friend of his as you don't know how he will react to the embarrassment of the situation. Some people like to deal with such shit on their own.

You're doing gods work man, make sure you do it right.

[ - ] Isaacjan [op] 9 points 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 07:34:17 ago (+10/-1)

I doubt I'll be able to do that. Im not going to stakeout the place or anything like that. I'm going to just tell him what i saw and heard and let him deal with his whore of a wife.

[ + ] Metanoid

[ - ] Metanoid 9 points 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 07:50:41 ago (+9/-0)

Someone is downvoating you all over. Maybe your manager? Just hearsay may not get desired results. Cheating women deny worse than jews pilpul. Then the guy will end up in the situation of not knowing the truth unless he knows how to deal with the situation properly which is unlikely. That will likely fuck the guy up pretty bad.

When dealing with infidelity where it is one person's word against another, without physical proof it becomes a clusterfuck really quickly.

[ - ] Isaacjan [op] 7 points 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 07:56:10 ago (+8/-1)*

So what, either spend my time sitting outside his apartment waiting, or not tell the husband?

I'm not connected to the guy. Yeah it may hurt and sucks, but not saying anything will haunt me for life. I'm not that kind of coward.

Edit: I'm just going to frame it as a warning. "Hey, watch out for this guy, hes done x y z and she's responded favorably, if you haven't heard of him from her you may want to look into it. No physical evidence, could be wrong, but saw and heard enough to warn you about him."

[ + ] Metanoid

[ - ] Metanoid 6 points 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 08:22:39 ago (+6/-0)

I think the warning is better as well. Might want to throw in something along the lines of "seem like a nice guy and don't deserve this shit". "Consider a PI or someone to tail her" etc...

[ + ] Metanoid

[ - ] Metanoid 5 points 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 08:27:57 ago (+5/-0)

Might also consider giving advice like not tipping his hand til he has more. She gets an inkling he is on to her and she will cover her tracks so fast there will be nothing to catch. Voice activated recorders and GPS are good tools if he doesn't want to involve a PI or track her himself or via a friend. The most important thing for him is to keep acting normal until he has proof. She seems like the kind that will get away with it otherwise.

[ - ] Gowithit 1 point 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 07:59:48 ago (+1/-0)

how do you know the husband?

[ - ] Isaacjan [op] 2 points 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 08:01:52 ago (+3/-1)

I do not. I can contact him, but never spoke with him. Seems like a decent enough guy.

[ - ] Gowithit 4 points 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 08:04:12 ago (+4/-0)

You are just going to cold call him and tell him" hey your wife is cheating"? Shes going to be able to get out of that one so quick.

oh I didnt see your response above. yeah the warning way sounds better.

[ - ] deleted 0 points 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 08:05:59 ago (+0/-0)

deleted

[ - ] Isaacjan [op] -1 points 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 08:06:01 ago (+0/-1)

Suggest an alternative. Read my edit above

[ - ] CHIRO 32 points 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 07:41:46 ago (+32/-0)*

You're going to see more and more of this. Consider the other things we've seen: women writing love letters to felons, modern women talking about their attractions to convicts, etc.

It's about the excitement of a guy who is 'independent'.

Now that women are earning wages/salaries and holding positions of status that sever her dependence on the complete, stable family unit, they will add novelty and 'enrich' their lives by having instability in their romances.

Instability is what women introduce, by nature. Men had to separate them, forming the units that made up a 'society of families' and isolating her from the workforce for a reason. A woman in this manager's position will seek to 'marry up' but to 'date outside', as in outside the boundaries of what's socially reasonable or expected. She'll eternalize her youth by 'throwing a middle finger to nature' and fucking frat boys and convicts. How exciting.

A secondary but not trivial element of this, is that women in these positions are unconsciously expressing deeply-seated fears inculcated in them by feminist types. You see, they are raised thinking this is what 'the men always did'. It's patriarchy: the male manager fucking around on his wife. Women have inherited a bitterness over this image, but at the same time, as they've been hypnotized intro trying to be men, they are virtually trying to become what they feared. It's also a form of fuck you, just the archetypal 'Luciferian' kind of fuck you - what loved you fucked you over, this scares you, so try to replace that thing. Try to be it (try to be God).

[ - ] Isaacjan [op] 11 points 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 07:52:05 ago (+12/-1)

That was very insightful, thank you. I struggle to comprehend how these evil fucking demons work and think.

[ + ] CHIRO

[ - ] CHIRO 12 points 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 08:00:40 ago (+12/-0)*

Don't get me wrong, though. Men have to drop the ball in cosmic ways for this shit to happen. Well, it's one of two things, you either have to wipe out all of the wise, good men, or you have to transform them into unwise, evil men. I think our culture has seen some of both. Embroil two generations of better men in the World Wars, and while they're away, the Jews will play. We were swindled. Those men trusted their governments. They trusted the moral compass of America. Meanwhile, as they were off dying, the Jew was sneaking into the back door of their homes to destroy them.

We are all evil - I should say, we all have a capacity for it. Male evil and female evil look different - they are different in a sense. But you don't see this kind of feminine evil expressed this way without male evil simultaneously. Men are permissive of this shit. The trouble is, it can get to a point, having gone on for so long and become so institutionalized, that the only way out is revolution. That's the swindle. They caused us not to pay attention. The 'tab' at the bar has been running up for decades and decades. Corrupted institutions have to be changed, so if you want a host society to change its institutions, corrupt them.

(((They))) want revolution, because they thrive on the switch. The Jew is not particularly concerned with what a host's values are, but rather with the process that occurs when the values shift, from one pole to the other and back. It's like a form of blood flow the Jew siphons from. Now we're in a position where the only way out of our hell (white man's hell) is to give the Jew the revolution he wants. All the while they've been setting themselves up to capitalize upon it. They've got the narratives ready to tell about each side of the story, because they already know the story.

[ + ] QueenAlt

[ - ] QueenAlt 11 points 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 08:56:48 ago (+11/-0)

As a older woman and an old goat, I completely agree.
When we send our daughters off to work we’re throwing them into the lions den.

[ - ] PotatoWhisperer 1 point 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 17:11:22 ago (+1/-0)

The trouble is, it can get to a point, having gone on for so long and become so institutionalized, that the only way out is revolution.

It doesn't help that they will not stop until you eradicate the very last one of them from your lands, and even then those outside of your lands will constantly be at the gates. Subversion and rot is in their very nature.

[ - ] PostWallHelena 3 points 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 12:07:17 ago (+7/-4)

You're going to see more and more of this. Consider the other things we've seen: women writing love letters to felons, modern women talking about their attractions to convicts, etc.

You’re cherry picking. Prostitutes are almost solely patronized by men. “Respectable” men will ruin their entire families for a tumble with some slut with bad character because they are hypnotized by boobies. I could go on.

But you pick something like “women write to felons” and you imply that it says something about all women. Women are weak! But don’t apply this standard to men.

Now that women are earning wages/salaries and holding positions of status that sever her dependence on the complete, stable family unit, they will add novelty and 'enrich' their lives by having instability in their romances.

Which is exactly what happened to men when they left their jobs as farmers and craftsmen and got fancy office jobs with disposable income and started living like aristocrats.

Men who delayed marriage until their 30s or later were screwing around. They normalized it, making whores out of lower class women because they always figured there was going to be enough nice girls left somewhere. But when you fuck some girl and dont marry her, you are turning some other white man’s woman in to a whore. Its a waste of a limited resource and its selfish and destabilizes society.

This is what white men started doing a century ago when they moved to the big city and started living more affluent lives and going to college instead of working and getting married.

Every single thing you are complaining about women doing now is what men started doing 100 years ago. You conveniently turn a blind eye to the decline in the standards of male sexual behavior and claim that women are inherently unstable. Wrong.

Males are the sex with the highest level of variability behaviorally because testoterone drives you relentlessly to go wandering, sexually as well as in other ways. Not stable. Occassionally homocidal.

There are two people on this thread who are saying their dads cheat. And another who has previously disclosed their father cheated. A couple of days ago someone posted that they discovered their grandpa “had two families”. No one in that thread called his grandpa a whore or unstable. Nobody said his grandpa was “ throwing a middle finger to nature”

You see, they are raised thinking this is what 'the men always did'. It's patriarchy: the male manager fucking around on his wife.

Some men always did this. Many wealthy men had the opportunity to do this. Then in the 20th century there was a great increase in men who did this, sleeping around, and a broad acceptance by men that it was okay to do this because “What are we puritans” and “Don’t be such a prude, Helena.” I did not see men tapping the breaks in the 80s or 90s.
Men did this more because they had an increased opportunity to do this. The same is now happening with women; only then does it indicate some inherent character flaw in the female? Cmon.

[ + ] Doglegwarrior

[ - ] Doglegwarrior 3 points 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 15:19:43 ago (+4/-1)

Holy shit I recently talked to a woman about this I said that men used to more narricistic, and from reading your post reply it makes sense the move to the city living like aristicrats etc... now women are being turned into the narrcist but technology online shit like Facebook Instagram etc.. is making them even worse. And it's getting much much worse when you learn about narricist then look at our current situation things start to fall into place really fast

[ + ] CHIRO

[ - ] CHIRO 1 point 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 19:51:49 ago (+1/-0)*

Almost everything you said is correct. It also has no bearing on anything I said.

You live in a world, which - more so in its developed parts, yet as a necessary condition for civilization in all parts - saw men give women the role of being choosers. I stress the term gave, since there is nothing other than the virtues of cooperation, civility, and paternal certainty that incentivizes men to give you (women) this option. But being given that role automatically assumes an asymmetry in this picture. We are not the same. Our sexual morality is not going to look the same.

To be sure, there are many sexually immoral men. We can analyze this in one of two ways, where either the moral stakes are about God and an eternal soul, or the analysis pertains to more practical (sociobiological) matters. My comment addressed openly the capacity for evil in all people, so I think I was being both charitable and theologically consistent. At the same time, I made no bones about saying the stakes are different in society between the sexual ethics of men and women. They have to be. Sexual egalitarianism is anti-civilizational.

No, it's not the same, and it never will be. If we included hierarchy and social competition among males in this analysis, that would become very clear. The relative number of men who will (again, ignoring theological considerations here) 'purchase' the kind of sexual power you are talking about will be small (relatively); it will come at the expense of all other men. For every 1 of these kinds of men there will be 10,000 who mostly lose out. This is not the same situation for women. I'm also not prepared to hear, "Don't you think there are female losers too?" To be sure, there are. But the very way they judge losing is different. For men, the situation is bleaker. Losing as a male is something like having no opportunity. Women will always have opportunity - losing for them is not liking what their options might be. This is self-evident. I don't require defending this point.

Another very important difference arises from men's sexual preferences and the way they select women. While testosterone makes men's behavior highly variable, which has dramatically increased the criteria according to which women choose men, men's preferences are highly static, meaning that men with greater freedom and power to be promiscuous will almost always allocate their sexual risk to women with straightforwardly beneficial genetics.

Women, on the other hand, as I pointed out, can and will select for novelty on the basis of parameters that are detrimental to her socially, and to the entire group. This is because the nature of her arousal and her attraction not only shifts according to a monthly hormonal oscillation, but also because it is much more complicated in general than men's sexual attraction. This greater complexity means, together with her ability to be the chooser (as underwritten by a social contract between men, not women), that her sexuality has to be socially managed in ways that men's does not. With men, their nearly universal preferences for the same 'winning females' together with their absolutely devastating degree of competition (think Pareto distribution), works itself out, so that the one-in-a-thousand (successfully) philandering men doesn't destroy a society. Women, however, are more like a collective. Where one goes, they all go...and without that same grueling hierarchy to siphon out just a few to be the top-tier bitches, it means there will be many more who are able to make highly variable sexual choices and actually see these choices through to their reproductive outcomes (like sleeping with antisocial felons/convicts or many foreign males). Since the average female is much more reproductively successful than the average male, this by default makes her sexuality a completely different force.

It's simply the case that most women don't have the foggiest idea about what life as a male is like. And most can't know this, since in point of fact, they do always have options. Just observe the complaints of most frustrated women: "Where are all the good guys!?" She has her pick of many men, but they don't meet her standards. Contrast this with the complaints of frustrated men: "Women literally won't look at me." For almost all women, there is some man out there who will save her. That isn't the case for the bottom 50% of men and it never has been. This economic picture is the reason your appeal to hypocrisy doesn't work.

People often assume that the sociological function of 'protecting' women (as in isolating them) is a male tactic to protect them from other men. To be sure, it serves that purpose. But it also has the function of protecting her from other women. The phenomenon of females organizing is almost always detrimental, if their game pits them against a society's male hierarchy, rather than sexually supporting it cooperatively. As long as their games are focused on something pro-social, it's just grand. But feminism is not pro-social female organization. It's organization against men, namely, the men they are probably historically and bio-psycho-socially the most related to. Hence, when this trend is revolutionary, you see women openly fetishizing non-native men and antisocial men. The high-school aged female begins to fetishize the drug-addict, wannabe-rapper nigger that cuts school and punched the principal, rather than the starting quarterback with the waspy upbringing.

[ - ] PostWallHelena 2 points 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 23:36:31 ago (+2/-0)*

Your whole premise, as I see it, is that evolution is fair to females but unfair to males. Perhaps you don’t see these trends in an evolutionary context, but I do, so I’m very certain that mother nature is not playing favorites. Lots of women say the same thing and they point to very real hardships that are part and parcel of womanhood. It doesnt matter. There are trade offs to being a male, benefits and penalties.

men give women the role of being choosers.

No. Females (of almost every species) are the choosier sex because they have a greater investment in reproduction. Females are much more highly invested. They cannot make dozens of babies. They have a massive nutritional investment and their life is endangered by childbirth. They are the primary caretakers of young children in every society. Male risk in each reproductive act is much lower. Men hardly ever die from ejaculation. Its like a 500 calorie investment. He could literally hit the road at that point.

I stress the term gave, since there is nothing other than the virtues of cooperation, civility, and paternal certainty that incentivizes men to give you (women) this option.

No. Did not give. White men tend to be monogamous which could be defined as a conservative reproductive strategy in which males invest high levels of nurturing and resources to a small number of offspring. Cold climates favor this strategy whereas hot climates favor polygamy. For humans. Did gibbon males choose to be monogamous? No, they just occupied a niche that favored it.

Sexual egalitarianism is anti-civilizational.

I dont know exactly what you mean but I probably disagree with you on this. There needs to be a fair partenership in which women exchange reproduction and child care work for economic support. Men are not naturally more virtuous and will make decisions to exploit females if they find themselves in a position to do so. The reverse is also true.

For every 1 of these kinds of men there will be 10,000 who mostly lose out.

No. It depends on what sort of society you are talking about one in ten men that benefits at the expense of 1 or 2 lower status males.

Actually this is a really complex math problem and you have to know all sorts of factors like whether there is polygamy or polygyny and if men were just killed or shut out completely reproductively or whether they had to delay marriage until late in life because of economic conditions and how widespread polygyny was (how many males reproduced with more than one woman) but also whether elites could get away with a mistress and one or two bastards on the side or whether they could have a harem with 100 women in it. All these variables make a difference when you are talking about just how screwed the average male gets by polygamy. But if it was only 1 in 10,000 “winners” then the penalty of the 9999 other guys is probably pretty low. If such a man took 10 wives, the other 9999 perfectly monogamous men would only have to delay marriage by a couple of weeks to reallocate the available females amongst themselves. Now you know why polygynous societies have large age disparities among couples.

Your math doesnt work out. If the female population’s reproductive potential is largely static ( it is) then there are far more male winners than you imply.

This is not the same situation for women. I'm also not prepared to hear, "Don't you think there are female losers too?" To be sure, there are. But the very way they judge losing is different. For men, the situation is bleaker. Losing as a male is something like having no opportunity.

Well here it comes anyway. In highly monogamous societies, women loose out and fail to reproduce as much as men. That is why there were so many unmarried women in the convents of europe. Only where there are high levels of polygamy are women assured reproductive success because aggressive males create an artificial scarcity of women. The more monogamous men are, the more the intrasexual competition is shifted on to women. The more invested men are in a pairing, the fussier they will be about their mates.

Women, on the other hand, as I pointed out, can and will select for novelty on the basis of parameters that are detrimental to her socially, and to the entire group.

Nonsense. If low value women are guaranteed reproductive success in polygamous societies then men are making more “detrimental “ matches. You cant have it both ways.

In polygamous societies women will tend to select the more aggressive men. In monogamous societies, men will be selected for solicitousness, being a good dad, reliable, etc. Because women had more choice of mates in monogamous societies (compared to polygyny in islamic regions) women selected for more solicitous males. Why are white guys “simps”? Intersexual selection by white females. When we have the choice, we select nice guys.
And men’s sexual tastes change in monogamy. Men go for the high value female because more is riding on his choice.

This is because the nature of her arousal and her attraction not only shifts according to a monthly hormonal oscillation, but also because it is much more complicated in general than men's sexual attraction. This greater complexity means, together with her ability to be the chooser (as underwritten by a social contract between men, not women), that her sexuality has to be socially managed

No. Women’s sexuality has to be managed in patrilineal societies so that productive males dont leave their heritable wealth to someone elses kid. This is not an issue in matrilineal societies since the males are not terribly productive so the wealth is minimal and is passed down through the maternal line. Its not because our turn ons are “more complicated” or whatever.

With men, their nearly universal preferences for the same 'winning females' together with their absolutely devastating degree of competition (think Pareto distribution), works itself out, so that the one-in-a-thousand (successfully) philandering men doesn't destroy a society. Women, however, are more like a collective. Where one goes, they all go...and without that same grueling hierarchy to siphon out just a few to be the top-tier bitches,

I think I already covered this. The intrasexual competition is more evenly distributed between males and females in monogamy. The solution to males being screwwed over by other males is solved by monogamy. This is the reason why white guys tend to get along better.

The phenomenon of females organizing is almost always detrimental, if their game pits them against a society's male hierarchy, rather than sexually supporting it cooperatively

No. You are cherry picking one jewish run movement. Lots of womens movements were to support soldiers or orphans or to ban booze or ponography. This is a ridiculous assertion. Im restraining myself here.

The high-school aged female begins to fetishize the drug-addict, wannabe-rapper nigger that cuts school and punched the principal, rather than the starting quarterback with the waspy upbringing.

I think youre fetishizing high school females. Every jewish imagining you see on the tv or social media is not reflective of white teenage females. Thats about as real as nigger NASA scientists.

Why do you think they are convincing these girls to cut their breasts off? Its because white girls are uncomfortable with the new sexy roles they are encouraging them to lead. They think they have to be prostitutes and they dont like the idea. They are uncomfortable with their bodies. They are not horny nymphos ready to ride black cock. Thats what you guys tell yourselves here. Its not reality. White teenage girls are biologically the same as they were when I was one. I didnt want to have sex. I didnt feel sexy. Most of my friends were the same. We felt pressured to be like the jew movies. We certainly did not fantasize about drug addicts and wannabe rappers.

[ + ] 1234lkjh

[ - ] 1234lkjh 0 points 2.5 yearsOct 23, 2022 00:32:03 ago (+1/-1)

The problem is, you're being thoughtful and logical on a forum where people are coming to re-up on anger and self-righteousness. Remember: jews < niggers < women < white men

[ - ] PostWallHelena 2 points 2.5 yearsOct 23, 2022 00:39:46 ago (+2/-0)

I dont actually find chiro to be terribly self righteous or angry.

[ + ] 3Whuurs

[ - ] 3Whuurs 0 points 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 13:01:19 ago (+1/-1)

“Respectable” men will ruin their entire families for a tumble with some slut with bad character because they are hypnotized by boobies. I could go on.

But you pick something like “women write to felons” and you imply that it says something about all women. Women are weak! But don’t apply this standard to men.

Now describe how natural the urge is for each side of that scenario, (the actual objective), and which side is a pure psychological retardation.

[ - ] PostWallHelena 2 points 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 15:40:14 ago (+3/-1)

Now describe how natural the urge is for each side of that scenario,

What are you trying to say? That men cheat because they cant help it but women cheat because theyre irrarional/bad?

Well that’s convenient. I thought women were supposed to be the ones that lacked personal accountability. Huh.

[ + ] 3Whuurs

[ - ] 3Whuurs -2 points 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 16:33:33 ago (+0/-2)

You can strawman and deflect from it all you want.
Still waiting you to answer.

[ - ] PostWallHelena 2 points 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 16:39:43 ago (+2/-0)

Why dont you clarify what you are trying to say. You tell me Im strawmanning you. Inferring that I mischaracterized you. Well I asked you to clarify, you incoherent bitch. Explain what the fuck you mean.

[ + ] Partofthepsyop

[ - ] Partofthepsyop 1 point 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 19:39:54 ago (+1/-0)

I think I can help here. 3Whuurs is saying men sleeping with sluts is more natural than women romanticizing felons. Because evolution favors that kind of behavior in males, which is bullshit, because if the woman's behavior wasn't also evolutionary favorable in some way how did it come about? But never mind that nonesense; the fact is all degeneracy is unnatural, because they go against morals and reason.

[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 20:39:19 ago (+0/-0)

3Whuurs is saying men sleeping with sluts is more natural than women romanticizing felons.

Thats what I was afraid of.

Whites and other northern eurasian have tended to be monogamous which comes relatively naturally to most whites.

In the tropics there is more promiscuity, including matrilineal societies where female promiscuity is relativley accepted. So there is certainly a natural precedent for women screwing around.

There is also poygyny which is a patriarchal system in which female fidelity is required but males are promiscuous.

The reason why male promiscuity is more common is that there is a greater reproductive incentive for males to have many mates. Like in animals, males can be reproductively hugely successful if they dont have to provide for their offspring’s food and protection. But they can only achieve this if they can successfully kill off other competing males or steal their resources and cock block them in some way. This is a more feasible strategy for human males if they live in the tropics where there is alot of plant based food that primates like and that are accessible to women. Polygyny is feasible where warrior tribes of males can conquer and enslave other males and steal their females.

Less of this happened in cold climates because females were heavily reliant on males for meat from hunting and later, intensive agriculture and herding. So men could only afford the one wife and a small number of children that he contributed high resources too. Occassionally there were some polygynous cultures in colder regions but they were all build on warlording.

I think @3whuurs doesnt understand that male promiscuity is only more natural in white men in the sense that rampant murder, enslavement of other whites, rape, and nigger style drive-bys are “natural” in white males.

We have some of our ancestry from such warlords so occassionally you see hypersexual males in the white population. You also get the occassional murderer and the two behaviors are intrinsically linked.

I just addressed the phenomenon of some women seeming to be attracted to violent males on a post yesterday and why it makes sense in an evolutionary contest.

Males tend to kidnap and rape women, historically. This is in our genetic history. Women who were agreeable to violent males, or even attracted to them may have had a better chance of survival than women who abhored violence or put up a fight. Also more violent males may have priduced sons with a better chance of survival and reproductive success in violent societies. These are reasons why some females may have a predisposition to prefer violent men and bad boys. Its a sign of high testosterone which is probably an asset in more sexually competitive populations. Like niggers or muslims.

But you’re right, you can’t have it both ways. Both these behaviors, women writing prisoners or men cheating on their spouses make sense in other more violent societies. But you cant have male infidelity a la cart without gaining the whole constellation of nigger behaviors, which is why whites have generally suppressed that behavior for at least a few thousand years.

Waiting for your answer @3whuurs.

[ + ] Partofthepsyop

[ - ] Partofthepsyop 0 points 2.5 yearsOct 23, 2022 19:42:37 ago (+0/-0)

But you cant have male infidelity without ... nigger behaviors

Thanks, but you misunderstood. I'm saying it's unnatural just like it's unnatural for niggers (or other apes) to build cities or follow laws out of consideration for others. Calling it natural because it exists or existed is the same argument libtards make. Every race or species strives to their own idea, and fidelity is an ideal inherent of White and some Oriental races.

if there is debate, it should be around what is good and generates the kind of world we want to live in. Race consciousness is what bridges the gap between the natural world and everything else we know to be good and true.

[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 2.5 yearsOct 23, 2022 20:44:46 ago (+0/-0)

Calling it natural because it exists or existed is the same argument libtards make. Every race or species strives to their own idea, and fidelity is an ideal inherent of White and some Oriental races.

But don’t you want to know why these differences arose in the first place? I mean maybe you are a creationist, but if you find evolution plausible then you have ask why did we go one way and niggers go another way?

The answer to that question is environment and a key mechanism in understanding these behavioral differences is sexual behaviors. What’s more, these same factors effect other primates and even other mammals and birds in similar ways.

In tropical environments, humans and other primates have higher levels of male sexual competition, meaning that it makes sense for males to fertilize as many females as possible and to murder other competitive males. Male investment in children is low because they have a quantity over quality strategy.

The opposite is true in cooler climates where monogamy and higher paternal care are more successful. At some point in the last 50,000 years our ancestors moved in to cooler climate and so did the ancestors of east asians. In these colder climates we became more intelligent and less impulsive. We have also changed alot since the advent of agriculture. These are the reasons why we dont act like niggers, but that could change. Look at the greeks. Look at the egyptians. A set of new economic or environmental factors could see us de-evolve or regress into a degenerate people.

Polygamy is one of those factors that could change the behavior of our race . Because of genetic drift, certain males could get much more reproductively successful than others, changing what is “inherent” to whites. Without any new dna introduced, this can happen. White characteristics are not written in stone and they can change. Thats why polygamy is so bad. All societies with high polygamy levels become violent because the worst males reproduce 2x than the best males, or more. Its highly dysgenic.

Continue thread

[ + ] Doglegwarrior

[ - ] Doglegwarrior 3 points 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 15:16:16 ago (+3/-0)

Everything you said is accurate our current society and culture is turning women into narricist at an alarming rate

[ - ] deleted 1 point 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 19:58:24 ago (+1/-0)

deleted

[ - ] DoughGoy 4 points 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 07:50:37 ago (+4/-0)

I agree with telling her husband, but be prepared that he may be mad at you and believe you are lying.

[ - ] Isaacjan [op] 5 points 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 07:53:19 ago (+6/-1)

That matters not at all, as long as I tell the truth my conscience is clean, I can't control his actions. If he doesn't believe me, at least he has been told. That's his choice.

[ - ] PostWallHelena 3 points 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 09:25:15 ago (+4/-1)*

I think that your number one priority should be the welfare of the kid, and if you drop this bomb haphazardly it could result in a bad outcome.

If you think the kid is better off with the dad, you should advise the dad to hire a private investigator and a divorce lawyer before confronting the wife. Everybody’s first impulse is to confront the spouse and say “did you do this?”. But the smart thing to do is to gather evidence toward establishing her as an unfit parent . You don’t want her knowing that the husband knows until youve got here dead to rights. Otherwise, whats the fucking point? Youve then accomplished separating a kid from it’s dad and provided the impetus for her to divorce rape him.

I mean maybe he’s a lying asshole too. Maybe theyre both assholes in which case, who cares. But if you think he’s the better parent, you should advise him not keep his cards close to the vest and get evidence. Cheating wont be enough but neglect and endangerment will often be provable in those situations

Remember that in a custody battle SHE will be favored by the courts for wanting to jab her kids and a case can be made the HE is a bad dad because he didnt want the kid to get jabbed. You are setting a chain of events in motion.

[ - ] Isaacjan [op] 3 points 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 10:03:43 ago (+3/-0)

I'm not going to worry about any of that. Whore cheating on husband, warn husband. That's it.

[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 11:03:43 ago (+2/-2)

You should have a care for your fellow whites.

[ - ] PotatoWhisperer 0 points 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 17:21:02 ago (+0/-0)

He is, by warning the guy. What happens next is entirely on the father dealing with his cheating whore of a slut that was once his wife.

[ + ] Sector7

[ - ] Sector7 1 point 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 20:00:58 ago (+1/-0)

The format of a warning has a massive effect on the result.

[ - ] PotatoWhisperer 0 points 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 20:05:47 ago (+0/-0)

As is whether he knows the dude or not. In this case, he is a perfect stranger.

[ - ] PotatoWhisperer 0 points 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 17:19:51 ago (+0/-0)

I think that your number one priority should be the welfare of the kid

That's the responsibility of the parents. We don't live in 100-man villages anymore.

If you think the kid is better off with the dad, you should advise the dad to hire a privite investigator and a divorce lawyer before confronting the wife.

That's up to the father, Isaacjan is a 3-rd party dude who has nothing to do with this shit. His only responsibility as a guy is to inform of the possible infidelity.

You are setting a chain of events in motion.

Again, not his problem. This is caused by the cheating whore, who should be roundly punished and removed from the family. But that's up to the father, and how he wants to go about doing things. Not Isaacjan, not you.

[ - ] PostWallHelena 3 points 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 17:42:48 ago (+3/-0)

That's the responsibility of the parents. We don't live in 100-man villages anymore.

And thats exactly the fucking problem. We stopped acting like that and became unmoored from our communities and unthinking consoomers and thats why we are fucked. We have to re-establish our white culture.

If he doesnt give a fuck about what happens to that kid after he drops his bomb, than he diesnt really care about the principle of this issue at all— he’s only using the problem as a means to get back at his boss who he doesnt like.

If you care about the principle of monogamy being violated then you care about the harm being done to this guy and his kid by this woman. If thats true then you ought to care that you dont cause them more harm than good.

Its irrational to claim you are doing whats right by telling the husband when you dont care what bad comes of your doing it in a reckless way.

All this shit is his problem. Its all our fucking problem. God damn it, how can you say shit like that after spending time on this site? If whites arent responsible for our own culture, jews sure as fuck will be. Cmon!

You want someone to care for you? You better start caring about whites.

[ - ] PotatoWhisperer 0 points 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 19:49:10 ago (+0/-0)

Lol, good lord is this a female-centric view on the matter.

He is caring by warning the guy. Anything else he says doesn't matter, as the rest is up to the guy getting cucked. Like talking to normies, you aren't going to change them with a few words.

Guys will know what I'm talking about here. You can't change a guy's mind about his women until he sees the light for himself. At that point then he is willing to listen, not before.

Everybody know's the guy that you warned him over and over about his cheating women and that she'll cheat on him, but he know that "I can change her bro, she's different" or some bullshit. And when she does cheat on him, as you warned, then he comes for advice.

Even then, it's up to the dude to take that advice, or to do something completely different.

Like hanging the bitch.

And there's not a damned thing he can do about it, however flowery and wise his words may be.

All that for a complete stranger. Now, if he actually knew the dude, knew the kid, the family, etc then he would be on the hook for more action. There are simply too many people with too many problems for you to spend such time, effort, and money on each stranger you may or may not be able to help.

[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 2.5 yearsOct 23, 2022 00:58:35 ago (+0/-0)

Lol, good lord is this a female-centric view on the matter.

Nah it really isnt . Its white centric.

Guys will know what I'm talking about here. You can't change a guy's mind about his women until he sees the light for himself.

We have no equivalent of this here in Lady’s World. You are talking in lady-proof riddles! Truly you males have mysterious ways.

[ + ] SecretHitler

[ - ] SecretHitler 1 point 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 09:53:34 ago (+1/-0)

Everyone is giving you so much advice when you don't need it. Good of you to tell the guy, and after that it's on him to be a man and decide what to do about it.

[ - ] texasblood 2 points 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 08:03:50 ago (+2/-0)

Jelly you got bumped 🎯

[ - ] boekanier 0 points 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 08:13:38 ago (+2/-2)

therefore: women should stay in their kitchen, in the outside world they are a disaster, also for themselves

[ + ] NemesisPrime

[ - ] NemesisPrime 0 points 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 11:22:52 ago (+0/-0)

But then they feel useless. Because they are.

[ - ] SilentByAssociation 5 points 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 09:01:59 ago (+5/-0)

My dad has been a serial cheater since I was 6 months old or so. Found out in 2016 but we always knew something was up.

[ - ] Isaacjan [op] 1 point 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 09:03:45 ago (+2/-1)

I suspect the same of mine

[ - ] SilentByAssociation 0 points 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 09:11:41 ago (+0/-0)

Does he have the empty carton living in what was supposed to be a $1K/month rental property since 2018 or '19?

[ - ] PostWallHelena 1 point 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 11:06:19 ago (+1/-0)

What does this mean? That your dad is living in a carton? That he keeps a second apartment?

[ - ] Gowithit 0 points 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 13:10:53 ago (+0/-0)

I'm guessing until he confirms that the father had the mistress stay in an apartment that he was supposed to be renting?

[ - ] SilentByAssociation 1 point 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 13:43:15 ago (+1/-0)

Has

It's a 1,060 Sq.ft. single family with an efficiency. Nothing terribly large, but it can easily be rented for about $1,000/month in this market, and that's not including the efficiency. I'm not sure about the utilities, but there's no question who pays the tax bill. She's also been known to run out of food stamps before the end of the month.

[ - ] Gowithit 1 point 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 13:51:51 ago (+1/-0)

Ouch.

[ - ] SilentByAssociation 0 points 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 13:59:38 ago (+1/-1)

And what gets me is that he knows about the jews ("not all jews; it's the Zionists), and introduced me to MGTOW. But he also lent me his copy of Neil Strauss' The Game. Mind you, this man has a married 30-year long marriage.

[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 13:27:38 ago (+0/-0)

It occured to me he means empty egg carton, as in a post wall roastie. Which he was supposed to rent out . So yeah I think I figured it out.

[ - ] SilentByAssociation 0 points 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 13:54:21 ago (+0/-0)

You got it, she's the empty carton. A "cat lady" (I use "lady" loosely), an "artist" (just like her Cuban great-great-grandad), and she has a barbed wire tattoo around her upper left arm. She would accurately be described as a parasite.

[ - ] deleted 0 points 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 13:11:04 ago (+0/-0)

deleted

[ + ] 2017Fallout

[ - ] 2017Fallout 0 points 2.5 yearsOct 23, 2022 16:10:14 ago (+0/-0)

Mine was also. He got older but his girlfriends stayed 18-20yrs. Mum kicked him out in the end. She had to raise me and my sibs alone.

[ - ] diggernicks 0 points 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 09:33:34 ago (+1/-1)

Don't get married

Fuck bitches

[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 11:11:33 ago (+1/-1)

Somebody needs a hug

[ + ] diggernicks

[ - ] diggernicks 0 points 2.5 yearsOct 26, 2022 21:03:38 ago (+0/-0)

I try to keep my contact with crazy people to a minimum

[ - ] usedoilanalysis 0 points 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 09:57:38 ago (+2/-2)

You feel left out OP? It sounds like you want to dig her guts out. Don't worry, I give them 3 months tops, the love chemicals wear out by then. Most women get mediocre to garbage sex, this guy may have been slightly above average, but relatively fantastic to her, so she imprinted on him.

[ - ] Isaacjan [op] -1 points 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 09:59:26 ago (+2/-3)

You're a disgusting kike

[ - ] usedoilanalysis 0 points 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 10:05:14 ago (+2/-2)

Look, why do you want to get involved in another person's infidelity? It's not your business, it's theirs, and all the fall out that comes from it. OP just seems butthurt incompetent Chad is banging his boss, thinking, 'that should have been me, no fair I'm telling'.

You know who tries to ruin other people's lives out of revenge and pettiness? Narcissists, bitch ass niggers, that's who.

[ - ] PostWallHelena 3 points 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 11:09:39 ago (+3/-0)

I dont agree. Monogamy is the basis of western civilization. Its why we are superior to the middle easterners. Infidelity is an assault on the entire community.

[ - ] usedoilanalysis 1 point 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 11:42:32 ago (+2/-1)

Who are you superior to?

[ - ] PostWallHelena 3 points 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 12:10:18 ago (+3/-0)

Well Im a white woman with a high IQ and good morals. So I would say, objectively, most people.

[ - ] usedoilanalysis 0 points 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 12:59:25 ago (+1/-1)

That's quite conceited, how good are you at electrical work, welding, mechanics? I'm sure there are people who are objectively superior to you in a wide range of endeavors. To say you're objectively superior to most people is a form of bragging.

[ - ] Isaacjan [op] 0 points 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 10:06:43 ago (+2/-2)

You're a very, very disgusting kike. Continue outing yourself.

[ - ] usedoilanalysis -1 points 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 10:13:42 ago (+1/-2)

You're a pathetic cuck, continue outing yourself.

[ + ] SumerBreeze

[ - ] SumerBreeze 0 points 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 12:18:01 ago (+2/-2)

You literally advocate for a cucked society, faggotkike.

[ - ] usedoilanalysis 0 points 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 12:52:43 ago (+1/-1)

Lol, you're defending a cuck that couldn't get pussy, so he tries to sabotage a relationship he has no business in. You're the definition of a faggot, don't hurt your limp wrists typing angry.

[ - ] usedoilanalysis 0 points 2.5 yearsOct 23, 2022 06:33:08 ago (+0/-0)

You literally want a society just like you, of insecure no pussy getting narcissistis.

[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 11:07:36 ago (+0/-0)

Lol.

[ - ] Deathstalker 1 point 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 10:26:57 ago (+1/-0)

I used to think white women were devious but now I know the ones that gave me that impression were Jews

[ - ] RobertJHarsh 4 points 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 10:26:58 ago (+4/-0)

Infidelity is fucking disgusting but also fucking funny. First job I ever had was at some off brand grocery store, not a chain. Some crusty jew fuck owned like 3 locations. Anyway, store manager's wife shows up for her birthday lunch and I guess his watch stopped because he was fucking one of the 20 something cashiers in his office when she walked in on it. She went off the god damn wall and tried to kill him and her with some metal pipe thing (forgot what it was called). Cops got called, cashier ended up going to the hospital with a nasty gash, fun all around.

[ - ] NosebergShekelman 1 point 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 10:51:06 ago (+1/-0)

I seen this happen for decades. Its actually fairly common for married women to fuck their coworkers.

[ - ] Rebooted 0 points 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 10:54:26 ago (+0/-0)

Make sure you have proof. They may be acting inappropriately but it could just be flirting.

[ - ] con77 1 point 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 10:56:04 ago (+3/-2)

Not your business

[ - ] Isaacjan [op] 0 points 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 10:57:25 ago (+2/-2)

What a pathetic, cowardly person you must be.

[ - ] 2Drunk 0 points 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 11:20:03 ago (+0/-0)

My boss direct boss is the blabbler. Doesn't know shit about the job but takes credit for everything. Her boss knows part of her job but absolutely incompetent and does not care to lean about anything I do. Top boss lets her take credit for my work.

Anyway my direct boss just gossips all day and hardly does any real work. She is the blabbler in this video.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q4PC8Luqiws

[ - ] NemesisPrime 1 point 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 11:22:05 ago (+1/-0)

The Husband. Tell him. Now!

[ - ] deleted 1 point 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 11:33:30 ago (+1/-0)

deleted

[ - ] Isaacjan [op] 0 points 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 11:35:13 ago (+0/-0)

I agree entirely, my plan is to find something new by February

[ - ] carnold03 0 points 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 11:46:15 ago (+1/-1)

Good. You got it out of your system. Now, you can update your resume with a calm head and apply for positions elsewhere so as to quietly depart, letting the family company fail and die.

[ - ] SumerBreeze 0 points 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 12:19:32 ago (+0/-0)

Maybe record everything she says about him, send it to her husband anonymously…

[ - ] deleted 0 points 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 13:48:17 ago (+2/-2)

deleted

[ - ] Isaacjan [op] 2 points 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 14:15:16 ago (+3/-1)

That was a lot of words to say absolutely nothing. I genuinely think people like you shouldn't exist.

[ - ] deleted 1 point 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 14:25:36 ago (+2/-1)

deleted

[ - ] Isaacjan [op] -1 points 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 14:27:36 ago (+1/-2)

"My schizo ravings don't mean anything? You must be unable to form a connection with anyone for any reason."

I genuinely think people like you should not exist.

[ - ] deleted 2 points 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 14:29:36 ago (+3/-1)

deleted

[ - ] SirNiggsalot 0 points 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 14:15:28 ago (+0/-0)

Give her my number , friend

[ - ] Cellphone 0 points 2.5 yearsOct 22, 2022 14:50:25 ago (+0/-0)

All these comments and I haven’t seen this warning-

Maybe the husband already knows and endorses this activity.