Sign into an existing account

I dont agree. Monogamy is the basis of western civilization. Its why we are superior to the middle easterners. Infidelity is an assault on the entire community.

You're a very, very disgusting kike. Continue outing yourself.

"My schizo ravings don't mean anything? You must be unable to form a connection with anyone for any reason."

I genuinely think people like you should not exist.

If that happened I may actually believe in karma or a higher power, or something. These evil people need something to happen to them.

I'm not going to worry about any of that. Whore cheating on husband, warn husband. That's it.

That's the responsibility of the parents. We don't live in 100-man villages anymore.


That's up to the father, Isaacjan is a 3-rd party dude who has nothing to do with this shit. His only responsibility as a guy is to inform of the possible infidelity.


Again, not his problem. This is caused by the cheating whore, who should be roundly punished and removed from the family. But that's up to the father, and how he wants to go about doing things. Not Isaacjan, not you.

What does this mean? That your dad is living in a carton? That he keeps a second apartment?

So what, either spend my time sitting outside his apartment waiting, or not tell the husband?

I'm not connected to the guy. Yeah it may hurt and sucks, but not saying anything will haunt me for life. I'm not that kind of coward.

Edit: I'm just going to frame it as a warning. "Hey, watch out for this guy, hes done x y z and she's responded favorably, if you haven't heard of him from her you may want to look into it. No physical evidence, could be wrong, but saw and heard enough to warn you about him."

As a older woman and an old goat, I completely agree.
When we send our daughters off to work we’re throwing them into the lions den.

It doesn't help that they will not stop until you eradicate the very last one of them from your lands, and even then those outside of your lands will constantly be at the gates. Subversion and rot is in their very nature.

Your whole premise, as I see it, is that evolution is fair to females but unfair to males. Perhaps you don’t see these trends in an evolutionary context, but I do, so I’m very certain that mother nature is not playing favorites. Lots of women say the same thing and they point to very real hardships that are part and parcel of womanhood. It doesnt matter. There are trade offs to being a male, benefits and penalties.
No. Females (of almost every species) are the choosier sex because they have a greater investment in reproduction. Females are much more highly invested. They cannot make dozens of babies. They have a massive nutritional investment and their life is endangered by childbirth. They are the primary caretakers of young children in every society. Male risk in each reproductive act is much lower. Men hardly ever die from ejaculation. Its like a 500 calorie investment. He could literally hit the road at that point.
No. Did not give. White men tend to be monogamous which could be defined as a conservative reproductive strategy in which males invest high levels of nurturing and resources to a small number of offspring. Cold climates favor this strategy whereas hot climates favor polygamy. For humans. Did gibbon males choose to be monogamous? No, they just occupied a niche that favored it.
I dont know exactly what you mean but I probably disagree with you on this. There needs to be a fair partenership in which women exchange reproduction and child care work for economic support. Men are not naturally more virtuous and will make decisions to exploit females if they find themselves in a position to do so. The reverse is also true.
No. It depends on what sort of society you are talking about one in ten men that benefits at the expense of 1 or 2 lower status males.

Actually this is a really complex math problem and you have to know all sorts of factors like whether there is polygamy or polygyny and if men were just killed or shut out completely reproductively or whether they had to delay marriage until late in life because of economic conditions and how widespread polygyny was (how many males reproduced with more than one woman) but also whether elites could get away with a mistress and one or two bastards on the side or whether they could have a harem with 100 women in it. All these variables make a difference when you are talking about just how screwed the average male gets by polygamy. But if it was only 1 in 10,000 “winners” then the penalty of the 9999 other guys is probably pretty low. If such a man took 10 wives, the other 9999 perfectly monogamous men would only have to delay marriage by a couple of weeks to reallocate the available females amongst themselves. Now you know why polygynous societies have large age disparities among couples.

Your math doesnt work out. If the female population’s reproductive potential is largely static ( it is) then there are far more male winners than you imply.
Well here it comes anyway. In highly monogamous societies, women loose out and fail to reproduce as much as men. That is why there were so many unmarried women in the convents of europe. Only where there are high levels of polygamy are women assured reproductive success because aggressive males create an artificial scarcity of women. The more monogamous men are, the more the intrasexual competition is shifted on to women. The more invested men are in a pairing, the fussier they will be about their mates.
Nonsense. If low value women are guaranteed reproductive success in polygamous societies then men are making more “detrimental “ matches. You cant have it both ways.

In polygamous societies women will tend to select the more aggressive men. In monogamous societies, men will be selected for solicitousness, being a good dad, reliable, etc. Because women had more choice of mates in monogamous societies (compared to polygyny in islamic regions) women selected for more solicitous males. Why are white guys “simps”? Intersexual selection by white females. When we have the choice, we select nice guys.
And men’s sexual tastes change in monogamy. Men go for the high value female because more is riding on his choice.
No. Women’s sexuality has to be managed in patrilineal societies so that productive males dont leave their heritable wealth to someone elses kid. This is not an issue in matrilineal societies since the males are not terribly productive so the wealth is minimal and is passed down through the maternal line. Its not because our turn ons are “more complicated” or whatever.
I think I already covered this. The intrasexual competition is more evenly distributed between males and females in monogamy. The solution to males being screwwed over by other males is solved by monogamy. This is the reason why white guys tend to get along better.
No. You are cherry picking one jewish run movement. Lots of womens movements were to support soldiers or orphans or to ban booze or ponography. This is a ridiculous assertion. Im restraining myself here.
I think youre fetishizing high school females. Every jewish imagining you see on the tv or social media is not reflective of white teenage females. Thats about as real as nigger NASA scientists.

Why do you think they are convincing these girls to cut their breasts off? Its because white girls are uncomfortable with the new sexy roles they are encouraging them to lead. They think they have to be prostitutes and they dont like the idea. They are uncomfortable with their bodies. They are not horny nymphos ready to ride black cock. Thats what you guys tell yourselves here. Its not reality. White teenage girls are biologically the same as they were when I was one. I didnt want to have sex. I didnt feel sexy. Most of my friends were the same. We felt pressured to be like the jew movies. We certainly did not fantasize about drug addicts and wannabe rappers.

What are you trying to say? That men cheat because they cant help it but women cheat because theyre irrarional/bad?

Well that’s convenient. I thought women were supposed to be the ones that lacked personal accountability. Huh.