×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules
7
7 comments block


[ - ] i_scream_trucks 2 points 1.6 yearsOct 21, 2022 05:39:17 ago (+2/-0)

it gets even funnier when you realise that those 'indigenous' 'first nations' tribes....

genocided the last competing hominid species. wiped them off the face of the earth. all of them.

tl;dr native africans, north americans, australian aboriginals, actually did to their neighbours, what they accuse us of trying to do to them.

unless history has forgotten to tell us something, they were already gone tens of thousands of years before liberal retards got all uppity about whites colonising, so where are they?

[ - ] Cunt 1 point 1.6 yearsOct 21, 2022 09:19:40 ago (+1/-0)

Aboriginals committing genocide? The "first" Australians? Com'on! You can't dangle that carrot and not drop some sort reference so I can use it.

[ - ] i_scream_trucks 0 points 1.6 yearsOct 22, 2022 00:59:58 ago (+0/-0)

we have plenty of fossil evidence supporting competing species of hominids when we emerged, denisovan, neanderthal, and a couple of others elsewhere in the world.

unless australia is the only place on the planet that never had any hominid before homo sapiens sapiens (aka us) then the aboriginals who call themselves the 'first nations' must have at one point, been competing with them for resources. theyre not there any more, and abo's claim theyve been here for 60,000 years so unless they all decided to stop fucking, or kill themselves, logic would dictate the aboriginals murdered them all, like they accuse us of attempting to do to them.

Australia isnt like most of asia africa or europe, we dont have shit like random shopping centre carparks being built every few kilometres everywhere in our country, its fucking huge and barren and thanks to the fact that our niggers never even built mud huts there is no known ancient architecture to be digging up and investigating, so no, i cant give you anything solid to research for yourself, im just extrapolating from the evidence we have supporting that theory in other places. this fuckin place is too big and too empty for people to be finding shit digging in random places.

aboriginal australians are seperated from pretty much every other 'homo sapiens' by some 50-60 thousand years and are far closer to being 'homo erectus' than 'homo sapiens'

[ - ] boekanier 0 points 1.6 yearsOct 21, 2022 09:33:16 ago (+0/-0)

homo sapiens himself is kind of a neanderthaler. Progress is reversed.

[ - ] Artificial_Intelligentile 0 points 1.6 yearsOct 21, 2022 09:05:23 ago (+0/-0)

liberalism is a disease. i agree.

but survival of the fittest???

should only those survive who can produce the most offspring, or shouldnt rather those survive who acn think ahead long enough to build a society that is capable to survive the death of the sun?

remember, 300 million years from now,the sun will have gotten so hot, life on earth will become impossible.

so "survival of the fittest" shouldnt be applied to short lived circumstances, but be defined by scientific methods.

the niGGer may be able to outbreed us, the jEw might be able to subvert us, but only WHITES are capable to evolve their society far enough in order to be able to conquer the stars, and make earth survive.

so yeah, survival of the fittest, but no, dont let yourself go extinct without defending yourself.

White compassion is absolutely necessary foor survival, yet we shouldnt extend it to those who outbreed us.

its our duty to prevent shitskin bugs like chinese from spreading to the stars.

they will pollute every planet with their slavery, while us Whites settle in Oneill Cylinders and watch new live sprout on the worlds we protect.

thats what being WHITE means

[ - ] deleted 0 points 1.6 yearsOct 21, 2022 07:15:40 ago (+0/-0)

deleted

[ - ] Artificial_Intelligentile 0 points 1.6 yearsOct 21, 2022 09:06:45 ago (+0/-0)

liberalism is a disease. i agree.

but survival of the fittest???

should only those survive who can produce the most offspring, or shouldnt rather those survive who acn think ahead long enough to build a society that is capable to survive the death of the sun?

remember, 300 million years from now,the sun will have gotten so hot, life on earth will become impossible.

so "survival of the fittest" shouldnt be applied to short lived circumstances, but be defined by scientific methods.

the niGGer may be able to outbreed us, the jEw might be able to subvert us, but only WHITES are capable to evolve their society far enough in order to be able to conquer the stars, and make earth survive.

so yeah, survival of the fittest, but no, dont let yourself go extinct without defending yourself.

White compassion is absolutely necessary foor survival, yet we shouldnt extend it to those who outbreed us.

its our duty to prevent shitskin bugs like chinese from spreading to the stars.

they will pollute every planet with their slavery, while us Whites settle in Oneill Cylinders and watch new live sprout on the worlds we protect.

thats what being WHITE means