Sign into an existing account

[ - ] chrimony 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 5, 2022 21:05:28 ago (+0/-0)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zMJKIBUU5fE

Shows a still from dogcam @2:22

A video analysis of dogcam shows curvature:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=edsUrLXrlLg

[ - ] VicariousJambi 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 5, 2022 21:18:57 ago (+0/-0)

Disagree, if the earth was a ball you should be able to see a lot more distortion than that.

[ - ] chrimony 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 5, 2022 21:28:21 ago (+0/-0)

The video shows a calculation of what you should see. It matches just fine. Of course there are tons of videos from higher up in space that show even more curvature, but the flattards say it's all "CGI" -- even though it's not just NASA now, it's all these independent rocket companies going to space to, what, put up fake satellites to fool the goyim?? There's no amount of evidence or reasoning to convince a flattard.

[ - ] VicariousJambi 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 5, 2022 21:39:33 ago (+0/-0)

I’ve done the calculations myself on objects I can see myself. Math doesn’t add up to what I see. I can see a city 25 miles away. Simply doesn’t add up to my personal physical observation.

[ - ] chrimony 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 5, 2022 22:01:56 ago (+0/-0)

I’ve done the calculations myself on objects I can see myself.

Then do the calculations for the dogcam video. Are they right or wrong? And remember, first it was "no curvature" and "water always finds it's level". Now it's "not enough curvature".

I can see a city 25 miles away. Simply doesn’t add up to my personal physical observation.

So you say. I can't verify your personal anecdote. But typical mistakes are doing the calculation wrong, not taking into account the height of objects, and not taking into account the height you are viewing from. And then of course there's always the issue of refraction, but repeated observations under different conditions should account for that.

[ - ] VicariousJambi 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 5, 2022 22:07:05 ago (+0/-0)

I don’t really care about the calculations for the video or if you trust me about my personal experiences. I know what I can see.

[ - ] chrimony 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 5, 2022 22:12:02 ago (+0/-0)

Of course. Typical flattard behavior. But a reminder that you don't even need to calculate to see that there is curvature in the dogcam video where there should be NONE according to flattards.

[ - ] VicariousJambi 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 5, 2022 22:15:38 ago (+0/-0)

Just because they threw up some numbers and a neat red curve doesn’t mean anything to me. What it’s not showing is anywhere near the curvature that they tell us should be there.

They also didn’t even do any math for me to disprove lol

[ - ] chrimony 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 5, 2022 22:19:10 ago (+0/-0)

The math is in the description. And flattards say there should be "NO CURVE", but it's plainly visible. Pick a lane.

Continue thread

[ + ] Deleted

[ - ] deleted 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 5, 2022 22:10:00 ago (+0/-0)

deleted

[ - ] FreeinTX 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 5, 2022 09:14:39 ago (+3/-3)

Doubling down on retard.

Again, sea "level" is a term that implies equal distance relative to the center of the earth, no brain.

And now, you're dodging the issue. Stop trying to prove "not round" and prove flat earth.

[ - ] PeckerwoodPerry 3 points 2.7 yearsAug 5, 2022 09:28:45 ago (+4/-1)

Fill a glass of water up to the very top and test that theory. Water definitely curves, and you are a fucking retard

[ - ] AOUsNameIsDavid [op] -3 points 2.7 yearsAug 5, 2022 09:31:57 ago (+0/-3)

Did it and the water spilt over the edge instead of curving to the shape of the glass. Fucking retard.

[ + ] PeckerwoodPerry

[ - ] PeckerwoodPerry 3 points 2.7 yearsAug 5, 2022 10:49:29 ago (+3/-0)

Yeah, you over filled it. There's a point where water tension creates a curve across the top before it spills. This is basic stuff.

[ - ] AOUsNameIsDavid [op] -1 points 2.7 yearsAug 5, 2022 10:53:43 ago (+1/-2)

Now do the same experiment, instead of a glass, use a ball that's rotating 1000mph and moving 66,666mph. Basic stuff really.

[ + ] olinneserpona

[ - ] olinneserpona 2 points 2.7 yearsAug 5, 2022 11:47:21 ago (+3/-1)

*use a ball the size of the earth with equivalent mass. Filthy liar.

[ - ] localsal 3 points 2.7 yearsAug 5, 2022 12:50:38 ago (+3/-0)

If you think the earth is flat, record a video of the sun setting for an hour.

Keep zooming in on the sun - a point source of light - for that full hour as it drops below the horizon.

A flat earth should allow the zoom to keep bring that sun back into view, right?

Post that hour (or 2, or 3) long video of zooming in each time the sun disappears - and there is your proof of a flat earth.

Until you can do that, your theory is flawed.

[ - ] ilikeskittles 4 points 2.7 yearsAug 5, 2022 09:02:38 ago (+6/-2)

I guess you don’t believe in Gravity either?

[ + ] FacelessOne

[ - ] FacelessOne -3 points 2.7 yearsAug 5, 2022 09:21:18 ago (+1/-4)

Does belief in unprovable kike theory make you feel better?

[ + ] SumerBreeze

[ - ] SumerBreeze 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 5, 2022 09:34:59 ago (+4/-3)

No kikes were involved in these European ideas.

Maybe you were dropped on your head as a kid, but you can still eat the scraps from our table.

[ - ] AOUsNameIsDavid [op] 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 5, 2022 10:15:30 ago (+2/-1)

Catholics are kikes, go ahead and source those European Ideas now.

[ + ] FacelessOne

[ - ] FacelessOne -1 points 2.7 yearsAug 5, 2022 10:53:51 ago (+2/-3)

About to say, tell me you know nothing about Jesuits and the Kabbalah without saying as much.

You think Astronomy and Space are "Proud White Achievments."

User 1 Week

[ - ] chrimony -1 points 2.7 yearsAug 5, 2022 20:59:36 ago (+0/-1)

Ancient Greeks figured out the spherical Earth long before the kike Saul brought Yahweh to the gentiles.

[ - ] FreeinTX 5 points 2.7 yearsAug 5, 2022 09:10:45 ago (+5/-0)

Again, you're trying to prove "not round" and too fucking stupid to understand "level" is a term that implies relative to the earth's center.

https://files.catbox.moe/ktxipj.jpeg

[ - ] AOUsNameIsDavid [op] -3 points 2.7 yearsAug 5, 2022 09:11:59 ago (+0/-3)

That's called a fish eye lens. Water doesn't curve. It remains level. That's why it's called sea level. Smooth brain.

https://files.catbox.moe/b8pp6t.jpeg

[ - ] FreeinTX 3 points 2.7 yearsAug 5, 2022 09:22:21 ago (+4/-1)

https://files.catbox.moe/8oupu7.jpg

[ - ] AOUsNameIsDavid [op] -3 points 2.7 yearsAug 5, 2022 09:23:16 ago (+0/-3)

[ - ] FreeinTX 3 points 2.7 yearsAug 5, 2022 09:26:43 ago (+3/-0)

Again, you're trying to prove "not round" by trying to dispell arguments that suggest round earth.

Prove flat earth.

https://files.catbox.moe/rvr50t.jpg

[ - ] AOUsNameIsDavid [op] -3 points 2.7 yearsAug 5, 2022 09:30:21 ago (+0/-3)

[ - ] FreeinTX 2 points 2.7 yearsAug 5, 2022 09:33:55 ago (+3/-1)

Is English a 2nd language for you?

You can't prove flat earth by trying to dispel arguments about round earth.

Stop trying to prove "not round" and prove flat earth. If it was true, this wouldn't be a difficult thing to do.

And I noticed you ignoring the two points I made that do suggest round earth.

The equilateral triangle and the apparent curved jet paths on a Flat map.

[ - ] AOUsNameIsDavid [op] -3 points 2.7 yearsAug 5, 2022 09:36:03 ago (+0/-3)

You ignore my facts, ill ignore your silly insignificant opinions. Pretty simple.

[ - ] FreeinTX 2 points 2.7 yearsAug 5, 2022 09:39:54 ago (+3/-1)

You aren't putting out any facts. You are trying to dispel arguments

Again, stop trying to prove "not round" and prove flat. If the Earth was flat, it would be easy to prove, right?

[ - ] AOUsNameIsDavid [op] -3 points 2.7 yearsAug 5, 2022 09:41:12 ago (+0/-3)

I'm posting memes containing solid facts. If the Earth were actually a ball, it would be easy to prove, right? Instead you have to rely on kike propaganda while im pumping out facts in meme form.

Continue thread

[ + ] SumerBreeze

[ - ] SumerBreeze 3 points 2.7 yearsAug 5, 2022 09:33:01 ago (+4/-1)

You’ve never gotten a ball wet? Why does the water curve around the ball? An amoeba will still be able to swim through the relatively flat water on the curved sphere, though.

[ - ] AOUsNameIsDavid [op] -1 points 2.7 yearsAug 5, 2022 10:13:27 ago (+1/-2)

Except the earth supposedly is not a stationary wet ball, it is supposedly rotating at 1000mph on its axis whilst hurling through space at 66,666mph. Centrifugal force pushes the water off a wet ball every single time.

Like so...

https://files.catbox.moe/4x15w2.webp

[ + ] olinneserpona

[ - ] olinneserpona 2 points 2.7 yearsAug 5, 2022 11:31:05 ago (+3/-1)

Liar. Try spinning the ball with one rotation that takes 24 hours and see how much water spinns off. That way you are at least trying to do an honest experiment. But no, you'd rather be a filthy liar.
Gravity is 300 times stronger than the centrifugal force created by earths spinn.