Sign into an existing account

Yeah, I saw that dumb cunt's comment. She's so detached from reality. Paris was like that because of the lack of diversity.

Diversity of Ideas, yes. Diversity of White peoples, yes.

But none of the modern diversity, there is nothing anti-white about paris in the 1920's outside of those few small circles of socialist jews planning to throw Europe into the chaos of war.

There'd be no policies discriminating against whites, barring them from the opportunities afforded to other races, in fact, it was likely that the opposite was true, and the native French and European man was placed above the foreigner, who was seen as a guest, some geographically misplaced oddity subject to pubic curiosity regarding lesser cultures, or as a lesser manlike creature with a greater propensity for criminal conduct, and little more than those things.

It was still a time when everyone was able to se their people as superior to all others, with white people having a lot more to back such claims, given their history of accomplishments compared to the other peoples they encountered. Perhaps one day those times shall return, they were, after all, the considerable bulk of human history, the century or so of white guilt is an abnormality on the historical record, in all other times, the things we whites feel guilty or ashamed about would be regarded as our great victories, evidence of our inherent supremacy, a testament tat of all humanity, our people should reign supreme, and perhaps be the sole inheritors of the Earth.

1920's France was a time when things were simpler.

Given that we had so much more freedom, if you were an idiot you'd die off and take your genes from the pool of human DNA along with you, if you were an asshole much the same would happen, if you abused you kids, for example, you could easily see that your offspring will not bear any of their own, thus ending your bloodline.

Given that we had such little diversity and a much more eugenic population, we had much less crime, people could trust one another to an extent that would considered insane today, there was also a lot more of an honest spirit to the men who lived then, under most circumstances, no one was holding any alternative motives for what they said or did, and if you were in an argument over politics or economics with someone, you didn't have to suspect that they were arguing disingenuously out of a need to conform to some ideological clique, or that they had motives to undermine or destroy the nation such that it could be replaced with a political system they were indoctrinated into supporting.

The Christians weren't of the modern day judeo-conservative types, which is also a unique product of this one century, and the atheists weren't the marxist redditor types that are also a unique fixture of this 100 years we live in. Both men would agree on most matters of public policy and keep their differences to specific matters, because back then, these weren't the all-encompassing identities that they are today, you had difficulty telling what a man's politics were from his religion, and vice versa.

Unless the man was a jew or muslim, whose religion and politics were one and the same by inherent design, and back then, it was seen as evidence that they were of weak minds, that they could not have one opinions which was independent of every other opinion they held, there was a low regard for jews and muslims, in fact, there was rightly a great degree of dislike for them.

But they fell into the trap that the residents of 4chan had fallen into with the rise of socjus, were it was a small problem of a fringe group who were clearly too insane to gain any sort of influence, they could mostly be ignored as you'd only encounter them in certain places under certain circumstances. A wise king once said, to put out the sparks before they become a conflagration, to do great things when they are small, and to never underestimate the power of a passionate mob of imbecilic fanatics, it's very rare that the rationality of an ideology has any bearing on how well it spreads it's influence.

I would very much like to live in a land which resembles Paris in the 1920's, even today, even just politically, it would be great if we were to build a country that had the exact system and policies of that place and time.

I think the very best thing we could do is actually try and look at the possibility of sending ourselves back in time to the Earth at an earlier point in history, essentially becoming temporal refugees, but ones who could prevent the worst mistakes from being made (I'd be fine with just killing the ancestors of all jews before they could ruin a nation for the first time, and then jumping back into the future to see how the timeline has progressed without the presence of the eternal enemy).

and sheeit