Proof #1 - if the plane flew flat and level on a ball earth they'd gain elevation as the flew.
I'm a pilot and this is horseshit. Go look at an artificial horizon on an airplane. Whether it be modern day digital or old school gyro, there is no way to use that instrument to fly knowingly and perfectly level for even the most brief of moments, let alone over miles. You couldn't knowingly get perfectly level to begin with since the accuracy in the instrument is not there, and even if you could, the slightest wind shift would change your trajectory, out of level.
Pilots, or autopilots, are constantly correcting for shifts in wind or output power to maintain level flight and level flight is not determined by the gyroscope artificial horizon, but rather a pressure differential measuring device called the rate of climb instrument which is lagging and based on changes of pressure relative to a relatively constant press inside the cabin. Small shifts in outside pressure or inside cabin pressure cause the rate of climb meter to move, and there are buffers on the instrument to rid it of spurious changes.
So, the 1st proof is not only bullshit. It's childish bullshit and demonstrates not only a lack of understanding of flight instruments, but an unwillingness to look at even the basic principals of flight instrumentation before makes such a fucking stupid claim.
Nigger, I'm an instrument rated pilot and twin engine plane owner.
And, you're trying to change the subject. There is nothing on any airplane that will allow that plane to be held in perfectly level flight for more than a moment in time.
No, it really isn't. I'm sure that SR-71 fighter jets are able to fly quite stable at Mach 3 mate. They don't have to correct for curvature because there isn't any.
They can keep DVing me and i'll keep deleting those accounts, and coming back with new alt and posting more truth each time. I used to be like one of the globetards so I know it's only a matter of time before they come to their dumbass realizations. The only reason I'm dedicating so much time to this is because everyone here has the potential to break free from the Globetard psyop. I believe in these faggots.
[ + ]anon
[ - ] anon 3426468 1 point 1.9 yearsJun 2, 2022 10:34:57 ago (+1/-0)
I'm a pilot and this is horseshit. Go look at an artificial horizon on an airplane. Whether it be modern day digital or old school gyro, there is no way to use that instrument to fly knowingly and perfectly level for even the most brief of moments, let alone over miles. You couldn't knowingly get perfectly level to begin with since the accuracy in the instrument is not there, and even if you could, the slightest wind shift would change your trajectory, out of level.
Pilots, or autopilots, are constantly correcting for shifts in wind or output power to maintain level flight and level flight is not determined by the gyroscope artificial horizon, but rather a pressure differential measuring device called the rate of climb instrument which is lagging and based on changes of pressure relative to a relatively constant press inside the cabin. Small shifts in outside pressure or inside cabin pressure cause the rate of climb meter to move, and there are buffers on the instrument to rid it of spurious changes.
So, the 1st proof is not only bullshit. It's childish bullshit and demonstrates not only a lack of understanding of flight instruments, but an unwillingness to look at even the basic principals of flight instrumentation before makes such a fucking stupid claim.
[ + ] AllOfThem
[ - ] AllOfThem [op] 0 points 1.9 yearsJun 2, 2022 13:51:19 ago (+1/-1)
Childish bullshit is trying to claim your a pilot online and dismissing proof based on your own ignorant playtime on flight simulators.
Which reminds me, do they replicate the EarthBall spinning at 1000mph in flight simulators? No, didn't think so.
[ + ] anon
[ - ] anon 3426468 1 point 1.9 yearsJun 2, 2022 14:31:20 ago (+1/-0)
And, you're trying to change the subject. There is nothing on any airplane that will allow that plane to be held in perfectly level flight for more than a moment in time.
That faggots 1st proof is laughable and childish.
[ + ] zongongo
[ - ] zongongo 1 point 1.9 yearsJun 2, 2022 16:03:20 ago (+2/-1)
[ + ] anon
[ - ] anon 3426468 1 point 1.9 yearsJun 2, 2022 16:06:47 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] anon
[ - ] anon 7519318 [op] 1 point 1.9 yearsJun 2, 2022 16:46:16 ago (+1/-0)
"I can't fly my plane straight in a flight simulator therefor DEBUNKED"
[ + ] anon
[ - ] anon 3426468 0 points 1.9 yearsJun 2, 2022 16:48:58 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] anon
[ - ] anon 7519318 [op] 1 point 1.9 yearsJun 2, 2022 16:51:44 ago (+1/-0)
"I didn't debunk it yet i'm not going to bother watching the rest of the proof, showcasing 199 other FACTS you also can't debunk"
You're the childish and dishonest one here mate
[ + ] anon
[ - ] anon 3426468 0 points 1.9 yearsJun 2, 2022 17:00:38 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] anon
[ - ] anon 7954536 0 points 1.9 yearsJun 2, 2022 18:15:24 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 1.9 yearsJun 2, 2022 16:00:31 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ]anon
[ - ] anon 1462009 0 points 1.9 yearsJun 2, 2022 22:26:04 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ]anon
[ - ] anon 7397288 -1 points 1.9 yearsJun 2, 2022 10:20:11 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] anon
[ - ] anon 3757062 1 point 1.9 yearsJun 2, 2022 10:24:18 ago (+2/-1)
[ + ] anon
[ - ] anon 7954536 1 point 1.9 yearsJun 2, 2022 18:17:14 ago (+1/-0)*
[ + ] anon
[ - ] anon 3757062 1 point 1.9 yearsJun 3, 2022 03:24:42 ago (+1/-0)