They're just retaining deadly Soviet era viruses for your health. Yeah... let's store Anthrax so that we'll all be healthy. [sarcastic micdrop]
???
You cannot develop treatments without studying the disease. And you cannot study a disease without storing it. In a lab. Which will of course have biohazard signs. And be funded by government agencies.
That -doesn't- prove they -aren't- running a bioweapons program. Maybe they are. Wouldn't be surprised. But all the "evidence" she presents can be plausibly explained by benign research facilities.
So why is she just dismissing that possibility with sarcasm, instead of addressing it? Why is she pretending that the only reason to study dangerous pathogens is to weaponize them, when it is obvious that you also need to study them to defend against them?
That's a textbook manipulation technique: Ignore arguments you can't win, just make fun of them instead.
The video is very well put together. Really slick. High production standards.
Did you not see the state of those buildings that are 'housing' the dangerous bio-research pathogens? They were supposed to destroy these pathogens 17 years ago.
The documents she shows of people dying mysteriously may have something to do with the experiments these labs were running, what do you have to say about that?
Probably the best produced and put together video of the ukraine situation I have ever seen. Touches all the key points from start to finish. Backs it all up with excellent sources and evidence right in the video. This is real journalism.
I really enjoy her videos, they are all this level of informative and concise. She just posts so infrequently, unfortunately. Never-the-less, great stuff to share with anyone.
[ + ] GloryBeckons
[ - ] GloryBeckons 0 points 3.2 yearsMar 20, 2022 22:56:02 ago (+1/-1)
???
You cannot develop treatments without studying the disease. And you cannot study a disease without storing it. In a lab. Which will of course have biohazard signs. And be funded by government agencies.
That -doesn't- prove they -aren't- running a bioweapons program. Maybe they are. Wouldn't be surprised. But all the "evidence" she presents can be plausibly explained by benign research facilities.
So why is she just dismissing that possibility with sarcasm, instead of addressing it? Why is she pretending that the only reason to study dangerous pathogens is to weaponize them, when it is obvious that you also need to study them to defend against them?
That's a textbook manipulation technique: Ignore arguments you can't win, just make fun of them instead.
The video is very well put together. Really slick. High production standards.
I wonder who is funding it.
[ + ] Love240
[ - ] Love240 [op] -1 points 3.2 yearsMar 20, 2022 23:12:05 ago (+0/-1)
The documents she shows of people dying mysteriously may have something to do with the experiments these labs were running, what do you have to say about that?
[ + ] RoBatten
[ - ] RoBatten 1 point 3.2 yearsMar 20, 2022 22:32:00 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Hobama
[ - ] Hobama 0 points 3.2 yearsMar 20, 2022 20:48:12 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] Love240
[ - ] Love240 [op] -1 points 3.2 yearsMar 20, 2022 21:30:40 ago (+0/-1)