Emotional responses to world/national/local/household problems lead to immense complications rather than solutions.
Women should be controlled by a firm hand that knows how to handle them. That is a tall ask for the supposed men in a society, especially one that has been kiked beyond belief.
But you refuse to see that the reasons they are so detestable are the same reasons they “keep their women in line” — polygyny. It makes males stupid and violent. Why are white guys more honest and hard working than muslims? These are traits promoted in monogamy with heavy FEMALE preference. That and 5 or 10 generations is the only thing separating white men from the muzzies.
Historically though white men did keep their wives in line, and were expected to (at least in public). Being henpecked was almost as shameful as being cuckolded. Monogamy doesn't have to mean being a doormat.
They don't. Arab women are going for white men, white arabs still get to fuck 10 year old white girls in white people countries without anything happening.
I always thought women had retard level emotional intelligence, being swept into awful decisions by constantly changing emotions, reading people wrong and getting swept up in panics because of idiot emotional levels. Emotional intelligence is understanding the nuances of unspoken communication and reading people. How many times have women blown up because they thought a man meant one thing when he said another? It's like talking to feral children.
They are obsessed with the idea of emotional intelligence for the same reason fat women are obsessed with people in shape- subconsciously they know they failed in that department.
My favorite is when my girlfriend blows up in the middle of my sentence before hearing what I am trying to say and the end part of the sentence that she didn't hear completely invalidates the reason she is blowing up.
Women all think they have this magical power only women have where they understand things better and read people in a way men can't when they're stupider in both these areas. It's like when people think idiot niggers have these mystical pearls of wisdom for idiot white people.
Do you know how women came to have greater agreeability? Warlords ride in to town and murder all the local males and then favor the females that “cooperate” and kill or leave to starve women who dont’.
High agreeability is a male preference that females are selected for ... sometimes it bites males in the ass, but they should have thought about that when they were warlording. The selection for this trait is driven by males.
I agree, this happens anywhere there is a conquered people. It is a survival mechanism especially for women. From cave men to ghengis khan to WWII to the taliban. It's in the bible as well. It's the reason women can be coerced into voting against their own best interests.
Have you ever seen EQ test questions? The answers are entirely subjective. You put what you think is the best answer, and no one else's opinion is worth more. You actually always have the highest EQ possible wrt your system of scoring. Crediting this shit is a symptom of low IQ.
[ - ] canbot 1 point 2.2 yearsMar 8, 2022 06:39:33 ago (+1/-0)
(((They))) claim women have higher EQ but in reality women are absolutely vicious with other women. They don't have a friend group like men do. They don't have loyalty like men do.
EQ is just one of those subjective measures that can easily be interpreted any way you want.
The man flu has been debunked, men do indeed get symptoms associated with a viral respiratory infection much worse than women. There are physiological, hormonal and immune response differences that would otherwise indicate men get the flu harder, and for longer with a higher rate of morbidity than women.
It was a scam run by perverts to get under women’s skirts under the false premise of medical intervention.
Did it work in the sense that some women had orgasms? If orgasms cured mental illness there wouldn’t be mental illness. Cooming is not a medical intervention.
This is something akin to molestation. Vulnerable young women with depression go to a medical authority for relief, their families pay this “doctor” who then takes advantage. A mental manipulation is involved here. It is a betrayal of trust.
“But they enjoyed it, you want children to be happy don’t you?” Says the child molester. I think your reasoning is comparable. These women didn’t benefit at all from this practice. They had to live with the embarassment of being duped and violated by these degenerates for the rest of their lives. Normal fucking white people do not just “get over” being masturbated by a stranger. Depression is not alleved by having your doctor take sexual advantage of you. Did I mention this was fucking stupid?
Also Im willing to bet no fat, ugly, or old women were ever “treated” in this way.
This is why I don't have women friends, my friend's wives are dumb as fuck. Stay at home/BLM/pray for Ukraine cunts. The funny thing is, they call me when they need practical advice or information as they are borderline spastic... but when it comes to this type of shit they think I'm being brutal, wacist etc etc. give me the 'look' but don't say a fucking word as they have nothing going on between the ears.
And they wonder why I don't want to go on their "girly night's out" FUCK THAT.
A lot of people don't understand that the leftist feminist social cause women are the bimbos. They're the ones who think the government is their big daddy, and repeat the word "patriarchy" because of that.
Feminists took offence at words like bimbo, because they were the bimbo faction of women, not all women.
Originally feminists were just intellectuals and dykes and intellectual dykes. There are still plenty of those sort. But (((corporate america)) or the educational system or somebody has sold feminism as a carefully curated rebellion to some low IQ bimbos with a lot of facile messaging. It is now one on the social issues that bimbos score social points on to comptete with other bimbos on some social justice playing field to be the champion of all virtue signalling.
Or maybe this is some bargaining chip that young females are using to improve their hand against males. I dunno. But it doesn’t come from selflessness. Its a power play. Im just not sure that the women who do it actually understand what they are doing.
Its easier for me to be objective about it because Im an old posty roastie. My motives are different. But it feels like today’s feminism is a bit of intrasexual competition combined with some collective bargaining directed toward prospective male mates. But I don’t think THEY think that’s what they’re doing.
British psychiatrist Simon Wessely says that females are more likely to talk to each other about their symptoms, which can spread outbreaks...
On average, women speak 7,000 more words per day than men. I personally believe they use much of that to speak about current events, feelings, and, like he mentions, symptoms. And due to women normally wanting to go along with the group, they are much more susceptible to the "reverse placebo" they refer to in the article.
edit: not that talking more is a bad thing. I don't want to come off as bitching about all women. Us guys have our shit, too. Just in general..
On average, women speak 7,000 more words per day than men.
Probably an underestimate. Lol. Sometimes I meet guys— straight guys— that really have the gift of the gab. But usually men like to talk alot less than me. Sometimes the men in my life will call me, but I find they don’t really want to have a conversation. Just exchange basic “news” and then look for opportunities to “escape” the conversation. I’ll say “are you trying to hang up on me?” And they’ll lie and say “no” and then I can make them listen to me for 5 more minutes. I know they don’t really want to talk anymore. But I like talking enough to drag it out.
due to women normally wanting to go along with the group
Accepted. But also we want to influence the group more. We’re not just taking instructions. We’re telling each other what to think.
I really like to talk and I think Im pretty typical among women in this respect. It feels good to share my thoughts and feelings with people I know and I like to hear what others are thinking and feeling. Its a dopamine hit. I feel irritated when people don’t want to share. This is genetic imo,
If human beings are information systems that transmit cultural information through conversations, then females are just sending and receiving more information back and forth than males. We tend to dismiss these conversations about feelings as unimportant but they aren’t. Females are therefore far more ‘synched up’ with the hive mind . There are obviously benefits to that capability or it wouldn’t be a thing. But if some bad actor is sending cultural disinformation, one would expect women would be more susceptible. So are men more ‘logical’? Or are they just getting less inundated with cultural (dis)information and doing more ‘independent processing’ ? Maybe the question is moot.
They should be taught how to control their own emotions. It's a skill that women have to deliberately cultivate, and it's probably because of the hormone package.
Emotions are an exciting ride, and a lot won't give that up.
It's not they haven't learned how to control their emotions, it's that they can't control their emotions.
The only thing women can learn to do is to control their actions - which is where men come in. Men need to teach the women how to act when their emotions arise.
Basically, create competitive sets of emotions with one side being a better route to take action from.
A basic example
Woman: Oh noes, covid is killing millions of people we need to get the jab! Man: Covid is killing the weak, old, and already dead, and the jab will more than likely hurt or even kill our kids. No jab! Woman: I guess our kids are more important than random people that are meant to die anyway. No jab!
Both arguments are emotion based to her, but the man needs to steer the action to the one that provides the better outcome.
You are just cherry picking the behaviors you attribute to emotional impulsivity. The prisons are filled with men — yes even white men— who failed to “control their emotions”. Using violence, fucking someone else’s wife, excessive drinking— aren’t these all emotion based behaviors?
Your example is refreshingly fact free and purely emotion based. That’s just an emotional narrative with some jewish mocking thrown in. That is not a serious argument based on facts or logic.
First, I said it was a basic example. There are countless other ones that can be read about all over the interwebs.
Emotions are not only what leads men - especially White men - to commit crimes. Don't forget that women - and the pussy pass - do not get the same treatment as men for similar crimes. Trying to correlate emotions to prison populations is going to fraught with confounding variables.
I doubt there are conclusive studies on emotional responses in general, and if there were, all the conclusions would be generalities that may never apply to individuals.
In general - the emotional component of women is very beneficial to nurturing the family. Making decisions based on emotions is bad business for everyone.
If you don't believe that last sentence, look up the direction of the world over the last 50 years and then look up the rise of women in leadership roles.
Yes, that is correlation vs causation. Add in the rise in familial problems due to the destruction of the "nuclear family" and the correlation starts to amplify.
Everyone has emotions - but it seems that men are able to mostly separate the long term decisions/consequences from the emotions more easily than women.
Not all - maybe not even most, in some cases, but in general.
Don't forget that women - and the pussy pass - do not get the same treatment as men for similar crimes
Nigger excuse. This is what niggers say “Mass inkahsuhrayshun n sheeit!! I dindu nuffin”— males commit more violent crime, they commit more robberies, they commit more rapes. Males are GENETICALLY predisposed to do all these things more than women and its because they have an evolutionary incentive to do so.
In fact, males of most animals are more prone to violence and more prone to rape and that’s because the pay offs for males, who have relatively low parental investments to annihilate male competition to hoard more females, is much higher. Violence and other strategies of intense male competition are much older than human beings and its so deeply embedded in your biology, its simply the way the brain develops in the presence of androgens. The process is highly similar for many animals.
There is no way women commit comparable levels of crime to males. Own it. Your penis pass is no good with me. Get it stamped by one of these other fags.
Everyone has emotions - but it seems that men are able to mostly separate the long term decisions/consequences from the emotions more easily than women.
It seems they’re not. Again you are arbitrarily assigning “emotions” to female behaviors which are suboptimal but for some reason the supoptimal behaviors of men are given other motivations. Why are they not emotion based?
For instance, wars are a fundamentally male behavior. Wars are always fought because A.) one group of males is trying to steal the females of another group of males or B.) one group of males is trying to steal the resources of another group of males so that they can acquire more females with additional resources. It’s the reason why males are 10x more ambitious than females in business and the reason why males are typically more ready to cheat each other to get ahead. More babes or more money which leads to more babes.
Truth is that the Russia Ukraine war is based on the same instinctual behavior that causes niggers in the hood to shoot each other. These are male behaviors and they are emotion based.
but the man needs to steer the action to the one that provides the better outcome.
War is a classic male behavior which does not provide a better outcome yet males are prone to it because of their manly manly fee fees . Same with these vulture capitalists that fuck over thousands of workers to become billionaires. These extreme levels of male competition are emotion driven and they do not produce optimal outcomes for society.
In general - the emotional component of women is very beneficial to nurturing the family. Making decisions based on emotions is bad business for everyone.
Your definition of emotions is incomplete. Women have more nurturing emotions. That will make prioritize compassion and safety in some situations. Men will have different emotions that will drive them to make different decisions.
What you really mean is that men have a different set of emotions that cause them to have different priorities. Males are still acting on emotions. You just choose to view male emotions as sensible because they coincide with your priorities.
muh neurotic wahmens fear the covid
Do you really suppose its a good idea to have the female of the species have and equal taste for risk as the male? Do you not understand why women would be more cautious about an outbreak of disease than men?
No. You think that because females are more cautious they are “irrational” or hysterical or whatever the fuck.
The egg layers always have more risk exposure in reproduction. It makes perfect sense that they are inherently cautious.
I could argue men are reckless as fuck. But it wouldn’t be productive because I recognize they are as reckless as they need to be to survive and produce offspring. Women are as cautious as they need to be.
Yes, that is correlation vs causation. Add in the rise in familial problems due to the destruction of the "nuclear family" and the correlation starts to amplify.
Not really surprising that you’re trying to pin the destruction of monogamy on women but it isn’t true. Monogamy is maintained by men. And it was destroyed by them. Starting with Henry VIII.
You faggots have to accept that women’s priorities are not the same as yours, and you need to strike a compromise in order to continue the human race. No you can’t have it all your way. It would be a fucking disaster if you did.
I think you do a good job of proving all my points, so I will only add one thing:
I never said that the destruction of monogamy was due to emotion or by women - those are your assumptions.
The prevailing view on here is that kikes are the ones that are destroying the nuclear family - which leads to many single parent households, and most of those are women.
Children raised my single mothers are demonstrably less adapted for civilized society - as a whole - than those raised in two parent families, and even by single fathers. That was my point - which I assumed most would understand from being on here for any length of time.
>I think you do a good job of proving all my points, so I will only add one thing:
I think you did a good job of avoiding mine.
I never said that the destruction of monogamy was due to emotion or by women - those are your assumptions.
Oh no. Your implication was fairly clear. You said the world has gone in the wrong direction as female have become leaders and then you said that it might be just a correlation but with the breakup of the nuclear family, “correlations begin to amplify” by which I assume your meaning to bee that the evidence builds for your hypothesis that women are “causing all the trouble” and on some wild emotional ride and need men to help them control their actions. That was what your meant.
But I can say exactly that same thing about men and its equally as true.
which leads to many single parent households, and most of those are women.
Obviously. Women are the primary caretakers of children. Male paternal investment is highly variable in humans.
Children raised my single mothers are demonstrably less adapted for civilized society - as a whole - than those raised in two parent families,
Children of single moms have social problems because males who abandon their mate and offspring tend to be pursuing a polygamous strategy which is associated with traits like promiscuity, violence, theft, etc and the apple doesn’t fall far from the tree. Being a shitty dad is genetic and it tends to go along with being a shitty person in other areas. The biggest problem isn’t a lack of male influence. Its the genes from shitty parents who tend not to marry, especially dads who like to make kids more than to take care of them.
That was my point
That was not your point at all. You know what your point was. You were in a circle jerk with yesiknow about women being driven hither and thither by their wild fee fees and you were developing a lesson plan to save us from ourselves through competive sets of emotions like your fake example. You guys are really funny.
You avoid my point that war is an emotion based male behavior and we are watching a retarded one that was completely created by men and is being fought by men and I might just have to create a competitve set of emotions so that men can take a better route next time.
But war doesn’t count cause thats different! Not those emotions! It’s different when we do it.
[ - ] localsal 1 point 2.2 yearsMar 8, 2022 02:57:11 ago (+1/-0)
LMAO.
You really think that men want to go to war?
Are you of the "women are the biggest victims of war" mentality? LMAO.
There are various reasons to go to war. Was it emotions when every country got embroiled in the Great War due to treaties?
As a pertinent example, is it emotions for putin to invade Ukraine to protect Russians from being killed by Ukrainians?
You boil down war to your liking, but here is a task - go ask men if they want to go to war. Not the talking head kikes on tv, but the real "gonna get shot to shit" men in the militaries.
Some of them probably love the idea of war, and want to kill enemies. In WW2, it was shown that about 10-20% of all soldiers actually killed an enemy.
Most soldiers that join up in a volunteer army during peacetime have no propensity to go to war. They enjoy the benefits of the military service and do not want to risk death. Most people do not like to risk death.
I heard stories of US National Guard troops protesting being sent to Iraq - "I didn't sign up for this" was common.
A country used to be analogous to a family, with the military being equivalent to the father. How many fathers want to fight randomly? To risk death or be taken away from their family? LOL. What do people fight for?
Is it "from emotions" when I say that I will fight to provide better opportunities for my kids? Is that emotion? or is it borne out of logic and reason to provide comfort for future generations?
Mayhaps you need to start talking to more men in your life.
LMAO. You really think women want to wear masks and never leave the house?
It really doesn’t matter what men think they want to do. It is what they end up doing based on emotionally driven instinct. Men aren’t aware of the evolutionary incentive of why they are driven to kill each other! They just are! It’s as emotionally driven as niggers shooting each other in the street. You seriously think making war is anything other than a biological activity of males? Males manufacture political justifications for what males are emotionally driven to do. “Crips is the sheeeeitt, Bloods disruspek us” or “muh WMD” . It doesn’t matter why males THINK they do what they do.
Are you of the "women are the biggest victims of war" mentality? LMAO.
You’re not listening to me. Men and women are players in an evolutionary game. Why don’t you turn off your mgtow narrative for 5 seconds?
As a pertinent example, is it emotions for putin to invade Ukraine to protect Russians from being killed by Ukrainians?
It is 100% male driven behavior that Putin and the assholes in NATO are fighting over Ukraine. They are empire building, they are hoarding resources. You don’t want to accept that this is based on a biological male instinct like women freaking out over covid— IT IS.
You boil down war to your liking
You boil covid quarantines down to your liking.
I heard stories of US National Guard troops protesting being sent to Iraq - "I didn't sign up for this" was common.
Perhaps they didn’t think through their emotion based decisions. Women need to train men to deal with their emotions and think logically — “hey, you could get killed!” . LMAO!
What do people fight for?
Men fight to gain reproductive access to females. There has never been a female war. Ever. The answer is staring you in the face.
Is it "from emotions" when I say that I will fight to provide better opportunities for my kids?
Is it “from emotions” when women want to protect their family from covid?
You were the simplistic fuck that wanted to reduce the entire covid hysteria down to “women are fundamentally flawed creatures who are only emotion driven and just can’t see sense.”
Ukraine is a stupid unnecessary war that a bunch of greedy powerful males want and a bunch of lower status males sign up eagerly to fight on one side or another and the overall result is SUBOPTIMAL for society, just as excessive covid restrictions are— but you have a double standard. You don’t want to see that war and most murders are territorial disputees between males that are emotionally driven. My male dog barks at every other dog that walks down the street.
I don’t say that it doesn’t have a purpose. I say it is emotionally driven and often leads to suboptimal results for society.
Mayhaps you need to start talking to more men in your life.
All I do is talk to men. Stop being so sensitive. Lol. Ive got this all wrapped up. Its science. You didn’t like when it was applied to dudes. Its because you’re so emotional and can’t appreciate logic. ;-P
[ - ] yesiknow 1 point 2.2 yearsMar 7, 2022 23:45:21 ago (+1/-0)
If you delete drugs, alcohol and schizoid brain damage from that group, then filter according to racial behaviour, I think you'll find that South of the equator evolution males aren't going to jail for emotional so much as calculated risks they were wrong about. They're the ones who go along quietly when the police come for them.
I think you'll find that South of the equator evolution males
Huh? Are you talking about whites or niggers? Do you mean whites are going to jail for white collar crimes? Whites go to jail far less for violent crimes or rapes or opportunistic crimes like stealling bikes. But they still do them far more than women. White collar crimes or organized crime rackets take more planning. But they are as based on emotion as some woman who goes around yelling about people not wearing masks. Why is one caused by emotion but the other isn’t? The covid Karens aren’t really being overwhelmed by an emotional impulse, are they? They are calculating risk yes? Men are as emotional and irrational as women, is my point.
[ - ] yesiknow 1 point 2.2 yearsMar 8, 2022 06:24:51 ago (+1/-0)
The mask bitches are not calculating risk. They're submissive to a daddy government and they are being emotional when they demand everyone else wear a mask even though they're wearing one. It's irrational. If this was twenty ot thirty years the mask bitches would have been running a calculated risk they'd lose because most men would have shunned and ridiculed them and normal women would likely have smacked them for being tyrant cunts,.
And yes, White men's crimes are more often based on calculated risk.
Hell, you can be right about the calculation and still get fucked. It's just odds. Most people that get ahead in life did something illegal at some point. By some combination of smarts and luck they didn't get caught. Not everyone is super smart. Sometimes even the best roll snake-eyes.
Social shame runs their lives they have this inner voice that is their enemy it literaly constantly fucks with them in our current feminized society...
Before jew feminism it was good it was constantly telling them to worry about the baby worry about having dinner ready worry about the house looking nice and the laundry done...
No that little voice is like a faggot it is in the work place telling women to worry about shit no one used to give a fuck about. Then it has them worrying about other women and their job status and a bunch of shit that doesn't matter or shouldn't matter to a woman.
[ + ] natehiggers
[ - ] natehiggers 15 points 2.2 yearsMar 7, 2022 18:59:14 ago (+17/-2)
[ + ] localsal
[ - ] localsal 11 points 2.2 yearsMar 7, 2022 19:20:29 ago (+11/-0)
Emotional responses to world/national/local/household problems lead to immense complications rather than solutions.
Women should be controlled by a firm hand that knows how to handle them. That is a tall ask for the supposed men in a society, especially one that has been kiked beyond belief.
[ + ] natehiggers
[ - ] natehiggers 11 points 2.2 yearsMar 7, 2022 19:27:40 ago (+12/-1)*
[ + ] MichaelStewart
[ - ] MichaelStewart 4 points 2.2 yearsMar 7, 2022 20:48:53 ago (+4/-0)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 3 points 2.2 yearsMar 7, 2022 21:05:23 ago (+4/-1)
[ + ] Broc_Liath
[ - ] Broc_Liath 16 points 2.2 yearsMar 7, 2022 22:11:42 ago (+16/-0)
[ + ] big_fat_dangus
[ - ] big_fat_dangus [op] 6 points 2.2 yearsMar 7, 2022 22:11:48 ago (+6/-0)
[ + ] 1Icemonkey
[ - ] 1Icemonkey 3 points 2.2 yearsMar 7, 2022 21:38:08 ago (+4/-1)
[ + ] natehiggers
[ - ] natehiggers 1 point 2.2 yearsMar 7, 2022 21:41:41 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] smokratez
[ - ] smokratez 3 points 2.2 yearsMar 8, 2022 03:44:55 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] diggernicks
[ - ] diggernicks -2 points 2.2 yearsMar 8, 2022 10:01:12 ago (+0/-2)
Being overly devoted to it like dune coons is below diarrhea tier fail
[ + ] NuckFiggers
[ - ] NuckFiggers 10 points 2.2 yearsMar 7, 2022 22:15:33 ago (+10/-0)
They are obsessed with the idea of emotional intelligence for the same reason fat women are obsessed with people in shape- subconsciously they know they failed in that department.
[ + ] solomonpapermaster
[ - ] solomonpapermaster 2 points 2.2 yearsMar 8, 2022 09:25:56 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] NuckFiggers
[ - ] NuckFiggers 2 points 2.2 yearsMar 8, 2022 11:24:12 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] Prairie
[ - ] Prairie 5 points 2.2 yearsMar 7, 2022 19:55:40 ago (+5/-0)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 4 points 2.2 yearsMar 7, 2022 21:15:10 ago (+7/-3)
High agreeability is a male preference that females are selected for ... sometimes it bites males in the ass, but they should have thought about that when they were warlording. The selection for this trait is driven by males.
[ + ] big_fat_dangus
[ - ] big_fat_dangus [op] 5 points 2.2 yearsMar 7, 2022 22:59:45 ago (+5/-0)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 2.2 yearsMar 8, 2022 16:30:05 ago (+1/-1)
You. Every Friday night. For the rest of your life.
[ + ] HelpAcct123
[ - ] HelpAcct123 4 points 2.2 yearsMar 7, 2022 21:43:57 ago (+4/-0)
[ + ] 1Icemonkey
[ - ] 1Icemonkey 2 points 2.2 yearsMar 7, 2022 21:39:17 ago (+3/-1)
[ + ] big_fat_dangus
[ - ] big_fat_dangus [op] 3 points 2.2 yearsMar 7, 2022 22:13:08 ago (+4/-1)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 1 point 2.2 yearsMar 8, 2022 01:41:24 ago (+2/-1)
[ + ] PussyShart
[ - ] PussyShart 0 points 2.2 yearsMar 8, 2022 03:20:25 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] 1Icemonkey
[ - ] 1Icemonkey 0 points 2.2 yearsMar 8, 2022 19:21:23 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] deleted
[ - ] deleted 1 point 2.2 yearsMar 8, 2022 15:27:46 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Teefinyomouf
[ - ] Teefinyomouf 3 points 2.2 yearsMar 7, 2022 20:52:09 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena -4 points 2.2 yearsMar 7, 2022 21:15:57 ago (+1/-5)
[ + ] big_fat_dangus
[ - ] big_fat_dangus [op] 6 points 2.2 yearsMar 7, 2022 23:00:47 ago (+6/-0)
[ + ] Ragnar
[ - ] Ragnar 2 points 2.2 yearsMar 7, 2022 23:12:44 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] diggernicks
[ - ] diggernicks 1 point 2.2 yearsMar 8, 2022 10:02:52 ago (+1/-0)
We need to repeal the 19th amendment
[ + ] canbot
[ - ] canbot 1 point 2.2 yearsMar 8, 2022 06:39:33 ago (+1/-0)
EQ is just one of those subjective measures that can easily be interpreted any way you want.
[ + ] TheViciousMrPim
[ - ] TheViciousMrPim 1 point 2.2 yearsMar 8, 2022 08:15:23 ago (+1/-0)
I keep hearing this but my personal(admittedly anecdotal) experience tells me it just aint so.
[ + ] green_man
[ - ] green_man 1 point 2.2 yearsMar 8, 2022 09:43:10 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 2.2 yearsMar 7, 2022 20:48:15 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] dulcima
[ - ] dulcima 7 points 2.2 yearsMar 7, 2022 19:24:51 ago (+7/-0)
[ + ] UncleDoug
[ - ] UncleDoug 4 points 2.2 yearsMar 7, 2022 19:56:41 ago (+4/-0)
Sort of like how gingers can tolerate more pain.
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 2 points 2.2 yearsMar 7, 2022 21:52:13 ago (+3/-1)
Men can take dutesteride to lessen the severity of covid.
[ + ] Clubberlang
[ - ] Clubberlang 3 points 2.2 yearsMar 7, 2022 19:51:17 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 1 point 2.2 yearsMar 7, 2022 21:18:04 ago (+3/-2)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 2 points 2.2 yearsMar 7, 2022 21:52:43 ago (+3/-1)
[ + ] Prairie
[ - ] Prairie 6 points 2.2 yearsMar 7, 2022 19:58:21 ago (+6/-0)
[ + ] localsal
[ - ] localsal 3 points 2.2 yearsMar 7, 2022 20:05:50 ago (+3/-0)
In fact, the "personal massager" was invented because doctors were getting fatigue and carpel tunnel from having to give so many orgasms.
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 2.2 yearsMar 8, 2022 08:29:04 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] bonghits4jeebus
[ - ] bonghits4jeebus 0 points 2.2 yearsMar 9, 2022 00:32:53 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 2.2 yearsMar 9, 2022 07:44:42 ago (+0/-0)
It was a scam run by perverts to get under women’s skirts under the false premise of medical intervention.
Did it work in the sense that some women had orgasms? If orgasms cured mental illness there wouldn’t be mental illness. Cooming is not a medical intervention.
This is something akin to molestation. Vulnerable young women with depression go to a medical authority for relief, their families pay this “doctor” who then takes advantage. A mental manipulation is involved here. It is a betrayal of trust.
“But they enjoyed it, you want children to be happy don’t you?” Says the child molester. I think your reasoning is comparable. These women didn’t benefit at all from this practice. They had to live with the embarassment of being duped and violated by these degenerates for the rest of their lives. Normal fucking white people do not just “get over” being masturbated by a stranger. Depression is not alleved by having your doctor take sexual advantage of you. Did I mention this was fucking stupid?
Also Im willing to bet no fat, ugly, or old women were ever “treated” in this way.
[ + ] thebearfromstartrack4
[ - ] thebearfromstartrack4 6 points 2.2 yearsMar 7, 2022 19:15:10 ago (+7/-1)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 2.2 yearsMar 9, 2022 08:43:11 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Terraeri1
[ - ] Terraeri1 4 points 2.2 yearsMar 7, 2022 21:27:14 ago (+4/-0)
And they wonder why I don't want to go on their "girly night's out" FUCK THAT.
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena -1 points 2.2 yearsMar 7, 2022 21:54:34 ago (+1/-2)
Males are so mercurial.
[ + ] Terraeri1
[ - ] Terraeri1 4 points 2.2 yearsMar 7, 2022 22:01:52 ago (+4/-0)
I'm not male.
[ + ] yesiknow
[ - ] yesiknow 2 points 2.2 yearsMar 7, 2022 23:51:33 ago (+2/-0)
Feminists took offence at words like bimbo, because they were the bimbo faction of women, not all women.
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 1 point 2.2 yearsMar 8, 2022 08:50:13 ago (+2/-1)
Or maybe this is some bargaining chip that young females are using to improve their hand against males. I dunno. But it doesn’t come from selflessness. Its a power play. Im just not sure that the women who do it actually understand what they are doing.
Its easier for me to be objective about it because Im an old posty roastie. My motives are different. But it feels like today’s feminism is a bit of intrasexual competition combined with some collective bargaining directed toward prospective male mates. But I don’t think THEY think that’s what they’re doing.
[ + ] big_fat_dangus
[ - ] big_fat_dangus [op] 1 point 2.2 yearsMar 8, 2022 09:07:37 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 1 point 2.2 yearsMar 8, 2022 10:36:07 ago (+2/-1)
[ + ] big_fat_dangus
[ - ] big_fat_dangus [op] 2 points 2.2 yearsMar 7, 2022 23:03:56 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 2.2 yearsMar 8, 2022 01:20:34 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] deleted
[ - ] deleted -1 points 2.2 yearsMar 8, 2022 15:25:39 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 2.2 yearsMar 8, 2022 16:31:57 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] derpfroot
[ - ] derpfroot 4 points 2.2 yearsMar 7, 2022 19:30:52 ago (+4/-0)*
edit: not that talking more is a bad thing. I don't want to come off as bitching about all women. Us guys have our shit, too. Just in general..
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 2 points 2.2 yearsMar 9, 2022 08:35:51 ago (+2/-0)
Probably an underestimate. Lol. Sometimes I meet guys— straight guys— that really have the gift of the gab. But usually men like to talk alot less than me. Sometimes the men in my life will call me, but I find they don’t really want to have a conversation. Just exchange basic “news” and then look for opportunities to “escape” the conversation. I’ll say “are you trying to hang up on me?” And they’ll lie and say “no” and then I can make them listen to me for 5 more minutes. I know they don’t really want to talk anymore. But I like talking enough to drag it out.
Accepted. But also we want to influence the group more. We’re not just taking instructions. We’re telling each other what to think.
I really like to talk and I think Im pretty typical among women in this respect. It feels good to share my thoughts and feelings with people I know and I like to hear what others are thinking and feeling. Its a dopamine hit. I feel irritated when people don’t want to share. This is genetic imo,
If human beings are information systems that transmit cultural information through conversations, then females are just sending and receiving more information back and forth than males. We tend to dismiss these conversations about feelings as unimportant but they aren’t. Females are therefore far more ‘synched up’ with the hive mind . There are obviously benefits to that capability or it wouldn’t be a thing. But if some bad actor is sending cultural disinformation, one would expect women would be more susceptible. So are men more ‘logical’? Or are they just getting less inundated with cultural (dis)information and doing more ‘independent processing’ ? Maybe the question is moot.
[ + ] AngryWhiteKeyboardWarrior
[ - ] AngryWhiteKeyboardWarrior 2 points 2.2 yearsMar 8, 2022 07:32:48 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] big_fat_dangus
[ - ] big_fat_dangus [op] 1 point 2.2 yearsMar 8, 2022 08:36:36 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Clubberlang
[ - ] Clubberlang 3 points 2.2 yearsMar 7, 2022 19:50:26 ago (+3/-0)
#Whooooduhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhthunkit?
[ + ] yesiknow
[ - ] yesiknow 3 points 2.2 yearsMar 7, 2022 19:29:21 ago (+3/-0)
Emotions are an exciting ride, and a lot won't give that up.
[ + ] localsal
[ - ] localsal 3 points 2.2 yearsMar 7, 2022 19:42:01 ago (+3/-0)
The only thing women can learn to do is to control their actions - which is where men come in. Men need to teach the women how to act when their emotions arise.
Basically, create competitive sets of emotions with one side being a better route to take action from.
A basic example
Woman: Oh noes, covid is killing millions of people we need to get the jab!
Man: Covid is killing the weak, old, and already dead, and the jab will more than likely hurt or even kill our kids. No jab!
Woman: I guess our kids are more important than random people that are meant to die anyway. No jab!
Both arguments are emotion based to her, but the man needs to steer the action to the one that provides the better outcome.
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 1 point 2.2 yearsMar 7, 2022 21:38:10 ago (+2/-1)
Your example is refreshingly fact free and purely emotion based. That’s just an emotional narrative with some jewish mocking thrown in. That is not a serious argument based on facts or logic.
[ + ] localsal
[ - ] localsal 2 points 2.2 yearsMar 7, 2022 22:13:11 ago (+2/-0)
First, I said it was a basic example. There are countless other ones that can be read about all over the interwebs.
Emotions are not only what leads men - especially White men - to commit crimes. Don't forget that women - and the pussy pass - do not get the same treatment as men for similar crimes. Trying to correlate emotions to prison populations is going to fraught with confounding variables.
I doubt there are conclusive studies on emotional responses in general, and if there were, all the conclusions would be generalities that may never apply to individuals.
In general - the emotional component of women is very beneficial to nurturing the family. Making decisions based on emotions is bad business for everyone.
If you don't believe that last sentence, look up the direction of the world over the last 50 years and then look up the rise of women in leadership roles.
Yes, that is correlation vs causation. Add in the rise in familial problems due to the destruction of the "nuclear family" and the correlation starts to amplify.
Everyone has emotions - but it seems that men are able to mostly separate the long term decisions/consequences from the emotions more easily than women.
Not all - maybe not even most, in some cases, but in general.
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena -1 points 2.2 yearsMar 7, 2022 23:47:17 ago (+1/-2)
Nigger excuse. This is what niggers say “Mass inkahsuhrayshun n sheeit!! I dindu nuffin”— males commit more violent crime, they commit more robberies, they commit more rapes. Males are GENETICALLY predisposed to do all these things more than women and its because they have an evolutionary incentive to do so.
In fact, males of most animals are more prone to violence and more prone to rape and that’s because the pay offs for males, who have relatively low parental investments to annihilate male competition to hoard more females, is much higher. Violence and other strategies of intense male competition are much older than human beings and its so deeply embedded in your biology, its simply the way the brain develops in the presence of androgens. The process is highly similar for many animals.
There is no way women commit comparable levels of crime to males. Own it. Your penis pass is no good with me. Get it stamped by one of these other fags.
It seems they’re not. Again you are arbitrarily assigning “emotions” to female behaviors which are suboptimal but for some reason the supoptimal behaviors of men are given other motivations. Why are they not emotion based?
For instance, wars are a fundamentally male behavior. Wars are always fought because A.) one group of males is trying to steal the females of another group of males or B.) one group of males is trying to steal the resources of another group of males so that they can acquire more females with additional resources. It’s the reason why males are 10x more ambitious than females in business and the reason why males are typically more ready to cheat each other to get ahead. More babes or more money which leads to more babes.
Truth is that the Russia Ukraine war is based on the same instinctual behavior that causes niggers in the hood to shoot each other. These are male behaviors and they are emotion based.
War is a classic male behavior which does not provide a better outcome yet males are prone to it because of their manly manly fee fees . Same with these vulture capitalists that fuck over thousands of workers to become billionaires. These extreme levels of male competition are emotion driven and they do not produce optimal outcomes for society.
Your definition of emotions is incomplete. Women have more nurturing emotions. That will make prioritize compassion and safety in some situations. Men will have different emotions that will drive them to make different decisions.
What you really mean is that men have a different set of emotions that cause them to have different priorities. Males are still acting on emotions. You just choose to view male emotions as sensible because they coincide with your priorities.
Do you really suppose its a good idea to have the female of the species have and equal taste for risk as the male? Do you not understand why women would be more cautious about an outbreak of disease than men?
No. You think that because females are more cautious they are “irrational” or hysterical or whatever the fuck.
The egg layers always have more risk exposure in reproduction. It makes perfect sense that they are inherently cautious.
I could argue men are reckless as fuck. But it wouldn’t be productive because I recognize they are as reckless as they need to be to survive and produce offspring. Women are as cautious as they need to be.
Not really surprising that you’re trying to pin the destruction of monogamy on women but it isn’t true. Monogamy is maintained by men. And it was destroyed by them. Starting with Henry VIII.
You faggots have to accept that women’s priorities are not the same as yours, and you need to strike a compromise in order to continue the human race. No you can’t have it all your way. It would be a fucking disaster if you did.
[ + ] localsal
[ - ] localsal 3 points 2.2 yearsMar 8, 2022 00:30:23 ago (+3/-0)
I never said that the destruction of monogamy was due to emotion or by women - those are your assumptions.
The prevailing view on here is that kikes are the ones that are destroying the nuclear family - which leads to many single parent households, and most of those are women.
Children raised my single mothers are demonstrably less adapted for civilized society - as a whole - than those raised in two parent families, and even by single fathers. That was my point - which I assumed most would understand from being on here for any length of time.
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 2.2 yearsMar 8, 2022 01:19:35 ago (+1/-1)
I think you did a good job of avoiding mine.
Oh no. Your implication was fairly clear. You said the world has gone in the wrong direction as female have become leaders and then you said that it might be just a correlation but with the breakup of the nuclear family, “correlations begin to amplify” by which I assume your meaning to bee that the evidence builds for your hypothesis that women are “causing all the trouble” and on some wild emotional ride and need men to help them control their actions. That was what your meant.
But I can say exactly that same thing about men and its equally as true.
Obviously. Women are the primary caretakers of children. Male paternal investment is highly variable in humans.
Children of single moms have social problems because males who abandon their mate and offspring tend to be pursuing a polygamous strategy which is associated with traits like promiscuity, violence, theft, etc and the apple doesn’t fall far from the tree. Being a shitty dad is genetic and it tends to go along with being a shitty person in other areas. The biggest problem isn’t a lack of male influence. Its the genes from shitty parents who tend not to marry, especially dads who like to make kids more than to take care of them.
That was not your point at all. You know what your point was. You were in a circle jerk with yesiknow about women being driven hither and thither by their wild fee fees and you were developing a lesson plan to save us from ourselves through competive sets of emotions like your fake example. You guys are really funny.
You avoid my point that war is an emotion based male behavior and we are watching a retarded one that was completely created by men and is being fought by men and I might just have to create a competitve set of emotions so that men can take a better route next time.
Penis pass denied!
[ + ] localsal
[ - ] localsal 1 point 2.2 yearsMar 8, 2022 02:57:11 ago (+1/-0)
You really think that men want to go to war?
Are you of the "women are the biggest victims of war" mentality? LMAO.
There are various reasons to go to war. Was it emotions when every country got embroiled in the Great War due to treaties?
As a pertinent example, is it emotions for putin to invade Ukraine to protect Russians from being killed by Ukrainians?
You boil down war to your liking, but here is a task - go ask men if they want to go to war. Not the talking head kikes on tv, but the real "gonna get shot to shit" men in the militaries.
Some of them probably love the idea of war, and want to kill enemies. In WW2, it was shown that about 10-20% of all soldiers actually killed an enemy.
Most soldiers that join up in a volunteer army during peacetime have no propensity to go to war. They enjoy the benefits of the military service and do not want to risk death. Most people do not like to risk death.
I heard stories of US National Guard troops protesting being sent to Iraq - "I didn't sign up for this" was common.
A country used to be analogous to a family, with the military being equivalent to the father. How many fathers want to fight randomly? To risk death or be taken away from their family? LOL. What do people fight for?
Is it "from emotions" when I say that I will fight to provide better opportunities for my kids? Is that emotion? or is it borne out of logic and reason to provide comfort for future generations?
Mayhaps you need to start talking to more men in your life.
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 2.2 yearsMar 8, 2022 08:05:55 ago (+1/-1)*
LMAO. You really think women want to wear masks and never leave the house?
It really doesn’t matter what men think they want to do. It is what they end up doing based on emotionally driven instinct. Men aren’t aware of the evolutionary incentive of why they are driven to kill each other! They just are! It’s as emotionally driven as niggers shooting each other in the street. You seriously think making war is anything other than a biological activity of males? Males manufacture political justifications for what males are emotionally driven to do. “Crips is the sheeeeitt, Bloods disruspek us” or “muh WMD” . It doesn’t matter why males THINK they do what they do.
You’re not listening to me. Men and women are players in an evolutionary game. Why don’t you turn off your mgtow narrative for 5 seconds?
It is 100% male driven behavior that Putin and the assholes in NATO are fighting over Ukraine. They are empire building, they are hoarding resources. You don’t want to accept that this is based on a biological male instinct like women freaking out over covid— IT IS.
You boil covid quarantines down to your liking.
Perhaps they didn’t think through their emotion based decisions. Women need to train men to deal with their emotions and think logically — “hey, you could get killed!” . LMAO!
Men fight to gain reproductive access to females. There has never been a female war. Ever. The answer is staring you in the face.
Is it “from emotions” when women want to protect their family from covid?
You were the simplistic fuck that wanted to reduce the entire covid hysteria down to “women are fundamentally flawed creatures who are only emotion driven and just can’t see sense.”
Ukraine is a stupid unnecessary war that a bunch of greedy powerful males want and a bunch of lower status males sign up eagerly to fight on one side or another and the overall result is SUBOPTIMAL for society, just as excessive covid restrictions are— but you have a double standard. You don’t want to see that war and most murders are territorial disputees between males that are emotionally driven. My male dog barks at every other dog that walks down the street.
I don’t say that it doesn’t have a purpose. I say it is emotionally driven and often leads to suboptimal results for society.
All I do is talk to men. Stop being so sensitive. Lol. Ive got this all wrapped up. Its science. You didn’t like when it was applied to dudes. Its because you’re so emotional and can’t appreciate logic. ;-P
[ + ] yesiknow
[ - ] yesiknow 1 point 2.2 yearsMar 7, 2022 23:45:21 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 2.2 yearsMar 8, 2022 00:00:51 ago (+1/-1)
Huh? Are you talking about whites or niggers? Do you mean whites are going to jail for white collar crimes? Whites go to jail far less for violent crimes or rapes or opportunistic crimes like stealling bikes. But they still do them far more than women. White collar crimes or organized crime rackets take more planning. But they are as based on emotion as some woman who goes around yelling about people not wearing masks. Why is one caused by emotion but the other isn’t? The covid Karens aren’t really being overwhelmed by an emotional impulse, are they? They are calculating risk yes? Men are as emotional and irrational as women, is my point.
[ + ] yesiknow
[ - ] yesiknow 1 point 2.2 yearsMar 8, 2022 06:24:51 ago (+1/-0)
And yes, White men's crimes are more often based on calculated risk.
[ + ] bonghits4jeebus
[ - ] bonghits4jeebus 0 points 2.2 yearsMar 9, 2022 00:35:09 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] giantprick
[ - ] giantprick 2 points 2.2 yearsMar 8, 2022 04:47:35 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ]deleted
[ - ] deleted 2 points 2.2 yearsMar 8, 2022 02:14:42 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] Doglegwarrior
[ - ] Doglegwarrior 2 points 2.2 yearsMar 7, 2022 22:30:51 ago (+2/-0)
Before jew feminism it was good it was constantly telling them to worry about the baby worry about having dinner ready worry about the house looking nice and the laundry done...
No that little voice is like a faggot it is in the work place telling women to worry about shit no one used to give a fuck about. Then it has them worrying about other women and their job status and a bunch of shit that doesn't matter or shouldn't matter to a woman.
THANKS JEWS
[ + ] dingbat
[ - ] dingbat 2 points 2.2 yearsMar 7, 2022 22:27:45 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] Garrett
[ - ] Garrett 1 point 2.2 yearsMar 8, 2022 11:33:49 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Cunt
[ - ] Cunt 1 point 2.2 yearsMar 8, 2022 05:57:09 ago (+1/-0)
...Imagine if women were as afraid of the Jew World Order as they were/are about COVID or WW3.
[ + ] i_scream_trucks
[ - ] i_scream_trucks 1 point 2.2 yearsMar 8, 2022 01:18:04 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] watts2db
[ - ] watts2db 1 point 2.2 yearsMar 7, 2022 23:46:05 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] mikenigger
[ - ] mikenigger 1 point 2.2 yearsMar 7, 2022 22:14:36 ago (+1/-0)
yup.
[ + ] 1Icemonkey
[ - ] 1Icemonkey 1 point 2.2 yearsMar 7, 2022 21:36:59 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Qwertytoal
[ - ] Qwertytoal 1 point 2.2 yearsMar 7, 2022 20:53:08 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] ModernGuilt
[ - ] ModernGuilt 1 point 2.2 yearsMar 7, 2022 20:48:26 ago (+2/-1)
[ + ] ForgottenMemes
[ - ] ForgottenMemes 1 point 2.2 yearsMar 7, 2022 20:38:15 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] localsal
[ - ] localsal 2 points 2.2 yearsMar 7, 2022 20:52:26 ago (+2/-0)
Way too many examples of that.
[ + ] RMGoetbbels
[ - ] RMGoetbbels 1 point 2.2 yearsMar 7, 2022 20:20:33 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] boekanier
[ - ] boekanier 0 points 2.2 yearsMar 8, 2022 03:04:17 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Trumpman1488
[ - ] Trumpman1488 0 points 2.2 yearsMar 7, 2022 20:48:22 ago (+2/-2)