Gould was one of the kikiest kikes in all of academia.
He was a shameless plaguerist with a knack for simply taking parts of other people's discoveries and then giving them a brand new label to claim being his own freshly made discovery.
He was known to lie constantly and commit academic fraud with regard to anything he published.
For example, his phoney "discovery" of punctuated equilibrium, it was 90% stolen material from better scientists, and 10% characteristically jewish pseudophilosphic waffling.
This despite the fact thst he was careful only to make his claims when he was under the impression that they could not be refuted.
His phony "debunking" of Morton's skulls were the most well known incidence of this long career of academic fraud, because it was that much of an embarrassment for anyone who had taken the guy seriously as a scientific authority who could be trusted.
It was well known that Richard Dawkins had a rivalry with the pathologically lying jew bastard, but the truth is that there was no rivalry at all, Dawkins hated him for being a habitual liar who everyone pretended to respect for some reason, Gould hated Dawkins for being the guy to expose his bullshit at parties and events they attended together.
Thet pretended to be friends for the media, but only out of a professional necessity.
You see, Gould was allowed to get away with his bullshit because he was smart enough to seek clout in the place the worst scientists go, science popularization.
He waa a pop science darling, on the front of popular mechanics, discovery, scientific american, and national geographic.
They couldn't touch him when he had all those normie eyes on him.
[ + ] account deleted by user
[ - ] account deleted by user 2 points 3.3 yearsFeb 14, 2022 19:35:42 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] Paradoxical003
[ - ] Paradoxical003 4 points 3.3 yearsFeb 14, 2022 19:44:14 ago (+4/-0)*
He was a shameless plaguerist with a knack for simply taking parts of other people's discoveries and then giving them a brand new label to claim being his own freshly made discovery.
He was known to lie constantly and commit academic fraud with regard to anything he published.
For example, his phoney "discovery" of punctuated equilibrium, it was 90% stolen material from better scientists, and 10% characteristically jewish pseudophilosphic waffling.
This despite the fact thst he was careful only to make his claims when he was under the impression that they could not be refuted.
His phony "debunking" of Morton's skulls were the most well known incidence of this long career of academic fraud, because it was that much of an embarrassment for anyone who had taken the guy seriously as a scientific authority who could be trusted.
It was well known that Richard Dawkins had a rivalry with the pathologically lying jew bastard, but the truth is that there was no rivalry at all, Dawkins hated him for being a habitual liar who everyone pretended to respect for some reason, Gould hated Dawkins for being the guy to expose his bullshit at parties and events they attended together.
Thet pretended to be friends for the media, but only out of a professional necessity.
You see, Gould was allowed to get away with his bullshit because he was smart enough to seek clout in the place the worst scientists go, science popularization.
He waa a pop science darling, on the front of popular mechanics, discovery, scientific american, and national geographic.
They couldn't touch him when he had all those normie eyes on him.
[ + ] Spaceman84
[ - ] Spaceman84 [op] 0 points 3.3 yearsFeb 14, 2022 20:26:54 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] chrimony
[ - ] chrimony 1 point 3.3 yearsFeb 15, 2022 09:57:31 ago (+1/-0)
But the guy who wrote the article does.
It's typical cherry picking of problems with no acknowledge of the transitional fossils which DO exist.
[ + ] Paradoxical003
[ - ] Paradoxical003 1 point 3.3 yearsFeb 15, 2022 11:05:50 ago (+1/-0)