☰
×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
28

cloud?

submitted by boekanier to whatever 3.3 yearsFeb 7, 2022 01:35:52 ago (+28/-0)     (media.gab.com)

https://media.gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/097/971/776/original/ff3fafadc064207d.jpg



6 comments block

sort by: hot new top old low

[ - ] Prairie 1 point 3.3 yearsFeb 7, 2022 06:51:11 ago (+1/-0)

It's multiple computers so that reliability is high (until it isn't). As always, if you hold it, you own it (your local data).

[ - ] mannerbund 1 point 3.3 yearsFeb 7, 2022 09:35:48 ago (+1/-0)

To the point where failure starts to become more prevalent in the cloud than on a single computer. AWS has had repeated outages this year.

I operate systems in the 'cloud', in high availability clusters, and on single nodes with no kind of failover.

Surprisingly enough, isolated systems have machines with the largest uptime, going on 7 years for a handful scattered around the lowest level of availability.

[ - ] ModernGuilt 0 points 3.3 yearsFeb 7, 2022 12:00:41 ago (+0/-0)

False dichotomy.
You can have multiple computers without muh cloud

[ - ] Prairie 0 points 3.3 yearsFeb 7, 2022 19:52:47 ago (+0/-0)

I thought that's what the cloud meant: a cloud of computers, spread out.

[ - ] ModernGuilt 4 points 3.3 yearsFeb 7, 2022 06:24:55 ago (+4/-0)

IT is infected with faggot ideologies like muh cloud and insane abstractions and containerizations

[ - ] Teefinyomouf 0 points 3.3 yearsFeb 7, 2022 09:39:35 ago (+0/-0)

Script kiddies and corporate took over. Short term solutions stacked to Jupiter.