Sign into an existing account

I've heard a lot of Darwinism advocates explain these things away as panspermia which is just a way of dodging the question.

Problem is, I've never dealt with this issue for a while now, you posted a video of someone who has used their time and resources to prepare their case, I'm put on the spot just now.
I'm basically a man on the street here, while I'm somewhat familiar with this topic, im not someone who knows this case in depth, and am likely to make mistakes that would hurt my ability to appeal to the people I present my case to, so the best response would be for me to find a video of someone else who has been able to give the same level of analysis to this subject.
Please give me some time to find it.

youtube.com/watch?v=K_HVrjKcvrU

Definitely not.

The people that believe in ID are not intelligent.


Hahahaha SW has an IQ in the ambient temperature range confirmed. God made it then evolution took over?


Do your own dirty work you brainlet. If the facts are inconvenient, ban yourself from further knowledge.

Did god create eyes or is there precedence for evolution from a patch of light-sensitive cells to what we have today?

You are intrinsically aware of all the less than stellar evolutionary adaptations overtime before marginally successful adaptive traits are made prominent are you?

X works so therefor an omnipotent watchmaker made it, lol

We can already associate a relationship with eukaryotic ancestors and a spirochete bacterium for the flagellum.

Injectisomes are simple structures used by some living bacteria to inject proteins into eukaryotic cells. This basic injectisome can be categorised as type three secretory system (TTSS).

The protein molecules that form the structure of the TTSS are very similar to components of the flagellar motor. So we can see similar structures occurring throughout bacterial evolution, evidentiary in bacterial gene-tree topology which is a record of observations in the natural world (Science).

Because you are not aware they exist, or that you do not understand the significance of their correlation, only proves to highlight your ignorance.
The bible doesnt discuss white discovery, just jewish mysticism.

There are no well-read religoids.

Not a single thing that we can observe was just created out of nowhere by a masterful invisible craftsman.

These anti-intelligentsia clowns are moving back into 1990s creationism again.

You might also say that you're a fairly typical modern atheist: condescending, self-righteous, and filled with misplaced anger and resentment.

you believe in God but don't like the idea that he is the designer of the universe?

Out of curiosity, are you christian, or some non-christian religious moralist? I just can't trust a bible that's full of jews acting jewy (see Saul the name changing infiltrator among many others) but I could see the possibility of some kind of cosmic forces at odds with each other that want to take our world in different directions. I just don't think any particular religion is going to give you the actual truth of whatever god or gods exist, and if it did, the jews wouldn't let us see it, or at least hide it better,

Darwinism is a series of kinks tied together incoherently. But repetition from everywhere makes up for what would otherwise be a nonsensical "theory".

account deleted by user