Rittenhouse was an important case in self-defense though it shouldn't have been. It set back the left's agenda for destroying your right. In revenge, they're going after anyone and everyone they can in this case and they will continue to do so. They're only going after this kid's parents because they're mad they lost. We already saw that will do anything when they lose when Trump won. Don't ever forget that.
So fucking what? Gun restriction laws are criminalization of people who haven't committed crimes.
Going after the kid's parents with a $10K reward and a federal manhunt and publicly televising this (while refusing to publicly televise Epstein pedoshit case) is 100% revenge on gun victories.
FFS, you can call in an listen to everything so that's all bullshit. It needs to be televised so people will fucking go after these sick, degenerate fucks.
I would love for this to be highly public. I don't know that I want federal trials to attain the circus status afforded things like the OJ trial where most of the fair and impartial aspect was consumed by minute by minute "analysis" by the MSM, promoting their interpretation and agenda. It failed with Kyle but it might be able to do real harm if, for example, they started having show trials for the 6 Jan people.
[ - ] spasswerk 1 point 2.4 yearsDec 4, 2021 19:22:15 ago (+1/-0)
Press lies and publishes hearsay, especially when actual sources don't as yet exist.
It sounds (see above caveat) as if the kid took the gun to school in the morning, before the teacher reported the threatening behaviour and the parents were called to the school. Could the parents have checked on the gun once called to the school? Did they have any reason to suspect the call was about possible violence? WHY THE FUCK didn't they check his bag while he was in the office with at least three adults?
It sounds like the parents were not the kind of folks I'd want to supervise my kids. Although I don't believe school officials should call in SWAT any time a kid points a finger and says "bang", at the time of the conference with the parents it would have been best practice to ask the parents if they would check the student's bag, if nothing else to see if there were any additional threatening writings. Some school officials are sweating tonight--and probably should be.
[ - ] grogoo 1 point 2.4 yearsDec 4, 2021 10:00:03 ago (+1/-0)
Yeah, or maybe this little devil shit was saying he was going to shoot up a school for the better part of a year and then his dad gave him a gun. Or maybe its your thing...
It can be both. The real issue here is that these people raised a piece of shit instead of a human being and other people paid the price. Laws won't save anyone. Making schools so "safe" you can't look at an ammunition website won't save anyone. Giving a gun to a 15 year old doesn't kill anyone. Being a piece of shit and raising a piece of shit is the issue. Go to church, love God, love your neighbors, do good to one another. Individual liberties require that you are your own master and not a slave to your own desires. These niggers deserve the book thrown at them.
[ + ] account deleted by user
[ - ] account deleted by user 8 points 2.4 yearsDec 4, 2021 07:20:30 ago (+8/-0)
[ + ] totes_magotes
[ - ] totes_magotes [op] 5 points 2.4 yearsDec 4, 2021 07:45:09 ago (+5/-0)
I have a bridge for sale, by the way.
Come on, none of that matters. It's pure anti-gun rights revenge.
[ + ] account deleted by user
[ - ] account deleted by user 3 points 2.4 yearsDec 4, 2021 09:34:13 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] totes_magotes
[ - ] totes_magotes [op] 3 points 2.4 yearsDec 4, 2021 10:17:31 ago (+3/-0)
Going after the kid's parents with a $10K reward and a federal manhunt and publicly televising this (while refusing to publicly televise Epstein pedoshit case) is 100% revenge on gun victories.
[ + ] spasswerk
[ - ] spasswerk 0 points 2.4 yearsDec 4, 2021 19:06:21 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] totes_magotes
[ - ] totes_magotes [op] 0 points 2.4 yearsDec 4, 2021 19:40:38 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] spasswerk
[ - ] spasswerk 0 points 2.4 yearsDec 4, 2021 19:44:58 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] totes_magotes
[ - ] totes_magotes [op] 0 points 2.4 yearsDec 4, 2021 19:58:23 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Empire_of_the_Mind
[ - ] Empire_of_the_Mind 0 points 2.4 yearsDec 4, 2021 09:52:49 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] dalai_llama
[ - ] dalai_llama -2 points 2.4 yearsDec 4, 2021 13:22:24 ago (+0/-2)
[ + ] spasswerk
[ - ] spasswerk 1 point 2.4 yearsDec 4, 2021 19:22:15 ago (+1/-0)
It sounds (see above caveat) as if the kid took the gun to school in the morning, before the teacher reported the threatening behaviour and the parents were called to the school. Could the parents have checked on the gun once called to the school? Did they have any reason to suspect the call was about possible violence? WHY THE FUCK didn't they check his bag while he was in the office with at least three adults?
It sounds like the parents were not the kind of folks I'd want to supervise my kids. Although I don't believe school officials should call in SWAT any time a kid points a finger and says "bang", at the time of the conference with the parents it would have been best practice to ask the parents if they would check the student's bag, if nothing else to see if there were any additional threatening writings. Some school officials are sweating tonight--and probably should be.
[ + ] grogoo
[ - ] grogoo 1 point 2.4 yearsDec 4, 2021 10:00:03 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] totes_magotes
[ - ] totes_magotes [op] 3 points 2.4 yearsDec 4, 2021 10:19:44 ago (+3/-0)
Which is it?
[ + ] DonaldJTrump
[ - ] DonaldJTrump 1 point 2.4 yearsDec 4, 2021 15:02:48 ago (+1/-0)