Interesting. Did you look at the gentiles that skewed jewish on the PC graph? They were all Italian and eastern mediterranean. Do you think that is because common ancestral middle eastern populations settled alot in S. Europe and the Levant in the neolithic or bronze and iron ages, or do you think its because enough jews immigrated to S. europe during the roman period and assimilated with the gentile populations? I’d love to know what they did for a living.
def both. jews also have a lot of greek heritage. as well as being 70 percent arab on average. italians and southern europeans have a lot of arab blood as well
jews are 70% arabic And the genetic brothers of Lebanese, Palestinians and Syrians. That's where they get their subversive behavior from. Theyre basically Arabs with enough White admixture to go undetected
Im gonna disagree with this. I used to think this. But they are worse than sand niggers. Sand niggers are a mix of a few different groups. The founding population of jews were taken from one or a mix of these, but they became an endogamous itinerant group living off of sand niggers. They evolved to exploit a parasitic niche off of other sand niggers probably within the early urban civilizations of mesopotamia. Their evolutionary strategy was different from other sand niggers and they were selected for different traits than the average sand nigger. The original group may not even have been the hebrews. It is possible that they assumed the identity of hebrews when they took them over, just as they did with other groups. Eventually some moved in to europe and mated with europeans at the rate of about 1% a generation, which over 2000 years or so gets you to around 50% european, which is what the ashkenazis and sephardics look like on a PC chart.
So why are they so horrible? Here’s the interesting bit. We weaponized them with hi IQ. They evolved a parasitic strategy in the middle east, with middle east level IQs. But after mating with whites, they picked up several genes for high IQ. Some of these genes are the genetic diseases they are known for— diseases that originate in european populations but are lower in frequency among europeans because they cause physical health issues that impair fitness for hard labor.
They are different from us and they are different from sand niggers because they are very strongly shaped for a unique economic strategy.
What happens when you cross a low IQ parasite with a high IQ altruist? You get 1 low IQ altruist, a couple of slightly shadey midwits and 1 high IQ parasite (aka super jew). This is a grossly oversimplified model. But I believe that the european jewish community tends to be descended from these super jews. People in the jewish community that lacked the genetic “right stuff” to exploit the jewish strategy just dropped out and assimilated in to gentile host populations. Jews descend from the people with the most in-group preference and the most parasitic traits—including strong skills in areas relevant to cultural manipulation of the host population. I have to believe that a lot of scummy europeans were attracted to these people as well, moved in the same circles.
But I also think that alot of the early christians were part jewish. Don’t really know your religious deal —that may be too controversial you. But I do think some jewish genes may have gotten in to the italian and greek populations during the roman era in this way.
jews with one jewish grandparent are 50 percent european. thats why they are like italians. italians are 50 percent european
from the paper:
The majority of informative subjects with no Jewish ancestry that scored most highly on PC1 were either of Italian or Eastern Mediterranean descent. This indicates that in a mixed American context, these populations may not be easily distinguishable from subjects with a single Jewish parent.
Well italians are 100% european but I get your drift. They have alot more contribution from middle eastern populations like neolithic anatolian farmers and maybe sea peoples or something. And then whatever riff raff immigrated during the roman era. But alot of that middle eastern genetics is from migration 8000 years ago. Way before jews existed.
Does the “jewish” results of these ities reflect a more ancient ME migration or DNA from literal jews in the family tree some time in the last 2000 years? Or 200?
Id love to analyze communist politicians in latin american countries too. I suspect theres a treasure trove of converso genetics there.
People create their religion and culture from their genetics.
The catholics have been imbued with kike sensibilities and not just because of the jesuits.
The top like to think they're influencing from the top down and that's only been the case with the deliberate propaganda based on advertising research. If it worked every single person in the country would have to believe they need nikes to exist. They don't, so that means that the overpaid tyrant bureaucrats who believe they're part of the influencing form the top down method are going to be killed if there no other way to get rid of them. Because the influence really does come from the bottom no matter how much the parasites try to force and manipulate it.
The phony Maoists won't do shit to the banksters, so it's another faction entirely that will have to blow up the Davos crowd and kill them.
'The majority of informative subjects with no Jewish ancestry that scored most highly on PC1 were either of Italian or Eastern Mediterranean descent. This indicates that in a mixed American context, these populations may not be easily distinguishable from subjects with a single Jewish parent.'
It depends on what jews you are talking about but jews move around and assimilate host dna at about 1% a generation, so at this point some european jews are as close to white as they are to levantine— of course they are neither, and they wouldn’t even be the same as a person who was half lebanese and half italian because neither of those groups have evolve as itinerant social parasites and are not selected for the traits useful to such a group.
No they aren’t mongols. No they aren’t Khazars, except for maybe a few caucusus jewish enclaves. Thats a myth. Ashkenazi infiltrated europe through the roman empire. Not Georgia.
We also found that subjects with Jewish ancestry were slightly more heterozygous than the subjects with no Jewish ancestry, suggesting that the genetic distinction between Jews and non-Jews may be more attributable to a Near-Eastern origin for Jewish populations than to population bottlenecks.
near eastern could mean asiatic
lots of jews have asian dna as well which would explain their commonly slanted eyes
As Ive said elsewhere, they are more diverse because they are picking up about 1% other people’s DNA where ever they happen to be living. I don’t want to say that there are no jewish groups with turkic dna, but its not a big piece of ashkenazi or sephardic DNA.
The weird frequency of genetic disease has been often attributed to some genetic bottleneck and then propagated through high levels of cousin marriage/inbreeding. But I think its more a result of the unique genetic signal from a strong selective pressure for their strategy: parasitism. High IQ in these “cultural” skills and a lack of need for physical fitness (unlike agrarians) would favor diseases like gauchers and some of these other phospholipid storage diseases which all have implications for cognition. The asymptomatic carriers have a cognitive advantage.
Why are gypsies lying theiveing sacks of shit. For the same reasons jews are. They have similar strategies, exploit the host society through deception. Same with Irish travellers. Its the economic strategy our ancestors pursue that shapes our psychology.
We intuitively want to track down the original “bad ‘uns” that spawned these people, like the Khazars, or the Edomites, or whatever. That is the wrong way to think about it. Being itinerant urban bureaucrats for 4000 years has made them who they are. You could create a similar group of scumbags from any race, if they evolved over milennia to exploit other groups of people. I suspect they were originally a group of priests that became rather corrupt after years of intermarriage with each other. Thats why I think the european aristocracy is so bad.
They engaged in a hypercompetition against each other over who could steal more of the 3rd world and make more shekels selling rum and tobbacco and opium and caffeine to europeans. Their empires were arguable founded on vice. France v Britain v Spain v Portugal v Holland. Who’s got more shekels. And they leveraged their asses with usury provided by the jews. Aristocrats tend to have parasitic traits. The longer they are in power and intermarrying exclusive to the rest of society, the more they will diverge from the rest of the society and evolve specialized traits to live off other people. And the less invested they will be in the welfare of the average people. Endogamous upper castes always become corrupt.
And this is why the aristocracy/elite tends to partner with jews over and over. They have similar strategies to sponge wealth of of productive laborers.
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 1 point 3.6 yearsOct 9, 2021 23:01:03 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Garrett
[ - ] Garrett [op] 0 points 3.6 yearsOct 9, 2021 23:04:06 ago (+0/-0)
https://www.voat.xyz/viewpost.php?postid=611ae7e283a81
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 3.6 yearsOct 9, 2021 23:57:54 ago (+0/-0)
Im gonna disagree with this. I used to think this. But they are worse than sand niggers. Sand niggers are a mix of a few different groups. The founding population of jews were taken from one or a mix of these, but they became an endogamous itinerant group living off of sand niggers. They evolved to exploit a parasitic niche off of other sand niggers probably within the early urban civilizations of mesopotamia. Their evolutionary strategy was different from other sand niggers and they were selected for different traits than the average sand nigger. The original group may not even have been the hebrews. It is possible that they assumed the identity of hebrews when they took them over, just as they did with other groups. Eventually some moved in to europe and mated with europeans at the rate of about 1% a generation, which over 2000 years or so gets you to around 50% european, which is what the ashkenazis and sephardics look like on a PC chart.
So why are they so horrible? Here’s the interesting bit. We weaponized them with hi IQ. They evolved a parasitic strategy in the middle east, with middle east level IQs. But after mating with whites, they picked up several genes for high IQ. Some of these genes are the genetic diseases they are known for— diseases that originate in european populations but are lower in frequency among europeans because they cause physical health issues that impair fitness for hard labor.
They are different from us and they are different from sand niggers because they are very strongly shaped for a unique economic strategy.
What happens when you cross a low IQ parasite with a high IQ altruist? You get 1 low IQ altruist, a couple of slightly shadey midwits and 1 high IQ parasite (aka super jew). This is a grossly oversimplified model. But I believe that the european jewish community tends to be descended from these super jews. People in the jewish community that lacked the genetic “right stuff” to exploit the jewish strategy just dropped out and assimilated in to gentile host populations. Jews descend from the people with the most in-group preference and the most parasitic traits—including strong skills in areas relevant to cultural manipulation of the host population. I have to believe that a lot of scummy europeans were attracted to these people as well, moved in the same circles.
But I also think that alot of the early christians were part jewish. Don’t really know your religious deal —that may be too controversial you. But I do think some jewish genes may have gotten in to the italian and greek populations during the roman era in this way.
[ + ] Garrett
[ - ] Garrett [op] 0 points 3.6 yearsOct 10, 2021 00:01:44 ago (+0/-0)
from the paper:
The majority of informative subjects with no Jewish ancestry that scored most highly on PC1 were either of Italian or Eastern Mediterranean descent. This indicates that in a mixed American context, these populations may not be easily distinguishable from subjects with a single Jewish parent.
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 3.6 yearsOct 10, 2021 00:53:54 ago (+0/-0)
Does the “jewish” results of these ities reflect a more ancient ME migration or DNA from literal jews in the family tree some time in the last 2000 years? Or 200?
Id love to analyze communist politicians in latin american countries too. I suspect theres a treasure trove of converso genetics there.
[ + ] Garrett
[ - ] Garrett [op] 0 points 3.6 yearsOct 10, 2021 01:23:28 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] yesiknow
[ - ] yesiknow 0 points 3.6 yearsOct 9, 2021 23:11:57 ago (+0/-0)*
The catholics have been imbued with kike sensibilities and not just because of the jesuits.
The top like to think they're influencing from the top down and that's only been the case with the deliberate propaganda based on advertising research. If it worked every single person in the country would have to believe they need nikes to exist. They don't, so that means that the overpaid tyrant bureaucrats who believe they're part of the influencing form the top down method are going to be killed if there no other way to get rid of them. Because the influence really does come from the bottom no matter how much the parasites try to force and manipulate it.
The phony Maoists won't do shit to the banksters, so it's another faction entirely that will have to blow up the Davos crowd and kill them.
[ + ] Garrett
[ - ] Garrett [op] 0 points 3.6 yearsOct 9, 2021 23:15:58 ago (+0/-0)
and the jesuit order was founded by crypto jews
[ + ] fightknightHERO
[ - ] fightknightHERO 0 points 3.6 yearsOct 9, 2021 22:45:13 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Garrett
[ - ] Garrett [op] 0 points 3.6 yearsOct 9, 2021 22:54:23 ago (+0/-0)*
i know they are cousins of syrians
https://archive.ph/ndEbG
'The majority of informative subjects with no Jewish ancestry that scored most highly on PC1 were either of Italian or Eastern Mediterranean descent. This indicates that in a mixed American context, these populations may not be easily distinguishable from subjects with a single Jewish parent.'
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 3.6 yearsOct 9, 2021 23:08:45 ago (+0/-0)
No they aren’t mongols. No they aren’t Khazars, except for maybe a few caucusus jewish enclaves. Thats a myth. Ashkenazi infiltrated europe through the roman empire. Not Georgia.
[ + ] Garrett
[ - ] Garrett [op] 0 points 3.6 yearsOct 9, 2021 23:15:20 ago (+0/-0)
We also found that subjects with Jewish ancestry were slightly more heterozygous than the subjects with no Jewish ancestry, suggesting that the genetic distinction between Jews and non-Jews may be more attributable to a Near-Eastern origin for Jewish populations than to population bottlenecks.
near eastern could mean asiatic
lots of jews have asian dna as well which would explain their commonly slanted eyes
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 3.6 yearsOct 10, 2021 00:20:57 ago (+0/-0)
The weird frequency of genetic disease has been often attributed to some genetic bottleneck and then propagated through high levels of cousin marriage/inbreeding. But I think its more a result of the unique genetic signal from a strong selective pressure for their strategy: parasitism. High IQ in these “cultural” skills and a lack of need for physical fitness (unlike agrarians) would favor diseases like gauchers and some of these other phospholipid storage diseases which all have implications for cognition. The asymptomatic carriers have a cognitive advantage.
Why are gypsies lying theiveing sacks of shit. For the same reasons jews are. They have similar strategies, exploit the host society through deception. Same with Irish travellers. Its the economic strategy our ancestors pursue that shapes our psychology.
We intuitively want to track down the original “bad ‘uns” that spawned these people, like the Khazars, or the Edomites, or whatever. That is the wrong way to think about it. Being itinerant urban bureaucrats for 4000 years has made them who they are. You could create a similar group of scumbags from any race, if they evolved over milennia to exploit other groups of people. I suspect they were originally a group of priests that became rather corrupt after years of intermarriage with each other. Thats why I think the european aristocracy is so bad.
[ + ] Garrett
[ - ] Garrett [op] 0 points 3.6 yearsOct 10, 2021 00:23:31 ago (+0/-0)
they dont actually have any power. in the end, they had to do what the money told them to do
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 3.6 yearsOct 10, 2021 12:15:49 ago (+0/-0)
And this is why the aristocracy/elite tends to partner with jews over and over. They have similar strategies to sponge wealth of of productive laborers.
[ + ] Garrett
[ - ] Garrett [op] 0 points 3.6 yearsOct 10, 2021 18:47:28 ago (+0/-0)
also they kicked out jews repeatedly