☰
×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules
40

Study: Cold kills 20 times more people than heat, This is the selective pressure that made Whites so intelligent as Whites adapted physiologically to the cold more than any other race (least amount of melanin to help synthesize sunlight and highest frequency of genes to detect cold)

submitted by Garrett to science 2.6 yearsSep 27, 2021 13:01:05 ago (+40/-0)     (archive.is)

https://archive.is/AyWou

' The sharp distinction between heat- and cold-related deaths is because low temperatures cause more problems for the body's cardiovascular and respiratory systems, [the study] added.'


Whites have fairest skin tone: https://archive.ph/gNxO4

Whites have highest frequency of gene to detect cold: https://archive.ph/ULcOP

Researchers say their findings back up the theory that wider nostrils developed in populations living in warm, humid conditions, while populations living in high latitudes, such as northern Europe, developed narrower nostrils as an adaptation to the chilly, dry conditions: https://archive.ph/3PQL0#selection-1101.0-1101.273



White skin helps to synthesize Vitamin D at a higher rate than other skin tones which also helps prevent rickets at a higher rate in White populations compared to populations living in the same conditions: https://web.archive.org/web/20210927185813/https://www.theglobeandmail.com/life/changes-in-arctic-diet-put-inuit-at-risk-for-rickets/article687556/


Skin type V individuals have, by definition, significant constitutive pigmentation that gives their skin its brown colour. The melanin pigment protects the underlying skin against damage from UVR. In reducing the UVR in this way it also reduces the vitamin D synthesis due to the same UVR. Thus, theory suggests, and our in vivo studies have shown [7,16] that skin type V individuals need more UVR (achieved naturally by more sun exposure) to make the same amount of vitamin D in skin as white Caucasians who lack their constitutive pigmentation.

httphttps://archive.ph/Z7IOw


27 comments block

sort by: hot new top old low

[ - ] Splooge 4 points 2.6 yearsSep 27, 2021 13:45:28 ago (+4/-0)

Forget about just survival, consider _ease_ of survival and its effect on development.

Darwin's research indicates that niggers stopped developing 200,000 years earlier than any other race, and no wonder. Africa practically abounds with free, easy food, docile prey, lush fauna, endless resources, and you never need to worry about freezing to death.

In fact, that's one of the reasons San Fagshithole is such a popular modern-day cesspit for crackniggers. You never need to worry about freezing to death.

[ - ] PostWallHelena 1 point 2.6 yearsSep 27, 2021 17:40:08 ago (+1/-0)

Its debateable whether chinks or whites are better adapted for cold. The course straight hair of asians, the fatty eyelids, the large cranial volumes (comparable to whites) and the weird mutations to their sebacious glands all support that chinky people are heavily adapted for cold. Light skin may be as much a result of low vitamin D (grain based) diet in whites as latitude. Like inuits are highly adapted for cold but not super white because of their all meat diet.

You may be familiar with Cold Winters Theory of intelligence. Obstacles of surviving cold winter led to smart gene pool —people planning ahead, storing food, building better shelters. I think its better to think of it as a risk averse / opportunistic trade off rather than a smart /stupid one. Specifically with respect to reproduction . There are no plants to eat in much of eurasia for 6 mos of the year. Women cant hunt. In this case, who’s children starve, the monogamist male’s child or the polygamist male’s child? You know the answer.

Polygamist males (opportunists) were successful in warmer climates because their females could fend for themselves to an extent as gatherers. Not so in cold climates. Cold climates favored monogamists and monogamist societies in turn favor low violence and theft between males because monogamy effectively limits the reproductive success of dominant males which reduces the scarcity of females. Males then compete with each other not by murdering and stealing from each other but by being the best providers which tends to reward intellect and ingenuity and cooperation over violence and muh dick. I really feel that the down stream effects of monogamy are largely responsible for hi IQ and many other behaviors common to cold climate people. Obviously this has implications for our current society and degrading sexual mores.

There is a thermodynamic issue at play. Big skulls are apparently a liability in hot weather.

And levels of melanin may also play a part in behaviors like sex and violence. Its widely been observed that heavily pignmented animals across many species are more aggressive and territorial. The melanocortin system regulates melanin production and violence and sex and hunger.

Also I think its pretty likely that some of the cold weather genes we enjoy were gifted to us by other cold weather eurasian populations like neanderthals and in the case of asians, denisovans.

[ - ] Garrett [op] 0 points 2.6 yearsSep 27, 2021 18:31:15 ago (+0/-0)*

Light skin prevents rickets in cold vitamin d deficient environments. Every other race than Whites is more prone to it. I showed a link that inuits are suffering because their diet has changed . it was their diet that was helping them thrive in cold, not superior physicality (though not enough to build in the cold as Whites have). It doesn't matter if they have Asian features. They are still more prone to rickets than Whites. Whites also have the highest frequency of the gene that detects cold, which gives Whites a advantage over every other race regarding survival in the cold.

[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 2.6 yearsSep 27, 2021 20:00:37 ago (+0/-0)

Yes but a shift from meat to grain during the agricultural revolution was probably the precipitating event for whites’ shift from tannish to titanium. Inuits did not evolve that super white skin because they were getting higher D from animal sources. Now that some of these groups have shifted more recently to hi grain diets they have become more susceptible to rickets. Does this prove superior physicality? It just proves whites are better evolved for grain diets. Whites have better tolerance to raw milk than anyone else as well. Does that make us superior? It makes us superior milk drinkers.

Inuits have a surpisingly hi IQ for hunter gatherers. I think its like 96. Thats basically the same as an Irishman. This shocked me. These studies can be off by a few points. But I really think cold weather is a major driver of IQ. The only really stupid people are those that have very low portion of ancestry that lived in cold climates at any time in the last 200,000 years. Native central americans have pretty low IQ but its not insanely low like australoids and SS Africans. Their ancestors were siberians 20,000 years ago. But a lack of selective pressure since then has caused their IQ to drop. That’s what is happening to us. We need eugenics to replace the selective pressure of cold winters.

[ - ] Garrett [op] 0 points 2.6 yearsSep 27, 2021 20:27:02 ago (+0/-0)*

Whites dont develop rickets because their pale skin allows them to synethesize sun light more effectively. and as is said, whites have a higher frequency of a gene that detects cold. not only that, blond hair and light colored eyes also absorb sunlight more easily.


Whites didnt develop rickets due to a grain diet, and Whites have not been on a grain diet compared to other groups, hence Whites being especially adapted to cheese and milk unlike asians. Inuits are not developing rickets due to a grain diet, they are developing it due to inability to synthesize sunlight at the same rate as Whites are. If Whites didnt develop rickets after switching to a grain diet, why are Inuits? Also Inuits are of the same physicality of native americans and native americans have been shown to have an extremely low iq. Not to mention that they commit a higher proportion of crimes in canada compared to Whites.


The reason why Ireland has such as low iq (as well as lithuania) is due to population displacement. Irish in the USA are on the same level as other White americans.




Skin type V individuals have, by definition, significant constitutive pigmentation that gives their skin its brown colour. The melanin pigment protects the underlying skin against damage from UVR. In reducing the UVR in this way it also reduces the vitamin D synthesis due to the same UVR. Thus, theory suggests, and our in vivo studies have shown [7,16] that skin type V individuals need more UVR (achieved naturally by more sun exposure) to make the same amount of vitamin D in skin as white Caucasians who lack their constitutive pigmentation.


https://archive.ph/Z7IOw

[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 2.6 yearsSep 27, 2021 21:59:09 ago (+0/-0)

Whites dont develop rickets because their pale skin allows them to synethesize sun light more effectively.

Yeah we both agree on that. Its not in question.

Im not sure what the adaptive advantage of blond hair and blue eyes are. I doubt its directly beneficial to D levels. Perhaps its just attractive. Perhaps they are linked to some other beneficia traits.

Whites didnt develop rickets due to a grain diet, and Whites have not been on a grain diet compared to other groups,

I think that is why and they may have been reliant on grain based diets longer than other cold weather climate people.

Inuits are not developing rickets due to a grain diet, they are developing it due to inability to synthesize sunlight at the same rate as Whites are.

This is an arbitrary statement. There are two sources of vit D. One is consuming it from animal sources. The other is manufacturing it with choleserol and sunlight. You can’t say low D is only due to one and not the other. If Inuits did not evolve light skin it would indicate they were getting enough vitamin D from dietary sources. Whites evolved extra white skin AFTER they lost a good source of D in their diet, meat. Europeans went from being hunters to grass eaters. Wheat, rye, oats. They evolved white skin due to a need that inuit didn’t have. Yes many europeans would have died of rickets until that happened.

Also Inuits are of the same physicality of native americans and native americans have been shown to have an extremely low iq.

Well they are not the same people as native americans and there is a lot of diversity within native americans. Even if inuits were the same as native americans (inuits only migrated to N. America a few thousand years ago) , native americans have been living in diverse environments (hot and cold, hunter gatherer and agrarian) for at least 10000 years. So that is more than enough time for one group to grow more intelligent or stupid. How do you account for the range of IQ among the different people of europe? A tribe under specific conditions can evolve a new trait rather quickly, I think much faster than you are assuming.

You can’t just say “oh all native americans had a 90 IQ when they crossed the land bridge 20,000 years ago so they all have a 90 IQ now.” That’s absurd. I would think people living in tropical areas would tend to lose IQ in general.

I would assume that hunter gatherers might be more prone to theft because ownership and private property concepts are less meaningful to them. That is absolutely genetic. Patrilineal monogamist agrarians had a strong sense of respect for each other’s property because it was a key concept within their society. That was a mental adaptation. Hunter gatherers just grab shit. Its what they do.

The reason why Ireland has such as low iq (as well as lithuania) is due to population displacement

Ok brain drain, maybe that explains it. But the irish were not as smart as the scandis or the germans. Theyve never impressed me as spectacular minds in america And I say that as someone heavily related to them.

It seems like you’re trying to prove something to me by citing this quote. I totlally understand the mechanism. There is a trade off : more vit D vs more UV damage and lower folic acid levels. Darker skin makes sense if you live in higer sunlight areas. Whites have probably substantially whitened since the agricultural revolution

[ - ] NeoNazirite 0 points 2.6 yearsSep 27, 2021 19:22:08 ago (+0/-0)

I live in Texas. Is that why I want multiple wives?

[ - ] PostWallHelena 1 point 2.6 yearsSep 27, 2021 20:13:27 ago (+1/-0)

Theoretically possible. Depends on how long your people were in texas.

I think there’s a range of behavior in the white population. Winter, and perhaps cultural rules, killed off or otherwise deselected more opportunistic males for a long time, and now that pressure is gone and guys like Trump and Mel are “getting away with” polygamy without the reproductive penalty they would have paid ages ago for overextending their ability to feed mouths. Men will get away with what they can. We are more prosperous now but those conditions are similar to tropical environments which had year round food availability.

[ - ] NeoNazirite 1 point 2.6 yearsSep 27, 2021 21:23:08 ago (+1/-0)

I'm not thinking with my dick though. I'm thinking about kick-starting our repopulation. It just so happens I'll love every minute of it in my reptile brain.

[ - ] PostWallHelena 1 point 2.6 yearsSep 27, 2021 22:22:01 ago (+1/-0)

What we need is more females willing to birth and raise a shitton of babies. We don’t have a lack of males. We have a lack of females willing to reproduce or at least willing to reproduce with males of average income. Maybe we could fuck with the birth sex ratio. If we increased the ratio of F to M it would make women hypercompetitive for males. Unfortunately many would resort to coal which is disasterous. The more they seem like us the more we are likely to muddy ourselves up with them. But its certainly one strategy for increasing the birth rate.

[ - ] NeoNazirite 1 point 2.6 yearsSep 27, 2021 22:23:28 ago (+1/-0)

sorry. All I heard was "Maybe we could fuck"

[ - ] PostWallHelena 1 point 2.6 yearsSep 27, 2021 22:27:11 ago (+1/-0)

Oh you and your reptile brain.

Anytime you want to talk turkey about retaking the earth demographically, Im game. You know, strategically. Not personally.

[ - ] NeoNazirite 0 points 2.6 yearsSep 27, 2021 22:44:55 ago (+0/-0)

I think the strategy is in our genes, but our environment is all out of wack. The strategy I see is in propaganda. If you want an enemy to stop coming across the river you take out the bridge. Separation from the jewmedia, filling the void with truth. But that doesn't stop the other side of the great dilemma. non-Whites in White lands. Like I said, the ratio will rebalance and perhaps a renaissance will follow.

[ - ] breh 1 point 2.6 yearsSep 27, 2021 17:33:10 ago (+1/-0)

The way to warm your body to protect from cold is with increased movement and activity, and the way to cool your body from heat is with decreased movement and activity. I think that is why Whites are so hard working and active, never being complacent with the status quo but seeking to achieve something greater than. Blacks have had tens of thousands of years of selective pressure to make them lazy layabouts.

[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 2.6 yearsSep 27, 2021 18:00:19 ago (+0/-0)

No thats not it. Its reproductive strategy. Black men do not have a legacy of supporting their mates and children economically.

High investment of males in their offspring is not universal. The lowest paternal investment is in matrilineal or matrilocal polygamous societies. This is what most of SS africa was before islamic and christian colonization and it is still a prevalent system in some places. Female chastity is not guaranteed therefore paternal investment is disincentivized. The maternal uncle tends to be the head of the household and he does invest in his neices and nephews but the incentive is not high. Who works their ass off to provide for their sister’s kids? Nobody. Providing wealth is not tied to getting laid.

Monogamists who can ensure paternity of offspring have the highest incentive to produce economically and low incentive for male-on-male violence compared to all polygamists, including the patriachal polygynists of the islamic world. Monogamy == low violence, high trust, high economic productivity.

[ - ] lord_nougat 1 point 2.6 yearsSep 27, 2021 17:30:22 ago (+1/-0)

I caught a cold awhile back. I totally died from it.

[ - ] deleted 0 points 2.6 yearsSep 28, 2021 17:50:28 ago (+0/-0)

deleted

[ - ] Garrett [op] 0 points 2.6 yearsSep 28, 2021 20:33:17 ago (+0/-0)

adaptations= selective pressure. Whites underwent the most selective pressure to survive in cold environments. thats why they are so adapted to survive in such a harsh environment. that in turn lead to higher intelligence. inuits also live in cold areas yet are not as innovative or successful as Whites due to the fact that they didnt undergo selective pressure like Whites did which would have resulted in lighter skin in order to be more adaptative to harsh environmental conditions. even today inuits develop rickets (vitamin d deficiency) at a higher rate than Whites because they never underwent selective pressure in order to become more adapted to the cold like Whites are (who thrive in cold weather and dont need such a vitamin d heavy diet to do so but rather synthesize vitamin d at a high rate due to their pale skin)

[ - ] toobaditworks 1 point 2.6 yearsSep 27, 2021 14:52:21 ago (+1/-0)

((Their)) theory of evolution is that whites developed because of different circumstances which gave them an advantage over all the lower IQ africans, indians, south americans and middle easterners. This advantage turned them into white supremacists who took over the world with their racism.

By flooding all the white countries with africans, indians, south americans and middle easterners over time will increase the IQ of all the africans, indians, south americans and middle easterners which will give them an advantage over whoever is left in africa, india and the middle east creating african, indian, south american and middle eastern supremacists who will take over the world with their racism.

[ - ] Garrett [op] 1 point 2.6 yearsSep 27, 2021 14:55:13 ago (+1/-0)*

i mean whites have undergone the most selective pressure to survive better than any other race under the harshest conditions that exist climate wise. even the eskimos are dying out thanks to a lack of walrus blubber to give them vitamin d. whites existed for tens of thousands years more than them without the help of blubber. that is the epitome of selective pressure



https://web.archive.org/web/20210927185813/https://www.theglobeandmail.com/life/changes-in-arctic-diet-put-inuit-at-risk-for-rickets/article687556/

[ - ] toobaditworks 1 point 2.6 yearsSep 27, 2021 15:06:53 ago (+1/-0)

without whites humanity will be dead and lost forever.

[ - ] Sunman_Omega 0 points 2.6 yearsSep 27, 2021 15:09:55 ago (+0/-0)

Yup. We literally discovered and invented everything of value and importance on earth and every other race failed. No Whites = goodbye, and good riddance, to humanity.

[ - ] Paradoxical003 0 points 2.6 yearsSep 27, 2021 22:32:57 ago (+0/-0)

Whites got smart because they had to prepare for winter.

Whites got kind because they had to work together to survive in the cold.

Whites had to pair bond and raise children with a single partner because it was so hard to move around due to winter, and because children needed to be supervised and educated to survive the winter seasons.

It all came down to living in a place where the environment would regularly turn deadly, where the air itself could kill you, all food was either hidden or disappeared, movement was very difficult, and where you couldn't see clearly most of the time.

[ - ] Ifuckdolphinseverday 0 points 2.6 yearsSep 27, 2021 19:24:27 ago (+0/-0)

Hyperborea

[ - ] Feelsgood 0 points 2.6 yearsSep 27, 2021 18:24:29 ago (+0/-0)

Criminals in Africa fuck off to another hut.


Criminals in Europe freeze to death.

[ - ] dalai_llama 0 points 2.6 yearsSep 27, 2021 16:52:55 ago (+0/-0)

I think the simple exercise of having to prepare for the winter also filtered a lot of lazy people out of the gene pool in the manner of the ant and the grasshopper parable.

[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 2.6 yearsSep 27, 2021 18:06:06 ago (+0/-0)

I think there’s no question that the ability to plan ahead was a key survival trait in northern eurasians. Its hard to think about planning for bad eventualities when things are going good. Africans and other warm weather groups have a YOLO ethic because it is not lethal to have such an outlook. Nobody wants to take a vacation in Finland because Finnish are not known as party people. They are fucking serious because the YOLO types died off long ago in Finland. Tropical people dance and bang on bongos all day because they can.