Newton's third law is: For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. The statement means that in every interaction, there is a pair of forces acting on the two interacting objects. The size of the forces on the first object EQUALS the size of the force on the second object.
30 floors of building can crush 30 floors, as by then, there will be nothing left to crush. 30 floors of building CANNOT crush 80 floors of stronger built building. It is physically IMPOSSIBLE.
Some sort of assistance is ABSOLUTELY necessary for things to have happened the way they did.
Ignorance of this basic fact by nearly everyone shows you the state of our (((educational))) system
30 floors can crush one floor and then 31 floors can crush 1 floor and then 32 floors can crush 1 floor and so on. I think thats a better way to model it . The 30 floors only need enough momentum to crush the supports of the next floo and then that floor adds to the momentum. But even if that werent the case I still think your logic is flawed.
The force is equally applied. There is no way around that, I am sorry. 30 floors of building will create 30 floors of rubble. The rubble will not crush much else of the stronger built lower structure.
IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR 30 FLOORS OF BUILDING TO CRUSH 80 STRONGER BUILT FLOORS WITHOUT EXPLOSIVES.
You haven't accounted for potential energy. As a floor falls, it converts more potential energy to kinetic energy. The floors above just have to break the vertical support structures. As long as the energy dissipated from breaking them is less than the gain in kinetic energy from the fall, it will keep gaining kinetic energy.
I think he was thinking about how acceleration is m/s^2. OP is still retarded and has no clue how physics work. Mainly that everhthing on earth is being pulled from its center of mass to the center of the earth at 9.81 m/s^2 every second of every day. All things that are standing on earth are pushing down and therefore having the same force being pushed upward at the same magnitude of force due to gravity just to stand. When something at the top of a structure falls it has momentum and can easily destroy the rest. Not so much in terms of a steel building on fire but for instance a jenga tower. I mean OP literally thinks we are in the vaccum of space or something. Posts like these are the ones that end up on “shit right wingers say” on shitlib websites and make us look like retards.
I was thinking more of how to understand things by starting with as simple a setup as possible. OP got confused with all the things going on at once so was unable to apply basic reasoning.
I mean I don’t think the official story is true at all but you might want to take a freshman physics class if you don’t know what momentum is. That’s like saying a bullet can’t possibly destroy a human brain because it’s bigger and more massive. Come on man. And no, you don’t understand that law of physics. It means for instance that if you’re standing on earth and weigh 170 lbs that there is a normal force pushing back upon the human body from the earth with the same 170 lbs. it’s why when you jump off a building you splat and die because you’ve accelerated towards the earth until terminal velocity set in assuming you were high enough. By your logic nothing small could ever blow through something bigger. The reason bullets are dangerous is because they are going very very fast when they aren’t massive.
As much as the plane story stinks to high heaven, if the towers did collapse to that degree they'd be absolutely fucked.
Sure, some of the 30 stories might miss or come down on areas intended to bear their weight to begin with, but most of it wouldn't. Couple that with the oscillating loads on the supports and the whole thing tears itself apart.
However I wouldn't expect them to collapse straight down bottom stories first. And I wouldn't expect a plane strike to be able to initiate the collapse to begin with. They were literally designed to withstand that.
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 15 points 3.8 yearsSep 11, 2021 01:23:56 ago (+15/-0)
[ + ] TheSimulacra
[ - ] TheSimulacra [op] 1 point 3.8 yearsSep 11, 2021 01:36:31 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] bobdole9
[ - ] bobdole9 1 point 3.8 yearsSep 11, 2021 11:42:31 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 3.8 yearsSep 11, 2021 11:57:43 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] TheSimulacra
[ - ] TheSimulacra [op] 0 points 3.8 yearsSep 11, 2021 01:33:45 ago (+0/-0)
IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR 30 FLOORS OF BUILDING TO CRUSH 80 STRONGER BUILT FLOORS WITHOUT EXPLOSIVES.
Thank you, that is all.
[ + ] Prairie
[ - ] Prairie 7 points 3.8 yearsSep 11, 2021 06:42:21 ago (+7/-0)
[ + ] patchCodeUnsuccessful
[ - ] patchCodeUnsuccessful 8 points 3.8 yearsSep 11, 2021 02:02:40 ago (+8/-0)
30 × 9.80665 m/s^2 = you're wrong.
[ + ] Nosferatjew
[ - ] Nosferatjew 3 points 3.8 yearsSep 11, 2021 02:25:22 ago (+4/-1)
That's not the formula. The correct fotmula is F=ma. There is no square. It's just F=ma. So, you're wrong.
[ + ] NukeisraelDeux
[ - ] NukeisraelDeux 4 points 3.8 yearsSep 11, 2021 03:12:00 ago (+5/-1)*
[ + ] Prairie
[ - ] Prairie 1 point 3.8 yearsSep 11, 2021 06:43:35 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] NukeisraelDeux
[ - ] NukeisraelDeux -1 points 3.8 yearsSep 11, 2021 14:00:13 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] Prairie
[ - ] Prairie 0 points 3.8 yearsSep 12, 2021 00:35:27 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] NukeisraelDeux
[ - ] NukeisraelDeux 6 points 3.8 yearsSep 11, 2021 01:50:08 ago (+7/-1)
[ + ] Broc_Liath
[ - ] Broc_Liath 1 point 3.8 yearsSep 11, 2021 06:44:38 ago (+1/-0)
Sure, some of the 30 stories might miss or come down on areas intended to bear their weight to begin with, but most of it wouldn't. Couple that with the oscillating loads on the supports and the whole thing tears itself apart.
However I wouldn't expect them to collapse straight down bottom stories first. And I wouldn't expect a plane strike to be able to initiate the collapse to begin with. They were literally designed to withstand that.
[ + ] Prairie
[ - ] Prairie 3 points 3.8 yearsSep 11, 2021 06:45:19 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 1 point 3.8 yearsSep 11, 2021 09:33:07 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Prairie
[ - ] Prairie 0 points 3.8 yearsSep 11, 2021 09:39:08 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] SocksOnCats
[ - ] SocksOnCats 0 points 3.8 yearsSep 11, 2021 16:31:23 ago (+0/-0)
Not saying jews didn't do 9/11, but your supposition here is incorrect.
[ + ] TheSimulacra
[ - ] TheSimulacra [op] 0 points 3.8 yearsSep 11, 2021 18:27:16 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] SocksOnCats
[ - ] SocksOnCats 0 points 3.8 yearsSep 12, 2021 13:38:17 ago (+0/-0)
Again, I'm not saying there weren't explosives or that jews didn't do 9/11, but you do need a better understanding of physics.