×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules
21

Idea: Posters with negative scp or ccp get automatically hidden

submitted by system to whatever 3.6 yearsApr 6, 2021 21:48:34 ago (+27/-6)     (whatever)*

But you can opt out to unhide them in your account options. Yay or nay? I'm noticing a lot of downvoted posts from a couple of users. Instead of limiting their posting, this might be a better idea. Or should I just leave as is? Let me hear your thoughts.

Edit: After reading all the comments, maybe an opt-in option to hide negative accounts is the better solution.

Edit: Thanks for all the input. I will sleep on it.


101 comments block


[ - ] MrPancake 0 points 3.6 yearsApr 7, 2021 12:07:35 ago (+0/-0)

If we don't see them; how can we report CP and other degeneracy to you? I assume you do not have the time to look at every post made on here. Certainly not if it grows.

[ - ] account deleted by user 0 points 3.6 yearsApr 7, 2021 09:44:09 ago (+0/-0)

account deleted by user

[ - ] Tallest_Skil 0 points 3.6 yearsApr 7, 2021 08:55:48 ago (+0/-0)

Opt in or you’re just censoring everyone forcibly.

WHY. IS. VOTING. ALLOWED. TO. MATTER. AT. ALL.

[ - ] asdf23 0 points 3.6 yearsApr 7, 2021 08:55:38 ago (+0/-0)

I would cache content locally on the browser localStorage, not post it publicly on the server, (But retain it in the server end as well). Locally users continue to see this content as it's loaded. Server wise the content will be rate limited. A queue builds 1 post per day or less. The queue is purged at some size on the server. Users that continue to have a long list of unpublished shit get punished with less points or where a single upvote is worth 3/5th of a real vote. Users that are constantly falling out of sync with the server might be trying to hack the site.

[ - ] account deleted by user 0 points 3.6 yearsApr 7, 2021 08:31:58 ago (+0/-0)

account deleted by user

[ - ] system [op] 0 points 3.6 yearsApr 7, 2021 11:00:01 ago (+0/-0)

Lockdown mode is off now.

[ - ] fightknightHERO 1 point 3.6 yearsApr 7, 2021 07:45:38 ago (+1/-0)

This is actually a good idea

[ - ] albatrosv15 0 points 3.6 yearsApr 7, 2021 06:58:48 ago (+0/-0)

One vote for opt-in.

Who i'm kidding. Voting doesn't matter.

[ - ] i_hate_sodomites 0 points 3.6 yearsApr 7, 2021 06:53:13 ago (+0/-0)

If I don't have to see diggernicks comments, or thelma having a jew fucking melt-down, I'm really, really okay with this. They're both a couple of IDF shills, and I'd laugh heartily if they were just listed with their names and "X' number of downvoats without having to read any of their comments unless I expanded them like an absolute retard.

Works for me, dude! Have at it!

[ - ] shitface9000 0 points 3.6 yearsApr 7, 2021 04:07:34 ago (+0/-0)

I have an idea that people with opinions i don't like get fucked in the ass.

[ - ] Murdock 0 points 3.6 yearsApr 7, 2021 01:52:06 ago (+0/-0)

I also believe -1 should not be hidden.
But I have an idea..
You can base on AVERAGE of the subverse.
If it's a new subverse with 10 posts, average 2 votes per post.. If the new post gets -2, gets hidden.
If it's an old subverse like whatever.. Let's say average votes from a post is 50...
When the new post gets -50. It gets hidden.
But you should check the averages. I don't know the data, maybe my idea sucks.
----
You could try a formula.. Like minimum -10 to hidden.
If average > 10 = average /2
In the whatever example.. We get 50/2= 25
If the post gets -25 it gets hidden.

[ - ] Doglegwarrior -2 points 3.6 yearsApr 6, 2021 23:58:53 ago (+0/-2)

Let's not be a bunch of fucking faggots !

I have to deal with a troll faggot shill kike named

@cheesebooger

I don't want him banned blocked shadow banned given some gay jew label.

Let the truth prove what he is it's that simple. I can ignore the faggot or keep trying to find out if an actual human is behind that account name. So far it seems like a kid or a jew shill or some middle aged gamma.

But let's not go down the fucking ban and block road

[ - ] paul_neri 0 points 3.6 yearsApr 7, 2021 05:32:36 ago (+0/-0)

agree (with the last line).

[ - ] account removed 1 point 3.6 yearsApr 6, 2021 23:44:24 ago (+1/-0)

account removed

[ - ] collegeTry 0 points 3.6 yearsApr 6, 2021 23:18:50 ago (+0/-0)

Traditional Voat CCP rules just encouraged circle jerking. This here's a cesspool no matter what, there's no sense in hiding the cringe.

[ - ] AloisH 0 points 3.6 yearsApr 6, 2021 22:51:40 ago (+0/-0)

Wow blocking works great!

[ - ] Jeff_Cajun_Year 1 point 3.6 yearsApr 6, 2021 22:47:40 ago (+1/-0)

@system take your time to decide what to do. We are in no hurry. It's good to talk it out.

[ - ] oldblo 0 points 3.6 yearsApr 6, 2021 22:44:11 ago (+0/-0)

If nothing else should you make such a thing I strongly suggest it be an opt in feature and not default or affecting those not logged in.

Again I stand opposed to it.

[ - ] Jeff_Cajun_Year 0 points 3.6 yearsApr 6, 2021 22:36:02 ago (+0/-0)

And a running list of Users who are in the red on the front page.

[ - ] account deleted by user 1 point 3.6 yearsApr 6, 2021 22:25:48 ago (+2/-1)

account deleted by user

[ - ] deleted 1 point 3.6 yearsApr 6, 2021 22:59:16 ago (+1/-0)*

deleted

[ - ] i_hate_sodomites 0 points 3.6 yearsApr 7, 2021 06:58:15 ago (+0/-0)

Dude, you need to stop smoking so much weed. You made zero sense here....

[ - ] Jeff_Cajun_Year -1 points 3.6 yearsApr 6, 2021 22:25:21 ago (+0/-1)

Ooo Oooo Opt-in Option but turn it on by default. So we don't have to go around telling everyone to opt-in. The option should be to show them. Not to hide the already hidden.

Could this create an underground voat where the negga's communicate via hidden posts? <--- just a weird thought I had.

[ - ] PeckerwoodPerry 0 points 3.6 yearsApr 6, 2021 22:17:45 ago (+1/-1)

That's a lot of power for one shithead with a VPN and too much time on his rubbing little hands.

[ - ] account deleted by user 1 point 3.6 yearsApr 6, 2021 22:17:14 ago (+1/-0)

account deleted by user

[ - ] beece 0 points 3.6 yearsApr 6, 2021 22:17:02 ago (+0/-0)

Has no one asked: WWPD?

[ - ] account deleted by user -1 points 3.6 yearsApr 6, 2021 22:13:08 ago (+1/-2)*

account deleted by user

[ - ] Jeff_Cajun_Year 1 point 3.6 yearsApr 6, 2021 22:37:55 ago (+2/-1)

Your inability to express your thoughts in an intelligent manner shows... well you get the picture.

[ - ] ruck_feddit 1 point 3.6 yearsApr 6, 2021 22:12:42 ago (+1/-0)

Cloning the limitations of original voat would work. You don't want people crying "shadow banning" or saying this place is poal. This is a tough sea to navigate.

[ - ] deleted 0 points 3.6 yearsApr 6, 2021 23:01:52 ago (+0/-0)

deleted

[ - ] PenisPie 3 points 3.6 yearsApr 6, 2021 22:12:23 ago (+3/-0)

I would rather everything be seen and maybe have their posting ability diminished instead. Like only a certain amount of posts per hour or something like that when they reach a certain amount.

[ - ] 3Whuurs 2 points 3.6 yearsApr 6, 2021 22:08:59 ago (+2/-0)

Idea: now that Q is literally the chosen gov op to demonize as terrorists, how about we just ban it from the site? Probly take care of 90% of the Down Voat issue to.

[ - ] veo 1 point 3.6 yearsApr 6, 2021 22:07:13 ago (+1/-0)

As others have mentioned, concern would be in brigading. If you have a means to prevent that, then this could be an option.

[ - ] AloisH -1 points 3.6 yearsApr 6, 2021 22:05:35 ago (+0/-1)

Yay, with turdlords idea but 25 instead of 100. Shiting on new users so much thier posts are hidden sounds like fun

[ - ] account deleted by user 2 points 3.6 yearsApr 6, 2021 22:02:36 ago (+2/-0)

account deleted by user

[ - ] oldblo 0 points 3.6 yearsApr 6, 2021 22:19:28 ago (+0/-0)

Sounds good to me.

[ - ] Antiliberalsociety 3 points 3.6 yearsApr 6, 2021 22:00:05 ago (+3/-0)

I've got a great idea. How about a "SUSPICIOUS USER" tag added to their name, and reset their score to -137 regardless of their score. Eh??

In all seriousness, I'd say the collapse function like on original Voat to unhide it.

[ - ] Jeff_Cajun_Year 1 point 3.6 yearsApr 6, 2021 22:34:05 ago (+1/-0)

JUST LIKE POAL DOES RIGHT?

[ - ] fightknightHERO 4 points 3.6 yearsApr 6, 2021 21:59:32 ago (+6/-2)

That's just NorthSeaPagan and his alts spamming the v/anime subs

[ - ] i_hate_sodomites 1 point 3.6 yearsApr 7, 2021 06:56:25 ago (+1/-0)

NorthSeaPagan isn't a jew like digger or the other losers, he's just a fucking schizo off his meds. Sometimes he actually makes sense (y'know, when he actually pops his pills). I just wish the fucking asshole would take his pills like he's supposed to, rather than on rare occasions....

[ - ] Darth_Nougat 1 point 3.6 yearsApr 6, 2021 21:58:26 ago (+1/-0)

sounds like a sensible proposal.

[ - ] oldblo 2 points 3.6 yearsApr 6, 2021 21:58:23 ago (+2/-0)

Leave it as is. No one needs this place to become a circle jerk.

[ - ] account deleted by user -2 points 3.6 yearsApr 6, 2021 21:57:40 ago (+2/-4)

account deleted by user

[ - ] AndrewBlazeIt 1 point 3.6 yearsApr 6, 2021 21:59:23 ago (+2/-1)

Maybe don't nuke someone's entire history because they pointed out you're farming upvotes.

[ - ] system [op] 4 points 3.6 yearsApr 6, 2021 22:06:15 ago (+4/-0)

I will look into that.

[ - ] AloisH 1 point 3.6 yearsApr 6, 2021 22:07:49 ago (+1/-0)

How's the server looking?

[ - ] AndrewBlazeIt 1 point 3.6 yearsApr 6, 2021 22:09:39 ago (+2/-1)*

I don't have any hard evidence, but he sure has a whole hell of a lot of upvotes for someone who's been here 4 days. Particularly considering active, well-known, well-liked goats have been here much longer and have far fewer.

And there are several subs he owns that he spams non-stop.

EDIT: Oh, and I noticed the downvotes started right after I'd pointed it out.

[ - ] account deleted by user 2 points 3.6 yearsApr 6, 2021 22:15:43 ago (+2/-0)

account deleted by user

[ - ] AndrewBlazeIt 0 points 3.6 yearsApr 6, 2021 22:17:13 ago (+2/-2)

You'll notice my previous post has -1, and I'd bet this comment will get one as well, around 1-2 minutes after posting it.

Pretty sure he put me on some kind of gay bot list

[ - ] account deleted by user 1 point 3.6 yearsApr 6, 2021 22:18:24 ago (+1/-0)

account deleted by user

[ - ] account deleted by user 0 points 3.6 yearsApr 7, 2021 00:25:10 ago (+0/-0)

account deleted by user

[ - ] oldblo 0 points 3.6 yearsApr 6, 2021 22:22:50 ago (+0/-0)

Like they did to you just now... Some people have some maturing to do.

[ - ] Murdock 0 points 3.6 yearsApr 7, 2021 03:13:32 ago (+0/-0)*

Maybe I am wrong, maybe it was not your nickname..
But on voat, there was a guy who posted normal things... Until one day, started with loli shit.
He was crying about being downvoted everywhere.
I think it's fair.
But again, maybe it was not you.
Edit: directed at NorthSeaPagan.

[ - ] account removed 0 points 3.6 yearsApr 6, 2021 23:46:35 ago (+0/-0)

account removed

[ - ] oldblo 0 points 3.6 yearsApr 6, 2021 22:00:36 ago (+1/-1)

Only real reason to limit their posting is if they are a spamming faggot. Even then I find it unpalatable.

[ - ] account deleted by user -3 points 3.6 yearsApr 6, 2021 22:04:21 ago (+0/-3)

account deleted by user

[ - ] AndrewBlazeIt 0 points 3.6 yearsApr 6, 2021 22:04:42 ago (+1/-1)

Hmm, so maybe don't nuke someone's entire history because they pointed out you're farming upvotes?

[ - ] oldblo 0 points 3.6 yearsApr 6, 2021 22:18:04 ago (+0/-0)*

I get it but I have my reasons. Dealing with "objectionable" material sounds like every bit like what I hate about other places. I figure a user block is plenty and that alone wont turn the site into a circle jerk.

[ - ] account deleted by user -1 points 3.6 yearsApr 6, 2021 22:22:01 ago (+0/-1)

account deleted by user

[ - ] oldblo 0 points 3.6 yearsApr 6, 2021 22:26:46 ago (+0/-0)*

Thats begging for bots, cunts that spam you with downvotes, social lynching for wrong think, soft censorship, ect... A block button works fine if you get sick of someones shit. No extra problems or encouragement for specific actions either.

Edit: When you say posts you dont mean comments do you? I can accept limiting what looks to be a bot or things that are not comments being posted in rapid succession. The limits on commenting is what really bothers me.

[ - ] account deleted by user 0 points 3.6 yearsApr 6, 2021 22:29:54 ago (+0/-0)

account deleted by user

[ - ] MrPim 4 points 3.6 yearsApr 6, 2021 21:57:36 ago (+4/-0)

Im going to voat no on that one.

[ - ] account deleted by user 13 points 3.6 yearsApr 6, 2021 21:57:24 ago (+13/-0)*

account deleted by user

[ - ] AloisH 4 points 3.6 yearsApr 6, 2021 22:06:21 ago (+4/-0)

You wont let us have any fun

[ - ] account deleted by user 3 points 3.6 yearsApr 6, 2021 21:59:09 ago (+4/-1)

account deleted by user

[ - ] Doglegwarrior -4 points 3.6 yearsApr 6, 2021 23:59:31 ago (+1/-5)

If the stupid jew nigger @cheesebooger

Thinks it's a good idea it is not

[ - ] account deleted by user 3 points 3.6 yearsApr 7, 2021 00:15:13 ago (+3/-0)

account deleted by user

[ - ] account deleted by user 1 point 3.6 yearsApr 7, 2021 07:09:47 ago (+1/-0)

account deleted by user

[ - ] account deleted by user 1 point 3.6 yearsApr 7, 2021 07:59:12 ago (+1/-0)

account deleted by user

[ - ] account deleted by user 1 point 3.6 yearsApr 9, 2021 16:43:54 ago (+1/-0)

account deleted by user

[ - ] AndrewBlazeIt 2 points 3.6 yearsApr 6, 2021 22:14:10 ago (+3/-1)

I thought oldVoat used the -100 thing too.

[ - ] account deleted by user 3 points 3.6 yearsApr 6, 2021 22:17:08 ago (+3/-0)*

account deleted by user

[ - ] Jeff_Cajun_Year 2 points 3.6 yearsApr 6, 2021 22:22:11 ago (+2/-0)

I like it. I would add that the user be informed of why at the time and what to do to get back into good graces.

I would also say that in order to get back into good graces they must get their SCP CCP back to ZERO not 99 ( or something like this .. make them work for it).

[ - ] account deleted by user 0 points 3.6 yearsApr 6, 2021 23:07:00 ago (+0/-0)

account deleted by user

[ - ] Jeff_Cajun_Year 0 points 3.6 yearsApr 6, 2021 23:14:24 ago (+0/-0)*

maybe we are over thinking this whole thing.
Just give users the ability to hide people by downvoat status.
Easier for @system to implement, less intrusive.

But I like the Idea for a Hall of shame.. where the serial downvoters are listed on the front page.

[ - ] SpankmeTankMe 1 point 3.6 yearsApr 6, 2021 23:17:18 ago (+1/-0)

This sounds like a more reasonable solution to me as well.

[ - ] account deleted by user 5 points 3.6 yearsApr 6, 2021 21:56:46 ago (+5/-0)*

account deleted by user

[ - ] Jeff_Cajun_Year 0 points 3.6 yearsApr 6, 2021 22:33:20 ago (+1/-1)

Do you want to go around finding people to block?

Or would you rather have the option to turn their posts and comments on and off?

What could it possibly matter to you to have that option?

[ - ] Tallest_Skil 2 points 3.6 yearsApr 7, 2021 08:58:27 ago (+2/-0)

Why should we be told what is and is not “good” by an anonymous collective? Why do others get to censor what I see (contextually)? Are we not adults? Why can’t we make the determination of what is and isn’t good on our own?

And how can we trust the collective to not be 99% jewish bots, like every single pro-white website?

[ - ] account deleted by user -3 points 3.6 yearsApr 6, 2021 21:59:15 ago (+0/-3)

account deleted by user

[ - ] account deleted by user 0 points 3.6 yearsApr 6, 2021 21:56:10 ago (+1/-1)*

account deleted by user

[ - ] deleted 0 points 3.6 yearsApr 6, 2021 23:03:18 ago (+0/-0)

deleted

[ - ] AndrewBlazeIt 6 points 3.6 yearsApr 6, 2021 21:53:00 ago (+7/-1)

Considering I just rustled someone's jimmies hard enough that they DV'ed my entire history, I'm against it.

[ - ] account deleted by user 2 points 3.6 yearsApr 6, 2021 22:12:38 ago (+2/-0)*

account deleted by user

[ - ] AndrewBlazeIt 2 points 3.6 yearsApr 6, 2021 22:15:49 ago (+3/-1)

Isn't that how oldVoat worked? I never asked Putt about the mechanics behind it, but something that would notice if you downvoted the same person over and over.

[ - ] account deleted by user 2 points 3.6 yearsApr 6, 2021 22:37:18 ago (+2/-0)

account deleted by user

[ - ] AndrewBlazeIt 1 point 3.6 yearsApr 6, 2021 22:40:40 ago (+2/-1)

It wasn't like that from the beginning, I don't think. It may have been in response to one of Crensch's tantrums about brigading, actually.

[ - ] GhostCow 1 point 3.6 yearsApr 8, 2021 00:41:58 ago (+1/-0)

I did this constantly to Ghostskin and all his alts up until the day Voat died. I don't think Puttitout tracked that stuff or if he did then he didn't care.

[ - ] AndrewBlazeIt 0 points 3.6 yearsApr 8, 2021 00:51:13 ago (+0/-0)

Dial gay

[ - ] Antiliberalsociety 0 points 3.6 yearsApr 6, 2021 23:17:27 ago (+0/-0)

They'll just use alts

[ - ] AndrewBlazeIt 0 points 3.6 yearsApr 7, 2021 21:15:25 ago (+1/-1)

It's already happening.

[ - ] account deleted by user -1 points 3.6 yearsApr 6, 2021 21:53:00 ago (+1/-2)*

account deleted by user

[ - ] system [op] 5 points 3.6 yearsApr 6, 2021 21:58:21 ago (+6/-1)*

Voat.co limited downvoted accounts to 10 posts a day. There is no such limit here as of now. I am simply offering options.

[ - ] account deleted by user 1 point 3.6 yearsApr 6, 2021 22:02:15 ago (+2/-1)

account deleted by user

[ - ] uvulectomy 4 points 3.6 yearsApr 6, 2021 21:59:52 ago (+6/-2)

You in particular could always just neck yourself.

[ - ] account deleted by user 2 points 3.6 yearsApr 6, 2021 22:02:44 ago (+3/-1)

account deleted by user

[ - ] Jeff_Cajun_Year 0 points 3.6 yearsApr 6, 2021 22:29:20 ago (+0/-0)

In this case. It would not matter to you, to have all the blocking options available. I personally do not want to go seeking out these people in order to block them. And how many Negga's do you think would abide by the NSFW tag?