This guy Kossinna advocated a model in which the indo-european languages were spread violently through a genetic spread of a germanic northern european people ( a large population turnover). His ideas were popular in the 3rd reich. Later libtard social scientists poo-pooed his theories and favored a kinder gentler model of a cultural spread of indo-european. But at least in some instances, the analysis of ancient DNA (using relatively new technology) has undermined the libshit hypothesis in favor of a model closer to Kossinna and the “Nazis”. This has occured mostly in the last 10 to 15 years.
Many other liberal anthropological consensuses (sp?) have been overturned about the evolution of people in other regions and timeframes using ancient and modern DNA analysis in recent years. Anthropologists “got schooled” by the geneticists.
PostWallHelena 0 points 2 weeks ago
This guy Kossinna advocated a model in which the indo-european languages were spread violently through a genetic spread of a germanic northern european people ( a large population turnover). His ideas were popular in the 3rd reich. Later libtard social scientists poo-pooed his theories and favored a kinder gentler model of a cultural spread of indo-european. But at least in some instances, the analysis of ancient DNA (using relatively new technology) has undermined the libshit hypothesis in favor of a model closer to Kossinna and the “Nazis”. This has occured mostly in the last 10 to 15 years.
Many other liberal anthropological consensuses (sp?) have been overturned about the evolution of people in other regions and timeframes using ancient and modern DNA analysis in recent years. Anthropologists “got schooled” by the geneticists.