The great irony about Anne Frank is that she helps disprove the Holocaust.
She was sent to Auschwitz where she wasn’t gassed or killed, then transferred to Bergen-Belsen where she died of Typhus in a hospital.
If Auschwitz was a death camp, why did Germany waste resources transferring her? But further her story lines up exactly with what revisionist say in that many Jews died in concentration camps at the end of the war from spread of disease and starvation.
https://x.com/Uncommonsince76/status/1875012202102477265https://files.catbox.moe/te2ihn.jpg![]()
muh_pseudonym_muffuguh 4 points 5 months ago
One thing thats worth noting about "the holocaust" which is never mentioned in the hundreds of Hollywood movies on the topic (How many movies has Hollywood made about the American Revolution? 3) is that all of the evidence of "the holocaust" comes via the Russians. Throughout the past 100 years everyone has always known what massive liars the Russians are, so evidence of "the holocaust" from Russians should be taken with a grain of salt.
Some of the evidence of "the holocaust" provided by the Russians has already been proved fake by contradicting eyewitness accounts, for example in this video:
https://youtu.be/4-JM6ChF-Fw?t=275
Anne Frank's stepsister Eva Schloss explains how she knows the the Russians' films and photos of the liberation of Auschwitz are fakes and even got the Russian government to officially admit to having fraudulently staged that evidence. Since the Russians faked the liberation of Auschwitz, that calls into question the rest of their evidence, why would they fake the Auschwitz evidence and then use real evidence from the other so-called "death camps", all of which were in what was Russian territory