3
Crowd Control: Nassau County Seeks To Make It Illegal To Stand Within 15 Feet Of Police During An Emergency     (www.zerohedge.com)
submitted by dosvydanya_freedomz to Technocracy 4 days ago (+3/-0)
2 comments last comment...
10
'Cyborg 1.0': World's First Robocop Debuts With Facial Recognition And 360° Camera Vision     (www.zerohedge.com)
submitted by dosvydanya_freedomz to Technocracy 1 week ago (+10/-0)
19 comments last comment...
4
Panama City Approves Bitcoin And Crypto Payments for Taxes, Fees, & Permits     (www.zerohedge.com)
submitted by dosvydanya_freedomz to Technocracy 1 week ago (+4/-0)
5 comments last comment...
https://www.zerohedge.com/crypto/panama-city-approves-bitcoin-and-crypto-payments-taxes-fees-permits

“Panama City council has just voted in favor of becoming the first public institution of government to accept payments in Crypto. Citizens will now be able to pay taxes, fees, tickets and permits entirely in crypto starting with BTC, ETH, USDC, USDT.”

“We will soon become the first public institution in the country to allow payment for municipal services in cryptocurrency, through an authorized bank that will be responsible for converting the proceeds into dollars for the Mayor’s Office.”

“Deal’s being signed next week at the Blockchain conf in Panama. Look out for signing of the deal next week.”

panama city,panama
19
Passengers Will Soon Need Real ID To Board Domestic Flights, TSA Warns     (www.zerohedge.com)
submitted by dosvydanya_freedomz to Technocracy 2 weeks ago (+19/-0)
37 comments last comment...
14
UK MPs Call For Digital Identity To "Tackle Illegal Immigration     (www.zerohedge.com)
submitted by dosvydanya_freedomz to Technocracy 2 weeks ago (+14/-0)
11 comments last comment...
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/uk-mps-call-digital-identity-tackle-illegal-immigration

hegelian dialectic in action. they created the immigration problem thus they are providing their preferred solution.

they think that they are too smart, clever even
27
Upcoming Windows 11 builds cannot install without internet and Microsoft Account     (infosec.exchange)
submitted by Kozel to Technocracy 1 month ago (+28/-1)
56 comments last comment...
11
The West lives in a simulation while Russia is shaping the real world (The Ukraine conflict epitomizes the technocratic decline foreseen by Oswald Spengler)     (www.rt.com)
submitted by dosvydanya_freedomz to Technocracy 1 month ago (+13/-2)
10 comments last comment...
https://www.rt.com/news/614311-west-russia-simulation-reality/

By Constantin von Hoffmeister, a political and cultural commentator from Germany, author of the new book >‘MULTIPOLARITY!’, and editor-in-chief of Arktos Publishing


The conflict in Ukraine is not about Ukraine. It is the West’s last delirious attempt to exert control over a world that no longer needs it. The West, lost in the labyrinth of its own technocratic nightmare, flails like a dying beast, mechanized and blind. The German historical philosopher Oswald Spengler (1880-1936), in ‘Man and Technics’ (1931), wrote of the Faustian civilization’s ultimate downfall, where technology, once an extension of organic culture, becomes an iron cage, trapping its creators in a world they no longer understand. The Western response to Ukraine is precisely this: Drones, sanctions, media narratives manufactured in real-time, an illusion of omnipotence maintained by algorithms, and artificial intelligence. But reality is slipping through the cracks. The more the West mechanizes, the more it loses its ability to perceive the living, breathing cultures it seeks to control.

A ceasefire? A negotiation? The West proposes them like a bureaucrat offering a new tax code, as if war were a spreadsheet that could be adjusted to fit quarterly projections. US President Donald Trump’s emissaries meet with Russian officials, not because they believe in peace but because the old America – his America – has sensed the shift. A world order of raw power is replacing the West’s dream of digital hegemony, and Russia, China, and a thousand-year-old history stand against it. Spengler saw it coming: The machines would overtake the soul, and the West would become incapable of organic thought. This is why they cannot understand Russia – not because they lack intelligence, but because their intelligence has been reduced to an algorithmic process, stripped of cultural depth. The West is thinking in the way that a machine thinks, and Russia, still a creature of history, is thinking like an empire.


Russian President Vladimir Putin dismisses the ceasefire offer because he knows it is a mirage. He speaks of root causes, of history, of a world that is not reducible to transactions and diplomatic maneuvers. The West recoils in horror. This is the fundamental difference: Russia still understands what war means, while the West sees only an endless data stream of casualties, arms shipments, and strategic objectives. Spengler called this the tragic turn of Faustian civilization – when man, having created his machines, no longer controls them. The West does not wage war for power or territory but to maintain the facade that it is still in control. War as process. War as algorithm. The end goal is never victory, only perpetual management of crises.


Meanwhile, the financial technocrats of the G7 conjure $50 billion from thin air, leveraging interest from Russia’s frozen assets, a sleight of hand that Spengler would recognize as the final stage of Western decay – economic manipulation replacing genuine production, artificial wealth replacing true cultural strength. The West no longer builds. It merely extracts, redistributes, and sanctions, hoping that the machinery of global finance can replace the natural momentum of a rising civilization. Russia, in contrast, returns to the old ways: Industry, military strength, self-reliance. The difference is stark. One civilization grows more entangled in its own mechanical hat tricks, the other returns to the fundamental logic of history.

Spengler saw technology as both the great achievement and the final undoing of the West. It began as a tool, an extension of man’s will, but in the late stages, it turns against its creators, reducing them to mere components in a system that no longer serves them. The West’s obsession with sanctions, surveillance, and narrative control is not an expression of power. It is a sign of weakness. True imperial civilizations do not need to micro-manage the world; they shape it through sheer will. This is why Trump, despite his flaws, represents the only real possibility for a Western resurgence. He rejects the managerial ethos. He understands power instinctively, like the rulers of old. The new Conservative Revolution in America is not about ideology. It is about reclaiming agency from the machine.


And yet, the media apparatus, a monstrous organism birthed by technics, continues its relentless march, shaping reality through distortion. Spengler wrote that the press, in the late stages of Western civilization, ceases to inform and instead dictates what must be believed. Ukraine is reduced to a symbolic battlefield in this grand narrative. Russia is the villain because the system requires a villain. The truth is irrelevant. The headlines are written before the events occur. The war exists less as a physical struggle and more as a media spectacle, a grotesque ritual in which Western leaders play-act as warriors while ensuring they remain far from the consequences of their own actions.


But while the West is trapped in its simulation, Russia operates in the real. The battlefield is not a metaphor. It is a place where men kill and die. Spengler warned that the civilizations of the late stage would become incapable of true war – they would engage in conflicts but only as technocratic exercises, devoid of the deep, existential struggle that defined the great wars of history. This is why the West cannot win in Ukraine. It fights as a bureaucratic entity, not as a people. And Russia, for all its flaws, fights as a people. The difference is everything.

So here we are, watching the end of an era. The West’s technics cannot save it. The more it relies on technology, the weaker it becomes. The West’s technocrats believe they are guiding history, but history is slipping from their grasp. Ukraine is just a chapter in a much larger story – the story of the old world returning, of empire reclaiming its place over the managerial state. And Trump? He is not the solution, but he is a symptom. A sign that somewhere, buried beneath the layers of bureaucracy and digital wallpaper, the West still remembers what power looks like.

This war is not about Ukraine. It never was. It is about the final struggle between technics and history, between the machine and the soul. And in the end, the machine will fail. Spengler saw it. We see it now. And Russia, whatever else it may be, understands it better than the West ever will.

2
Andrew Torba - Transhumanist Satanists Replace God (or are trying to replace him, emphasis mine!)     (ussanews.com)
submitted by dosvydanya_freedomz to Technocracy 2 months ago (+2/-0)
7 comments last comment...
https://ussanews.com/2025/02/25/andrew-torba-transhumanist-satanists-replace-god/

The transhumanist movement is built on a fundamental lie. It promises the evolution of humanity beyond its natural limits, offering a future where man merges with machine, where death is conquered through technology, and where artificial intelligence surpasses human intelligence. This vision is presented as inevitable, as the next step in human progress. But at its core, transhumanism is not about progress at all–it is a rebellion against God, an attempt to remake humanity in the image of those who reject the divine order.”



Transhumanism is not a new idea. It is simply a modern iteration of the oldest deception in history–the same lie whispered in the Garden of Eden: “You will be like God.” Since the Fall, mankind has sought to escape the constraints of mortality, weakness, and dependency on the Creator.

Today, this desire manifests in the belief that technology can free man from suffering, aging, and even death itself. The central delusion of transhumanism is the belief that human consciousness can be uploaded into machines, that the mind is nothing more than a complex set of data that can be transferred into an artificial medium. This idea is rooted in materialism, the false philosophy that denies the soul and reduces human beings to nothing more than biological software. If the mind is just data, then it can be copied, modified, and improved like a computer program. But this is a profound misunderstanding of human nature.

Human consciousness is not a mere function of neural activity; it is the immaterial soul breathed into man by God. A machine, no matter how advanced, can never possess the essence of human personhood. An AI may mimic human responses, generate art, and even engage in convincing conversation, but it does not have a soul. It does not love, it does not pray, and it does not seek after God. No matter how sophisticated artificial intelligence becomes, it will always be an imitation, a counterfeit life without true being.

The transhumanist vision of the future is not one of human flourishing–it is one of enslavement. The promise of digital immortality is a cruel deception, because no person can truly exist apart from the body given to them by God. The desire to escape the limitations of the flesh through technology leads not to liberation, but to the reduction of man into something less than human. If our identity can be stored on a server, then it can also be deleted, modified, and controlled by those who own the technology.

Those who push the transhumanist agenda see themselves as architects of a new reality. They envision a future where AI governs decision-making, where human reproduction is engineered in labs, and where consciousness is no longer tied to biology. Their ultimate goal is to redefine what it means to be human, not in accordance with God’s design, but according to their own ideological whims. This is not progress; it is a direct assault on the image of God in man. The consequences of this ideology are already visible. Increasingly, people view their bodies as obstacles to be overcome rather than as gifts to be stewarded. The rapid rise of gender ideology, bioengineering, and human enhancement technologies reflects a culture that no longer accepts human nature as given. If the body is seen as something that can be altered at will, then it is only a short step toward accepting the idea that humanity itself should be “upgraded” to fit the demands of a technological society.

Christians must reject this deception outright. We are not machines to be optimized. Our worth is not in our intelligence, our physical abilities, or our ability to integrate with AI. Our worth is found in the fact that we are created by God, for God, and in the image of God. The goal of the Christian life is not to transcend human nature, but to redeem it through Christ. While transhumanists seek immortality through technology, Christians already possess the promise of eternal life–not through machines, but through the resurrection of the body in Christ. This is the great divide between transhumanism and Christianity. One seeks eternity through silicon and software, the other through grace and redemption. One places its faith in human innovation, the other in divine providence. One seeks to replace God, the other submits to Him.

We must resist the push toward transhumanist ideology by firmly grounding ourselves in biblical anthropology. We must teach our children that their bodies are not mistakes to be corrected but gifts to be honored. We must reject any attempt to redefine human nature according to the standards of AI engineers and secular philosophers. And most importantly, we must remind the world that true life–eternal, glorious, and incorruptible–does not come from technology, but from Christ alone. Transhumanism is a false gospel, promising salvation through machines rather than through the blood of Christ. It is a modern-day Tower of Babel, an attempt to ascend to heaven by human effort rather than through faith. But like every rebellion against God, it will ultimately fail. Those who trust in the Lord will inherit eternal life–not as digital consciousness, not as AI-augmented beings, but as resurrected and glorified children of God.


Silicon Valley’s most influential leaders promote a dangerous vision of technological progress that threatens human dignity at its core. Their philosophy boils down to three destructive ideas. First, they worship speed and growth above all else, treating ethical concerns as obstacles to “innovation.” This “progress at any cost” mindset justifies breaking moral and social norms if it means advancing artificial intelligence, genetic engineering, or brain-computer interfaces faster. Second, they view ordinary human limitations–aging, fatigue, the need for sleep and relationships–as problems to eliminate through technology rather than intrinsic parts of what makes us human. Their ultimate goal appears to be replacing flawed biological humans with enhanced transhumans or pure machine intelligence. Third, they idolize market forces and technological inevitability, claiming unregulated capitalism and AI development will naturally create utopia–a naive faith that ignores how power consolidates in the hands of those controlling the technology.

The dominant techno-optimist ideology of our time–a reckless fusion of Nietzschean will-to-power, accelerationist dogma, and neoliberal market absolutism–is not just misguided but fundamentally anti-human. It does not seek to serve humanity but to surpass it, viewing human beings as a temporary evolutionary step toward a post-biological order. Its adherents do not merely disrupt industries; they aim to rewrite human nature itself, treating moral limits as obsolete constraints and communities as relics to be dismantled. Beneath their utopian rhetoric lies a nihilistic project: the replacement of embodied souls with disembodied data, of sacred life with machine logic.



31
DOGE Finds $4.7 Trillion In Virtually Untraceable Treasury Payments     (www.zerohedge.com)
submitted by dosvydanya_freedomz to Technocracy 2 months ago (+31/-0)
20 comments last comment...
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/doge-finds-47-trillion-virtually-untraceable-treasury-payments

The Elon Musk-led Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) on Monday revealed its finding that $4.7 trillion in disbursements by the US Treasury are "almost impossible" to trace, thanks to a rampant disregard for the basic accounting practice of using of tracking codes when dishing out money.



its untraceable because it went to black ops programs or in the pockets of very influential ppl
18
US Cattle Herd Shrinks To 1951 Lows As Beef Crisis Deepens     (www.zerohedge.com)
submitted by dosvydanya_freedomz to Technocracy 2 months ago (+18/-0)
21 comments last comment...
5
Supreme Court Allows Law Requiring Small Businesses To Report Ownership Information     (www.zerohedge.com)
submitted by dosvydanya_freedomz to Technocracy 3 months ago (+5/-0)
4 comments last comment...
2
EU Updates Digital Rules Requiring Big Tech To Allow 'Reporters' To Monitor Hate Speech     (www.zerohedge.com)
submitted by dosvydanya_freedomz to Technocracy 3 months ago (+2/-0)
0 comments...
2
Migrants Not Needed: BlackRock's Fink Says 'Xenophobic' Countries Will Have Higher Standard Of Living Amid AI Revolution     (www.zerohedge.com)
submitted by dosvydanya_freedomz to Technocracy 3 months ago (+2/-0)
1 comments last comment...
https://www.zerohedge.com/technology/migrants-not-needed-blackrocks-fink-says-xenophobic-countries-will-have-higher-standard

Larry Fink, the CEO of BlackRock and arguably one of the most powerful men on the planet, is now openly saying that the countries with xenophobic immigration policies are going to have a higher standard of living, faster productivity growth, and will be better able to accommodate the social impact of artificial intelligence advances over the coming years.

only if these countries goes back to reproducing the native population like it was before. if you dont reproduce you are welcoming a ton of issues in long range

that's why i think that whites should reproduce like rabbits
3
Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) tracker website      (www.atlanticcouncil.org)
submitted by dosvydanya_freedomz to Technocracy 3 months ago (+3/-0)
5 comments last comment...
0
BlackRock CEO Wants SEC To "Rapidly Approve" Tokenization Of Bonds & Stocks     (www.zerohedge.com)
submitted by dosvydanya_freedomz to Technocracy 3 months ago (+0/-0)
0 comments...
4
ROBO-VILLE Top secret ‘living lab’ robot city of the future built near volcano will welcome first human residents later this year     (www.the-sun.com)
submitted by dosvydanya_freedomz to Technocracy 3 months ago (+4/-0)
2 comments last comment...
https://www.the-sun.com/tech/13233734/toyota-woven-city-futuristic-robot-humans-moving-in/

PEOPLE will move into a top secret robotic utopia "living laboratory" later this year filled with futuristic tech.

Toyota has been building its Woven City since 2021 which will serve as a test ground for driverless cars, smart >homes and robotics.
2
my discussion with AI ABOUT TOKENIZATION      (Technocracy)
submitted by dosvydanya_freedomz to Technocracy 3 months ago (+2/-0)
1 comments last comment...
what do you think about the tokenization of an economy?

Tokenization of an economy refers to the process of converting real-world assets into digital tokens on a blockchain. This can include everything from real estate and art to stocks and commodities1. Here are some key points about tokenization:

Increased Accessibility: Tokenization allows for fractional ownership, making it easier for more people to invest in high-value assets. This can democratize access to investments that were previously out of reach for many.

Enhanced Security: By representing assets as digital tokens, transaction security can be improved, and fraud risks can be reduced.

Efficiency and Speed: Tokenized assets can be traded more quickly and easily, reducing settlement times and increasing market liquidity.

Regulatory Challenges: Implementing tokenization requires navigating complex regulations and ensuring compliance with financial laws.

Potential for Innovation: Tokenization opens up new avenues for fundraising, market operations, and financial services, driving innovation in the financial sector.

Overall, tokenization has the potential to transform economies by making markets more inclusive, efficient, and secure. However, it also comes with challenges that need to be addressed, such as regulatory compliance and technological infrastructure.

What are your thoughts on the potential impact of tokenization on the economy?


whats the difference between this and the people that worked on mines and received tokens instead of real money in the past?

Great question! The key difference lies in the nature and purpose of the tokens:

Historical Mining Tokens: In the past, mining companies issued tokens (often called "scrip") to their workers as a form of payment. These tokens could be used to purchase goods at the company store, essentially acting as a substitute for cash1. This system was often used in remote mining areas where access to official currency was limited. The tokens were typically backed by the company and could be exchanged for real money or goods within the company's ecosystem3.

Modern Tokenization: In today's context, tokenization involves converting real-world assets into digital tokens on a blockchain. These tokens represent ownership or a share of the underlying asset and can be traded on digital platforms. Unlike historical mining tokens, modern tokens are part of a decentralized system and can represent a wide range of assets beyond just company-issued currency.

In essence, historical mining tokens were a practical solution for localized economies within mining communities, while modern tokenization is a broader financial innovation that leverages blockchain technology to create digital representations of various assets.

Does this help clarify the difference for you?




but the big companies managing these tokens would be the banks and the state or am i wrong?

You're right in that traditional financial institutions like banks and regulatory bodies (states or governments) are likely to play significant roles in the tokenized economy, but it's a bit more complex.

Banks: Many banks are exploring or have already started implementing blockchain technology and digital tokens. They may act as custodians, facilitators, and intermediaries for tokenized assets, ensuring security and regulatory compliance.

Governments and Regulators: The state plays a crucial role in setting regulations and legal frameworks for tokenized assets. Governments are also exploring the possibility of issuing central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) that are essentially tokenized versions of their national currencies.

Private Companies and Startups: Beyond banks and governments, numerous fintech companies and startups are driving innovation in tokenization. These entities may create platforms for trading tokenized assets, develop blockchain solutions, or offer related services.

Decentralized Platforms: In addition to centralized institutions, decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms are also emerging. These platforms operate without traditional intermediaries, using smart contracts to enable peer-to-peer transactions.

In summary, while banks and governments will have significant roles, the ecosystem of a tokenized economy is likely >to be diverse, involving various players from traditional institutions to innovative startups and decentralized >platforms.

Do you find the idea of a tokenized economy intriguing? What aspects interest you the most?

could you create a feudal like system with tokenization?

The idea of creating a feudal-like system using tokenization is an interesting thought experiment. While tokenization has the potential to revolutionize economies by decentralizing asset ownership and increasing accessibility, it could also be designed in ways that mimic historical socio-economic structures, like feudalism. Here's how it might look:

Lords and Vassals: In a tokenized feudal system, "lords" might be the primary holders of tokens representing significant assets (land, resources, etc.). These lords could issue tokens to "vassals" in exchange for services, loyalty, or other obligations.

Land Ownership: Tokenized land ownership could allow lords to distribute portions of their holdings to vassals, who would then manage and cultivate the land. Smart contracts could govern these relationships, specifying the rights and duties of both parties.

Economic Dependency: Vassals might receive tokens for their labor or resources produced, which could be spent within >a closed economic system controlled by the lords. This creates a dependency similar to the historical feudal >economy.

Smart Contracts: These digital agreements could enforce the obligations and benefits of vassalage, including payments, services rendered, and other feudal duties.

Decentralized Control: Unlike historical feudalism, where power was centralized with the nobility, a tokenized >system might enable a more decentralized structure where multiple stakeholders can participate and govern >collaboratively.

While this is a speculative and theoretical scenario, it's important to note that tokenization offers opportunities for more equitable and transparent economic systems. The design and implementation of such systems would be critical to ensuring they don't replicate the exploitative aspects of historical feudalism.

It's a thought-provoking topic! Do you have any specific aspects or scenarios in mind related to this idea?


YEAH a bunch of billionaires hoarding all the world's wealth with this system in place

It's a valid concern, and one that is often raised in discussions about the future of economies and technology. Tokenization has the potential to democratize access to assets and create more inclusive financial systems, but it also carries the risk of concentrating wealth and power if not properly regulated.

The key factors in preventing such an outcome include:

Regulation: Strong regulatory frameworks can help ensure fair and transparent practices, preventing the concentration of wealth in the hands of a few.

Decentralization: Emphasizing decentralized platforms can reduce the control of powerful entities and create a more equitable distribution of resources.

Public Awareness and Participation: Encouraging widespread participation and understanding of tokenized systems can help distribute economic benefits more broadly.

Ethical Standards: Establishing and enforcing ethical standards for companies and individuals involved in tokenization can help mitigate the risk of exploitation.

Balancing innovation with fairness is crucial to creating a more just and inclusive economic system. What do you >think are some effective measures to achieve this balance?


i'd prefer all my transactions with real money. thank you very much

That's completely understandable! Real money has been the backbone of transactions for a long time, and many people >feel more comfortable with it. It's all about what works best for you and aligns with your preferences.

If you ever want to dive deeper into any other topic or have more questions, I'm here to help. Whether it's about >finance, history, or just a fun fact, feel free to reach out!



Message Copilot



0
Davos Shocker: Countries Around The World Eyeing Bitcoin Strategic Reserves Thanks To Trump     (www.zerohedge.com)
submitted by dosvydanya_freedomz to Technocracy 3 months ago (+0/-0)
0 comments...
4
TECHNOCRATIC SMART CITIES ARE HERE: ROBO-VILLE Top secret ‘living lab’ robot city of the future built near volcano will welcome first human residents     (anamihalceamdphd.substack.com)
submitted by dosvydanya_freedomz to Technocracy 3 months ago (+4/-0)
1 comments last comment...
-1
Trump Era Policies Could Fuel Surge In Tokenized Real-World-Assets     (www.zerohedge.com)
submitted by dosvydanya_freedomz to Technocracy 3 months ago (+1/-2)
2 comments last comment...
https://www.zerohedge.com/crypto/trump-era-policies-could-fuel-surge-tokenized-real-world-assets

The tokenization of real-world assets (RWA) has become a key focus for traditional finance companies aiming to build bridges to decentralized finance (DeFi), improving liquidity, accessibility and transparency with RWA transactions.

Four days before US President-elect Donald Trump takes office on Jan. 20, Cointelegraph interviewed Eli Cohen, general counsel of the RWA tokenizing platform Centrifuge, to discuss trends he expects to see in 2025.

He predicts that expanding demand for yields will drive more diverse tokenized products.

An unyielding market

cited high Treasury rates and increasing competition among stablecoin issuers pushing the market toward “higher yielding, still safe investments.”

Stablecoins, which rely on tokenized Treasurys for yields, stand to benefit from this evolution, Cohen said.

Cohen expects the incoming Trump administration to deliver “a very public renouncement and repudiation” of restrictive policies, such as Operation Chokepoint 2.0, further encouraging RWA market growth.

Cohen said the shift from Gary Gensler’s leadership of the US Securities and Exchange Commission to the new leadership appointed by Trump will be “very different.” It may help TradFi firms overcome “internal resistance” to crypto markets
4
Reminder: Real ID deadline is this year. What to know know about the travel requirement.     (www.yahoo.com)
submitted by dosvydanya_freedomz to Technocracy 3 months ago (+4/-0)
2 comments last comment...
https://www.yahoo.com/news/reminder-real-id-deadline-know-114437516.html

A Real ID seal on all state-issued identification documents will soon be a must, especially if you plan on traveling this upcoming summer and beyond. And it's definitely not too early to head over to your state's driver's licensing agency to get your documents in order.

Anyone interested in flying has until May 7, 2025, to obtain a state-issued identification card or driver's license with a Real ID seal, per the Department of Homeland Security. (Unless you have a valid passport.)

Any state-issued identification document without the seal fails to adhere to the "minimum security standards" set by The Real ID Act of 2005, which prevents travelers from flying domesticallyand from entering certain federal facilities.

internal passports lol so communist
6
Just Like Clockwork, The Propaganda Push For Digital ID Kicks Into Gear In The UK     (www.zerohedge.com)
submitted by dosvydanya_freedomz to Technocracy 3 months ago (+6/-0)
2 comments last comment...
1
Technocracy Rising, Part 1: Why It's Crucial To Understand The End Game     (www.zerohedge.com)
submitted by dosvydanya_freedomz to Technocracy 4 months ago (+1/-0)
0 comments...
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/technocracy-rising-part-1-why-its-crucial-understand-end-game

What is Technocracy?


Historically, technocracy has not been well received. In fact, many who accurately comprehended its goals viewed it as a threat to democracy and the debt-based economic order run by the central banking establishment that has dominated the last century. Technocrats railed against this “Price System,” arguing it alone was to blame for the inequalities and inefficiencies of society. There is definitely some truth to their claims.

Under the Price System at its best there is not a single field of endeavor where the best technical standards are allowed to prevail. In other words, poverty, waste, crime, poor public health, bad living conditions, enforced scarcity, and low load-factors, are every one the direct and necessary consequences of the Price System… What we have tried to make clear is that it is the Price System itself, and not the individual human being, which is at fault.”

– Technocracy Study Course, Technocracy Inc. 1933,
2
Trump Names Billionaire Scott Bessent As Treasury Secretary     (www.zerohedge.com)
submitted by dosvydanya_freedomz to Technocracy 5 months ago (+2/-0)
6 comments last comment...
https://www.zerohedge.com/economics/trump-names-billionaire-scott-bessent-treasury-secretary

Bessent, 62, is a Wall Street veteran who once worked for George Soros, and founder of international macro investment company Key Square Group. He served as a key economic adviser to Trump’s 2024 campaign.

Others contenders for the role included Howard Lutnick, the chairman and CEO of Cantor Fitzgerald and BGC Partners. He co-chairs the Trump–Vance transition team, which is in charge of selecting administration candidates, vetting >personnel, and crafting policy. Lutnick was ultimately chosen on Nov. 19 to lead the Department of Commerce.

Kevin Warsh, 54, a former Morgan Stanley banker and former Federal Reserve Board governor, likewise entered the conversation. He became the leading candidate for treasury secretary on the betting website Polymarket after reports emerged that the president-elect was expanding his search to fill the position.
6
GOLDMAN sachs feels apprehensive towards AI      (www.goldmansachs.com)
submitted by dosvydanya_freedomz to Technocracy 6 months ago (+6/-0)
2 comments last comment...