Sign into an existing account

The Solomon Asch Experiment

The Solomon Asch experiments, conducted in the 1950s, are seminal studies in social psychology that demonstrated the power of conformity in groups. Solomon Asch, a Polish-American psychologist, designed a series of experiments to investigate the extent to which social pressure from a majority group could influence a person to conform.

The Experiment Setup

1. Participants: The study involved groups of 7 to 9 male college students.

2. Task: The task was a simple perceptual one, where participants had to match the length of a line on one card to one of three lines on another card. The correct answer was always obvious.

3. Confederates: All but one of the participants in each group were confederates, meaning they were in on the experiment. The real participant, unaware of the setup, was seated either at the end or second to last in the line-up.

4. Procedure: Confederates were instructed to give unanimous but incorrect answers on 12 out of 18 trials, called "critical trials."

Findings

1. Conformity Rate: On average, about one-third (32%) of the participants conformed to the clearly incorrect majority on the critical trials.

2. Individual Differences: About 75% of participants conformed at least once, while 25% never conformed.

3. Responses: When interviewed after the experiment, many participants said they did not really believe the group’s answers but had gone along with the group for fear of being ridiculed or thought peculiar. A few of them said they actually believed the group's answers were correct.

Factors Influencing Conformity

1. Group Size: Conformity increased with group size up to a point, with the highest levels of conformity observed with three to four confederates. Larger groups did not significantly increase the level of conformity.

2. Unanimity: The presence of just one ally who also gave the correct answer significantly reduced conformity. When participants had at least one other person who supported their correct choice, the pressure to conform was substantially decreased.

3. Confidence: Participants who were more confident in their judgments were less likely to conform.

Implications

The Asch conformity experiments highlighted the powerful impact of social pressure and group dynamics on individual behavior. These findings have been applied to various fields, including education, business, and politics, to understand how group influences can shape decision-making and behavior.

The Asch experiments remain a cornerstone in social psychology, illustrating the profound effect of group pressure on individual judgments and behaviors. They paved the way for further research into social influence, conformity, and group dynamics, shaping our understanding of human social behavior.

Application to the Heliocentric Lie

1. Perceived Consensus: To convince the masses of the heliocentric model, it is not necessary to convince each individual directly. Instead, the strategy involves creating a perceived consensus. If people believe that the majority, including respected authorities and peers, accept the heliocentric model, they are likely to conform to this view, even if it contradicts their own observations and logic. The Asch experiment shows that individuals often doubt their own senses when they see others unanimously endorsing a different perspective.

2. Authority and Expertise: The role of scientific authorities, educational systems, and media is crucial. By presenting the heliocentric model as an established and uncontested fact through these channels, a powerful illusion of unanimous agreement is created. Asch's findings suggest that under such conditions, individuals are likely to adopt the prevailing view to avoid social isolation or the perception of ignorance.

3. Social and Psychological Pressure: The Asch experiment highlights how social pressure can lead to conformity. In the context of heliocentrism, individuals who question or refute the model may face ridicule, ostracism, or even professional consequences. This social pressure discourages dissent and promotes conformity to the accepted narrative, further reinforcing the lie.

4. Educational Indoctrination: From a young age, individuals are taught the heliocentric model as an unquestionable truth. This early indoctrination, combined with the perception of unanimous belief among teachers, peers, and media, ensures that the belief is deeply ingrained. The Asch experiment illustrates how once a belief is established within a social framework, it becomes self-perpetuating, as individuals conform to avoid conflict and maintain social harmony.

5. Media Manipulation: The widespread dissemination of space flight narratives and astronomical imagery through movies, news, and documentaries reinforces the heliocentric model. The Asch experiment demonstrates that when an individual perceives a unanimous belief in such media portrayals, they are likely to align their views accordingly, even if they personally doubt the authenticity of space flight or astronomical observations.

Conclusion

The Solomon Asch experiment reveals that convincing the masses of a lie, such as the heliocentric model, does not require direct persuasion of each individual. Instead, by creating a strong perception of consensus and leveraging social and psychological pressures, the illusion of truth can be maintained. People are more likely to conform to what they believe everyone else believes, even if it contradicts their own observations and reason. This powerful insight into human behavior underscores how the heliocentric model could be perpetuated as a grand deception.

https://ifers.forumotion.com/f7-nasa-un-freemasonry-vatican-jews-jesuits-nwo

https://ifers.forumotion.com/t324-the-international-jew-the-world-s-foremost-problem


Scroll down and see that all of the content has been censored by kikes.

https://ifers.forumotion.com/t180-the-jewish-run-slave-trade

https://ifers.forumotion.com/t154-jewish-ritual-sacrifice

The list goes on.

All topics that no mainstream globetard will ever touch on. Let's see any one of your dogmatic globetard talking heads dispute the legitimacy of the holohoax and showcase the control that kikes have over everyone.

Globetards are shaped by government institutions run by kikes.

https://migchels.wordpress.com/2015/04/02/copernicus-and-his-kabbalistic-methods/

Copernicus wrote


Copernicus also wrote


It reminds me of that retarded quote from Albert Einstein.


The retard tells you that there's no way for him to prove his claim and then goes ahead and asserts his claim as objective reality. Retarded.

The Flaws in Heliocentric Claims: Gravity, Atmosphere, and Lunar Tides

https://files.catbox.moe/lkcyvy.png

The heliocentric model, which posits that the Earth revolves around the Sun and the Moon orbits the Earth, is deeply ingrained in modern scientific thought. However, this model contains several inconsistencies and contradictions, especially when examining the behavior of our atmosphere and the influence of gravitational forces. By exploring these contradictions, we can expose the weaknesses in heliocentric claims regarding the atmosphere and the Moon's effect on tides.

The Atmosphere and the Vacuum of Space

One of the most glaring issues with the heliocentric model is the explanation of how our pressurized atmosphere can exist next to the near-perfect vacuum of space. According to the second law of thermodynamics, gases should naturally move from areas of higher pressure to lower pressure until equilibrium is reached. In this case, the high-pressure atmosphere should expand into the vacuum of space, yet this does not happen.

Proponents of the heliocentric model argue that gravity prevents this expansion. They claim that gravity, even at its weakest point on the edge of the atmosphere, is sufficient to keep the gases from dissipating into space. However, this explanation is fraught with problems. Gravity's pull weakens with distance, and at the edge of the atmosphere, it is significantly weaker than at the Earth's surface. The notion that this feeble gravitational pull can counteract the natural tendency of gases to expand into a vacuum is highly questionable.

The Moon and Tides

The explanation for tides in the heliocentric model further complicates the picture. It is claimed that the Moon's gravity is strong enough to cause high and low tides on Earth. This implies that the Moon's gravitational pull can influence the Earth's oceans, which are under the strongest influence of Earth's gravity. If the Moon can exert such a force on the Earth's oceans, then logically, the Moon's gravity should have an even stronger effect as we move upwards from the Earth's surface towards the Moon.

At higher altitudes, the Earth's gravitational pull weakens, while the Moon's influence would ostensibly become stronger. Therefore, at the edge of the atmosphere facing the Moon, both the Earth's and the Moon's gravitational forces should be competing for the same matter. This competition is further complicated by the presence of the vacuum of space, which would naturally draw the atmospheric gases outward.

Competing Gravitational Forces

If the Moon's gravity can pull on the water at the Earth's surface, where Earth's gravity is strongest, it stands to reason that this pull would be even more pronounced at higher altitudes, where Earth's gravity is weaker. Consequently, the gases in the atmosphere at the edge facing the Moon should be caught in a tug-of-war between the Earth's and the Moon's gravitational forces. The vacuum of space would add another layer of complexity, as it would exert a force causing the gases to expand outward.

This situation leads to a paradox: if gravity is indeed responsible for holding the atmosphere in place, then the Moon's gravitational pull should disrupt this balance, particularly at the edge of the atmosphere. The competing forces of Earth's gravity, the Moon's gravity, and the vacuum of space create a scenario that the heliocentric model fails to adequately explain.

Conclusion

The heliocentric claims that gravity can hold the atmosphere in place and that the Moon causes tides on Earth are fraught with inconsistencies. The second law of thermodynamics dictates that gases should expand into a vacuum, yet we are told gravity prevents this, even at its weakest point. Furthermore, if the Moon's gravity can cause tides on Earth, it should also significantly affect the atmosphere, particularly at higher altitudes where Earth's gravitational pull weakens. The heliocentric model's inability to reconcile these competing forces and natural laws highlights its flaws and calls into question its validity. By examining these inconsistencies, we can see that the explanations provided by the heliocentric model are not only implausible but also contradictory.

https://files.catbox.moe/16v45y.png

And this is obviously an alt that deleted my comment. I will post screenshots of the same exact message from multiple accounts.

https://www.upgoat.net/viewpost?postid=66ac6561357f1&commentid=66ac98388b805

This is what's triggering them.

https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2020-03-01/who-got-america-to-the-moon-a-unlikely-collaboration-of-jews-and-former-nazi-engineers


This is why they want everyone to block me and moderate the site.

He still can't explain this.

https://files.catbox.moe/lkcyvy.png

https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2020-03-01/who-got-america-to-the-moon-a-unlikely-collaboration-of-jews-and-former-nazi-engineers

One former Nazi, one American Jew. Little more than a decade separated them from the Holocaust.

Looming before two of America’s top rocket engineers were many critical decisions, including what kind of fuel would be needed to blast off astronauts to the moon.

Silverstein had guided research at Lewis in liquid hydrogen, a much more powerful fuel that had never been used in a rocket before. He was certain such a technological leap was necessary for the long lunar journey.

When the first Saturn with hydrogen-powered stages was tested on Nov. 9, 1967, Von Braun sent a photograph of the launch with a handwritten note: “To Dr. Abe Silverstein whose pioneering work in liquid hydrogen technology paved the way to today’s success — Wernher von Braun.”

The collaboration between Von Braun and Silverstein was not unique. During the Apollo program, which landed Americans on the moon six times between 1969 and 1972, NASA was filled with both Jewish scientists and a large group of Germans who had worked for Hitler before and during World War II. The Nazi regime had been dedicated to the extermination of Jews. That the two groups were able to work side by side suggests a level of reconciliation, or at least acceptance, that would seem a near impossibility in today’s fractious social and political climate.

“My dad said NASA was built by Jews, Nazis and hillbillies,” recalled Reuben Slone, the son of NASA engineer Henry Slone, a member of the Cleveland Jewish community.

There is wide agreement that the collaboration between Germans and Jews was essential to the Apollo moon landings and much of the U.S. nuclear deterrent.

The Times reviewed hundreds of pages of NASA’s Apollo documents, dozens of oral histories by Germans and Jews, and interviewed the children of the engineers to understand how these two groups interacted in one of the greatest technical achievements in history.

“Not to have brought them over would have been a crime,” said Daniel Goldin, a Jewish engineer from New York who became the longest-serving administrator in NASA history. “You could get dogmatic about it, but the Cold War could have ended the world.”

On the Jewish side, Silverstein helped set up the entire human space flight program before NASA was created in 1958. Abraham Hyatt, who fled Ukraine with his family before World War II, was a headquarters planning director. Milton Rosen was chief of NASA’s science mission directorate. George Low became deputy chief of NASA, known for his advocacy of the gutsy 1968 decision to orbit the moon after only one human test flight of the Apollo system. Louis Rosenblum was a key technologist in energy. Slone specialized in propulsion. Erwin Zaretsky was one of the world’s top experts in ball bearings and machinery lubrication.

He was low-profile, but liked working in the technical trenches and brought an ambitious agenda to NASA — pushing for a revolutionary type of rocket engine and conducting the research to achieve it at the center in Cleveland. It was Silverstein who chose the moon program’s name of Apollo, for the Greek god of light, music and the sun.

Asked how the Jewish scientists could work with the Germans, the synagogue’s leader, Rabbi Enid Lader, said: “It shows the potential for forgiveness. These engineers were driven by a very sincere Jewish value to work for the good of society. For the German scientists, this gave them the opportunity to turn their work used for evil to good. It is redemption.”

By no means were Silverstein and the other Jews afraid to stand up for their beliefs. By the 1960s, they founded the Cleveland Council on Soviet Anti-Semitism, aiming to expose the persecution of Soviet Jews.

jewish Internet Defense Force (JIDF)

1. Creating a False Consensus
- Tactic: Mobilizing volunteers to post pro-Israel content across various platforms.
- Implementation: Engaging in coordinated campaigns where a large number of JIDF volunteers post, comment, and share pro-Israel narratives. This creates an illusion of widespread support.
- Impact: This can drown out accurate information that is critical of Israel, making it seem less credible or less popular.

2. Manipulating Social Engagement Metrics
- Tactic: Using bots and coordinated efforts to inflate the engagement on pro-Israel content.
- Implementation: Artificially boosting likes, shares, and positive comments on certain posts.
- Impact: This can make the content appear more credible and widely accepted, influencing public perception and marginalizing accurate but less-engaged content.

3. Suppressing Opposing Views
- Tactic: Reporting and flagging content that criticizes Israel.
- Implementation: Organizing mass reporting campaigns to remove or downrank critical content.
- Impact: Reduces the visibility and reach of accurate information that does not align with their narrative.

4. Infiltrating Opposition Groups
- Tactic: Masquerading as opposition members to disrupt and influence discussions.
- Implementation: JIDF operatives join critical forums and groups, spreading misinformation or steering conversations to cause discord.
- Impact: Weakens the effectiveness of genuine opposition and spreads confusion, reducing the dissemination of accurate information.

Ministry of Strategic Affairs and Public Diplomacy

1. Astroturfing
- Tactic: Creating fake grassroots movements that promote pro-Israel views.
- Implementation: Establishing fake social media accounts and online groups that appear independent but push government-approved narratives.
- Impact: Misleads the public into believing there is organic, widespread support for these views, overshadowing accurate information.

2. Influencing Influencers
- Tactic: Partnering with social media influencers to spread pro-Israel messages.
- Implementation: Collaborating with popular personalities to subtly endorse Israeli policies and narratives.
- Impact: Leverages the trust and reach of influencers to shape public opinion, making it difficult for accurate, critical information to gain traction.

3. Discrediting Opposition Sources
- Tactic: Producing content that attacks the credibility of critical voices.
- Implementation: Publishing articles, videos, and social media posts that question the reliability and intentions of journalists or organizations that publish accurate but critical information.
- Impact: Undermines the trust in these sources, making their accurate information less likely to be believed or shared.

4. Double Agents
- Tactic: Deploying operatives to act as members of opposition groups.
- Implementation: Operatives provide false information or disrupt the group's activities from within.
- Impact: Reduces the effectiveness of opposition groups and spreads misinformation, thereby weakening the impact of accurate information.

IDF Cyber Defense Division

1. Cyber Espionage and Sabotage
- Tactic: Infiltrating and disrupting critical websites and communications.
- Implementation: Hacking into websites or email accounts of opposition groups to alter or delete accurate content.
- Impact: Prevents the dissemination of accurate information and spreads false narratives through compromised channels.

2. Social Engineering
- Tactic: Manipulating individuals within opposition groups to spread misinformation.
- Implementation: Using operatives to gain the trust of key members and influence their actions.
- Impact: Causes opposition groups to inadvertently spread misinformation, discrediting their accurate information.

3. Creating Fake Opposition Accounts
- Tactic: Establishing fake accounts that appear to be critical of Israel but actually promote subtle pro-Israel narratives.
- Implementation: These accounts post extreme views or leak information that benefits pro-Israel narratives.
- Impact: Discredits genuine opposition and misleads the public about the true nature of critical voices.

Israeli National Cyber Directorate (INCD)

1. Coordinated Information Campaigns
- Tactic: Running large-scale campaigns to flood the internet with pro-Israel content.
- Implementation: Producing high-quality content and distributing it widely to overshadow critical information.
- Impact: Drowns out accurate but critical information, creating a skewed perception of the facts.

2. Monitoring and Countering Misinformation
- Tactic: Actively monitoring online spaces for critical content and countering it in real-time.
- Implementation: Deploying teams to quickly respond to and discredit accurate but critical information.
- Impact: Reduces the impact and spread of accurate information that contradicts the government's narrative.

3. Intelligence Gathering and Preemptive Sabotage
- Tactic: Gathering intelligence on opposition plans and disrupting them.
- Implementation: Using cyber tools to intercept and sabotage the dissemination of accurate critical information.
- Impact: Prevents accurate information from reaching the public, maintaining control over the narrative.

Summary
By employing these tactics, these organizations can effectively subvert the flow of accurate information online. They create a false consensus, manipulate engagement metrics, suppress dissenting views, infiltrate and disrupt opposition groups, and leverage influential voices to shape public opinion. Through a combination of propaganda and counterintelligence, they ensure that their preferred narratives dominate, while accurate, critical information is marginalized or discredited.

https://files.catbox.moe/ixccaa.gif
https://files.catbox.moe/j2fzlv.png

You can not have fixed stars forming constellations for thousands of years with the globetard model.

You can not feel any of the acceleration/deceleration caused within an elliptical path/orbit as there is a continuous velocity change.

You definitely can not have a fixed North pole star 2,527,808,910,468,951 miles away in its own orbit.