Upgoat - "what's upgoat!"

Paradoxical003
User deleted account

Member for: 3.0 years

scp: 3081 (+3641/-560)

ccp: 3262 (+3596/-334)

votes given: 215 (+146/-69)

score: 6343

Trophies

Read before watching. (youtube.com)

submitted by Paradoxical003 to whatever 1.8 years ago

9 comments

Read this before watching.

The mainstream right wing and everything to the left of that are the women of the political spectrum, they have power over us, and they so smug in their position of superiority, but they should be do confident.

We are the men, and we are holding ourselves back from simply taking our dominance over them by a set of rules that we've all agreed on, what holds us back is others of our kind who still beleive the rules are worth adhering to.

If we throw off these rules and step past that line, then we will simply win, all we need is to not feel guilt or shame for defeating them.

We have all these complex abstract systems in place, based around ideas that don't actually exist in the physical world, except through the words and deeds that we've chosen to do or say in their name.

It's so easy to believe that things like laws, or morals, or any other philosophical concept relating to how people should govern themselves and each other.

But all these things are make believe, things we pretend are real because it suits us to do so.

As soon as it suits us better to do something else, we would be genetic dead ends to refrain from switching modes of behavior to something that suits us more.

Everyone is driven by selfish interests, no true altruistic act is even possible, because without the expectation of any personal benefit to taking sone action, there exists no motive, and thus no impetus to take such an action.

Why would you do a thing that you truly have no desire or reason to do, unless there was something that you desire even more that exists to motivate you into undertaking such an act?

Why would you do the thing that you think will make things worse for those you care about, unless there exists some benefit for them that outweighs the cost?

If you do something that benefits you directly, the selfish motive is right there, I it instead makes things better for someone else, the benefit is that you are benefitted vicariously in sone way, even if that beneficiary is some being that's far removed, hypothetical, or hated by you, it still suits you in some way to do what you think is some good for them.

The fact is that personal benefit is not only external or material things, motives do exists that are internal and psychological, whether you do something to feel good that doesn't benefit anyone else, or in fact only brings about harm to others, or whether that act does benefit others in sone way. The fact remains that the good feelings you expect to get from the act serve as the motivation to taking such an action.

But when the reward and punishment systems programed into your brain no longer favor one course of behavior, and shift to favoring another, your behavior will modify itself in accordance, as will your outlook.

I've said time and again on here that our relationship to our enemies could be poetically compared to an abusive relationship, but I'll further qualify this description with the added detail that the partner abusing us is female, in that they know we are stronger than them, but count on us to never use that strength against them no matter how much we are attacked.

Humans are driven by six emotions:

Sadness/Grief/Regret/etc.: the emotional punishment for things that we perceive as hurting our chances to propagate our genes.

Fear/Disgust/Anger/etc.: the emotional aversion to what we perceive as belonging to the first category of things.

Emotions like Happiness or Contentedness are the rewards for things which we perceive as increasing the chances of our genetic propagation.

And emotions like Desire or Anticipation are the emotional attraction to such things as found in the third category.

If we lack the emotional motivation to do the things we do, we wouldn't do them.

They studied animals and people who had the emotional centers of their brains cut out, damaged, or disabled, and they simply don't act in ways emotions drive them to if they lack the emotional experiences to motivate them so.

Without emotions, there can be no morality, even the animals with the most simple brains are emotionally driven.

Without the emotions to make you want to be moral, moral knowledge or wisdom by itself will have no effect upon how you conduct yourself.

What is the most secure pc? (describe the build, especially if custom) (whatever)

submitted by Paradoxical003 to whatever 1.8 years ago

7 comments

Post links to sites that you recommend (minds.com)

submitted by Paradoxical003 to whatever 1.8 years ago

15 comments

They are always telling you what they plan to do: "rainwater is poisonous" = "we are going to poison you through the tapwater, and don't want you drinking the rain instead" (whatever)

submitted by Paradoxical003 to whatever 1.8 years ago

25 comments

"toxic forever chemicals" my ass.

The different ideologies whose existence cannot be tolerated are those which compel their adherents to seek out and destroy any expression of disagreement. (whatever)

submitted by Paradoxical003 to whatever 1.8 years ago

5 comments

For example, social justice, it intentionally seeks out any space in their society were someone could express views that conflict with socjus, infiltrates them, takes them over, and then shuts down anything that isn't socjus approved.

Then it goes on to shut down anything that isn't strictly socjus, and then goes on a witch hunt to purge anyone who isn't an SJW, before devolving into a constant paranoid hunt for those who are less than perfect SJW's, even if only in their heads.

The final stage is removing the groups the SJW's hate from the space, anyone white and male male, then anyone white or male, this causes the institution to die or otherwise take on the worst possible state it could be in, and then social justice warriors move onto the next thing they can infest and kill, like a malignant cancer.

Wars happen when they do this to countries.

That's why these types of people with no interest in gaming had forcibly invaded the gamer community, because their ideology doesn't permit the very existence of anything that isn't in full agreement and compliance with itself, even if it's far removed from them, and poses no immediate threat to them, it's a jihad, and the very existence of the infidel is an affront to the ideology which commands it's followers to purge the heresy from the universe as a consequence.

Such intolerant ideas are what are truly intolerable ideas, you cant trust anyone who is so much as suspected of subscribing to one of them because they will do and say anything they can to ensure their ideology is the only one that can be expressed. That's the reality of it, to include every viewpoint will only ensure that the views which instruct their followers to do absolutely anything to expunge the other ideas (that instead tolerate disagreement) will be able to do so.

Everyone perceives the world in terms of stories, characters, settings, narratives, etc. They don't see the world in terms of facts or logic. Tey are also primarily motivated by the way things affect them in an immediate and personal way, which is what makes them buy into a story in the first place. (whatever)

submitted by Paradoxical003 to whatever 1.8 years ago

5 comments

The left understands this, and so they make great gains in influencing the minds of people, The entire right wing of politics fail to recognize this, or it's significance, and so they commit themselves to the same losing strategies of winning hearts and minds to their cause.

They understand that people think in terms of stories, and that they choose their stories based on how they are personally affected in the immediate time frame by the message that story carries.

Additionally, the left also recognizes the importance of psychology, they study behaviorism and know how to sway the majority of any group to any idea, though it might take a series of smaller changes to get there.

This is something else that the right pays no attention to, but they should, they really should.

It's almost as if the entire left wing cares only about winning, and the entire right is just dedicated to doing the same thing over and over, without improvement, like they don't care about winning at all.

There's nothing heroic about failing to do what it takes to secure victory for what you think is right.

We need to create a movement of Nationalism without Christianity (whatever)

submitted by Paradoxical003 to whatever 1.8 years ago

20 comments

The Christian nationalists are what I feared they would be.

They are setting themselves up as controlled opposition, so we need to have a schism.

It's fake, so we need something real, something that would go up against these guys.

Like I said, jews hate Jesus and Christianity, but that won't stop them from using these things against us.

We need to go out in real life and start a genuine movement.

More leftist cuckoldry (youtube.com)

submitted by Paradoxical003 to whatever 1.8 years ago

1 comments

Played ghostwire tokyo - good game until the line "all property is theft, kid" comes out of the mouth of the "wise mentor" character. Looked it up, the line was altered by the translators to insert their shitty political views into the game. (whatever)

submitted by Paradoxical003 to whatever 1.8 years ago

3 comments

Problem is, even though I'm as capitalist as they come, I agree, but for a very different reason than the leftist commie.

Force is the ultimate ruler of all abstract concepts that regulate human society, including ownership, it is determined by the administration of force like everything else.

Screw the idea of "natural rights", "human rights" aren't real, but they are made real only by the use of force or the credible threat of force, violence and struggle is the building block of order, both in civilization and in nature.

Order emerges out of chaos, and violence is what God molds chaos into order over time, violence is also what preserves order, entropy is when the violence keeping society together gradually wanes until the violence threatening to overwhelm it finally does so.

In my view, giving people "rights" was a mistake, because "rights" shouldn't be a property of people:

Only the government should have "rights", and those "rights" will be a very specific list of things that the government is allowed to do, the government is forbidden from doing anything it has not been given the explicit "right" to do, if they do, that is "acting out of rights" and the people who constitute that government will all be executed for treason and replaced.

We need to destroy the databases of DNA collection companies (whatever)

submitted by Paradoxical003 to whatever 1.8 years ago

53 comments

We know from the reports they send back in response to people sending in diluted dishsoap and lizard spit that they are not doing what they claim to do.

They are just making shit up in the reports that they send back, they don't exist to tell you the truth about your ancestry, or find you your extended family members.

Which is kinda fucked up since they will on rare occasion tell people things like how their father isn't biologically related to them, or how they are at risk for some serious disease that they aren't actually at risk for, or that they are at risk of having children with some sort of serious genetic defects.

Of course, contracts that nobody reads will give give companies a free pass for running people's lives by just making things up and lying to their clients about serious topics, and sending them to meet complete strangers who aren't actually related to them.

Companies like 23 and me are giving away access to the genetic data of their clients to other companies working in biotechnology.

This includes companies that are working on the development of artificial bioweapons that will only attack those with a specific genetic profile, think of it, a lab made germ that only targets one person amd kills them, then destroys itself to hide evidence of its existence.

So that means if you haven't sent in your DNA samples to one of these companies, you are safe, right?

WRONG! lol.

First, they aren't just collecting it from the people who use these services and send their samples in, they are also able to collect it from various sources where your DNA was sampled.

Even the most hard-core of us have likely been tested in a hospital shortly after they were born.

People have found that services like 23 and me were able to find extended family matches to them despite them never having used their service or any similar one in the past (for example, if you were circumcised or vaccinated, then they most definitely have your DNA profile on archive, the same is true of you if you've ever donated fluids or signed over your body parts).

Second, even if they don't have yours, they will have yours.

They can piece together your profile to astonishing levels of accuracy using the data they do have access to, it's rather simple to determine the DNA of one person from some others, and then use that compiled profile to deduce the profiles of their relatives.

It's not hard tp do, amd not a new thing either, it's also frighteningly accurate, and keeps being on target until you get far enough away that the mutations have accumulated enough to throw off the predictions.

If they've got your sibling, mom, or dad, they definitely got you, too, but the same goes for a grandparent or parent's sibling, or first cousin.

The data they've got on all the other people, whether sent in willingly, or taken from them in secret, or figured out, it will fuck you over no matter who you are.

So the answer is to destroy the databases and any archives that exist of them, with lawsuits, or with magnets, or with malware, or with hammers, it doesn't matter how.

They must go for the sake of humanity's future.

Rather than taking the fight to the enemy directly, we should first strike at the weapons which they intend to use against us, there'd be little controversy in how we assail their offensive line, simply mentioning the fucked up stuff they've been doing is going to hurt them pretty badly so their ability to complain is severely gimped at the moment.

In fact, merely exposing what they've been doing is enough to do critical hit damage to them.

All these companies are run by the chosen ones, and they have nothing but hatred for white gentiles, of which they'd been most open.

Their dream is a tyranny that can not just invade your privacy from the outside of your body, they also want to know your innermost thoughts, your genetic traits, everything such as these, so they could use the information against you.

Optimally, they want mind control, to take over your mind directly and completely, while leaving only the illusion of genuine authentic thoughts.

It's a scary future, a zombie apocalypse, but one after the zombies of classic voodoo lore or something out of the thing or the body snatchers, or even the manchurian candidate.

Where the zombies are living, capable of everything they'd be able to do as a normal human, and appearing just like the ordinary people they would otherwise be, in fact, they'd be perfectly indistinguishable from a normal human being except for one thing:

That at any moment, they might receive some commands to believe, think, feel, say, or do things, and at these commands, they will obey them.
With one command transmitted into their brains, their entire personality could be erased and overwritten with a wholly new one, as could their memories.
One person could effectively be made into another, just occupying the same body as the person they previously were, they could be made to do anything, to anyone, at any time, even if such an act would be repugnant to them before the command was received.

A passionate desire or driving obsession could be implanted, as could a debilitating fear, which could be just as motivating, or a petty hatred could also be manufactured from nothing, they could even be made to go berserk at cue if wanted, memories could be altered too, so reasons for why these moods or interests exist could be fabricated with as much ease.
So could all other sorts of information, true or untrue, be implanted into their heads, what they think they know will be able to be controlled, along with the certainty they feel regarding this knowledge, and the intensity of how they feel about this "truth" they now believe in (meaning how much investment they have in it's truth, and how hard it would be to change their minds on it).
Even skills that require a lifetime of experience to master could be transmitted to them without them needing to be learned, but they could also be "retrained" in how to do things the wrong way, as well, deaths by accidents might be able to be arranged like this, particularly for those zombies who work in dangerous jobs.

There is someone or some group that is in total power over their minds, able to assume control at any time, and issue a command they are only capable of following, it could be any kind of command within their ability, including an order to kill others, or themselves, and they will be helpless but to obey, those tasks which fall outside of their ability would still produce the attempt from them to do it with the best results that they could possibly manage.

One of the worst kinds of zombies out there, kind of like the influenced from the condemned series of video games.

The only other worse kind that I could think of are the exosuit zombies from the game "the surge", where an omnicidal AI is controlling both living people and cadavers like with external physical force, just like puppets would be, and doing so through the cybernetic exoskeleton suits that were surgically integrated into their bodies, resulting in horrors like people who are trying to kill you while shouting at you to get away from them so they can't hurt you, or to come kill them and out them out of their misery.

Jap toon on books and fake news (www.youtube.com)

submitted by Paradoxical003 to whatever 1.8 years ago

3 comments

Today a thief will rob you in the open, everyone will see it, they will just slowly walk away. Today a murderer will kill your family member, and just expect you to accept it. (whatever)

submitted by Paradoxical003 to whatever 1.8 years ago

7 comments

If the cops won't do anything, and they won't then the criminals will commit crimes right out in the open, they will do so casually, and act like they did nothing wrong immediately after.

The cops won't do anything to punish the murderer or thief, but they will go after you if you try to get justice on them for being robbed of property or another person in your life.

When will conservatives and libertarians realize that the vast majority of nonwhites will never support them politically, and that the vast majority of the people who hate white people are not white themselves. (whatever)

submitted by Paradoxical003 to whatever 1.8 years ago

75 comments

They are in denial, about everything.

The left controls them through their automatic rejection of their labels, and the validity of those labels.

They have nothing to offer nonwhites, who will lose their privileged status of being oppressed, who know damn well they will fail to compete with whites in the economic arena once the playing field is level, and who have nothing to gain from their ideology.

Nonwhites are naturally disinclined to think like they do, anyway, the independent mentality is only commonly found among white men.

Being someone who distrusts the police or authority makes you a more heroic person (www.youtube.com)

submitted by Paradoxical003 to whatever 1.8 years ago

0 comments

Important finding - the minorities did better, but only because they were unlikely to trust that their society was just and would help them.

They think that society discriminates against them, the more you think cops aren't trustworthy, the more you are likely to stand up for others when you see something you don't approve of.

Heroic people are those who distrust the existing system.

So a White Nationalist would be hero material, because they feel like they are representing a race that is persecuted by the system they exist in.

According to this video, this is the exact catalyst for stepping out of line to provide aid to someone in need, so they'd do it (especially if it's a White person they'd be helping).

Anyone who feels like the system hates them would be willing to go out of their way to help someone in need, you don't have to actually be an oppressed minority, you just need to feel like one.

Heck, merely being openly racist is doing something that fits the zimbardo definition of heroism, acting selflessly, based on what you think is right, at great personal risk or cost, even in the face of the apathy or outright disapproval of those around them.

But doesn't this have a dark side?

What about someone like this who encounters a situation where they intervene and it results in a negative result, because they've gotten involved in things without having all the information?

They could end up contributing to a problem by thinking they are acting like a hero, they might even unwittingly become the allies of a villain, or the thing that actually kills the person they tried to rescue.

Are you saving as kid from a kidnapper? or just beating up a father dealing with his bratty kid's tantrum?

Are you helping someone whose been pierced by a foreign object? or are you causing undue damage and bleeding, ultimately killing the person you are attempting to save?

There was that true crime video where a man kills a girl's father to help her escape from the physical and sexual abuse she says she experienced from him, but in reality she just wanted him dead.

Furthermore, heroism could go one way or another, as these types of people are able to be recruited into a cause easily, and it could be a cause to make things better, or one to make things worse, while seeming to it's members as a way to make them better.

Heroism lacks a moral dimension, and it lacks a dimension of being someone who makes things better, all it takes to be a hero is to fit the zimbardo definition, which is concerned with what the hero thinks is right.

If you kill someone or commit an act of domestic terrorism, you could be a hero by this definition, you are taking a huge personal and moral risk, for the sake of something you believe to be right, at great personal risk or cost, where most people are apathetic or outright opposed to taking such action.

Thoughts? (www.youtube.com)

submitted by Paradoxical003 to whatever 1.8 years ago

1 comments

music tastes, apparently another thing we are allowed to use to predict personality traits, but not anything like genetics, or, god forbid, race. (www.youtube.com)

submitted by Paradoxical003 to whatever 1.8 years ago

2 comments

Some people get offended when you mention the predictive ability of political beliefs on guessing personality traits.

Some people resist the idea of personality traits as existing at all, they know where the rabbit hole is likely to lead.

The left loves the concept of free will, and some objective force of good and evil, all the things they pretend to reject, they actually cling to when these ideas are truly explored.

Post-modernism is a far-left idea that is inevitably going to lead to post-postmodernism, which is very much on the far right.

If there's no morality but personal preferences, then there's nothing inherently wrong with preferring your own race over others, if there's no free will, then why could we blame the racist for acting on the instincts that come from millions of years of evolution, and exist within all of us for a very good reason, in that they served the genes of our ancestors better than others, who dies without carrying on their genetic legacy.

That's why they fear us embracing their philosophical pretensions and analyzing them to their proper conclusions.

They rely on political polarization, gut-instinct rejection on partisanship alone, to keep us from making it through the storm of nihilism towards the true ultimate conclusion which could be drawn from their philosophical premises.

That we should act on the basis of what benefits our genes in increasing their number, that we should use the best of our abilities to achieve these ends, the result is the strongest and most unyielding variant of White Supremacy.

A lot of you think of me as being soft, especially due to my previous posts, you assume I'm coming from a place of sentimentality, and I am, but not for what you think.

White people need to be able to live apart from the other races, just as they are able to do so apart from us, this is something I understand and don't need to be reminded of it's vital necessity, not just for the White race, but for the future of all the life of Earth, If we die out, the life of our planet outliving the Earth's demise follows.

But for us to win, we need to have a strategy and tactic that works, understanding the experiences most people have is important for the sake of our mission's success.

So too is working with the circumstances we find ourselves in, and adapting our approach to what is effective, rather than what makes us appear most hardcore to the other posters on this forum.

That's what I'm doing, looking for the best route to our success, and one that could allow us to fall back to another route should our current course be denied us.

I'm telling you to understand the enemy, and become them at a minimum, not in adopting their cause, but in adopting the strategies and tactics that have thus far proven themselves effective for people in a position like ours.

Strategies and tactics are tools, means to an end, they are like weapons which could be picked up and turned against those who had previously wielded them, the best teachers in battle are your opponents, and you should be grateful for the lessons that came with every defeat you had survived, repay them with the ultimate defeat, attained by using what they had taught you to beat them with.

A lot of you are agents on here pretending to be hotheaded dumbasses who cant see things beyond face value, who cant differentiate between a short term strategy and a long term one, and who can't see how one can serve as the staging ground for the other, you try to manipulate the culture on here by doing so, to keep us from becoming a sophisticated force with a good grasp on the situation and how to get what we want from it.

What we could do is the following:

- push for equality, equal rights for Whites, and thus make people aware of how White people are discriminated against now, and how they were persecuted by other races throughout history.

- push for Libertarianism, not White Nationalism, a libertarian state is one where many of the goals of White Nationalism are achieved, many of the powers of the NWO are nullified, and we could move on to National Socialism, White Nationalism, or whatever other political ideology you support from there.

- get the meanings, merits, and faults of the labels used to attack people or ideas to be re-examined from an objective perspective. Confront the -ism and ask why it is objectionable.

- make philosophy mainstream, make it so that people are seen to ask the questions across all schools of philosophy in the offline world, and so that every could know their side. teach the young ones critical thinking, fallacious argumentation, and ways to lie without saying things that were untrue.

- expose the ways people can be conditioned into thinking a certain way, teach about human psychology, mind manipulation techniques like those seen in cults, Show how most people's views were distorted by selectively presenting them with examples of things that all share a trait which only the minority of the things possess.

Youtube keeps recommending me these kinds of videos, it's got me very worried about the kind of info they have on me. (www.youtube.com)

submitted by Paradoxical003 to whatever 1.8 years ago

7 comments

The only people I'm interested in getting rid of are those who are some degree of anti-white and cannot be converted out of it. (whatever)

submitted by Paradoxical003 to whatever 1.8 years ago

8 comments

If a nigger or jew isn't anti-white that means that they aren't a threat to my people's existence and not an obstacle in the way of our future.

I don't think we need to get rid of anyone who isn't trying to kill us or complicit in that, and even if they are, I'd rather be rid of them by changing their minds from enemy to non-enemy or ally than than by killing.

Killing should be about defending yourself and your people, as should our cause, our movement, and our communities.

We should not become motivated by hate of those who are not like us, but rather by a greater love of those who are like us, and a lesser love for those more dissimilar to us.

We need to make the best decisions for our people, to take the best actions for their sake, and this includes having ideas and words which are useful to the ends that we treasure.

How many niggers and jews are threats against us out of ignorance or false beliefs? how many of those could be educated out of that? How many of them are not ever going to be a threat to whites, and are just trying to live their own lives?

I live around non-whites, and as far as I could judge from my experiences, I think that the ones I live around are decent people, I can't say the same for those who don't live around me.

I've seen the statistics, science, and videos, which I don't doubt the veracity of, but for my conclusion in reconciling my personal offline experiences with the things I've learned online, I suspect that the people within each race who posses different qualities are likely to group together in different locations, and live separately for the most part.

The "good ones" and "bad ones" are grouped together around their own kind, and there's at least some level of separation between the two groups, it's probably not complete, but there's definitely some difficulty in moving between them.

Blonde guys should get with blonde chicks, Ginger guys with ginger chicks, Blue eyes with blue eyes, and Green eyes with green eyes. Preserve as many of your recessive traits as possible by finding a partner that matches and making as lot of babies with them. (whatever)

submitted by Paradoxical003 to whatever 1.8 years ago

48 comments

Vice is evil, but this video makes a good point. (www.youtube.com)

submitted by Paradoxical003 to whatever 1.8 years ago

6 comments

How many of you love your significant other? (whatever)

submitted by Paradoxical003 to whatever 1.8 years ago

43 comments

Your wife or husband, boyfriend or girlfriend, or just crush, I guess we'd count them as significant in this sense as well.

-1

The plan for the sustainable future (whatever)

submitted by Paradoxical003 to whatever 1.8 years ago

3 comments

It's prison work camps.
That's what the smart cities are, very technologically advanced versions of communist hell on earth.
The WEF jews want to convert our daily lives to living in gulags, no freedom, no privacy, no property, reproduction will be controlled, and we will always be at risk of being killed off because we will be in a constant state of terminal illness which they will be able to postpone as a reward for our compliance and productivity.
Also food will be given as rewards for obedience and production as well, so without them we starve.
Good food and other basic pleasures will be a luxury, one that the elites will have ample access to, while you will be a slave with very restricted access.
Going outside will be a luxury, but you will have no access to privacy while you do so, and leaving the city will be a crime.
It's like they took all the dystopias ever written, and said that they could combine the worst of all of them together, make them real with modern technology, and we'd still want it if they did a good enough advertising campaign, while creating catastrophes they could save us from, and tricking us into not noticing all the horrifying shit they've been doing and planning on doing.
It's like Peterson said, they will encroach upon you until you start to push back, then they will hold things at this level, often with things that appease you in order to make you stop resisting them, then its back to closing in on you.
You get used to it as it goes, and when things are at a point that anyone sane would consider intolerable, you won't realize how much they've taken from you until you look back at the history of your country and your world.

-1

How about this then: we can mass migrate to some place in the nonwhite world and start pulling an "uno reverse card". Or we could mass migrate to some shithole in the western world like Portland, take it over by enforcing our laws and becoming the defacto government, turning it into a eutopian state (whatever)

submitted by Paradoxical003 to whatever 1.8 years ago

16 comments

One way works quite well, judging from Mexico being invaded by Californians, we will be conquering the country we head to, or at least establishing an ethnic commubity within those countries like the migrants do in our countries, much of the plans of the nwo count on us staying put in our countries.

Not moving to some place full of nonwhites and racially segregating ourselves in those places where the laws against are weaker and there's a lack of ability to enforce them against us.

It's not expected, and the nwo has a very delicate plan that could easily disrupted by something coming along that they do not expect.

And you'll object to this by saying we should stay to "fight" for our homes, but your idea of "fighting" so far is ineffective voting, very rarely protesting or filing some lawsuits at best, and none of these things will ever change anything.

You will also bluster a bunch about one day going outside with your guns, and maybe you make good on that, and show off your rifles while spouting some impotent lines about your patience having limits or something else thats supposed to be vaguely threatening.

The establishment knows this is all a bluff, you won't do fuck all and they know it, if you did try something, you'd be on your own, as the rest of you will disown you.

There will never be a violent or unlawful solution, best you could hope for is some lone wolves, followed by people being visited by government and taken away one by one, with little trouble.

One man is nothing against a squad of them.

The other option doesn't require you to move our of the country, you move to the worst parts, which have a weak police presence, and you enforce the laws in the place of the police, but not the laws of the preexisting government, instead you will be enforcing your laws in your way, it will be your government, at least in effect, on paper it's still the country's government, but that doesn't matter, you're the one keeping law and order there.

Since the place had become so terrible, it'd be easy for you to turn it into someplace that's a heaven on earth by comparison, under your rule, some people will be very happy, and support your decision to keep it all from falling back into the hands of the government that had so mismanaged it.

You will turn it from a majority minority hellscape of urban decay, degeneracy, crime, and poverty into a self sufficient majority white paradise.

You came and made things better, then everyone who wants to live in the better place you built on top of a failed state, province, city, town, etc. Will flock to it.

You can implement any sort of changes you want to have in that place, any sort of government could exist there, as you essentially create government by dictating the laws you enforce and the way on which you enforce them, a law that exists on paper but isn't enforced may as well not exist, a law that doesn't exist on paper but is enforces nonetheless is as good as a real law. Government is abstract concept, it is only made real by what it does when it afflicts the actions of the people who believe in it.

Either way, we preserve our people and form a community that could defend itself from threats, while also making the connections that lead to our number's growth.

Yes, if we do a mass movement to some other country they won't allow us to do so legally, that's completely irrelevant as we won't be migrating legally, we will simply be physically transporting ourselves there and staying.

If they try to get rid of us, we simply don't let them, very likely their ability to evict us by force is limited and we could take advantage of that, either by intimidation, or combat, or some other form of resistance.

The power of causing more problems when being made to leave by way of us banding together to prevent even one of us, even the worst of us, from being removed from the land is not to be understated, they will probably leave us alone even if they want us gone.

We will build up our numbers, and we will expand our communities, until the country is overtaken.

Even when we have taken the country, we could then start sending out our excess people I the countries surrounding it, eventually seizing those as well.

In thos way, we conquer without aggression, but won't be pussies like the White South Africans either, the only time we do anything is after we are attacked, our force will be like friction, purely defensive, only to counter and nullify the force employed against us, but when attacked in any way.

We will always jump to defending each other, always taking the side of our own when even one of us is placed in any kind of conflict against even one of them.
Nothing matters but the defense of the interests of those from our race.

Other than that we will be reclusive and insular, hidden away in our own enclaves that grow and grow in size, continously expanding to cover more of the country we've invaded.

At the same time we take our men and have them go directly after any position of influence in their country.
We will focus on building up pur power on the country alongside our presence.

Our women's wombs will be our primary means of attack, our men will make a lot of money, and our people will eventually be able to grow strong enough to retake the countries we left behind.

Collectively mass migrating to one location, taking it over without any violence that could be used to demonize us, and then building a better home in that place, it's the ideal solution, I think.

We aren't directly hurting anyone, at most we are only arresting criminals and giving them fair punishments for their crimes.

I think it's a natural progression for some private entrepreneurs to step in and fill the vacuum once the police are defended and abolished, to make a new set of laws and go about enforcing them, in the process causing massive improvements to the place we'd occupied.

I think that our collective physical presence is the best weapon we could have, and that we should be making plans on using it effectively if we want to make a difference.

Scattering and isolating by going innawoods is not an effective solution to the difficulties we face as a people, we need to be physically together in a place where we can identify each other as sharing our ideological in group.

We could talk about organizing events in real life, forming communities that hold regular get togethers in the offline world, or something.

Right now we are doing nothing.

We were, we used to, not even a decade ago we were making a big difference simply due to our willingness to go outside and meet with one another, gathering physically, instead of on here, was enough to give us an edge that, if continued to be pushed instead of abandoned, would have paid out great dividends for us over time.

The solution is to do what works, and this, whatever we are doing here, isn't working.

-1

Share ans compare your fedis here (whatever)

submitted by Paradoxical003 to whatever 1.8 years ago

1 comments

I'll start:

Freespeechextremist.com

Found it back in the mid 2010s.

The biggest mistake conservatives make is thinking that if you.do good things to people, that's they'd be good to you as well, or that if you apologize and make restitution for past wrongs, that you'd be forgiven. (whatever)

submitted by Paradoxical003 to whatever 1.8 years ago

5 comments

Tl;Dr, conservatives need to learn some psychology, or at the very least need to notice the patterns of responses they get from others to their actions.
It's very important that they stop lying to themselves that the people who hate them are not "mostly white" but mostly composed of other races of people, and that it had been this way for a long time.

In fact, it's been noted repeatedly that if people realize that they can get good stuff out of you every when they treat you badly, that they will continue to treat you badly, and in fact be one worse, just so that they could continue receiving the benefits of bullying you.

Giving your lunch money to a bully makes them bully you more, and like you less, while going put of your way to do good things for someone who abuses you will not only escalate the abuse, but trap you in a parasitic relationship with them.

Similarly, when you make restitution for past wrongdoings, and the victim only ever demands more from you, you've locked yourself in a perpetual debt with them, they don't care about the crime you committed, or even if you did anything at all, they only care that they have something on you that they can use to get things from you for as long as you are willing to pay them for it.

It's like a business, you've taught them that they can get stuff by attacking you, and furthering their attacks means furthering your payments to them for attacking you as well, when antiwhite black people see blacks getting things from whitey whenever they do antiwhite things, they are taught to be more antiwhite, so that their people continue to get paid.

Blacks get compensation on compensation on compensation forever, all for saying the exact same things, they are like birds hitting buttons that dispense feed, for as long as we apologize and pay them, they will continue to do the things they've learned gets them paid.

I mention the blacks here because it seems that Conservatives are allergic to admitting that black people are racist against them, they like to characterize anyone on the left who does something bad or hateful as being white, even when they aren't.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=T-dOFhIenek

This moronic ginger ignores all the baseless anti-white hatred coming from blacks for the last couple decades, and lies when HD says the racism against white people is mostly coming from other white people.

That's wrong, most of it by far is coming from black people and nonwhite people, but he's too indoctrinated with the conservative bogeyman of the white privileged sheltered college liberal as his sole enemy.

His confirmation bias and cherrypicking is ridiculously extreme to anyone whose been paying attention for the last 20 years.

Blacks want material things, food, wealth, sex, etc. That's just human, the conservatives want to convince black people that being "seen as helpless victims" is an incentive for them to give up the free things they get from being seen that way.

The strategy is a failing one, they are demanding that people give up the higher priority level of the hierarchy of needs, in order to satisfy the lower priority levels.

Furthermore, blacks don't really seem all that bothered by how this ideology sees them from a conservative point of view, because from a liberal perspective, they aren't characterized in that way, they are told they are an inherently great people whose failures could be perpetually blamed on the white men.
This flatters them, as it covers for the relative lack of ability which blacks know they have as a people, compared to whites.

Conservatism actually believes they are a great people, but blacks know they aren't, and if they leave the liberal narrative behind, it's only going to be a chance to prove their incompetence as a people.
I think that conservatives are also sheltered privileged people, who don't realize the issues with what they are saying, because they refuse to see the world for how it is.

Problem conservatives can be spotted easily when they step out into a mostly white audience and mention the racial diversity of the crowd as being the first thing they say.
First thing they say, first thing they care about is not being seen as racist, probably the biggest, most important thing to them is positive PR, that's a sign that this guy will do nothing for you as a white man but throw you under the bus to appease the unappeasable press.
We need someone who truly doesn't give a damn about race, which which someone who cares for the facts, and who ignores being called racist, or embraces it as being a good thing.

Sign into an existing account