Sign into an existing account

Some people get offended when you mention the predictive ability of political beliefs on guessing personality traits.

Some people resist the idea of personality traits as existing at all, they know where the rabbit hole is likely to lead.

The left loves the concept of free will, and some objective force of good and evil, all the things they pretend to reject, they actually cling to when these ideas are truly explored.

Post-modernism is a far-left idea that is inevitably going to lead to post-postmodernism, which is very much on the far right.

If there's no morality but personal preferences, then there's nothing inherently wrong with preferring your own race over others, if there's no free will, then why could we blame the racist for acting on the instincts that come from millions of years of evolution, and exist within all of us for a very good reason, in that they served the genes of our ancestors better than others, who dies without carrying on their genetic legacy.

That's why they fear us embracing their philosophical pretensions and analyzing them to their proper conclusions.

They rely on political polarization, gut-instinct rejection on partisanship alone, to keep us from making it through the storm of nihilism towards the true ultimate conclusion which could be drawn from their philosophical premises.

That we should act on the basis of what benefits our genes in increasing their number, that we should use the best of our abilities to achieve these ends, the result is the strongest and most unyielding variant of White Supremacy.

A lot of you think of me as being soft, especially due to my previous posts, you assume I'm coming from a place of sentimentality, and I am, but not for what you think.

White people need to be able to live apart from the other races, just as they are able to do so apart from us, this is something I understand and don't need to be reminded of it's vital necessity, not just for the White race, but for the future of all the life of Earth, If we die out, the life of our planet outliving the Earth's demise follows.

But for us to win, we need to have a strategy and tactic that works, understanding the experiences most people have is important for the sake of our mission's success.

So too is working with the circumstances we find ourselves in, and adapting our approach to what is effective, rather than what makes us appear most hardcore to the other posters on this forum.

That's what I'm doing, looking for the best route to our success, and one that could allow us to fall back to another route should our current course be denied us.

I'm telling you to understand the enemy, and become them at a minimum, not in adopting their cause, but in adopting the strategies and tactics that have thus far proven themselves effective for people in a position like ours.

Strategies and tactics are tools, means to an end, they are like weapons which could be picked up and turned against those who had previously wielded them, the best teachers in battle are your opponents, and you should be grateful for the lessons that came with every defeat you had survived, repay them with the ultimate defeat, attained by using what they had taught you to beat them with.

A lot of you are agents on here pretending to be hotheaded dumbasses who cant see things beyond face value, who cant differentiate between a short term strategy and a long term one, and who can't see how one can serve as the staging ground for the other, you try to manipulate the culture on here by doing so, to keep us from becoming a sophisticated force with a good grasp on the situation and how to get what we want from it.

What we could do is the following:

- push for equality, equal rights for Whites, and thus make people aware of how White people are discriminated against now, and how they were persecuted by other races throughout history.
<Just this knowledge alone is enough to do serious damage to the credibility of the other side, both those on top, who hide things from the masses, and those on rank and file, whose lack of historical knowledge is made apparent, or whose hatred of White people is exposed.>

- push for Libertarianism, not White Nationalism, a libertarian state is one where many of the goals of White Nationalism are achieved, many of the powers of the NWO are nullified, and we could move on to National Socialism, White Nationalism, or whatever other political ideology you support from there.
<a shill will show up here pretending that supporting one thing as a route to establishing something else is objectionable in some way, they might throw some attacks my way to attempt to discredit me in your eyes, do not ignore their claims, but investigate them instead.>

- get the meanings, merits, and faults of the labels used to attack people or ideas to be re-examined from an objective perspective. Confront the -ism and ask why it is objectionable.
<Heck, you could ask other questions like "Why do we hate the things we were programmed to hate (especially when compared to the things we weren't programmed to hate, and the things we were programmed to love)?">

- make philosophy mainstream, make it so that people are seen to ask the questions across all schools of philosophy in the offline world, and so that every could know their side. teach the young ones critical thinking, fallacious argumentation, and ways to lie without saying things that were untrue.

- expose the ways people can be conditioned into thinking a certain way, teach about human psychology, mind manipulation techniques like those seen in cults, Show how most people's views were distorted by selectively presenting them with examples of things that all share a trait which only the minority of the things possess.
<For example, black people are more likely to be serial killers than whites are, but if you've only been shown white serial killers, you can be mislead into thinking that whites are more likely to be serial killers, even though that's not the case. Project innocence focuses on forwarding a false narrative of police discrimination against black people by taking cases in which evidence has degraded beyond utility in conviction, and then getting the black man who was convicted on that evidence off. We can expose that scam by getting White people off on the same grounds, then making the same claims to the media that project innocence does. Most victims of civil asset forfeiture are White, in fact Whites are disproportionately targeted for CAF by police, but no one will care to show it unless they can find some black or brown guys who were victimized in this way. We can make some fictional work that illustrates this bias.>