Sign into an existing account

Sorry, going on a Minds binge apparently. Haven't been on it in a long time and the content is actually decent.

Pull quotes:

>The U.S. Supreme Court began hearing arguments on Wednesday in a dispute involving a government-run program to monitor for overfishing of herring off New England's coast that gives its conservative majority a chance to further limit the regulatory powers of federal agencies.

>The companies have asked the court, with its 6-3 conservative majority, to rein in or overturn a precedent established in 1984 that calls for judges to defer to federal agency interpretation of U.S. laws deemed to be ambiguous, a doctrine called "Chevron deference."

Basically, in the United states, laws are made by an elected congress. One of the fundamental complaints made by more conservative/libertarian types is that laws are effectively made by unelected, shadowy government agencies modernly known as "the deep state". On paper, the deep state is part of the executive branch, but in practice it's it's own ecosphere and then you get the idea of them being the group that selects the president.

One of the major loopholes "the deep state" uses is the afore mentioned Chevron deference. The idea is that, if Congress hasn't made a law about something, a federal agency has every right to make and enforce their own "laws", as long as they are "reasonable". This is absurd bullshit and has been used to justify converting the US government into the opposite of what it was supposed to be.

You have to get into the pedantic bullshit of the US constitution being a "positive or negative document." The deep state would argue the constitution is a negative document, meaning it says what the government cannot do, but it means they can do anything else, which is almost limitless. A limited government type would say the constitution is a positive document, meaning it tells the government what it can do, but it can't do anything else. That actually limits the government severely, which I think most here would support.

So, if the Supreme Court does it's job and rules correctly on this case it sets up the dismantlement of the deep state. I know, I know...how dare I be a glimmer of hope when everything fucking sucks and we all know it.

I have made the conscious decision to look to a future that is actually better than the current day. I think we are at the very beginning stages of seeing a lot of events happen that will cause enough normies to pull their heads out of their asses that it might actually start to make a difference if you choose to take advantage of it.

Basically, as the general collapse starts to happen, it will cause some communities of people to pull triggers on things they wouldn't have done just 5 years ago. For instance, I could see more than 50 states all of a sudden. I could actually see N. California, S. Illinois, and W. New York become their own states. I could even see *new countries* emerge in all of this.

I think you're about to see pockets of sanity start to emerge here and there that you can take advantage of if you choose too. I'm currently studying to start a career in a field heavily involved in the repair and rebuilding of industry. I am beginning to envision a future where I'm actually happy.

Apparently it was "world jewish day"...? All of this going "mainstream" (at least on alt-socials and twitter/X) just feels weird. As in, I should be happy, but I don't understand what's changed all of a sudden and I'm not sure what's going on.

Actually a neat little documentary about the history of football, but the violence talk at the beginning made me laugh because of how hard it would make people "REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!" today.

So many times academics analyze songs, but they couldn't write it themselves. They think it's like math, but it's not, it's more like just playing what sounds right.

A lot of the zogbots you hate, hate zog too...

>According to one 2021 study, only 23 percent of Generation Z describe themselves as passionate sports fans, as opposed to 42 percent of millennials, 33 percent of Generation X, and 31 percent of baby boomers. Further, a sizable 27 percent of Gen Z described themselves as “anti-sports,” compared with single-digit percentages from other generations saying the same.

Makes me wonder what the "bigger problem" is.

I personally love sports. As in, the actual doing of them. I was a successful athlete until a tragic shoulder injury. So now that I started with "I love sports" and got your autismo minds to sperg, let me explain: I love sports, not (((sportsball))) or (((niggerball))). I only pay attention to my (almost) all white high school sports, mainly football (which I played), and motorsports. I stopped watching pro and college sports over a decade ago, actually *before* they became super political.

I actually see the whole "they became way to political" thing as merely a symptom of a more fundamental issue. I stopped watching because "they" clearly were making the sports more like reality TV than, you know...a sport.

For instance, I like a good game. Doesn't matter if it's high scoring or low scoring. In American football, I'd love a 3-0 game just as much as a 103-100 game, and yet, ToUcHdOwNs ArE eXcItInG!!!!11!!11!! so the NFL and NCAA changed rules to make the sport of football more like basket ball. Oh, and the same wizards of smart also made them WAAAAAAAAAYYYYYY to political. A move that's really, simply predictable for those dumbasses...

But still, I wonder what the "bigger problem" is that the title of the article refers to. Let's find out...

>The gradual loss of interest in sports is a symptom of a larger problem, which is that Gen Z lacks both civic involvement and any interest in attaining it. This has been a significant factor in the erosion of the community fabric where Gen Z lives. As we spend an increasing amount of time tuned into our digital lives, many of us lose sight of the traditional forms of community that previous generations relied on.

Now, ironically, I'd agree with much of that...but of course the jew only laments this A.) in the sense it can't make money off them, and B.) way to fucking late. Hey boomers...that paragraph I quoted just now. You're finally acting like it's an emergency, but it's not. It was an emergency 10-15 years ago. You did nothing. Now it's a fucking disaster.

The boomer generation is quickly becoming the largest percentage of homeless people in America...GOOD! You not only deserve it. You earned it. Go starve, suffer, and die. We'll all enjoy watching it.

I don't want to point out two things that **ARE** happening...I want to point out 2 things that **ARE NOT** happening:

1. Massive protests

and

2. Massive social media "trending" campaigns.

Now, only after I pointed out those two things, will I point out what *is* happening:

**ACTUALLY...FUCKING...SOMETHING...**

Name two things more jewey than social media and protests. Go ahead...I'll wait. Yep, that's right, if there is anything more jewey than them, it is an incredibly short list. I guess the talmud is more jewey than those two things, but I struggle to find other things, because both social media and protests are about as fake n' gay as they get. In fact, doing either of those things lets weaklings feel like they did something, when they really didn't, and nothing ever gets much further than that, am I right? I'm right...

My point is, remember Jan. 6th? The trucker convoy? Getting literally anything trending on any platform? Remember the fucking Tea Party all those years ago? Remember the "biden" stickers with him pointing at a high price and saying "I did that!"? Remember any of that actually accomplishing a damn thing...? Me either...

Illinois, specifically the parts outside of "Chicagoland", has a rich history of telling authority to fuck off. You couldn't possibly imagine a state where there is one seat of power (chicago) so diametrically opposed to the rest of the entire state, and it's been that way for a very long time.

So, I can tell you from personal experience, if you want to defeat tyranny, the answer is always: local, local, local.

"They" can use propaganda all they want to try and convince you that the USA is some sort of majority zog, but I know, and in my area **WE** know, that we are not.

The idea I want to leave you with to chew on the rest of the day is this: fuck social media, and fuck large protest movements coordinated by someone who's last name, inevitably, always ends in -berg, or -stein. The way to successfully tell zog to fuck off is to say it without even saying it. Just do it. "They" don't want you to know that's possible.

Have a nice day.

And I'm finally sitting down to do that, but am quickly having to admit that, while I'm a decent internet sleuth, I am not, in fact, a literal scientific researcher. But maybe some of you are, or are at least better than me at it, and can point me to some good tools to look up what I want to look up.

[A young SBBH trainee is asked to help catch an Obvious Fed on the Internet, but to do this, she must ask for the assistance of one of the internets most notorious schizologists.](https://files.catbox.moe/kxlmcx.png)

https://www.bitchute.com/video/I5qnJQHaIbVC/

The humor is in the story and the story is in the subtitles.