Those are, 100%, fragmentation grenades. Russian grenades make that popping noise when the fuse ignites. Here's a link: https://youtu.be/T90KnzsKM0c?t=65 Those look like they might be RGD-5 grenades but it's shit quality.
You need to stop talking about shit that you're completely ignorant of, you're just making yourself look retarded. Also, for the other retards who think that frag grenades would kill everyone in the room, "shred" them even, frag grenades fucking suck. Unless you're basically on top of them or really unlucky, you're just going to have a lot of shrapnel wounds. This should also make sense when you see how little explosive power they have from the linked video.
It is painfully obvious that you, and the people that upvoated this garbage, have never deployed a frag grenade or a flashbang. Flashbangs detonate after ~1 second, they're meant to surprise people and it would be pointless to have a 3-4 second fuse on a flashbang like the ones in the video have.
You have to have hostile, open, continuous, exclusive, and notorious possession of the land for twenty years (typically) before you can file a claim for adverse possession. It's so that unused property remains on the market and doesn't just sit there forever with no one using it. If the landowner comes on the land and tells you to leave or files an ejectment at any point during those twenty years, the clock starts over.
White Christians are the descendants of Abraham. It should be pretty obvious, the cultural white european religion has always been Christianity. Oh and the jews kinda killed Jesus, not really buying the whole chosen people thing.
What's really astounding is that he doesn't know that the jews are the descendants of the canaanites. They hate Christians because we slaughtered them back in the day and took their land. So yes, it was their land originally. But they deceived us into giving them their land back because they are the children of satan and deception is to them what empathy and goodwill is to white Christians.
That's unironically first degree murder with what I would say is a weak argument for second degree. Either way, it is definitely murder. Seeing as how he's black and killed a white dude, we're lucky if he gets charged with involuntary manslaughter.
There are three possible 1A violations when a government entity seeks to restrict speech because it is specifically about jews:
1) General freedom of speech violation - there are some forums where the government is allowed to restrict speech. For example, you aren't allowed to talk in courtrooms unless you are doing a case. Otherwise, the government may not engage in content regulation outside certain circumstances. The most unfavorable type of content restriction is a viewpoint-based restriction. So in this video, there is a viewpoint restriction in that they didn't want him expressing his view that jews are to blame for the covid response. It is not a simple content based restriction since they were obviously talking about covid and his speech fell within a discussion about covid.
2) Freedom of religion - jews are, and have always been, the religious enemies of Christians. Indeed, Jesus himself called them the children of satan in John 8:44. Thus, Christians are restricted in exercising their religion of saving others by showing them that they are being deceived by jews and to instead turn towards the truth (God). Deception being the primary tool of satan, who is the father of lies.
3) Establishment violation - Government generally can't support or restrict one religion over any others. By preventing people from saying anything bad about jews, then they are clearly violating the establishment clause since the government doesn't go to such lengths to defend any other religion. This one can be a bit tricky since jews are basically like Schrodinger's race/religion. It can be either one, but if you are referring to religious jews it is an establishment violation.
Women should remain silent in the churches. They are not allowed to speak, but must be in submission, as the law says. If they want to inquire about something, they should ask their own husbands at home; for it is disgraceful for a woman to speak in the church.
There are plenty studies of single father households that you can use to compare numbers yourself. Such a comparison will show that single fathers are way better at raising men than single mothers due to the reduced incarceration rate and increased rates of beneficial indicators like high school graduation that are seen in single father households. Single father households just aren't as prevalent in stand-alone studies because of both the fact that they aren't really as much of a problem as well as the fact they are much less common than single mother households. Certainly, the numbers are better for a two-parent household than single father, but the primary focus is, and should be, on single-mother households since that's where the primary source of issues come from both as a function of performance and number.
Pretty sure those are moles. They are holding on in a line like that because their eyes aren't great with regards to "normal" use. However, they are exceptional at detecting light.
It was a default judgment because no answer was filed. This is what happens 100% of the time when the defendant doesn't file an answer within 21 days of being served or within 60 days if they waived service. There was no verdict, y'all need to learn basic shit about law or actually read the articles that people post instead of just reading their retarded fucking headlines.
Well no one is burning in hell right now because judgement day hasn't happened yet. Also not really sure about the pre-supposed fact that the majority of our White ancestors are burning in hell. The cultural religion of Whites is Christianity.
You missed the best part: "The shelter has reached out to the new owner. So did Sweat, his attorney and 7News. As of Friday night, she has declined to return Bear."
The country would have to repeal the fourteenth amendment. But that wouldn't necessarily make anything unconstitutional, it would just allow for segregation.
>Forced racial integration is unconstitutional due to the neverending violence, poverty, crime, and destruction is causes. Therefore a federal judge must order an end to the government's practice of forced integration. Just file the lawsuit.
LawFag 1 point 1.4 years ago
It's called a civil war when the government wins, it's called a revolution when the people do.
/v/WhitePeopleIsland viewpost?postid=659bd1db0e4ab
LawFag 1 point 1.5 years ago
"BABYLONBEE.COM" There is no functional difference between braindead normies and the people who thought this was real.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=659722ad94dd5
LawFag 2 points 1.5 years ago
You're racist if you don't think we are the same.
/v/SouthAfrica viewpost?postid=65888548e5b31
LawFag 4 points 1.5 years ago
Those are, 100%, fragmentation grenades. Russian grenades make that popping noise when the fuse ignites. Here's a link: https://youtu.be/T90KnzsKM0c?t=65 Those look like they might be RGD-5 grenades but it's shit quality.
You need to stop talking about shit that you're completely ignorant of, you're just making yourself look retarded. Also, for the other retards who think that frag grenades would kill everyone in the room, "shred" them even, frag grenades fucking suck. Unless you're basically on top of them or really unlucky, you're just going to have a lot of shrapnel wounds. This should also make sense when you see how little explosive power they have from the linked video.
It is painfully obvious that you, and the people that upvoated this garbage, have never deployed a frag grenade or a flashbang. Flashbangs detonate after ~1 second, they're meant to surprise people and it would be pointless to have a 3-4 second fuse on a flashbang like the ones in the video have.
/v/news viewpost?postid=657c4c2831d65
LawFag 0 points 1.5 years ago
The vast majority of American common law came from English common law. It's the same thing.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=65751481ca4d4
LawFag 2 points 1.5 years ago
You have to have hostile, open, continuous, exclusive, and notorious possession of the land for twenty years (typically) before you can file a claim for adverse possession. It's so that unused property remains on the market and doesn't just sit there forever with no one using it. If the landowner comes on the land and tells you to leave or files an ejectment at any point during those twenty years, the clock starts over.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=65751481ca4d4
LawFag 4 points 1.5 years ago
The truth always has been and always will be anti-semitic. That shit is literally in the Bible
/v/HDLunited viewpost?postid=657452c2a83aa
LawFag 3 points 1.6 years ago
White Christians are the descendants of Abraham. It should be pretty obvious, the cultural white european religion has always been Christianity. Oh and the jews kinda killed Jesus, not really buying the whole chosen people thing.
What's really astounding is that he doesn't know that the jews are the descendants of the canaanites. They hate Christians because we slaughtered them back in the day and took their land. So yes, it was their land originally. But they deceived us into giving them their land back because they are the children of satan and deception is to them what empathy and goodwill is to white Christians.
/v/HDLunited viewpost?postid=6556a2d4ccd65
LawFag 6 points 1.6 years ago
That's unironically first degree murder with what I would say is a weak argument for second degree. Either way, it is definitely murder. Seeing as how he's black and killed a white dude, we're lucky if he gets charged with involuntary manslaughter.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=6540149ce6452
LawFag 4 points 1.6 years ago
Here's some
Rev. 2:9, 3:9
John 8:44
Acts 7:43
Amos 5:26
Basically the entirety of Acts 17
Titus 1:10–14
1 Thessalonians 2:14–16
/v/AskVoat viewpost?postid=653e91fd3366d
LawFag 3 points 1.6 years ago
"Christians"
/v/Christianity viewpost?postid=653d89e1a7435
LawFag 1 point 1.7 years ago
Judge Learned Hand (the guy who the quote in the article is from) was the GOAT. Nicknamed the 10th justice on the Supreme Court
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=6531aa078f21d
LawFag 3 points 1.7 years ago
There are three possible 1A violations when a government entity seeks to restrict speech because it is specifically about jews:
1) General freedom of speech violation - there are some forums where the government is allowed to restrict speech. For example, you aren't allowed to talk in courtrooms unless you are doing a case. Otherwise, the government may not engage in content regulation outside certain circumstances. The most unfavorable type of content restriction is a viewpoint-based restriction. So in this video, there is a viewpoint restriction in that they didn't want him expressing his view that jews are to blame for the covid response. It is not a simple content based restriction since they were obviously talking about covid and his speech fell within a discussion about covid.
2) Freedom of religion - jews are, and have always been, the religious enemies of Christians. Indeed, Jesus himself called them the children of satan in John 8:44. Thus, Christians are restricted in exercising their religion of saving others by showing them that they are being deceived by jews and to instead turn towards the truth (God). Deception being the primary tool of satan, who is the father of lies.
3) Establishment violation - Government generally can't support or restrict one religion over any others. By preventing people from saying anything bad about jews, then they are clearly violating the establishment clause since the government doesn't go to such lengths to defend any other religion. This one can be a bit tricky since jews are basically like Schrodinger's race/religion. It can be either one, but if you are referring to religious jews it is an establishment violation.
/v/OccidentalEnclave viewpost?postid=651c48191e265
LawFag 0 points 1.7 years ago
1 Corinthians 14:34-35
Women should remain silent in the churches. They are not allowed to speak, but must be in submission, as the law says. If they want to inquire about something, they should ask their own husbands at home; for it is disgraceful for a woman to speak in the church.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=6511d06b08703
LawFag 2 points 1.7 years ago
There are plenty studies of single father households that you can use to compare numbers yourself. Such a comparison will show that single fathers are way better at raising men than single mothers due to the reduced incarceration rate and increased rates of beneficial indicators like high school graduation that are seen in single father households. Single father households just aren't as prevalent in stand-alone studies because of both the fact that they aren't really as much of a problem as well as the fact they are much less common than single mother households. Certainly, the numbers are better for a two-parent household than single father, but the primary focus is, and should be, on single-mother households since that's where the primary source of issues come from both as a function of performance and number.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=65119eb368147
LawFag 0 points 1.7 years ago
Studies don't have to be authorized by courts though?
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=65119eb368147
LawFag 5 points 1.8 years ago
Pretty sure those are moles. They are holding on in a line like that because their eyes aren't great with regards to "normal" use. However, they are exceptional at detecting light.
/v/Nature viewpost?postid=650454c1b3089
LawFag 2 points 1.8 years ago
Are you allowed to indict the many over the fact that 1/3 of all black adult males in weimerica are convicted felons?
/v/HDLunited viewpost?postid=64fd03faee643
LawFag 3 points 1.8 years ago
It was a default judgment because no answer was filed. This is what happens 100% of the time when the defendant doesn't file an answer within 21 days of being served or within 60 days if they waived service. There was no verdict, y'all need to learn basic shit about law or actually read the articles that people post instead of just reading their retarded fucking headlines.
/v/news viewpost?postid=64ef992909ec8
LawFag 0 points 1.8 years ago
Well no one is burning in hell right now because judgement day hasn't happened yet. Also not really sure about the pre-supposed fact that the majority of our White ancestors are burning in hell. The cultural religion of Whites is Christianity.
/v/AskVoat viewpost?postid=64dec914039e5
LawFag 2 points 1.8 years ago
This is one of the reasons why you never step over a casualty.
/v/funny viewpost?postid=64db7672d47c4
LawFag 6 points 1.9 years ago
You missed the best part: "The shelter has reached out to the new owner. So did Sweat, his attorney and 7News. As of Friday night, she has declined to return Bear."
/v/Florida viewpost?postid=64d8dee28a569
LawFag 2 points 1.9 years ago
He slipped up and said "sanhedrin" which is a book in the talmud. The goy aren't supposed to know about the talmud, so they always just say torah.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=64c80542578a4
LawFag 0 points 1.9 years ago
The country would have to repeal the fourteenth amendment. But that wouldn't necessarily make anything unconstitutional, it would just allow for segregation.
/v/WhiteNationalism viewpost?postid=64c393c471e65
LawFag 0 points 1.9 years ago
>Forced racial integration is unconstitutional due to the neverending violence, poverty, crime, and destruction is causes. Therefore a federal judge must order an end to the government's practice of forced integration. Just file the lawsuit.
That's not how the constitution works.
/v/WhiteNationalism viewpost?postid=64c393c471e65