×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
9
10 comments block


[ - ] DivineLight2 2 points 9 hoursJun 17, 2025 05:40:46 ago (+2/-0)

This is a fake image from an ai video. Wish it was real.

[ - ] SundayMatinee 0 points 6 hoursJun 17, 2025 09:03:43 ago (+0/-0)

The HTN lettering at the tip of the building should be all the tell people need to see it for the AI slop it is. It is no wonder juden are funneling billions into AI research since once it has been improved to the point that significant artifacting like text is resolved they'll be able to fabricate all the evidence they want. Look at how many people blindly believe shit tier slop posts like this one. There is no defending this AI garbage.

[ - ] puremadness 0 points 4 hoursJun 17, 2025 10:16:10 ago (+0/-0)

the only skyscrapers to ever fall from impact, are the ones on 9/11.
They are built to withstand impact from a commercial airliner.
They dont melt, they dont even weaken for another jillion degrees.

[ - ] Prairie 0 points 9 hoursJun 17, 2025 05:38:21 ago (+0/-0)

Obviously they all learned from 9/11 and rebuilt these or these were made after that. /s

[ - ] puremadness 0 points 4 hoursJun 17, 2025 10:17:04 ago (+0/-0)

There was a skyscraper in Russia that burned for weeks.
didn't fall down.

[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 2 hoursJun 17, 2025 12:27:19 ago (+0/-0)

Was it burning jet fuel? How hot does jet fuel burn?

[ - ] Puller_of_Noses 0 points 12 hoursJun 17, 2025 02:51:58 ago (+1/-1)

You can't trust single source pictures anymore.
That's why the next FF will be presented from multiple angles.

[ - ] PostWallHelena -1 points 5 hoursJun 17, 2025 09:44:11 ago (+0/-1)

Because the WTC had a unique architecture and was entirely supported on its “shell” which melted when the jet fuel burned. It was not as structurally robust.

[ - ] JudyStroyer 0 points 2 hoursJun 17, 2025 12:39:17 ago (+0/-0)

It was specifically designed to absorb an airliner impact. There are thousands of architects and engineers that have gone on the record saying the collapse couldn’t have happened without additional explosives. If it was an organic collapse as you describe there would be no reason to have the concrete pulverized the way it was into a fine dust. There was no chunks, there was no “pancaking” or any of the shit claimed that supports the “collapse” narrative. A falling building can ot just create forces to laterally throw pieces outward. There are countless fdny on record witnessing multiple explosions.

If jet fuel caused wtc 1,2 to collapse, what caused wtc7 to do so?

[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 1 hourJun 17, 2025 13:46:12 ago (+0/-0)

It was specifically designed to absorb an airliner impact.

The vax was designed to prevent covid. So? You think people don’t make claims about their product they can’t meet?

There are thousands of architects and engineers that have gone on the record saying the collapse couldn’t have happened without additional explosives.

Every tom dick and harry with an engineering degree is not a definitive source. Too many people want to be famous off this shit. If you want to see a zebra bad enough, you will see one.