You will never find a pair of dentures or a bridge that fuses the front two teeth like that.
There are other signs this is an AI video, but the teeth are the obvious point.
For anyone sceptical, consider the fact that someone could create a video like this with AI using the publically available services. Is it more likely, given the presence of the visual anomalies that this is a real person talking or an AI rendering?
There isnt a real gap, and the aesthetic relief is so tiny you'd have to do a macro on his mouth to resolve it at 360p. And see how much bigger his upper teeth are compared to the lower ones? That's not just parallax from overbite. Speech impediment checks out for upper dentures too.
I noticed the teeth too. If AI, I am fairly impressed at the camera shakiness and the consistency of the scene. Mouth movement and speech (impediment) also impressive. At this point I don't believe we can be certain about what's real and not anymore. Scary but neat.
I can see where people would use AI as a spokesperson/ model for what they would like to say to keep some anonymity so I don't think this video is necessarily nefarious. What are you thinking is the problem with the message coming from AI instead of a real person?
In this case there's nothing wrong with the message's observation by itself. The observations about continual fake environmental alarmism is valid, and the motive behind the message appears to be to bolster alarmism fatigue and reduce trust in the state.
Someone using AI for this message could be doing so to test for flaws in the delivery. I see no problem in that by itself. I don't mind helping point things out to help the improvement process. The second simultaneous reason could be more nefarious, and that is the concept that by encouraging fatigue and distrust in environmental topics, that genuine alarmism raised for the financial situation becomes ignored by the population.
When a real person puts their face forward, they have some skin in the game. If they say ridiculous things they risk losing face and being disregarded in future. But AI generated personas can essentially function like a type of forum sliding and consensus breaking. You can make it seem like 1000 people have sufficient conviction to put forward and opinion with their face. Meanwhile, it's actually a tech or two playing with prompts.
obviously raising taxes will save the earth EVERYTIME, just wait for project blue beam and aliens or god comes into play. there is no point in taxes under communism.
[ + ] Reunto
[ - ] Reunto -2 points 5 hoursMay 25, 2025 08:29:37 ago (+0/-2)
Do you see it?
Now ask yourself why someone would make an AI video to say these lines.
[ + ] bobdole9
[ - ] bobdole9 1 point 4 hoursMay 25, 2025 09:33:24 ago (+1/-0)
Playing devil's advocate: I have not had any sort of fake teeth or dental work for a bridge or dentures.
With how janky the bottom teeth are, is it possible the top teeth are either cheap dentures or a dental bridge?
[ + ] Reunto
[ - ] Reunto -2 points 3 hoursMay 25, 2025 10:15:07 ago (+0/-2)
There are other signs this is an AI video, but the teeth are the obvious point.
For anyone sceptical, consider the fact that someone could create a video like this with AI using the publically available services. Is it more likely, given the presence of the visual anomalies that this is a real person talking or an AI rendering?
[ + ] BMN003
[ - ] BMN003 1 point 3 hoursMay 25, 2025 10:15:04 ago (+1/-0)
https://eurodenture.com/wp-content/uploads/horseshoe-upper-denture.jpg
There isnt a real gap, and the aesthetic relief is so tiny you'd have to do a macro on his mouth to resolve it at 360p. And see how much bigger his upper teeth are compared to the lower ones? That's not just parallax from overbite. Speech impediment checks out for upper dentures too.
[ + ] Reunto
[ - ] Reunto -2 points 3 hoursMay 25, 2025 10:16:23 ago (+0/-2)
Go on, bring more accounts in to vouch that this isn't AI.
[ + ] BMN003
[ - ] BMN003 0 points 28 minutesMay 25, 2025 13:35:11 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Clubberlang
[ - ] Clubberlang 0 points 3 hoursMay 25, 2025 10:21:59 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Reunto
[ - ] Reunto -1 points 1 hourMay 25, 2025 12:46:15 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] NeverHappened
[ - ] NeverHappened 0 points 3 hoursMay 25, 2025 10:49:21 ago (+0/-0)
I can see where people would use AI as a spokesperson/ model for what they would like to say to keep some anonymity so I don't think this video is necessarily nefarious. What are you thinking is the problem with the message coming from AI instead of a real person?
[ + ] Reunto
[ - ] Reunto 0 points 1 hourMay 25, 2025 12:59:52 ago (+0/-0)
Someone using AI for this message could be doing so to test for flaws in the delivery. I see no problem in that by itself. I don't mind helping point things out to help the improvement process. The second simultaneous reason could be more nefarious, and that is the concept that by encouraging fatigue and distrust in environmental topics, that genuine alarmism raised for the financial situation becomes ignored by the population.
When a real person puts their face forward, they have some skin in the game. If they say ridiculous things they risk losing face and being disregarded in future. But AI generated personas can essentially function like a type of forum sliding and consensus breaking. You can make it seem like 1000 people have sufficient conviction to put forward and opinion with their face. Meanwhile, it's actually a tech or two playing with prompts.
[ + ] goatfugee12
[ - ] goatfugee12 1 point 3 hoursMay 25, 2025 10:13:31 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Clubberlang
[ - ] Clubberlang 2 points 3 hoursMay 25, 2025 10:20:59 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] GreatSatan
[ - ] GreatSatan 0 points 2 hoursMay 25, 2025 11:07:31 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Leveraction
[ - ] Leveraction 0 points 2 hoursMay 25, 2025 11:08:01 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] VitaminSieg
[ - ] VitaminSieg 0 points 2 hoursMay 25, 2025 11:37:05 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] BulletStopper
[ - ] BulletStopper 1 point 2 hoursMay 25, 2025 11:51:09 ago (+1/-0)
They want YOU to think that.