Sort of like an analog to the killing of a farm dog that gets a taste for the chickens and eggs, which must be put down.
Killing a human is a traumatic event, and I recently had a discussion with a veteran of combat with PTSD. The act of killing another person is a trauma in itself, and I learned that there were two extreme groups - the ones that have a taste for killing and the ones that are broken by the act of killing.
In the military, it is hard to get out, as most soldiers are serving for x amount of time, and I heard stories of many who would gladly leave immediately if they could.
This mindset should apply to cops as well. Why does a cop stay at the job after killing another human? The vast majority of zogbots that kill civilians stay on the job, and actually have gotten a taste for taking another man's life. Even with that PTSD of killing a man, the zogbots do their (((counseling))) and then return to duty - voluntarily.
The short story "The Most Dangerous Game" shows the progression in killing, how hunting animals soon becomes boring and the new rush is to go after more intelligent prey.
I now have thoughts about how every zogbot starts their day with thoughts of "I might be able to legally kill someone today" and it really disturbs me.
Forcing a zogbot out of law enforcement permanently after killing someone will have two direct benefits - 1) someone that has experienced taking someone's life will not be able to legally do it again, and 2) the risk of losing their job might make zogbots think a little harder about shooting when it really isn't needed.
The zogbot (((unions))) will obviously never let a law such as this pass, but such a law would be a great benefit for Whites, not so much help for society with the nigger problems though, whose ranks need to be cut down often.
In what towns or cities do officers shoot people? Maybe some places are too violent.
In wealthy towns police are super polite, especially if you relaxed and are polite. Never try to speed the interaction, or they can use that as leverage.
Also if you psychologically manipulate them and invoke - to protect and serve - it short-circuits to enforce.
In poorer towns they bully people, but you can generally get them to relax if you know how.
There are some videos where some really screw up and should at least lose their job.
Obviously in some places there are niggers and spics and others that base their cultures on violence. Still, there can be some policing that doesn't end up with killing everyone.
Some notable video genres that really are telling - how about the calls to police for a "suicidal person" that end up with the cops killing the person they are called to help? Or other "medical" situations where the person needing help is shot?
"protect and serve" are just buzzwords to placate the normies. In reality, like I posted a while back somewhere, the overall philosophy of zogbots has become "cop safety above all else", full stop. Like in Uvalde where the 100 cops just sat outside in a circlejerk for an hour and even kept parents from going in.
Whereas the philosophy of the military is "mission above all", like in Saving Private Ryan, where a squad is deployed to get the one guy, losing how many? From a manpower analysis, that was a huge loss, (side note, the one guy was saved to make up for the loss of 3 brothers, and then 5? soldiers trying to save him, and he only has 2? kids???).
The fact that zogbots treat every call as a potential to shoot someone is just insane in the US, and now the world. It would be nice if the mission statement of the police was toward citizens rather than that (((blue line))) bullshit, but it isn't.
And it is looking like it is only going to get worse, with more zogbots being trigger happy than ever, and with no societal mechanism to stop it. Even money paid out to lawsuits doesn't fix anything.
I think it is important that any cop that has legally terminated another's life is given every bit of support they need.
Legal killing can be part of the job. I'm not so concerned about the feeling behind the killing, only whether or not they did so legally.
If a cop has a temptation and taste for killing, so long as they refrain from going outside of the bounds of their duty, I don't care. If that boundary of duty needs adjustment that's a different consideration.
If you look at our legal system and understand that sociopathy (ASPD) is DSM-5 you'll understand that employers need to accommodate sociopaths. So long as the disorder is mitigated/treated you can expect that many work environments may have sociopaths and that you will not be legally able to discriminate against them or displace them from work as a result of their condition.
With that legal framework in mind, it follows that it would not necessarily be a problem for there to be a sociopathic cop or banker, so long as the system is built up in such a way to appropriately mitigate the damage potential. There is nothing in a cop's job profile that would make it a bona fide occupational requirement (BFOR) not to be a sociopath.
[ - ] localsal [op] 1 point 12 hoursMay 22, 2025 18:22:25 ago (+1/-0)
The conversation came up about some of the zogbot killing videos.
Many of the videos are just ego killings where the victim was never a threat and the cops WANTED to escalate to deadly force. The consensus around us was that this is a "badge of honor" among zogbots and they dream about getting into these situations and ending a life.
The accommodation of a sociopath in a civilized society is to NOT give them a gun and a license to kill. If they want to do that, join the militia and head to Ukraine. This isn't something that should be desired in Western society.
The whole point about law enforcement - in theory, obviously - is that these are regular citizens given a little bit more authority to do the jobs that regular citizens do not have the time or skills/training or health to do. That is all.
But zogbots have corrupted that power, under the IDF training - filthy kikes, to believe that they are our masters and that they have unlimited power over us, including the power to kill at will if they feel threatened.
This is well beyond the initial ideal of a police force. I get it, niggers and kikes ruin everything, but watching the old Andy Griffith show, the sheriff didn't even have a gun. Yeah, it's kiked Hollywood, but I would guess real life mirrored that somewhat up until 1965.
I think that because of the legal framework protecting sociopaths, the only effective path forward would be to fine tune process to reduce needless escalations. And to instil behavioural BFORs that would weed out sociopaths with less self-control (those unable to satisfy the BFORs).
Eventually you would only be left with high functioning sociopaths that can disguise their behaviour. The ones that overall would be hard to detect and identify anyway.
At that point, if those sociopathic individuals are successfully able to conform to the requirements, it follows that even if identified you wouldn't be able to (or perhaps even want to) remove them from position.
[ + ] Sleazy
[ - ] Sleazy 0 points 5 hoursMay 23, 2025 01:19:45 ago (+0/-0)
Hang them
[ + ] Cantaloupe
[ - ] Cantaloupe 0 points 9 hoursMay 22, 2025 21:08:58 ago (+0/-0)*
In what towns or cities do officers shoot people? Maybe some places are too violent.
In wealthy towns police are super polite, especially if you relaxed and are polite. Never try to speed the interaction, or they can use that as leverage.
Also if you psychologically manipulate them and invoke - to protect and serve - it short-circuits to enforce.
In poorer towns they bully people, but you can generally get them to relax if you know how.
There are some videos where some really screw up and should at least lose their job.
[ + ] localsal
[ - ] localsal [op] 0 points 9 hoursMay 22, 2025 21:24:16 ago (+0/-0)
Some notable video genres that really are telling - how about the calls to police for a "suicidal person" that end up with the cops killing the person they are called to help? Or other "medical" situations where the person needing help is shot?
"protect and serve" are just buzzwords to placate the normies. In reality, like I posted a while back somewhere, the overall philosophy of zogbots has become "cop safety above all else", full stop. Like in Uvalde where the 100 cops just sat outside in a circlejerk for an hour and even kept parents from going in.
Whereas the philosophy of the military is "mission above all", like in Saving Private Ryan, where a squad is deployed to get the one guy, losing how many? From a manpower analysis, that was a huge loss, (side note, the one guy was saved to make up for the loss of 3 brothers, and then 5? soldiers trying to save him, and he only has 2? kids???).
The fact that zogbots treat every call as a potential to shoot someone is just insane in the US, and now the world. It would be nice if the mission statement of the police was toward citizens rather than that (((blue line))) bullshit, but it isn't.
And it is looking like it is only going to get worse, with more zogbots being trigger happy than ever, and with no societal mechanism to stop it. Even money paid out to lawsuits doesn't fix anything.
[ + ] Sleazy
[ - ] Sleazy 0 points 5 hoursMay 23, 2025 01:21:09 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] DukeofRaul
[ - ] DukeofRaul 0 points 11 hoursMay 22, 2025 19:52:02 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Reunto
[ - ] Reunto 0 points 12 hoursMay 22, 2025 18:02:23 ago (+0/-0)
Legal killing can be part of the job. I'm not so concerned about the feeling behind the killing, only whether or not they did so legally.
If a cop has a temptation and taste for killing, so long as they refrain from going outside of the bounds of their duty, I don't care. If that boundary of duty needs adjustment that's a different consideration.
If you look at our legal system and understand that sociopathy (ASPD) is DSM-5 you'll understand that employers need to accommodate sociopaths. So long as the disorder is mitigated/treated you can expect that many work environments may have sociopaths and that you will not be legally able to discriminate against them or displace them from work as a result of their condition.
With that legal framework in mind, it follows that it would not necessarily be a problem for there to be a sociopathic cop or banker, so long as the system is built up in such a way to appropriately mitigate the damage potential. There is nothing in a cop's job profile that would make it a bona fide occupational requirement (BFOR) not to be a sociopath.
[ + ] localsal
[ - ] localsal [op] 1 point 12 hoursMay 22, 2025 18:22:25 ago (+1/-0)
Many of the videos are just ego killings where the victim was never a threat and the cops WANTED to escalate to deadly force. The consensus around us was that this is a "badge of honor" among zogbots and they dream about getting into these situations and ending a life.
The accommodation of a sociopath in a civilized society is to NOT give them a gun and a license to kill. If they want to do that, join the militia and head to Ukraine. This isn't something that should be desired in Western society.
The whole point about law enforcement - in theory, obviously - is that these are regular citizens given a little bit more authority to do the jobs that regular citizens do not have the time or skills/training or health to do. That is all.
But zogbots have corrupted that power, under the IDF training - filthy kikes, to believe that they are our masters and that they have unlimited power over us, including the power to kill at will if they feel threatened.
This is well beyond the initial ideal of a police force. I get it, niggers and kikes ruin everything, but watching the old Andy Griffith show, the sheriff didn't even have a gun. Yeah, it's kiked Hollywood, but I would guess real life mirrored that somewhat up until 1965.
[ + ] Reunto
[ - ] Reunto 0 points 11 hoursMay 22, 2025 19:04:36 ago (+0/-0)
Eventually you would only be left with high functioning sociopaths that can disguise their behaviour. The ones that overall would be hard to detect and identify anyway.
At that point, if those sociopathic individuals are successfully able to conform to the requirements, it follows that even if identified you wouldn't be able to (or perhaps even want to) remove them from position.
[ + ] localsal
[ - ] localsal [op] 1 point 11 hoursMay 22, 2025 19:07:48 ago (+1/-0)
Seems logical that trying to screen for any behaviors other than (((approved))) ones would meet fierce opposition from the kike zogbot unions.
[ + ] DukeofRaul
[ - ] DukeofRaul 0 points 11 hoursMay 22, 2025 19:53:38 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Sleazy
[ - ] Sleazy 0 points 5 hoursMay 23, 2025 01:22:55 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] lord_nougat
[ - ] lord_nougat 3 points 13 hoursMay 22, 2025 17:39:43 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] Thyhorrorcosmic103
[ - ] Thyhorrorcosmic103 0 points 2 hoursMay 23, 2025 04:14:19 ago (+0/-0)